Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2008.05840

A diagrammatic approach to information flow in encrypted communication (extended version)

Peter Hines

Published Aug 13, 2020• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We give diagrammatic tools to reason about information flow within encrypted communication. In particular, we are interested in deducing where information flow (communication or otherwise) has taken place, and fully accounting for all possible paths. The core mathematical concept is using a single categorical diagram to model the underlying mathematics, the epistemic knowledge of the participants, and (implicitly) the potential or actual communication between participants. A key part of this is a `correctness' or `consistency' criterion that ensures we accurately & fully account for the distinct routes by which information may come to be known (i.e. communication and / or calculation). We demonstrate how this formalism may be applied to answer questions about communication scenarios where we have the partial information about the participants and their interactions. Similarly, we show how to analyse the consequences of changes to protocols or communications, and to enumerate the distinct orders in which events may have occurred. We use various forms of Diffie-Hellman key exchange as an illustration of these techniques. However, they are entirely general; we illustrate in an appendix how other protocols from non-commutative cryptography may be analysed in the same manner.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.05840

Related papers

A Modular Approach to the Design and Analysis of Authentication and Key Exchange Protocols.

Mihir Bellare Y, Ran Canetti, Hugo Krawczyk

We present a general framework for constructing and analyzing authentication protocols in realistic models of communication networks. This framework provides a sound formalization for the authentication problem and suggests simple and attractive design principles for general authentication and key exchange protocols. The key element in our approach is a modular treatment of the authentication problem in cryptographic protocols; this applies to the definition of security, to the design of the protocols, and to their analysis. In particular, following this modular approach, we show how to systematically transform solutions that work in a model of idealized authenticated communications into solutions that are secure in the realistic setting of communication channels controlled by an active adversary. Using these principles we construct and prove the security of simple and practical authentication and key-exchange protocols. In particular, we provide a security analysis of some well-known key exchange protocols (e.g. authenticated Diffie-Hellman key exchange), and of some of the techniques underlying the design of several authentication protocols that are currently being

•Jan 1, 1998•380 citations

Information-theoretic security

Imre Csiszár, János Körner

Contemporary techniques of data security are primarily based on computational complexity, typically on the infeasibility of inverting certain functions using currently available mathematical techniques and computing power. Among the various protocols based on such ideas, those approved by the cryptography community appear secure enough, but mathematical and technological progress may render them insecure in the future. Indeed, past experience suggests that this is likely to happen. Information-theoretic secrecy offers provable security even against an adversary with unlimited computing power. This chapter provides a glimpse into the substantial progress that has been made towards clarifying the theoretical possibilities in this direction. Practical applications are reasonably expected within a much shorter time than capacity-achieving coding techniques have followed Shannon's discovery of the noisy channel coding theorem. Two kinds of problems will be addressed: secure transmission over insecure channels and secret key generation taking advantage of public communication. After introducing necessary concepts and tools in Section 17.1, these problems will be treated in Sections 17.2 and 17.3. Let us emphasize that the mathematical models and techniques will be similar to those in previous chapters. These models, however, are now studied from a non-cooperative aspect: a major goal is to keep (at least) one party ignorant of (at least part of) the information exchanged.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 30, 2011•10 citations

A Diagrammatic Approach to Information Flow in Encrypted Communication

Peter Hines

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2020•4 citations

Fully Robust Tree-Diffie-Hellman Group Key Exchange (Full Version)

Timo Brecher, Emmanuel Bresson, Mark Manulis

We extend the well-known Tree-Diffie-Hellman technique used for the design of group key exchange (GKE) protocols with robustness, i.e. with resistance to faults resulting from possible system crashes, network failures, and misbehavior of the protocol participants. We propose a fully robust GKE protocol using the novel tree replication technique: our basic protocol version ensures security against outsider adversaries whereas its extension addresses optional insider security. Both protocols are proven secure assuming stronger adversaries gaining access to the internal states of participants. Our security model for robust GKE protocols can be seen as a step towards unification of some earlier security models in this area.

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Provably secure authenticated group Diffie-Hellman key exchange

Emmanuel Bresson, Olivier Chevassut, David Pointcheval

Authenticated key-exchange protocols allow two participants A and B , communicating over a public network and each holding an authentication means to exchange a shared secret value. Methods designed to deal with this cryptographic problem ensure A (resp. B ) that no other participants aside from B (resp. A ) can learn any information about the agreed value and often also ensure A and B that their respective partner has actually computed this value. A natural extension to this cryptographic method is to consider a pool of participants exchanging a shared secret value and to provide a formal treatment for it. Starting from the famous two-party Diffie--Hellman (DH) key-exchange protocol and from its authenticated variants, security experts have extended it to the multiparty setting for over a decade and, in the past few years, completed a formal analysis in the framework of modern cryptography. The present paper synthesizes this body of work on the provably-secure authenticated group DH key exchange.

