Secure Message Transmission (SMT) is a two-party cryptographic protocol by which the sender can securely and reliably transmit messages to the receiver using multiple channels. An adversary can corrupt a subset of the channels and commit eavesdropping and tampering attacks over the channels. In this work, we introduce a game-theoretic security model for SMT in which adversaries have some preferences for protocol execution. We define rational “timid” adversaries who prefer to violate security requirements but do not prefer the tampering to be detected. First, we consider the basic setting where a single adversary attacks the protocol. We construct perfect SMT protocols against any rational adversary corrupting all but one of the channels. Since minority corruption is required in the traditional setting, our results demonstrate a way of circumventing the cryptographic impossibility results by a game-theoretic approach. Next, we study the setting in which all the channels can be corrupted by multiple adversaries who do not cooperate. Since we cannot hope for any security if a single adversary corrupts all the channels or multiple adversaries cooperate maliciously, the scenario can arise from a game-theoretic model. We also study the scenario in which both malicious and rational adversaries exist.
Secure Message Transmission (SMT) is a two-party cryptographic protocol by which the sender can securely and reliably transmit messages to the receiver using multiple channels. An adversary can corrupt a subset of the channels and commit eavesdropping and tampering attacks over the channels. In this work, we introduce a game-theoretic security model for SMT in which adversaries have some preferences for protocol execution. We define rational “timid” adversaries who prefer to violate security requirements but do not prefer the tampering to be detected. First, we consider the basic setting where a single adversary attacks the protocol. We construct perfect SMT protocols against any rational adversary corrupting all but one of the channels. Since minority corruption is required in the traditional setting, our results demonstrate a way of circumventing the cryptographic impossibility results by a game-theoretic approach. Next, we study the setting in which all the channels can be corrupted by multiple adversaries who do not cooperate. Since we cannot hope for any security if a single adversary corrupts all the channels or multiple adversaries cooperate maliciously, the scenario can arise from a game-theoretic model. We also study the scenario in which both malicious and rational adversaries exist.
Secure Message Transmission (SMT) is a two-party cryptographic protocol by which the sender can securely and reliably transmit messages to the receiver using multiple channels. An adversary for SMT can corrupt a subset of the channels and make eavesdropping and tampering over the channels. In this work, we introduce a game-theoretic security model for SMT in which adversaries have some preferences for the protocol execution. We define rational timid adversaries who prefer to violate the security requirements, but do not prefer the tampering to be detected. Such adversaries could arise since they may fear losing their corrupted channels for which they needed some cost or risks. First, we consider the basic setting in which a single adversary attacks the protocol. We show that, even if all but one of the channels are corrupted, we can construct perfect SMT protocols against rational adversaries. In the traditional cryptographic setting, perfect SMT can be constructed only when the adversary corrupts a minority of the channels. Our results demonstrate a way of circumventing the cryptographic impossibility results by a game-theoretic approach. Next, we study the setting in which all the channels can be corrupted by multiple adversaries who do not cooperate. Since we cannot hope for any security if a single adversary corrupts all the channels or multiple adversaries cooperate maliciously, the scenario can arise from a game-theoretic model. We present several perfect SMT protocols, including a non-interactive protocol based on the idea of cheater-identifiable secret sharing. We also study the scenario in which both malicious and rational adversaries exist.
