Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2009.01646 · Europhysics Letters (EPL)

Violation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation by Stern-Gerlach measurements

Yuki Inoue, Masanao Ozawa

Published Feb 1, 2021• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Although Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by a rigorously proven relation about intrinsic indeterminacy in quantum states, Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation (EDR) has been commonly believed as another aspect of the principle. However, recent developments of quantum measurement theory made Heisenberg's EDR testable to observe its violations. Here, we study the EDR for Stern-Gerlach measurements. In a previous report, it has been pointed out that their EDR is close to the theoretical optimal. The present letter reports that even the original Stern-Gerlach experiment in 1922, as the available experimental data show, violates Heisenberg's EDR. The results suggest that Heisenberg's EDR is more ubiquitously violated than it has long been supposed.

DOI
10.1209/0295-5075/133/30001

Related papers

Error-disturbance relation in Stern-Gerlach measurements

Yuki Inoue, Masanao Ozawa

Although Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by a rigorously proven relation about intrinsic uncertainties in quantum states, Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation (EDR) has been commonly believed to be another aspect of the principle. Based on the recent development of universally valid reformulations of Heisenberg's EDR, we study the error and disturbance of Stern-Gerlach measurements of a spin-1/2 particle. We determine the range of the possible values of the error and disturbance for arbitrary Stern-Gerlach apparatuses with the orbital degree prepared in an arbitrary Gaussian state. We show that their error-disturbance region is close to the theoretical optimal and actually violates Heisenberg's EDR in a broad range of experimental parameters. We also show the existence of orbital states in which the error is minimized by the screen at a finite distance from the magnet, in contrast to the standard assumption.

arXiv:1910.07929•Physical Review A•Oct 26, 2020•4 citations

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in neutron spin measurements

Stephan Sponar

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.

International Journal of Quantum Information•May 21, 2016•0 citations

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in a superconducting quantum processor

TINGRUI DONG, So-Young Baek, Fumihiro Kaneda +1 more

We experimentally test the error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDR) in generalized, variable strength measurements of superconducting qubits on a NISQ processor. Making use of sequential weak measurements that keeps the initial signal state practically unchanged prior to the main measurement, we demonstrate that the Heisenberg EDR is violated, yet the Ozawa and Branciard EDRs are valid throughout the range of measurement strengths from no measurement to projection measurement. Our results verify that universal EDRs are valid even in a noisy quantum processor and will stimulate research on measurement-based quantum information and communication protocols using a NISQ processor.

arXiv:2311.00303•Nov 1, 2023•0 citations

Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation: Experimental study of competing approaches

Georg Sulyok, Stephan Sponar

Over the past few years, Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation has experienced increased attention since several experimental publications verified the theoretical findings of Ozawa predicting the violation and thus necessary reformulation of Heisenberg's relation. However, soon after their appearance, an alternative theory was presented by Busch and co-workers, which proclaimed the validity of Heisenberg's relation and thus gave rise to heated debates. Here, we present an experimental comparison of the competing approaches by applying them to the same neutron optical measurement apparatus. Empirical results for the different definitions of error and disturbance are presented for special input states and configurations of the apparatus to illustrate the opposing approaches. The inequalities restricting errors and disturbances are particularly emphasized. Despite the strong controversy, in the case of projectively measured qubit observables, both approaches lead to equal outcomes.

Physical Review A•Aug 28, 2017•15 citations

Proof of Heisenberg's Error-Disturbance Relation for Individual Measurements

Seiji Kosugi

Heisenberg originally envisioned the error-disturbance relation under the premise that the state after measurement must remain consistent with the Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation. This implies that the measurement error must be formulated via a posterior observable $\hat{x}_t$, rather than a prior observable $\hat{x}_0$, because the posterior measurement error determines the post-measurement uncertainty of the electron. Building upon the preliminary conceptual foundation reported in arXiv:1504.03779, this paper presents a rigorous derivation of the error-disturbance principle formulated from the unitary transformation equations of observables. Each readout $X$ of a posterior probe observable $\hat{X}_t$ completes a single measurement event, producing a specific conditional object state. The Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation must hold for these states. Specifically, we show that the uncertainty relation between the error $ε_{X}(\hat{x}_t)$ and the disturbance $η_{X}(\hat{p}_0)$ holds strictly at the level of individual measurements, characterized by the specific readout $X$. We also verify that conventional error-disturbance relations, where the errors are evaluated by averaging over the unconditioned state, hold true. Our results provide a refined theoretical basis for understanding the fundamental trade-off in individual measurement outcomes.

quant-pharXiv:2609.18211•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations

A Universal Formulation of Uncertainty Relation for Error and Disturbance

Jaeha Lee, Izumi Tsutsui

We present a universal formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any conceivable quantum measurement and the resultant observation (observer) effect of statistical nature. Owing to its simplicity and operational tangibility, our general relation is also experimentally verifiable. Our relation violates the traditional na{ï}ve bound $\hbar/2$ for the position-momentum measurement while respecting Heisenberg's original philosophy of the uncertainty principle. Our error-disturbance relation admits a parallel formulation to our relation for errors, which also embraces the standard Kennard--Robertson (Schr{ö}dinger) relation as a special case; this attains a unified picture of the three orthodox realms of uncertainty regarding quantum indeterminacy, measurement, and observation effect within a single framework.

arXiv:2004.06099•Apr 13, 2020•0 citations
Abstract Although Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by a rigorously proven relation about intrinsic indeterminacy in quantum states, Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation (EDR) has been commonly believed as another aspect of the principle. However, recent developments of quantum measurement theory made Heisenberg's EDR testable to observe its violations. Here, we study the EDR for Stern-Gerlach measurements. In a previous report, it has been pointed out that their EDR is close to the theoretical optimal. The present letter reports that even the original Stern-Gerlach experiment in 1922, as the available experimental data show, violates Heisenberg's EDR. The results suggest that Heisenberg's EDR is more ubiquitously violated than it has long been supposed.
Although Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by a rigorously proven relation about intrinsic uncertainties in quantum states, Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation (EDR) has been commonly believed to be another aspect of the principle. Based on the recent development of universally valid reformulations of Heisenberg's EDR, we study the error and disturbance of Stern-Gerlach measurements of a spin-1/2 particle. We determine the range of the possible values of the error and disturbance for arbitrary Stern-Gerlach apparatuses with the orbital degree prepared in an arbitrary Gaussian state. We show that their error-disturbance region is close to the theoretical optimal and actually violates Heisenberg's EDR in a broad range of experimental parameters. We also show the existence of orbital states in which the error is minimized by the screen at a finite distance from the magnet, in contrast to the standard assumption.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.
We experimentally test the error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDR) in generalized, variable strength measurements of superconducting qubits on a NISQ processor. Making use of sequential weak measurements that keeps the initial signal state practically unchanged prior to the main measurement, we demonstrate that the Heisenberg EDR is violated, yet the Ozawa and Branciard EDRs are valid throughout the range of measurement strengths from no measurement to projection measurement. Our results verify that universal EDRs are valid even in a noisy quantum processor and will stimulate research on measurement-based quantum information and communication protocols using a NISQ processor.
Over the past few years, Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation has experienced increased attention since several experimental publications verified the theoretical findings of Ozawa predicting the violation and thus necessary reformulation of Heisenberg's relation. However, soon after their appearance, an alternative theory was presented by Busch and co-workers, which proclaimed the validity of Heisenberg's relation and thus gave rise to heated debates. Here, we present an experimental comparison of the competing approaches by applying them to the same neutron optical measurement apparatus. Empirical results for the different definitions of error and disturbance are presented for special input states and configurations of the apparatus to illustrate the opposing approaches. The inequalities restricting errors and disturbances are particularly emphasized. Despite the strong controversy, in the case of projectively measured qubit observables, both approaches lead to equal outcomes.
Heisenberg originally envisioned the error-disturbance relation under the premise that the state after measurement must remain consistent with the Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation. This implies that the measurement error must be formulated via a posterior observable x^t\hat{x}_tx^t​, rather than a prior observable x^0\hat{x}_0x^0​, because the posterior measurement error determines the post-measurement uncertainty of the electron. Building upon the preliminary conceptual foundation reported in arXiv:1504.03779, this paper presents a rigorous derivation of the error-disturbance principle formulated from the unitary transformation equations of observables. Each readout XXX of a posterior probe observable X^t\hat{X}_tX^t​ completes a single measurement event, producing a specific conditional object state. The Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation must hold for these states. Specifically, we show that the uncertainty relation between the error εX(x^t)ε_{X}(\hat{x}_t)εX​(x^t​) and the disturbance ηX(p^0)η_{X}(\hat{p}_0)ηX​(p^​0​) holds strictly at the level of individual measurements, characterized by the specific readout XXX. We also verify that conventional error-disturbance relations, where the errors are evaluated by averaging over the unconditioned state, hold true. Our results provide a refined theoretical basis for understanding the fundamental trade-off in individual measurement outcomes.
We present a universal formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any conceivable quantum measurement and the resultant observation (observer) effect of statistical nature. Owing to its simplicity and operational tangibility, our general relation is also experimentally verifiable. Our relation violates the traditional na{ï}ve bound ℏ/2\hbar/2ℏ/2 for the position-momentum measurement while respecting Heisenberg's original philosophy of the uncertainty principle. Our error-disturbance relation admits a parallel formulation to our relation for errors, which also embraces the standard Kennard--Robertson (Schr{ö}dinger) relation as a special case; this attains a unified picture of the three orthodox realms of uncertainty regarding quantum indeterminacy, measurement, and observation effect within a single framework.