ACM Transactions on Information and System Security•Jul 1, 2007•88 citations

An Analysis of a Cryptographic Communication Protocol

Maria Strand

We have considered a cryptographic communication protocol and given a proof for its security.

66•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations
We give diagrammatic tools to reason about information flow within encrypted communication. In particular, we are interested in deducing where information flow (communication or otherwise) has taken place, and fully accounting for all possible paths. The core mathematical concept is using a single categorical diagram to model the underlying mathematics, the epistemic knowledge of the participants, and (implicitly) the potential or actual communication between participants. A key part of this is a correctness' or consistency' criterion that ensures we accurately & fully account for the distinct routes by which information may come to be known (i.e. communication and / or calculation). We demonstrate how this formalism may be applied to answer questions about communication scenarios where we have the partial information about the participants and their interactions. Similarly, we show how to analyse the consequences of changes to protocols or communications, and to enumerate the distinct orders in which events may have occurred. We use various forms of Diffie-Hellman key exchange as an illustration of these techniques. However, they are entirely general; we illustrate in an appendix how other protocols from non-commutative cryptography may be analysed in the same manner.
We present a general framework for constructing and analyzing authentication protocols in realistic models of communication networks. This framework provides a sound formalization for the authentication problem and suggests simple and attractive design principles for general authentication and key exchange protocols. The key element in our approach is a modular treatment of the authentication problem in cryptographic protocols; this applies to the definition of security, to the design of the protocols, and to their analysis. In particular, following this modular approach, we show how to systematically transform solutions that work in a model of idealized authenticated communications into solutions that are secure in the realistic setting of communication channels controlled by an active adversary. Using these principles we construct and prove the security of simple and practical authentication and key-exchange protocols. In particular, we provide a security analysis of some well-known key exchange protocols (e.g. authenticated Diffie-Hellman key exchange), and of some of the techniques underlying the design of several authentication protocols that are currently being
Contemporary techniques of data security are primarily based on computational complexity, typically on the infeasibility of inverting certain functions using currently available mathematical techniques and computing power. Among the various protocols based on such ideas, those approved by the cryptography community appear secure enough, but mathematical and technological progress may render them insecure in the future. Indeed, past experience suggests that this is likely to happen. Information-theoretic secrecy offers provable security even against an adversary with unlimited computing power. This chapter provides a glimpse into the substantial progress that has been made towards clarifying the theoretical possibilities in this direction. Practical applications are reasonably expected within a much shorter time than capacity-achieving coding techniques have followed Shannon's discovery of the noisy channel coding theorem. Two kinds of problems will be addressed: secure transmission over insecure channels and secret key generation taking advantage of public communication. After introducing necessary concepts and tools in Section 17.1, these problems will be treated in Sections 17.2 and 17.3. Let us emphasize that the mathematical models and techniques will be similar to those in previous chapters. These models, however, are now studied from a non-cooperative aspect: a major goal is to keep (at least) one party ignorant of (at least part of) the information exchanged.
We extend the well-known Tree-Diffie-Hellman technique used for the design of group key exchange (GKE) protocols with robustness, i.e. with resistance to faults resulting from possible system crashes, network failures, and misbehavior of the protocol participants. We propose a fully robust GKE protocol using the novel tree replication technique: our basic protocol version ensures security against outsider adversaries whereas its extension addresses optional insider security. Both protocols are proven secure assuming stronger adversaries gaining access to the internal states of participants. Our security model for robust GKE protocols can be seen as a step towards unification of some earlier security models in this area.
Authenticated key-exchange protocols allow two participants A and B , communicating over a public network and each holding an authentication means to exchange a shared secret value. Methods designed to deal with this cryptographic problem ensure A (resp. B ) that no other participants aside from B (resp. A ) can learn any information about the agreed value and often also ensure A and B that their respective partner has actually computed this value. A natural extension to this cryptographic method is to consider a pool of participants exchanging a shared secret value and to provide a formal treatment for it. Starting from the famous two-party Diffie--Hellman (DH) key-exchange protocol and from its authenticated variants, security experts have extended it to the multiparty setting for over a decade and, in the past few years, completed a formal analysis in the framework of modern cryptography. The present paper synthesizes this body of work on the provably-secure authenticated group DH key exchange.