Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2009.11057 · Physical review. E

Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory

Tomohiro Tanogami

Published Feb 18, 2021• 15 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We investigate three-dimensional quantum turbulence as described by the Gross-Pitaevskii model using the analytical method exploited in the Onsager "ideal turbulence" theory. We derive the scale independence of the scale-to-scale kinetic energy flux and establish a double-cascade scenario: At scales much larger than the mean intervortex ℓ_{i}, the Richardson cascade becomes dominant, whereas at scales much smaller than ℓ_{i}, another type of cascade is induced by quantum stress. We then evaluate the corresponding velocity power spectrum using a phenomenological argument. The relation between this cascade, which we call quantum stress cascade, and the Kelvin-wave cascade is also discussed.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.103.023106

Related papers

Comment on “Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory”

Giorgio Krstulovic, Victor S. L’vov, Sergey Nazarenko

In a recent paper, Tanogami [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106] proposes a scenario for quantum turbulence where the energy spectrum at scales smaller than the intervortex distance is dominated by a quantum stress cascade, in opposition to Kelvin-wave cascade predictions. The purpose of the present Comment is to highlight some physical issues in the derivation of the quantum stress cascade, in particular to stress that quantization of circulation has been ignored.

arXiv:2107.10598•Physical review. E•Feb 28, 2022•3 citations

Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory'"

Tomohiro Tanogami

We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [arXiv:2107.10598] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.

arXiv:2111.11659•Nov 23, 2021•1 citation

Theoretical Analysis of the Energy Cascade in Quantum Turbulence: From Richardson–Kolmogorov Eddies to Kelvin Waves

Abishek Mahalingam

Abstract Quantum turbulence — the chaotic, non-equilibrium state of a superfluid threaded by a dense tangle of quantized vortex lines — provides a uniquely clean testbed for the universal statistical mechanics of turbulent energy transfer. We develop a theoretical account of the energy cascade across all relevant length scales: from macroscopic, quasi-classical Richardson–Kolmogorov eddies, through the dimensionally frustrated L’vov–Nazarenko–Rudenko (LNR) bottleneck at the mean inter-vortex spacing, down to the weakly nonlinear Kelvin-wave cascade on individual filaments, and finally to the zero-temperature dissipation cutoff. Starting from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and its Madelung hydrodynamic decomposition, we separate the compressible and incompressible components of the flow to isolate the vortical and acoustic energy channels. Vortex reconnection is identified as the microscopic mechanism coupling these regimes, and the competing predictions of the Vortex Filament Model and the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for reconnection dynamics are compared. We review the theoretical controversy between the Kozik–Svistunov six-wave cascade and the L’vov–Nazarenko four-wave cascade, together with the associated tilt-symmetry debate, and present the finite-temperature two-fluid (HVBK) description, showing how mutual friction locks the normal and superfluid components at large scales while damping Kelvin waves at small scales. PACS numbers: 67.25.dk, 47.37.+q, 03.75.Kk, 47.32.C−

•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations

Superfluid Turbulence from Quantum Kelvin Wave to Classical Kolmogorov Cascades

Jeffrey Yepez, George Vahala, Linda L. Vahala +1 more

The main topological feature of a superfluid is a quantum vortex with an identifiable inner and outer radius. A novel unitary quantum lattice gas algorithm is used to simulate quantum turbulence of a Bose-Einstein condensate superfluid described by the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on grids up to 5760(3). For the first time, an accurate power-law scaling for the quantum Kelvin wave cascade is determined: k(-3). The incompressible kinetic energy spectrum exhibits very distinct power-law spectra in 3 ranges of k space: a classical Kolmogorov k(-(5/3)) spectrum at scales greater than the outer radius of individual quantum vortex cores and a quantum Kelvin wave cascade spectrum k(-3) on scales smaller than the inner radius of the quantum vortex core. The k(-3) quantum Kelvin wave spectrum due to phonon radiation is robust, while the k(-(5/3)) classical Kolmogorov spectrum becomes robust on large grids.

arXiv:0905.0159•Physical Review Letters•Aug 19, 2009•90 citations

Direct energy cascade in two-dimensional compressible quantum turbulence

Ryu Numasato, Makoto Tsubota, Victor S. L’vov

We numerically study two-dimensional quantum turbulence with a Gross-Pitaevskii model. With the energy initially accumulated at large scale, quantum turbulence with many quantized vortex points is generated. Due to the lack of enstrophy conservation in this model, direct energy cascade with a Kolmogorov-Obukhov energy spectrum $E(k)\ensuremath{\propto}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}5/3}$ is observed, which is quite different from two-dimensional incompressible classical turbulence in the decaying case. A positive value for the energy flux guarantees a direct energy cascade in the inertial range (from large to small scales). After almost all the energy at the large scale cascades to the small scale, the compressible kinetic energy realizes the thermodynamic equilibrium state without quantized vortices.

arXiv:1002.3667•Physical Review A•Jun 24, 2010•93 citations

Turbulence in Quantum Gases: Vortices, Waves, and Cascades

Ashton S. Bradley, Tyler W. Neely, Xiaoquan Yu +1 more

We review turbulence in ultracold quantum gases, using the scalar contact-interaction Bose-Einstein condensate as the reference system for quantized circulation, compressibility, vortices, sound, and cascades. We focus on the quantitative diagnostics that connect helium and classical phenomenology to microscopic wave-function dynamics: incompressible and compressible kinetic-energy spectra, wave-occupation spectra, spectral fluxes, vortex-resolved correlations, and velocity statistics. These diagnostics distinguish equilibrium vortex organization, decaying turbulent relaxation, forced cascade dynamics, and weak-wave turbulence, and show why power laws alone are insufficient evidence for a cascade. We survey experiments on two-dimensional Onsager clustering, three-dimensional vortex-line turbulence, box-trap wave cascades, engineered dissipation, and turbulent equations of state. We close by briefly placing the contact-interaction scalar superfluid system in a broader landscape of nonlocal, multicomponent, fermionic, and driven-dissipative quantum fluids, where turbulence concepts can be tested for universality.

