Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2009.03279 · Nature Communications

Jordan products of quantum channels and their compatibility

Mark Girard, Martin Plávala, Jamie Sikora

Published Apr 9, 2021• 25 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Given two quantum channels, we examine the task of determining whether they are compatible-meaning that one can perform both channels simultaneously but, in the future, choose exactly one channel whose output is desired (while forfeiting the output of the other channel). Here, we present several results concerning this task. First, we show it is equivalent to the quantum state marginal problem, i.e., every quantum state marginal problem can be recast as the compatibility of two channels, and vice versa. Second, we show that compatible measure-and-prepare channels (i.e., entanglement-breaking channels) do not necessarily have a measure-and-prepare compatibilizing channel. Third, we extend the notion of the Jordan product of matrices to quantum channels and present sufficient conditions for channel compatibility. These Jordan products and their generalizations might be of independent interest. Last, we formulate the different notions of compatibility as semidefinite programs and numerically test when families of partially dephasing-depolarizing channels are compatible.

DOI
10.1038/s41467-021-22275-0

Related papers

Quantum channel marginal problem

Chung-Yun Hsieh, Matteo Lostaglio, Antonio Acín

Given a set of local dynamics, are they compatible with a global dynamics? We systematically formulate these questions as quantum channel marginal problems. These problems are strongly connected to the generalization of the no-signaling conditions to quantized inputs and outputs and can be understood as a general toolkit to study notions of quantum incompatibility. In fact, they include as special cases channel broadcasting, channel extendibility, measurement compatibility, and state marginal problems. After defining the notion of compatibility between global and local dynamics, we provide a solution to the channel marginal problem that takes the form of a semidefinite program. Using this formulation, we construct channel incompatibility witnesses, discuss their operational interpretation in terms of an advantage for a state-discrimination task, prove a gap between classical and quantum dynamical marginal problems, and show that the latter is irreducible to state marginal problems.

arXiv:2102.10926•Physical Review Research•Mar 31, 2022•26 citations

Destroying and Preserving Measurement Incompatibility over a Quantum Channel

Eric Chitambar, Yujie Zhang

A quantum channel is called incompatibility-breaking if it always destroys the incompatibility of quantum measurements. On the other extreme are incompatibility-preserving channels, which never destroy incompatibility. This work studies both types of channels through the mathematical framework of zonotopes and zonoids, an approach that provides a complete characterization of compatibility for dichotomic measurements and is particularly powerful in the qubit setting. Using the language of zonoids, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for when a qubit unital channel is incompatibility-breaking, which are also sufficient for nonunital channels. As one of our main results, we demonstrate the superactivation phenomenon of two incompatibility-breaking qubit channels that are no longer incompatibility-breaking when used in parallel. Translating this result into the task of quantum steering, it says that two copies of a two-qubit Werner state can be steered at noise threshold $1/2$, even though this is impossible using just one copy. For the problem of incompatibility preservation, we prove that a quantum channel with matching input and output dimensions will preserve general incompatibility if and only if it is a unitary transformation. When the output dimension is larger, this result no longer holds, and we offer a conjectured form of a general incompatibility-preserving channel.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06642•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum marginal problem and incompatibility

Erkka Haapasalo, Tristan Kraft, Nikolai Miklin +1 more

One of the basic distinctions between classical and quantum mechanics is the existence of fundamentally incompatible quantities. Such quantities are present on all levels of quantum objects: states, measurements, quantum channels, and even higher order dynamics. In this manuscript, we show that two seemingly different aspects of quantum incompatibility: the quantum marginal problem of states and the incompatibility on the level of quantum channels are in many-to-one correspondence. Importantly, as incompatibility of measurements is a special case of the latter, it also forms an instance of the quantum marginal problem. The generality of the connection is harnessed by solving the marginal problem for Gaussian and Bell diagonal states, as well as for pure states under depolarizing noise. Furthermore, we derive entropic criteria for channel compatibility, and develop a converging hierarchy of semi-definite programs for quantifying the strength of quantum memories.

