Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2010.12010

Three Faces of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase

Patrick Das Gupta

Published Oct 21, 2020• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Beginning with the basic notions of quantum theory, impossibility of `trajectory' description for particles that ensues from uncertainty principle is discussed. Why the observed tracks in bubble/cloud chambers are not really the `trajectories' of high energy particles, rather they are simply the trails of the atoms/molecules excited or ionized in the direction of the high momenta of the incoming particles, are highlighted. Thereafter, the notion of symmetry and its application to the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation have been delineated. The demand for U(1) gauge invariance and the resulting `gauge miracle', that automatically leads to the correct interaction terms describing the electromagnetic force between the charge particles and the field, have been elaborated upon. A simple treatment, but with explicit derivation, of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, is presented, that underlines a strange phenomena - sites, impenetrable by charge particles but are threaded with magnetic field lines, conspire with a `Trojan Horse', namely the magnetic vector potential outside, to cause measurable shift in the double-slit interference fringes. This shift in the interference pattern is non-classical since the charge particles move in field-free regions. The crucial Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase that makes its entry in the above bizarre effect is also deployed to derive the observed magnetic flux quantisation in superconductors as well as the Dirac result which implies that the existence of a single magnetic monopole anywhere in the universe would entail quantisation of the product of a particle's electric charge and the monopole's magnetic charge. Nontrivial consequences of AB phase follow whenever the physical region accessible, from the point of view of the wavefunction of a charge particle, is multiply-connected.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2010.12010

Related papers

Gauge-independent description of the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Xiang Li, T. H. Hansson, Wei Ku

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential $\mathbf{A}$, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics $\mathbf{A}$ is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than $\mathbf{B}$ in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant $\mathbf{B}$ field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the $\mathbf{B}$ field in the region inaccessible to the particle.

arXiv:2209.11091•Physical Review A•Sep 21, 2022•9 citations

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect: An Exploration of Quantum Interference and Electromagnetic Potentials

Bahman Zohuri

The AB (Aharonov-Bohm) effect is a pivotal quantum mechanical phenomenon that illustrates the fundamental role of the electromagnetic vector potential A in determining the phase of a charged particle's wave function, even in regions where the magnetic field B is zero.This effect demonstrates that quantum particles are influenced not only by the fields directly present but also by the potentials associated with those fields.In the AB effect, an electron beam is split into two paths, with one path encircling a solenoid and the other bypassing it.Despite the absence of a magnetic field in the regions traversed by the beams, the vector potential A associated with the magnetic flux  through the solenoid induces a phase shift in the electron's wave function.This phase shift, quantified by qc     , manifests as a change in the interference pattern observed in the detection screen.The phenomenon underscores the principle of gauge invariance in QED (quantum electrodynamics), where physical observables remain invariant under local gauge transformations of the vector and scalar potentials.This reinforces the notion that the vector potential A has a profound impact on quantum systems, beyond its classical role.This article outlines the AB effect, including its theoretical framework, experimental observations, and implications.The focus on the role of the vector potential in quantum mechanics provides a comprehensive understanding of this important phenomenon.

Journal of Energy and Power Engineering•Jun 28, 2024•1 citation

From Primitives to the Aharonov–Bohm Phase

Allen Proxmire

In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

An interpretation for Aharonov-Bohm effect with classical electromagnetic theory

Gaobiao Xiao

The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that charged particles may be affected by the vector potential in regions without any electric or magnetic fields [1]. The Aharonov-Bohm effect was experimentally confirmed [2-3] and has been found in many situations [4-6]. A common explanation is based on quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunctions associated with the charges will accumulate a phase shift due to the vector potential. However, consensus about its nature and interpretation has not been achieved [7-14]. We here propose a simple but reasonable interpretation based on the theory for electromagnetic radiation and couplings [15]. The energy associated with a pulse radiator is divided into a Coulomb-velocity energy and a radiative energy, together with a macroscopic Schott energy accounting for the energy exchange between them. All these energies are expressed with terms including the potentials, so are the mutual coupling energies. There exists a force acting on the moving charges even though the fields completely vanish. This force makes the charges pass through the magnetic solenoid in different velocity with different path length, causing a phase shift the same as that obtained with quantum mechanics. The theory is originally aimed for providing an interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling. It is derived directly from the Maxwell theory with no modification but only substitution and reorganization.

arXiv:2201.12292•Jan 26, 2022•3 citations

The Aharonov–Bohm Effect: Gauge Potentials, Quantum Phase, and Experimental Evidence

Giancarmine Sparso

This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.

•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations

Generalized Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Shan Gao

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect highlights the fundamental role of electromagnetic potentials in quantum mechanics, manifesting as a phase shift for a charged particle in field-free regions. While well-established for static magnetic fluxes, the effect's behavior under time-varying fluxes remains an open and debated question. Employing the WKB method, we derive the AB phase shift for a time-dependent magnetic vector potential, demonstrating that for circular paths in the quasistatic regime, it is proportional to the time-averaged enclosed magnetic flux, \(Δφ_{\rm AB} = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T e Φ(t) \, dt\), with the total phase shift, including kinetic contributions, equaling \(e Φ(0)\). For non-circular paths, the phase shift depends on both the flux history and path geometry, revealing the effect's hybrid nature involving gauge potentials and induced electric fields. We verify the consistency of our gauge choice with Maxwell's equations and discuss the implications for local versus nonlocal interpretations of the AB effect. We also generalize the results to scenarios with nonzero external magnetic fields, where the enclosed flux is through the actual electron paths, and for circular paths of radius $R$, the AB phase shift is also proportional to the time average of the enclosed flux \(Φ_{\rm enc}(R,t)\), with the total phase shift depending only on the initial enclosed flux \(e Φ_{\rm enc}(R,0)\); for general non-circular paths, the external magnetic field affects trajectories and phase accumulation through the Lorentz force, leading to additional path dependence. These findings clarify the role of gauge-dependent potentials and induced fields in the generalized AB effect, offering new theoretical insights and potential applications in quantum technologies.