The problem of secure message transmission (SMT), due to its importance in both \npractice and theory, has been studied extensively. Given a communication network in \nwhich a sender S and a receiver R are indirectly connected by unreliable and distrusted \nchannels, the aim of SMT is to enable messages to be transmitted from S to R with a \nreasonably high level of privacy and reliability. SMT must be achieved in the presence \nof a Byzantine adversary who has unlimited computational power and can corrupt the \ntransmission. In the general adversary model, the adversary is characterized by an \nadversary structure. We study two diff�erent measures of security: perfect (PSMT) and \nalmost perfect (APSMT). Moreover, reliable (but not private) message transmission (RMT) are considered as a specifi�c part of SMT. In this thesis, we study RMT, APSMT \nand PSMT in two di�fferent network settings: point-to-point and multicast. \nTo prepare the study of SMT in these two network settings, we present some ideas \nand observations on secret sharing schemes (SSSs), generalized linear codes and critical \npaths. First, we prove that the error-correcting capability of an almost perfect SSS is \nthe same as a perfect SSS. Next, we regard general access structures as linear codes, \nand introduce some new properties that allow us to construct pseudo-basis for efficient \nPSMT protocol design. In addition, we de�fine adversary structures over "critical paths", \nand observe their properties. Having these new developments, the contributions on SMT \nin the aforementioned two network settings can be presented as follows. \nThe results on SMT in point-to-point networks are obtained in three aspects. First, \nwe show a Guessing Attack on some existing PSMT protocols. This attack is critically \nimportant to the design of PSMT protocols in asymmetric networks. Second, we determine necessary and sufficient conditions for di�fferent levels of RMT and APSMT. \nIn particular, by applying the result on almost perfect SSS, we show that relaxing the \nrequirement of privacy does not weaken the minimal network connectivity. Our �final \ncontribution in the point-to-point model is to give the �first ever efficient, constant round \nPSMT protocols in the general adversary model. These protocols are designed using \nlinear codes and critical paths, and they signifi�cantly improve some previous results in \nterms of communication complexity and round complexity. \nRegarding SMT in multicast networks, we solve a problem that has been open for \nover a decade. That is, we show the necessary and sufficient conditions for all levels of \nSMT in di�fferent adversary models. First, we give an Extended Characterization of the \nnetwork graphs based on our observation on the eavesdropping and separating activities \nof the adversary. Next, we determine the necessary and sufficient conditions for SMT \nin the general adversary model with the new Extended Characterization. Finally, we \napply the results to the threshold adversary model to completely solve the problem of \nSMT in general multicast network graphs.
We study the problem of information-theoretically secure message transmission (SMT) in asynchronous directed networks. In line with the literature, the distrust and failures of the network is captured via a computationally unbounded Byzantine adversary that may corrupt some subset of nodes. We give a characterization of networks over which SMT from sender S to receiver R is possible in both the well-known settings, namely perfect SMT (PSMT) and unconditional SMT (USMT). We distinguish between two variants of USMT: one in which R can output an incorrect message (with small probability) and another in which R never outputs a wrong message, but may choose to abort (with small probability). We also provide efficient protocols for an important class of networks.
In the Secure Message Transmission (SMT) problem two nodes in a network want to communicate securely (both privately and reliably), given that some of the nodes in the network are corrupted by an adaptive byzantine adversary with unlimited computational power. A SMT protocol uses multiple paths between the sender S and a receiver R to guarantee privacy and reliability of the message transmission. Privacy means that the adversary learns no information about the transmitted secret, whereas reliability means that the receiver always receives the message sent by the sender. S and R are connected by n disjoint paths where a subset of which (at most t in case of a threshold adversary) can be corrupted by an adversary. Efficiency parameters of a SMT protocol are the number of rounds (number of interactions between S and R ), communication complexity, and computational complexity. An (e, δ)-SMT protocol bounds the adversary's success probability of breaking privacy and reliability to e and δ, respectively. A SMT protocol for a given number of rounds is optimal if its transmission rate (amount of communication per one bit of message) matches the lower bound for that number of rounds. Optimal protocols have been constructed for a restricted set of parameters. It has been proved that secure SMT is possible if and only if n ≥ 2t + 1, where t is the number of paths corrupted by the adversary.
This thesis describes a number of contributions to the study of SMT problem. First, we improve the system parameter of a previously introduced wire virtualization method for constructing optimal protocols using two component protocols. Using the improved wire virtualization method we present the first optimal 1-round (0, δ)-SMT protocol for higher connectivity.