cond-mat.quant-gasCross-listedarXiv:2607.22244•Jul 27, 2026•0 citations
We investigate three-dimensional quantum turbulence as described by the Gross-Pitaevskii model using the analytical method exploited in the Onsager "ideal turbulence" theory. We derive the scale independence of the scale-to-scale kinetic energy flux and establish a double-cascade scenario: At scales much larger than the mean intervortex ℓ_{i}, the Richardson cascade becomes dominant, whereas at scales much smaller than ℓ_{i}, another type of cascade is induced by quantum stress. We then evaluate the corresponding velocity power spectrum using a phenomenological argument. The relation between this cascade, which we call quantum stress cascade, and the Kelvin-wave cascade is also discussed.
In a recent paper, Tanogami [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106] proposes a scenario for quantum turbulence where the energy spectrum at scales smaller than the intervortex distance is dominated by a quantum stress cascade, in opposition to Kelvin-wave cascade predictions. The purpose of the present Comment is to highlight some physical issues in the derivation of the quantum stress cascade, in particular to stress that quantization of circulation has been ignored.
We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [arXiv:2107.10598] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.
Abstract Quantum turbulence — the chaotic, non-equilibrium state of a superfluid threaded by a dense tangle of quantized vortex lines — provides a uniquely clean testbed for the universal statistical mechanics of turbulent energy transfer. We develop a theoretical account of the energy cascade across all relevant length scales: from macroscopic, quasi-classical Richardson–Kolmogorov eddies, through the dimensionally frustrated L’vov–Nazarenko–Rudenko (LNR) bottleneck at the mean inter-vortex spacing, down to the weakly nonlinear Kelvin-wave cascade on individual filaments, and finally to the zero-temperature dissipation cutoff. Starting from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and its Madelung hydrodynamic decomposition, we separate the compressible and incompressible components of the flow to isolate the vortical and acoustic energy channels. Vortex reconnection is identified as the microscopic mechanism coupling these regimes, and the competing predictions of the Vortex Filament Model and the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for reconnection dynamics are compared. We review the theoretical controversy between the Kozik–Svistunov six-wave cascade and the L’vov–Nazarenko four-wave cascade, together with the associated tilt-symmetry debate, and present the finite-temperature two-fluid (HVBK) description, showing how mutual friction locks the normal and superfluid components at large scales while damping Kelvin waves at small scales. PACS numbers: 67.25.dk, 47.37.+q, 03.75.Kk, 47.32.C−
The main topological feature of a superfluid is a quantum vortex with an identifiable inner and outer radius. A novel unitary quantum lattice gas algorithm is used to simulate quantum turbulence of a Bose-Einstein condensate superfluid described by the Gross-Pitaevskii equation on grids up to 5760(3). For the first time, an accurate power-law scaling for the quantum Kelvin wave cascade is determined: k(-3). The incompressible kinetic energy spectrum exhibits very distinct power-law spectra in 3 ranges of k space: a classical Kolmogorov k(-(5/3)) spectrum at scales greater than the outer radius of individual quantum vortex cores and a quantum Kelvin wave cascade spectrum k(-3) on scales smaller than the inner radius of the quantum vortex core. The k(-3) quantum Kelvin wave spectrum due to phonon radiation is robust, while the k(-(5/3)) classical Kolmogorov spectrum becomes robust on large grids.
We numerically study two-dimensional quantum turbulence with a Gross-Pitaevskii model. With the energy initially accumulated at large scale, quantum turbulence with many quantized vortex points is generated. Due to the lack of enstrophy conservation in this model, direct energy cascade with a Kolmogorov-Obukhov energy spectrum $E(k)\ensuremath{\propto}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}5/3}$ is observed, which is quite different from two-dimensional incompressible classical turbulence in the decaying case. A positive value for the energy flux guarantees a direct energy cascade in the inertial range (from large to small scales). After almost all the energy at the large scale cascades to the small scale, the compressible kinetic energy realizes the thermodynamic equilibrium state without quantized vortices.
We review turbulence in ultracold quantum gases, using the scalar contact-interaction Bose-Einstein condensate as the reference system for quantized circulation, compressibility, vortices, sound, and cascades. We focus on the quantitative diagnostics that connect helium and classical phenomenology to microscopic wave-function dynamics: incompressible and compressible kinetic-energy spectra, wave-occupation spectra, spectral fluxes, vortex-resolved correlations, and velocity statistics. These diagnostics distinguish equilibrium vortex organization, decaying turbulent relaxation, forced cascade dynamics, and weak-wave turbulence, and show why power laws alone are insufficient evidence for a cascade. We survey experiments on two-dimensional Onsager clustering, three-dimensional vortex-line turbulence, box-trap wave cascades, engineered dissipation, and turbulent equations of state. We close by briefly placing the contact-interaction scalar superfluid system in a broader landscape of nonlocal, multicomponent, fermionic, and driven-dissipative quantum fluids, where turbulence concepts can be tested for universality.