Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2010.04048 · Physical Review A

Quantum measurement incompatibility in subspaces

Roope Uola, Tristan Kraft, Sébastien Designolle, Nikolai Miklin, Armin Tavakoli, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää, Otfried Gühne, Nicolas Brunner

Published Feb 5, 2021• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider the question of characterizing the incompatibility of sets of high-dimensional quantum measurements. We introduce the concept of measurement incompatibility in subspaces. That is, starting from a set of measurements that is incompatible, one considers the set of measurements obtained by projection onto any strict subspace of fixed dimension. We identify three possible forms of incompatibility in subspaces: (i) incompressible incompatibility---measurements that become compatible in every subspace, (ii) fully compressible incompatibility---measurements that remain incompatible in every subspace, and (iii) partly compressible incompatibility---measurements that are compatible in some subspace and incompatible in another. For each class, we discuss explicit examples. Finally, we present some applications of these ideas. First, we show that joint measurability and coexistence are two inequivalent notions of incompatibility in the simplest case of qubit systems. Second, we highlight the implications of our results for tests of quantum steering.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.103.022203

Related papers

Simulability of High-Dimensional Quantum Measurements

Marie Ioannou, Pavel Sekatski, Sébastien Designolle +3 more

We investigate the compression of quantum information with respect to a given set M of high-dimensional measurements. This leads to a notion of simulability, where we demand that the statistics obtained from M and an arbitrary quantum state ρ are recovered exactly by first compressing ρ into a lower-dimensional space, followed by some quantum measurements. A full quantum compression is possible, i.e., leaving only classical information, if and only if the set M is jointly measurable. Our notion of simulability can thus be seen as a quantification of measurement incompatibility in terms of dimension. After defining these concepts, we provide an illustrative example involving mutually unbiased bases, and develop a method based on semidefinite programming for constructing simulation models. In turn we analytically construct optimal simulation models for all projective measurements subjected to white noise or losses. Finally, we discuss how our approach connects with other concepts introduced in the context of quantum channels and quantum correlations.

arXiv:2202.12980•Physical Review Letters•Nov 4, 2022•19 citations

Measurement incompatibility and noiseless quantum codes

Yu-Xuan Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen

We construct a rank-one minimal informationally complete measurement (MIC) with an invertible dual operator and prove that, for arbitrary finite input and output dimensions, a channel universally preserves measurement incompatibility if and only if its input space contains a noiseless code subspace of the full output dimension. Preserving the compatibility threshold of a finite family of binary measurements already guarantees such a code. Furthermore, for every $d\ge2$, there exists a family of binary measurements that is incompatible on the full space but compatible after compression to any proper subspace. These results resolve the conjecture of Chitambar and Zhang and the existence question posed by Uola and coauthors. We also give an explicit construction of exact encodings and show that, for a sufficiently small shift in the compatibility threshold, the transmission error of an approximate encoding is bounded by a constant times the square of the shift. These results establish a connection between measurement compatibility, quantum steering, and quantum error correction.

quant-pharXiv:2610.37347•Oct 28, 2026•0 citations

Strict hierarchy between $n$-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility

Lucas Tendick, Costantino Budroni, Marco Túlio Quintino

The incompatibility of quantum measurements, i.e. the fact that certain observable quantities cannot be measured jointly is widely regarded as a distinctive quantum feature with important implications for the foundations and the applications of quantum information theory. While the standard incompatibility of multiple measurements has been the focus of attention since the inception of quantum theory, its generalizations, such as measurement simulability, $n$-wise incompatibility, and mulit-copy incompatibility have only been proposed recently. Here, we point out that all these generalizations are differing notions of the question of how many measurements are genuinely contained in a measurement device. We then show, that all notions do differ not only in their operational meaning but also mathematically in the set of measurement assemblages they describe. We then fully resolve the relations between these different generalizations, by showing a strict hierarchy between these notions. Hence, we provide a general framework for generalized measurement incompatibility. Finally, we consider the implications our results have for recent works using these different notions.

arXiv:2506.21223•Jun 26, 2025•0 citations

Incompatible measurements in quantum information science

Otfried Gühne, Erkka Haapasalo, Tristan Kraft +2 more

Some measurements in quantum mechanics disturb each other. This has puzzled physicists since the formulation of the theory, but only in recent decades has the incompatibility of measurements been analyzed in depth and detail, using the notion of joint measurability of generalized measurements. In this Colloquium joint measurability and incompatibility are reviewed from the perspective of quantum information science. The Colloquium starts by discussing the basic definitions and concepts. An overview on applications of incompatibility, such as in measurement uncertainty relations, the characterization of quantum correlations, or information processing tasks like quantum state discrimination, is then presented. Finally, emerging directions of research, such as a resource theory of incompatibility as well as other concepts to grasp the nature of measurements in quantum mechanics, are discussed.

arXiv:2112.06784•Dec 13, 2021•7 citations

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino, Nicolas Brunner

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs ${\mathcal{N}}_{B}$ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

arXiv:1707.06960•Physical Review A•Jan 25, 2018•79 citations

Colloquium: Incompatible measurements in quantum information science

Otfried Gühne, Erkka Haapasalo, Tristan Kraft +2 more

Some measurements in quantum mechanics disturb each other. This has puzzled physicists since the formulation of the theory, but only in recent decades has the incompatibility of measurements been analyzed in depth and detail, using the notion of joint measurability of generalized measurements. In this Colloquium joint measurability and incompatibility are reviewed from the perspective of quantum information science. The Colloquium starts by discussing the basic definitions and concepts. An overview on applications of incompatibility, such as in measurement uncertainty relations, the characterization of quantum correlations, or information processing tasks like quantum state discrimination, is then presented. Finally, emerging directions of research, such as a resource theory of incompatibility as well as other concepts to grasp the nature of measurements in quantum mechanics, are discussed.

