arXiv:2007.03631 · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

Published Jul 7, 2020• 3 citations

Abstract

The Forrelation problem, introduced by Aaronson [A10] and Aaronson and Ambainis [AA15], is a well studied problem in the context of separating quantum and classical models. Variants of this problem were used to give exponential separations between quantum and classical query complexity [A10, AA15]; quantum query complexity and bounded-depth circuits [RT19]; and quantum and classical communication complexity [GRT19]. In all these separations, the lower bound for the classical model only holds when the advantage of the protocol (over a random guess) is more than $\approx 1/\sqrt{N}$, that is, the success probability is larger than $\approx 1/2 + 1/\sqrt{N}$. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the XOR of $k$ independent copies of the Forrelation function (where $k\ll N$). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level $2k$ is bounded by $α^k$, cannot compute the XOR of $k$ independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than $O\left(\frac{α^k}{N^{k/2}}\right)$. This is a strengthening of a result of [CHLT19], that gave a similar result for $k=1$, using the technique of [RT19]. As an application of our result, we give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol of cost $\mbox{polylog}(N)$ (when players share $\mbox{polylog}(N)$ EPR pairs), however, any classical interactive randomized protocol of cost at most $\tilde{o}(N^{1/4})$, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. We also give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm of cost $\mbox{polylog}(N)$, and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess.

DOI: 10.4230/lipics.approx/random.2021.52

Related papers

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

Jan 1, 20212 citations

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations.

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

Electronic colloquium on computational complexityJan 1, 20201 citation

Exponential quantum-classical query separations for cyclic Forrelation

Yuxin Zhang, Changpeng Shao

quant-pharXiv:2610.41694Nov 2, 2026

k-forrelation optimally separates Quantum and classical query complexity

Nikhil Bansal, Makrand Sinha

arXiv:2008.07003ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)Jun 15, 202122 citations

IQP circuits for 2-Forrelation

Quentin Buzet, André Chailloux

quant-pharXiv:2604.15248Apr 17, 20260 citations

Quantum versus Randomized Communication Complexity, with Efficient Players

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Avishay Tal

arXiv:1911.02218Computational ComplexityOct 28, 20228 citations

arXiv:2007.03631 · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

Published Jul 7, 2020• 3 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

\approx 1/\sqrt{N}

, that is, the success probability is larger than

\approx 1/2 + 1/\sqrt{N}

. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the XOR of

k

independent copies of the Forrelation function (where

k\ll N

). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level

2k

is bounded by

α^k

, cannot compute the XOR of

k

independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than

O\left(\frac{α^k}{N^{k/2}}\right)

. This is a strengthening of a result of [CHLT19], that gave a similar result for

k=1

, using the technique of [RT19]. As an application of our result, we give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol of cost

\mbox{polylog}(N)

(when players share

\mbox{polylog}(N)

EPR pairs), however, any classical interactive randomized protocol of cost at most

\tilde{o}(N^{1/4})

, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. We also give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm of cost

\mbox{polylog}(N)

, and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess.

