Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2008.06317

Exact Quantum Query Algorithms Outperforming Parity -- Beyond The Symmetric functions

Chandra Sekhar Mukherjee, Subhamoy Maitra

Published Aug 14, 2020• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In Exact Quantum Query model, almost all of the Boolean functions for which non-trivial query algorithms exist are symmetric in nature. The most well known techniques in this domain exploit parity decision trees, in which the parity of two bits can be obtained by a single query. Thus, exact quantum query algorithms outperforming parity decision trees are rare. In this paper we first obtain optimal exact quantum query algorithms ($Q_{algo}(f)$) for a direct sum based class of $Ω\left( 2^{\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}} \right)$ non-symmetric functions. We construct these algorithms by analyzing the algebraic normal form together with a novel untangling strategy. Next we obtain the generalized parity decision tree complexity ($D_{\oplus}(f)$) analysing the Walsh Spectrum. Finally, we show that query complexity of $Q_{algo}$ is $\lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil$ whereas $D_{\oplus}(f)$ varies between $n-1$ and $\lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil+1$ for different classes, underlining linear separation between the two measures in many cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first family of algorithms beyond generalized parity (and thus parity) for a large class of non-symmetric functions. We also implement these techniques for a larger (doubly exponential in $\frac{n}{4}$) class of Maiorana-McFarland type functions, but could only obtain partial results using similar algorithmic techniques.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.06317

Related papers

An Exact Quantum Query Algorithm Beyond Parity using Maiorana-McFarland (MM) type Bent functions.

Chandra Sekhar Mukherjee, Subhamoy Maitra

The Exact Quantum Query model is the least explored query model, and almost all of the functions for which non-trivial query algorithms exist are symmetric in nature. In this paper we explore the Maiorana-McFarland(MM) type Bent functions, defined on all even $n$ variables. The (classical) Deterministic Query Complexity ($D(f)$) of all functions in this class is $n$. In this regard we construct an $\frac{n}{2} + \lceil \frac{n}{8} \rceil$ query exact quantum algorithm that is not a parity decision tree and evaluates a non-symmetric subclass of MM type Bent functions on $n$ variables consisting of $\left(2^{\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor}!\right)\left(2^{\lceil \frac{n}{4} \rceil}!\right) 2^{2^{\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor}}$ functions. Finally we also extend this technique for functions defined on odd values of $n$ using the Bent concatenation method. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm beyond parity for a general class of non-symmetric functions.

•Aug 14, 2020•0 citations

Classical-Quantum Separations in Certain Classes of Boolean Functions-- Analysis using the Parity Decision Trees

Chandra Sekhar Mukherjee, Subhamoy Maitra

In this paper we study the separation between the deterministic (classical) query complexity ($D$) and the exact quantum query complexity ($Q_E$) of several Boolean function classes using the parity decision tree method. We first define the Query Friendly (QF) functions on $n$ variables as the ones with minimum deterministic query complexity $(D(f))$. We observe that for each $n$, there exists a non-separable class of QF functions such that $D(f)=Q_E(f)$. Further, we show that for some values of $n$, all the QF functions are non-separable. Then we present QF functions for certain other values of $n$ where separation can be demonstrated, in particular, $Q_E(f)=D(f)-1$. In a related effort, we also study the Maiorana McFarland (M-M) type Bent functions. We show that while for any M-M Bent function $f$ on $n$ variables $D(f) = n$, separation can be achieved as $\frac{n}{2} \leq Q_E(f) \leq \lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil$. Our results highlight how different classes of Boolean functions can be analyzed for classical-quantum separation exploiting the parity decision tree method.