•Aug 28, 2025•0 citations
We consider the question of characterizing the incompatibility of sets of high-dimensional quantum measurements. We introduce the concept of measurement incompatibility in subspaces. That is, starting from a set of measurements that is incompatible, one considers the set of measurements obtained by projection onto any strict subspace of fixed dimension. We identify three possible forms of incompatibility in subspaces: (i) incompressible incompatibility---measurements that become compatible in every subspace, (ii) fully compressible incompatibility---measurements that remain incompatible in every subspace, and (iii) partly compressible incompatibility---measurements that are compatible in some subspace and incompatible in another. For each class, we discuss explicit examples. Finally, we present some applications of these ideas. First, we show that joint measurability and coexistence are two inequivalent notions of incompatibility in the simplest case of qubit systems. Second, we highlight the implications of our results for tests of quantum steering.
We investigate the compression of quantum information with respect to a given set M of high-dimensional measurements. This leads to a notion of simulability, where we demand that the statistics obtained from M and an arbitrary quantum state ρ are recovered exactly by first compressing ρ into a lower-dimensional space, followed by some quantum measurements. A full quantum compression is possible, i.e., leaving only classical information, if and only if the set M is jointly measurable. Our notion of simulability can thus be seen as a quantification of measurement incompatibility in terms of dimension. After defining these concepts, we provide an illustrative example involving mutually unbiased bases, and develop a method based on semidefinite programming for constructing simulation models. In turn we analytically construct optimal simulation models for all projective measurements subjected to white noise or losses. Finally, we discuss how our approach connects with other concepts introduced in the context of quantum channels and quantum correlations.
We construct a rank-one minimal informationally complete measurement (MIC) with an invertible dual operator and prove that, for arbitrary finite input and output dimensions, a channel universally preserves measurement incompatibility if and only if its input space contains a noiseless code subspace of the full output dimension. Preserving the compatibility threshold of a finite family of binary measurements already guarantees such a code. Furthermore, for every d≥2d\ge2d≥2, there exists a family of binary measurements that is incompatible on the full space but compatible after compression to any proper subspace. These results resolve the conjecture of Chitambar and Zhang and the existence question posed by Uola and coauthors. We also give an explicit construction of exact encodings and show that, for a sufficiently small shift in the compatibility threshold, the transmission error of an approximate encoding is bounded by a constant times the square of the shift. These results establish a connection between measurement compatibility, quantum steering, and quantum error correction.
Strict hierarchy between nnn-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility
The incompatibility of quantum measurements, i.e. the fact that certain observable quantities cannot be measured jointly is widely regarded as a distinctive quantum feature with important implications for the foundations and the applications of quantum information theory. While the standard incompatibility of multiple measurements has been the focus of attention since the inception of quantum theory, its generalizations, such as measurement simulability, nnn-wise incompatibility, and mulit-copy incompatibility have only been proposed recently. Here, we point out that all these generalizations are differing notions of the question of how many measurements are genuinely contained in a measurement device. We then show, that all notions do differ not only in their operational meaning but also mathematically in the set of measurement assemblages they describe. We then fully resolve the relations between these different generalizations, by showing a strict hierarchy between these notions. Hence, we provide a general framework for generalized measurement incompatibility. Finally, we consider the implications our results have for recent works using these different notions.
Some measurements in quantum mechanics disturb each other. This has puzzled physicists since the formulation of the theory, but only in recent decades has the incompatibility of measurements been analyzed in depth and detail, using the notion of joint measurability of generalized measurements. In this Colloquium joint measurability and incompatibility are reviewed from the perspective of quantum information science. The Colloquium starts by discussing the basic definitions and concepts. An overview on applications of incompatibility, such as in measurement uncertainty relations, the characterization of quantum correlations, or information processing tasks like quantum state discrimination, is then presented. Finally, emerging directions of research, such as a resource theory of incompatibility as well as other concepts to grasp the nature of measurements in quantum mechanics, are discussed.
We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs NB{\mathcal{N}}_{B}NB​ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.
Some measurements in quantum mechanics disturb each other. This has puzzled physicists since the formulation of the theory, but only in recent decades has the incompatibility of measurements been analyzed in depth and detail, using the notion of joint measurability of generalized measurements. In this Colloquium joint measurability and incompatibility are reviewed from the perspective of quantum information science. The Colloquium starts by discussing the basic definitions and concepts. An overview on applications of incompatibility, such as in measurement uncertainty relations, the characterization of quantum correlations, or information processing tasks like quantum state discrimination, is then presented. Finally, emerging directions of research, such as a resource theory of incompatibility as well as other concepts to grasp the nature of measurements in quantum mechanics, are discussed.