DOI: 10.4230/lipics.approx/random.2021.52

Related papers

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

The Forrelation problem, first introduced by Aaronson [Scott Aaronson, 2010] and Aaronson and Ambainis [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015], is a well studied computational problem in the context of separating quantum and classical computational models. Variants of this problem were used to give tight separations between quantum and classical query complexity [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015]; the first separation between poly-logarithmic quantum query complexity and bounded-depth circuits of super-polynomial size, a result that also implied an oracle separation of the classes BQP and PH [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]; and improved separations between quantum and classical communication complexity [Uma Girish et al., 2021]. In all these separations, the lower bound for the classical model only holds when the advantage of the protocol (over a random guess) is more than ≈ 1/√N, that is, the success probability is larger than ≈ 1/2 + 1/√N. This is unavoidable as ≈ 1/√N is the correlation between two coordinates of an input that is sampled from the Forrelation distribution, and hence there are simple classical protocols that achieve advantage ≈ 1/√N, in all these models. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the xor of k independent copies of (a variant of) the Forrelation function (where k≪ N). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level 2k is bounded by α^k (that is, the sum of the absolute values of all Fourier coefficients at level 2k is bounded by α^k), cannot compute the xor of k independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than O((α^k)/(N^{k/2})). This is a strengthening of a result of [Eshan Chattopadhyay et al., 2019], that gave a similar statement for k = 1, using the technique of [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]. We give several applications of our result. In particular, we obtain the following separations: Quantum versus Classical Communication Complexity. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog(N) (where Alice and Bob also share polylog(N) EPR pairs), and such that, any classical randomized protocol of communication complexity at most õ(N^{1/4}), with any number of rounds, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the classical protocol has polynomially small advantage were known between these models [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2016; Uma Girish et al., 2021]. Quantum Query Complexity versus Bounded Depth Circuits. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm with query complexity polylog(N), and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the constant-depth circuit has polynomially small advantage were known [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019].The Forrelation problem, first introduced by Aaronson [Scott Aaronson, 2010] and Aaronson and Ambainis [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015], is a well studied computational problem in the context of separating quantum and classical computational models. Variants of this problem were used to give tight separations between quantum and classical query complexity [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015]; the first separation between poly-logarithmic quantum query complexity and bounded-depth circuits of super-polynomial size, a result that also implied an oracle separation of the classes BQP and PH [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]; and improved separations between quantum and classical communication complexity [Uma Girish et al., 2021]. In all these separations, the lower bound for the classical model only holds when the advantage of the protocol (over a random guess) is more than ≈ 1/√N, that is, the success probability is larger than ≈ 1/2 + 1/√N. This is unavoidable as ≈ 1/√N is the correlation between two coordinates of an input that is sampled from the Forrelation distribution, and hence there are simple classical protocols that achieve advantage ≈ 1/√N, in all these models. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the xor of k independent copies of (a variant of) the Forrelation function (where k≪ N). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level 2k is bounded by α^k (that is, the sum of the absolute values of all Fourier coefficients at level 2k is bounded by α^k), cannot compute the xor of k independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than O((α^k)/(N^{k/2})). This is a strengthening of a result of [Eshan Chattopadhyay et al., 2019], that gave a similar statement for k = 1, using the technique of [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]. We give several applications of our result. In particular, we obtain the following separations: Quantum versus Classical Communication Complexity. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog(N) (where Alice and Bob also share polylog(N) EPR pairs), and such that, any classical randomized protocol of communication complexity at most õ(N^{1/4}), with any number of rounds, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the classical protocol has polynomially small advantage were known between these models [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2016; Uma Girish et al., 2021]. Quantum Query Complexity versus Bounded Depth Circuits. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm with query complexity polylog(N), and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the constant-depth circuit has polynomially small advantage were known [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019].

Jan 1, 20212 citations

Lower Bounds for XOR of Forrelations.

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Wei Zhan

The Forrelation problem, first introduced by Aaronson [Scott Aaronson, 2010] and Aaronson and Ambainis [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015], is a well studied computational problem in the context of separating quantum and classical computational models. Variants of this problem were used to give tight separations between quantum and classical query complexity [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015]; the first separation between poly-logarithmic quantum query complexity and bounded-depth circuits of super-polynomial size, a result that also implied an oracle separation of the classes BQP and PH [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]; and improved separations between quantum and classical communication complexity [Uma Girish et al., 2021]. In all these separations, the lower bound for the classical model only holds when the advantage of the protocol (over a random guess) is more than ≈ 1/√N, that is, the success probability is larger than ≈ 1/2 + 1/√N. This is unavoidable as ≈ 1/√N is the correlation between two coordinates of an input that is sampled from the Forrelation distribution, and hence there are simple classical protocols that achieve advantage ≈ 1/√N, in all these models. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the xor of k independent copies of (a variant of) the Forrelation function (where k≪ N). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level 2k is bounded by α^k (that is, the sum of the absolute values of all Fourier coefficients at level 2k is bounded by α^k), cannot compute the xor of k independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than O((α^k)/(N^{k/2})). This is a strengthening of a result of [Eshan Chattopadhyay et al., 2019], that gave a similar statement for k = 1, using the technique of [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]. We give several applications of our result. In particular, we obtain the following separations: Quantum versus Classical Communication Complexity. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog(N) (where Alice and Bob also share polylog(N) EPR pairs), and such that, any classical randomized protocol of communication complexity at most o(N^{1/4}), with any number of rounds, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the classical protocol has polynomially small advantage were known between these models [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2016; Uma Girish et al., 2021]. Quantum Query Complexity versus Bounded Depth Circuits. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm with query complexity polylog(N), and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the constant-depth circuit has polynomially small advantage were known [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019].The Forrelation problem, first introduced by Aaronson [Scott Aaronson, 2010] and Aaronson and Ambainis [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015], is a well studied computational problem in the context of separating quantum and classical computational models. Variants of this problem were used to give tight separations between quantum and classical query complexity [Scott Aaronson and Andris Ambainis, 2015]; the first separation between poly-logarithmic quantum query complexity and bounded-depth circuits of super-polynomial size, a result that also implied an oracle separation of the classes BQP and PH [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]; and improved separations between quantum and classical communication complexity [Uma Girish et al., 2021]. In all these separations, the lower bound for the classical model only holds when the advantage of the protocol (over a random guess) is more than ≈ 1/√N, that is, the success probability is larger than ≈ 1/2 + 1/√N. This is unavoidable as ≈ 1/√N is the correlation between two coordinates of an input that is sampled from the Forrelation distribution, and hence there are simple classical protocols that achieve advantage ≈ 1/√N, in all these models. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the xor of k independent copies of (a variant of) the Forrelation function (where k≪ N). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level 2k is bounded by α^k (that is, the sum of the absolute values of all Fourier coefficients at level 2k is bounded by α^k), cannot compute the xor of k independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than O((α^k)/(N^{k/2})). This is a strengthening of a result of [Eshan Chattopadhyay et al., 2019], that gave a similar statement for k = 1, using the technique of [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019]. We give several applications of our result. In particular, we obtain the following separations: Quantum versus Classical Communication Complexity. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog(N) (where Alice and Bob also share polylog(N) EPR pairs), and such that, any classical randomized protocol of communication complexity at most o(N^{1/4}), with any number of rounds, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the classical protocol has polynomially small advantage were known between these models [Dmitry Gavinsky, 2016; Uma Girish et al., 2021]. Quantum Query Complexity versus Bounded Depth Circuits. We give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm with query complexity polylog(N), and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. Previously, only separations where the constant-depth circuit has polynomially small advantage were known [Ran Raz and Avishay Tal, 2019].