arXiv:2004.12942•Apr 27, 2020•2 citations

Exact Quantum 1-Query Algorithms and Complexity

Daowen Qiu, Guoliang Xu

Deutsch–Jozsa problem (D–J) has exact quantum 1-query complexity (“exact” means no error), but requires super-exponential queries for the optimal classical deterministic decision trees. D–J problem is equivalent to a symmetric partial Boolean function, and in fact, all symmetric partial Boolean functions having exact quantum 1-query complexity have been found out and these functions can be computed by D–J algorithm. A special case is that all symmetric Boolean functions with exact quantum 1-query complexity follow directly and these functions are also all total Boolean functions with exact quantum 1-query complexity obviously. Then there are pending problems concerning partial Boolean functions having exact quantum 1-query complexity and new results have been found, but some problems are still open. In this paper, we review these results regarding exact quantum 1-query complexity and in particular, we also obtain a new result that a partial Boolean function with exact quantum 1-query complexity is constructed and it cannot be computed by D–J algorithm. Further problems are pointed out for future study.

SPIN•Aug 12, 2021•3 citations

On Exact Quantum Query Complexity

Ashley Montanaro, Richard Jozsa, Graeme Mitchison +2 more

We present several families of total boolean functions which have exact quantum query com-plexity which is a constant multiple (between 1/2 and 2/3) of their classical query complexity, and show that optimal quantum algorithms for these functions cannot be obtained by simply computing parities of pairs of bits. We also characterise the model of nonadaptive exact quantum query complexity in terms of coding theory and completely characterise the query complexity of symmetric boolean functions in this context. These results were originally inspired by nu-merically solving the semidefinite programs characterising quantum query complexity for small problem sizes. We include numerical results giving the optimal success probabilities achievable by quantum algorithms computing all boolean functions on up to 4 bits, and all symmetric boolean functions on up to 6 bits. 1

•Jan 1, 2011•25 citations

Classical-Quantum Separations in Minimal Query Complexity of Boolean Functions.

Chandra Sekhar Mukherjee, Subhamoy Maitra

Query complexity is a model of computation in which functions are evaluated by making queries to the variables. In a very recent paper [Physical Review A 101, 022325 (2020)], Chen, Ye and Li provided a characterization of exact one-query quantum algorithms. We first note that this result is an immediate corollary of what was proved five years back by Montanaro, Jozsa and Mitchison [Algorithmica 71, pp. 775-796 (2015)]. Further, in this model, we concentrate on understanding the differences between classical and quantum computation in terms of number of influencing variables of a function given lowest query complexity in the classical domain. We explore the parity decision tree model to portray possible separations between classical and quantum computations in specific cases. Our results classify different classes of Boolean functions on $n$-variables ($n$ being a function of $k$), that can be evaluated (i) with exactly $k$ queries in both classical and exact quantum model or (ii) with $k$ queries in classical model and $(k-1)$ queries in exact quantum model.

•Apr 27, 2020•0 citations

Improved Quantum Query Upper Bounds Based on Classical Decision Trees

Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro

Given a classical query algorithm as a decision tree, when does there exist a quantum query algorithm with a speed-up over the classical one? We provide a general construction based on the structure of the underlying decision tree, and prove that this can give us an up-to-quadratic quantum speed-up. In particular, we obtain a bounded-error quantum query algorithm of cost $O(\sqrt{s})$ to compute a Boolean function (more generally, a relation) that can be computed by a classical (even randomized) decision tree of size $s$. Lin and Lin [ToC'16] and Beigi and Taghavi [Quantum'20] showed results of a similar flavor, and gave upper bounds in terms of a quantity which we call the "guessing complexity" of a decision tree. We identify that the guessing complexity of a decision tree equals its rank, a notion introduced by Ehrenfeucht and Haussler [Inf. Comp.'89] in the context of learning theory. This answers a question posed by Lin and Lin, who asked whether the guessing complexity of a decision tree is related to any complexity-theoretic measure. We also show a polynomial separation between rank and randomized rank for the complete binary AND-OR tree. Beigi and Taghavi constructed span programs and dual adversary solutions for Boolean functions given classical decision trees computing them and an assignment of non-negative weights to its edges. We explore the effect of changing these weights on the resulting span program complexity and objective value of the dual adversary bound, and capture the best possible weighting scheme by an optimization program. We exhibit a solution to this program and argue its optimality from first principles. We also exhibit decision trees for which our bounds are asymptotically stronger than those of Lin and Lin, and Beigi and Taghavi. This answers a question of Beigi and Taghavi, who asked whether different weighting schemes could yield better upper bounds.

