Abstract In adiabatic quantum annealing, the speed with which an anneal can be run, while still achieving a high final ground state (GS) fidelity, is dictated by the size of the minimum gap that appears between the ground and first excited state in the annealing spectrum. To avoid the exponential slowdown associated with exponentially closing gaps, diabatic transitions to higher energy levels may be exploited in such a way that the system returns to the GS before the end of the anneal. In certain cases, this is facilitated by the original annealing spectrum. However, there are also examples where careful manipulation of the annealing Hamiltonian has been used to alter the spectrum to create a diabatic path to the GS. Since diabatic transitions depend on the evolution rate and the gap sizes in the spectrum, it is important to consider the sensitivity of any potential enhancement to changes in the anneal time as well as any parameters involved in the manipulation of the spectrum. We explore this sensitivity using annealing spectra containing an exponentially closing gap and an additional, tuneable, small gap created by a catalyst. We find that there is a trade-off between the precision needed in the catalyst strength and the anneal time in order to maintain the enhancement to the final GS fidelity.Abstract In adiabatic quantum annealing, the speed with which an anneal can be run, while still achieving a high final ground state (GS) fidelity, is dictated by the size of the minimum gap that appears between the ground and first excited state in the annealing spectrum. To avoid the exponential slowdown associated with exponentially closing gaps, diabatic transitions to higher energy levels may be exploited in such a way that the system returns to the GS before the end of the anneal. In certain cases, this is facilitated by the original annealing spectrum. However, there are also examples where careful manipulation of the annealing Hamiltonian has been used to alter the spectrum to create a diabatic path to the GS. Since diabatic transitions depend on the evolution rate and the gap sizes in the spectrum, it is important to consider the sensitivity of any potential enhancement to changes in the anneal time as well as any parameters involved in the manipulation of the spectrum. We explore this sensitivity using annealing spectra containing an exponentially closing gap and an additional, tuneable, small gap created by a catalyst. We find that there is a trade-off between the precision needed in the catalyst strength and the anneal time in order to maintain the enhancement to the final GS fidelity.

arXiv:2402.13811Quantum Science and TechnologyJan 16, 20254 citations

Recent progress of quantum annealing

Sei Suzuki

AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20150 citations

Diabatic quantum annealing by counter-diabatic driving

Luise Prielinger, Andreas Hartmann, Yu Yamashiro +3 more

We introduce a two-parameter approximate counter-diabatic term into the Hamiltonian of the transverse-field Ising model for quantum annealing to accelerate convergence to the solution, generalizing an existing single-parameter approach. The protocol is equivalent to unconventional diabatic control of the longitudinal and transverse fields in the transverse-field Ising model and thus makes it more feasible for experimental realization than an introduction of new terms such as non-stoquastic catalysts toward the same goal of performance enhancement. We test the idea for the $p$ -spin model with $p=3$ , which has a first-order quantum phase transition, and show that our two-parameter approach leads to significantly larger ground-state fidelity and lower residual energy than those by traditional quantum annealing as well as by the single-parameter method. We also find a scaling advantage in terms of the time to solution as a function of the system size in a certain range of parameters as compared to the traditional methods.We introduce a two-parameter approximate counter-diabatic term into the Hamiltonian of the transverse-field Ising model for quantum annealing to accelerate convergence to the solution, generalizing an existing single-parameter approach. The protocol is equivalent to unconventional diabatic control of the longitudinal and transverse fields in the transverse-field Ising model and thus makes it more feasible for experimental realization than an introduction of new terms such as non-stoquastic catalysts toward the same goal of performance enhancement. We test the idea for the $p$-spin model with $p=3$, which has a first-order quantum phase transition, and show that our two-parameter approach leads to significantly larger ground-state fidelity and lower residual energy than those by traditional quantum annealing as well as by the single-parameter method. We also find a scaling advantage in terms of the time to solution as a function of the system size in a certain range of parameters as compared to the traditional methods.

Nov 5, 20204 citations

Assessing the Quantum in Quantum Annealing

Wade DeGottardi, David Ferguson, С. А. Новиков +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMar 7, 20190 citations

p

-spin model with

p=3

, which has a first-order quantum phase transition, and show that our two-parameter approach leads to significantly larger ground-state fidelity and lower residual energy than those by traditional quantum annealing as well as by the single-parameter method. We also find a scaling advantage in terms of the time to solution as a function of the system size in a certain range of parameters as compared to the traditional methods.