arXiv:1909.02941•Quantum•Jun 15, 2021•26 citations

Compatibility of quantum instruments

Chloe Kim, Yujie Zhang, Eric Chitambar +2 more

Measurement compatibility asks whether a family of quantum measurements can be simulated by one parent measurement followed by classical post-processing. We extend this measurement compatibility to the notion of \emph{$d$-compatibility} for measurements, channels, and instruments whose parent passes a $d$-dimensional quantum system and unlimited classical information to the post-processing. We formulate $d$-compatibility as a common linear factorization of operator spaces and operator systems and show that $d$-compatible families form a closed set, even with infinitely many settings and a separable infinite-dimensional input. To certify $d$-incompatibility, we define the compatibility functional as the smallest product of completely bounded norms over common factorizations through a $d$-dimensional register. Using factorization theory of operator spaces, we show that measure-and-prepare channels defined in terms of mutually unbiased bases and pinching channels defined in terms of Heisenberg-Weyl operators are $d$-incompatible in certain regimes of $d$. We also link $d$-compatibility of multi-instruments to the preparability of Choi assemblages using channel-state duality, and use this connection to show that for bipartite states the (in)compatibility of instruments can be used to certify Schmidt numbers and the implementability of the instrument using one-way LOCC protocols. Finally, our compatibility functional also bounds the generalized robustness of compatibility, which we interpret through a memory-bounded nontransient preparation game.

quant-pharXiv:2609.40266•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Relating Compatibility and Divisibility of Quantum Channels

Cristhiano Duarte, Lorenzo Catani, Raphael C. Drumond

Abstract We connect two key concepts in quantum information: compatibility and divisibility of quantum channels. Two channels are compatible if they can be both obtained via marginalization from a third channel. A channel divides another channel if it reproduces its action by sequential composition with a third channel. (In)compatibility is of central importance for studying the difference between classical and quantum dynamics. The relevance of divisibility stands in its close relationship with the onset of Markovianity. We emphasize the simulability character of compatibility and divisibility, and, despite their structural difference, we find a set of channels – self-degradable channels – for which the two notions coincide. We also show that, for degradable channels, compatibility implies divisibility, and that, for anti-degradable channels, divisibility implies compatibility. These results provide physical insights and motivate further research on these classes of channels and shed new light on the meaning of these two largely studied notions.

arXiv:2102.11168•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 8, 2022•3 citations

A sufficient family of necessary inequalities for the compatibility of quantum marginals

Thomas C. Fraser

The quantum marginal problem is concerned with characterizing which collections of quantum states on different subsystems are compatible in the sense that they are the marginals of some multipartite quantum state. Presented here is a countable family of inequalities, each of which is necessarily satisfied by any compatible collection of quantum states. Additionally, this family of inequalities is shown to be sufficient: every incompatible collection of quantum states will violate at least one inequality belonging to the family.