arXiv:2203.02968•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations
In Exact Quantum Query model, almost all of the Boolean functions for which non-trivial query algorithms exist are symmetric in nature. The most well known techniques in this domain exploit parity decision trees, in which the parity of two bits can be obtained by a single query. Thus, exact quantum query algorithms outperforming parity decision trees are rare. In this paper we first obtain optimal exact quantum query algorithms (Qalgo(f)Q_{algo}(f)Qalgo​(f)) for a direct sum based class of Ω(2n2)Ω\left( 2^{\frac{\sqrt{n}}{2}} \right)Ω(22n​​) non-symmetric functions. We construct these algorithms by analyzing the algebraic normal form together with a novel untangling strategy. Next we obtain the generalized parity decision tree complexity (D⊕(f)D_{\oplus}(f)D⊕​(f)) analysing the Walsh Spectrum. Finally, we show that query complexity of QalgoQ_{algo}Qalgo​ is ⌈3n4⌉\lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil⌈43n​⌉ whereas D⊕(f)D_{\oplus}(f)D⊕​(f) varies between n−1n-1n−1 and ⌈3n4⌉+1\lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil+1⌈43n​⌉+1 for different classes, underlining linear separation between the two measures in many cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first family of algorithms beyond generalized parity (and thus parity) for a large class of non-symmetric functions. We also implement these techniques for a larger (doubly exponential in n4\frac{n}{4}4n​) class of Maiorana-McFarland type functions, but could only obtain partial results using similar algorithmic techniques.
The Exact Quantum Query model is the least explored query model, and almost all of the functions for which non-trivial query algorithms exist are symmetric in nature. In this paper we explore the Maiorana-McFarland(MM) type Bent functions, defined on all even nnn variables. The (classical) Deterministic Query Complexity (D(f)D(f)D(f)) of all functions in this class is nnn. In this regard we construct an n2+⌈n8⌉\frac{n}{2} + \lceil \frac{n}{8} \rceil2n​+⌈8n​⌉ query exact quantum algorithm that is not a parity decision tree and evaluates a non-symmetric subclass of MM type Bent functions on nnn variables consisting of (2⌊n4⌋!)(2⌈n4⌉!)22⌊n4⌋\left(2^{\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor}!\right)\left(2^{\lceil \frac{n}{4} \rceil}!\right) 2^{2^{\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor}}(2⌊4n​⌋!)(2⌈4n​⌉!)22⌊4n​⌋ functions. Finally we also extend this technique for functions defined on odd values of nnn using the Bent concatenation method. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm beyond parity for a general class of non-symmetric functions.
In this paper we study the separation between the deterministic (classical) query complexity (DDD) and the exact quantum query complexity (QEQ_EQE​) of several Boolean function classes using the parity decision tree method. We first define the Query Friendly (QF) functions on nnn variables as the ones with minimum deterministic query complexity (D(f))(D(f))(D(f)). We observe that for each nnn, there exists a non-separable class of QF functions such that D(f)=QE(f)D(f)=Q_E(f)D(f)=QE​(f). Further, we show that for some values of nnn, all the QF functions are non-separable. Then we present QF functions for certain other values of nnn where separation can be demonstrated, in particular, QE(f)=D(f)−1Q_E(f)=D(f)-1QE​(f)=D(f)−1. In a related effort, we also study the Maiorana McFarland (M-M) type Bent functions. We show that while for any M-M Bent function fff on nnn variables D(f)=nD(f) = nD(f)=n, separation can be achieved as n2≤QE(f)≤⌈3n4⌉\frac{n}{2} \leq Q_E(f) \leq \lceil \frac{3n}{4} \rceil2n​≤QE​(f)≤⌈43n​⌉. Our results highlight how different classes of Boolean functions can be analyzed for classical-quantum separation exploiting the parity decision tree method.