quant-pharXiv:2601.17659•Foundations of Physics•Jan 27, 2026•1 citation
Beginning with the basic notions of quantum theory, impossibility of trajectory' description for particles that ensues from uncertainty principle is discussed. Why the observed tracks in bubble/cloud chambers are not really the trajectories' of high energy particles, rather they are simply the trails of the atoms/molecules excited or ionized in the direction of the high momenta of the incoming particles, are highlighted. Thereafter, the notion of symmetry and its application to the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation have been delineated. The demand for U(1) gauge invariance and the resulting gauge miracle', that automatically leads to the correct interaction terms describing the electromagnetic force between the charge particles and the field, have been elaborated upon. A simple treatment, but with explicit derivation, of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, is presented, that underlines a strange phenomena - sites, impenetrable by charge particles but are threaded with magnetic field lines, conspire with a Trojan Horse', namely the magnetic vector potential outside, to cause measurable shift in the double-slit interference fringes. This shift in the interference pattern is non-classical since the charge particles move in field-free regions. The crucial Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase that makes its entry in the above bizarre effect is also deployed to derive the observed magnetic flux quantisation in superconductors as well as the Dirac result which implies that the existence of a single magnetic monopole anywhere in the universe would entail quantisation of the product of a particle's electric charge and the monopole's magnetic charge. Nontrivial consequences of AB phase follow whenever the physical region accessible, from the point of view of the wavefunction of a charge particle, is multiply-connected.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential A\mathbf{A}A, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics A\mathbf{A}A is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than B\mathbf{B}B in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant B\mathbf{B}B field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the B\mathbf{B}B field in the region inaccessible to the particle.
The AB (Aharonov-Bohm) effect is a pivotal quantum mechanical phenomenon that illustrates the fundamental role of the electromagnetic vector potential A in determining the phase of a charged particle's wave function, even in regions where the magnetic field B is zero.This effect demonstrates that quantum particles are influenced not only by the fields directly present but also by the potentials associated with those fields.In the AB effect, an electron beam is split into two paths, with one path encircling a solenoid and the other bypassing it.Despite the absence of a magnetic field in the regions traversed by the beams, the vector potential A associated with the magnetic flux  through the solenoid induces a phase shift in the electron's wave function.This phase shift, quantified by qc     , manifests as a change in the interference pattern observed in the detection screen.The phenomenon underscores the principle of gauge invariance in QED (quantum electrodynamics), where physical observables remain invariant under local gauge transformations of the vector and scalar potentials.This reinforces the notion that the vector potential A has a profound impact on quantum systems, beyond its classical role.This article outlines the AB effect, including its theoretical framework, experimental observations, and implications.The focus on the role of the vector potential in quantum mechanics provides a comprehensive understanding of this important phenomenon.
In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.
The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that charged particles may be affected by the vector potential in regions without any electric or magnetic fields [1]. The Aharonov-Bohm effect was experimentally confirmed [2-3] and has been found in many situations [4-6]. A common explanation is based on quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunctions associated with the charges will accumulate a phase shift due to the vector potential. However, consensus about its nature and interpretation has not been achieved [7-14]. We here propose a simple but reasonable interpretation based on the theory for electromagnetic radiation and couplings [15]. The energy associated with a pulse radiator is divided into a Coulomb-velocity energy and a radiative energy, together with a macroscopic Schott energy accounting for the energy exchange between them. All these energies are expressed with terms including the potentials, so are the mutual coupling energies. There exists a force acting on the moving charges even though the fields completely vanish. This force makes the charges pass through the magnetic solenoid in different velocity with different path length, causing a phase shift the same as that obtained with quantum mechanics. The theory is originally aimed for providing an interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling. It is derived directly from the Maxwell theory with no modification but only substitution and reorganization.
This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect highlights the fundamental role of electromagnetic potentials in quantum mechanics, manifesting as a phase shift for a charged particle in field-free regions. While well-established for static magnetic fluxes, the effect's behavior under time-varying fluxes remains an open and debated question. Employing the WKB method, we derive the AB phase shift for a time-dependent magnetic vector potential, demonstrating that for circular paths in the quasistatic regime, it is proportional to the time-averaged enclosed magnetic flux, ΔφAB=1T∫0TeΦ(t) dtΔφ_{\rm AB} = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T e Φ(t) \, dtΔφAB​=T1​∫0T​eΦ(t)dt, with the total phase shift, including kinetic contributions, equaling eΦ(0)e Φ(0)eΦ(0). For non-circular paths, the phase shift depends on both the flux history and path geometry, revealing the effect's hybrid nature involving gauge potentials and induced electric fields. We verify the consistency of our gauge choice with Maxwell's equations and discuss the implications for local versus nonlocal interpretations of the AB effect. We also generalize the results to scenarios with nonzero external magnetic fields, where the enclosed flux is through the actual electron paths, and for circular paths of radius RRR, the AB phase shift is also proportional to the time average of the enclosed flux Φenc(R,t)Φ_{\rm enc}(R,t)Φenc​(R,t), with the total phase shift depending only on the initial enclosed flux eΦenc(R,0)e Φ_{\rm enc}(R,0)eΦenc​(R,0); for general non-circular paths, the external magnetic field affects trajectories and phase accumulation through the Lorentz force, leading to additional path dependence. These findings clarify the role of gauge-dependent potentials and induced fields in the generalized AB effect, offering new theoretical insights and potential applications in quantum technologies.