Then we introduce a modular approach for constructing SMT protocols using two or more modules. Using this approach we design an optimal 1-round (0, δ)-SMT protocol for the minimum connectivity, which has higher reliability than any comparable protocol. We also design a similar protocol for higher connectivity improving the reliability of the protocol presented in the first part of this thesis.
Constructing secure and efficient (in communication) SMT protocols against a threshold adversary has been extensively researched. However less is known about SMT problem for a generalized adversary who can corrupt one out of a set of possible subsets. In this part of the thesis, we focus on 1-round (0, δ)-SMT protocols against a generalized adversary. These protocols are especially attractive because of their possible practical applications.
Finally, we introduce a new security definition by presenting an alternative privacy definition, which is based on guessing advantage of the adversary, to construct more efficient (in communication) protocols. Our motivation is that if the received message is long enough and has sufficient entropy, then it can be used as a secret key. We give the relationship between the new security definition and the known one, and revisit bounds on connectivity and transmission rates of SMT protocols under the new definition. We also give constructions for a 1-round and a 3-round protocol, secure under the new definition, that are optimal.
The contributions made in this thesis add to the research on the secure message transmission problem and show new directions for future research.
In the problem of Secure Message Transmission in the public discussion model (SMT-PD), a Sender wants to send a message to a Receiver privately and reliably. Sender and Receiver are connected by n channels, up to t < n of which may be maliciously controlled by a computationally unbounded adversary, as well as one public channel, which is reliable but not private. The SMT-PD abstraction has been shown instrumental in achieving secure multi-party computation on sparse networks, where a subset of the nodes are able to realize a broadcast functionality, which plays the role of the public channel. However, the implementation of such public channel in point-topoint networks is highly costly and non-trivial, which makes minimizing the use of this resource an intrinsically compelling issue. In this paper, we present the first SMT-PD protocol with sublinear (i.e., logarithmic in m, the message size) communication on the public channel. In addition, the protocol incurs a private communication complexity of O ( mn n−t), which, as we also show, is optimal. By contrast, the best known bounds in both public and private channels were linear. Furthermore, our protocol has an optimal round complexity of (3, 2), meaning three rounds, two of which must invoke the public channel. Finally, we ask the question whether some of the lower bounds on resource use for a single execution of SMT-PD can be beaten on average through amortization. In other words, if Sender and Receiver must send several messages back and forth (where later messages depend on earlier ones), can they do better than the naïve solution of repeating an SMT-PD protocol each time? We show that amortization can indeed drastically reduce the use of the public channel: it is possible to limit the total number of uses of the public channel to two, no matter how many messages are ultimately sent between two nodes. (Since two uses of the public channel are required to send any reliable communication whatsoever, this is best possible.) Key words: Secure message transmission, information-theoretic security, almost-everywhere secure computation, randomness extractors.
In Secure message transmission (SMT) protocols two nodes in a network want to communicate securely, given that some of the nodes in the network are corrupted by an adversary with unlimited computational power. An SMT protocol uses multiple paths between the sender and a receiver to guarantee privacy and reliability of the message transmission. An (e, δ)-SMT protocol bounds the adversary's success probability of breaking privacy and reliability to e and δ, respectively. Rate optimal SMT protocols have the smallest transmission rate (amount of communication per one bit of message). Rate optimal protocols have been constructed for a restricted set of parameters.In this paper we use wire virtualization method to construct new optimal protocols for a wide range of parameters using previously known optimal protocols. In particular, we design, for the first time, an optimal 1-round (0, δ)-SMT protocol for n = (2 + c)t, c ≥ 1/t, where n is the number of paths between the sender and the receiver, up to t of which are controlled by the adversary. We also design an optimal 2-round (0, 0)-SMT protocol for n = (2 + c)t, c ≥ 1/t, with communication cost better than the known protocols. The wire virtualization method can be used to construct other protocols with provable properties from component protocols.