arXiv:2211.00685•Nov 1, 2022•0 citations
Given two quantum channels, we examine the task of determining whether they are compatible-meaning that one can perform both channels simultaneously but, in the future, choose exactly one channel whose output is desired (while forfeiting the output of the other channel). Here, we present several results concerning this task. First, we show it is equivalent to the quantum state marginal problem, i.e., every quantum state marginal problem can be recast as the compatibility of two channels, and vice versa. Second, we show that compatible measure-and-prepare channels (i.e., entanglement-breaking channels) do not necessarily have a measure-and-prepare compatibilizing channel. Third, we extend the notion of the Jordan product of matrices to quantum channels and present sufficient conditions for channel compatibility. These Jordan products and their generalizations might be of independent interest. Last, we formulate the different notions of compatibility as semidefinite programs and numerically test when families of partially dephasing-depolarizing channels are compatible.
Given a set of local dynamics, are they compatible with a global dynamics? We systematically formulate these questions as quantum channel marginal problems. These problems are strongly connected to the generalization of the no-signaling conditions to quantized inputs and outputs and can be understood as a general toolkit to study notions of quantum incompatibility. In fact, they include as special cases channel broadcasting, channel extendibility, measurement compatibility, and state marginal problems. After defining the notion of compatibility between global and local dynamics, we provide a solution to the channel marginal problem that takes the form of a semidefinite program. Using this formulation, we construct channel incompatibility witnesses, discuss their operational interpretation in terms of an advantage for a state-discrimination task, prove a gap between classical and quantum dynamical marginal problems, and show that the latter is irreducible to state marginal problems.
A quantum channel is called incompatibility-breaking if it always destroys the incompatibility of quantum measurements. On the other extreme are incompatibility-preserving channels, which never destroy incompatibility. This work studies both types of channels through the mathematical framework of zonotopes and zonoids, an approach that provides a complete characterization of compatibility for dichotomic measurements and is particularly powerful in the qubit setting. Using the language of zonoids, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for when a qubit unital channel is incompatibility-breaking, which are also sufficient for nonunital channels. As one of our main results, we demonstrate the superactivation phenomenon of two incompatibility-breaking qubit channels that are no longer incompatibility-breaking when used in parallel. Translating this result into the task of quantum steering, it says that two copies of a two-qubit Werner state can be steered at noise threshold 1/21/21/2, even though this is impossible using just one copy. For the problem of incompatibility preservation, we prove that a quantum channel with matching input and output dimensions will preserve general incompatibility if and only if it is a unitary transformation. When the output dimension is larger, this result no longer holds, and we offer a conjectured form of a general incompatibility-preserving channel.
One of the basic distinctions between classical and quantum mechanics is the existence of fundamentally incompatible quantities. Such quantities are present on all levels of quantum objects: states, measurements, quantum channels, and even higher order dynamics. In this manuscript, we show that two seemingly different aspects of quantum incompatibility: the quantum marginal problem of states and the incompatibility on the level of quantum channels are in many-to-one correspondence. Importantly, as incompatibility of measurements is a special case of the latter, it also forms an instance of the quantum marginal problem. The generality of the connection is harnessed by solving the marginal problem for Gaussian and Bell diagonal states, as well as for pure states under depolarizing noise. Furthermore, we derive entropic criteria for channel compatibility, and develop a converging hierarchy of semi-definite programs for quantifying the strength of quantum memories.
Measurement compatibility asks whether a family of quantum measurements can be simulated by one parent measurement followed by classical post-processing. We extend this measurement compatibility to the notion of \emph{ddd-compatibility} for measurements, channels, and instruments whose parent passes a ddd-dimensional quantum system and unlimited classical information to the post-processing. We formulate ddd-compatibility as a common linear factorization of operator spaces and operator systems and show that ddd-compatible families form a closed set, even with infinitely many settings and a separable infinite-dimensional input. To certify ddd-incompatibility, we define the compatibility functional as the smallest product of completely bounded norms over common factorizations through a ddd-dimensional register. Using factorization theory of operator spaces, we show that measure-and-prepare channels defined in terms of mutually unbiased bases and pinching channels defined in terms of Heisenberg-Weyl operators are ddd-incompatible in certain regimes of ddd. We also link ddd-compatibility of multi-instruments to the preparability of Choi assemblages using channel-state duality, and use this connection to show that for bipartite states the (in)compatibility of instruments can be used to certify Schmidt numbers and the implementability of the instrument using one-way LOCC protocols. Finally, our compatibility functional also bounds the generalized robustness of compatibility, which we interpret through a memory-bounded nontransient preparation game.
Abstract We connect two key concepts in quantum information: compatibility and divisibility of quantum channels. Two channels are compatible if they can be both obtained via marginalization from a third channel. A channel divides another channel if it reproduces its action by sequential composition with a third channel. (In)compatibility is of central importance for studying the difference between classical and quantum dynamics. The relevance of divisibility stands in its close relationship with the onset of Markovianity. We emphasize the simulability character of compatibility and divisibility, and, despite their structural difference, we find a set of channels – self-degradable channels – for which the two notions coincide. We also show that, for degradable channels, compatibility implies divisibility, and that, for anti-degradable channels, divisibility implies compatibility. These results provide physical insights and motivate further research on these classes of channels and shed new light on the meaning of these two largely studied notions.
The quantum marginal problem is concerned with characterizing which collections of quantum states on different subsystems are compatible in the sense that they are the marginals of some multipartite quantum state. Presented here is a countable family of inequalities, each of which is necessarily satisfied by any compatible collection of quantum states. Additionally, this family of inequalities is shown to be sufficient: every incompatible collection of quantum states will violate at least one inequality belonging to the family.