Deutsch–Jozsa problem (D–J) has exact quantum 1-query complexity (“exact” means no error), but requires super-exponential queries for the optimal classical deterministic decision trees. D–J problem is equivalent to a symmetric partial Boolean function, and in fact, all symmetric partial Boolean functions having exact quantum 1-query complexity have been found out and these functions can be computed by D–J algorithm. A special case is that all symmetric Boolean functions with exact quantum 1-query complexity follow directly and these functions are also all total Boolean functions with exact quantum 1-query complexity obviously. Then there are pending problems concerning partial Boolean functions having exact quantum 1-query complexity and new results have been found, but some problems are still open. In this paper, we review these results regarding exact quantum 1-query complexity and in particular, we also obtain a new result that a partial Boolean function with exact quantum 1-query complexity is constructed and it cannot be computed by D–J algorithm. Further problems are pointed out for future study.
We present several families of total boolean functions which have exact quantum query com-plexity which is a constant multiple (between 1/2 and 2/3) of their classical query complexity, and show that optimal quantum algorithms for these functions cannot be obtained by simply computing parities of pairs of bits. We also characterise the model of nonadaptive exact quantum query complexity in terms of coding theory and completely characterise the query complexity of symmetric boolean functions in this context. These results were originally inspired by nu-merically solving the semidefinite programs characterising quantum query complexity for small problem sizes. We include numerical results giving the optimal success probabilities achievable by quantum algorithms computing all boolean functions on up to 4 bits, and all symmetric boolean functions on up to 6 bits. 1
Query complexity is a model of computation in which functions are evaluated by making queries to the variables. In a very recent paper [Physical Review A 101, 022325 (2020)], Chen, Ye and Li provided a characterization of exact one-query quantum algorithms. We first note that this result is an immediate corollary of what was proved five years back by Montanaro, Jozsa and Mitchison [Algorithmica 71, pp. 775-796 (2015)]. Further, in this model, we concentrate on understanding the differences between classical and quantum computation in terms of number of influencing variables of a function given lowest query complexity in the classical domain. We explore the parity decision tree model to portray possible separations between classical and quantum computations in specific cases. Our results classify different classes of Boolean functions on nnn-variables (nnn being a function of kkk), that can be evaluated (i) with exactly kkk queries in both classical and exact quantum model or (ii) with kkk queries in classical model and (k−1)(k-1)(k−1) queries in exact quantum model.
Given a classical query algorithm as a decision tree, when does there exist a quantum query algorithm with a speed-up over the classical one? We provide a general construction based on the structure of the underlying decision tree, and prove that this can give us an up-to-quadratic quantum speed-up. In particular, we obtain a bounded-error quantum query algorithm of cost O(s)O(\sqrt{s})O(s​) to compute a Boolean function (more generally, a relation) that can be computed by a classical (even randomized) decision tree of size sss. Lin and Lin [ToC'16] and Beigi and Taghavi [Quantum'20] showed results of a similar flavor, and gave upper bounds in terms of a quantity which we call the "guessing complexity" of a decision tree. We identify that the guessing complexity of a decision tree equals its rank, a notion introduced by Ehrenfeucht and Haussler [Inf. Comp.'89] in the context of learning theory. This answers a question posed by Lin and Lin, who asked whether the guessing complexity of a decision tree is related to any complexity-theoretic measure. We also show a polynomial separation between rank and randomized rank for the complete binary AND-OR tree. Beigi and Taghavi constructed span programs and dual adversary solutions for Boolean functions given classical decision trees computing them and an assignment of non-negative weights to its edges. We explore the effect of changing these weights on the resulting span program complexity and objective value of the dual adversary bound, and capture the best possible weighting scheme by an optimization program. We exhibit a solution to this program and argue its optimality from first principles. We also exhibit decision trees for which our bounds are asymptotically stronger than those of Lin and Lin, and Beigi and Taghavi. This answers a question of Beigi and Taghavi, who asked whether different weighting schemes could yield better upper bounds.