Electronic colloquium on computational complexityJan 1, 20201 citation

Exponential quantum-classical query separations for cyclic Forrelation

Yuxin Zhang, Changpeng Shao

We study the randomized classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation, a cyclic analogue of $k$ -Forrelation [AA15, STOC'15; BS21, STOC'21]. Given $k$ Boolean functions $f_1,\ldots,f_k:\mathbb{F}_2^n\to\{-1,1\}$ , the goal is to estimate $T_k=N^{-1}\operatorname{Tr}(D_{f_1}H^{\otimes n}\cdots D_{f_k}H^{\otimes n}),$ where $D_{f_i}=\operatorname{diag}(f_i(x):x\in\mathbb{F}_2^n)$ , $H$ is the Hadamard gate, and $N=2^n$ . This normalized-trace problem can be solved with $k$ quantum queries in the DQC1 model. Its classical query complexity was left open in [JLS+26, FOCS'26], which conjectured a lower bound of $\widetildeΩ(N^{1-2/k})$ . We establish a nearly complete characterization of the nonadaptive classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation. For even $k\ge 4$ , we prove a tight bound of $Θ_k(N^{1-2/k})$ for constant additive error. For odd $k\ge 5$ , we obtain a lower bound of $Ω_k(N^{1-2/(k-1)})$ and an upper bound of $O_k(N^{1-2/k})$ . Surprisingly, $k=3$ admits a polylogarithmic-query nonadaptive classical algorithm, disproving the conjecture in this case. These results suggest an unexpected parity-dependent structure: the nonadaptive complexity may be governed by the independence number of the $k$ -cycle, leading to the exponent $1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor$ , rather than the previously conjectured $1-2/k$ , which was motivated by a Fourier-growth heuristic. Finally, allowing adaptivity, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(N^{1/4})$ for every $k\ge4$ . Although formally close to $k$ -Forrelation, the cyclic structure leads to rather different classical behavior and requires different techniques. Our lower bounds are based on hidden-shift collision constructions, and our upper bounds follow from randomized sampling together with cycle-specific conditional-moment estimates. Our results provide a systematic understanding of its query advantages over classical computation.We study the randomized classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation, a cyclic analogue of $k$-Forrelation [AA15, STOC'15; BS21, STOC'21]. Given $k$ Boolean functions $f_1,\ldots,f_k:\mathbb{F}_2^n\to\{-1,1\}$, the goal is to estimate $T_k=N^{-1}\operatorname{Tr}(D_{f_1}H^{\otimes n}\cdots D_{f_k}H^{\otimes n}),$ where $D_{f_i}=\operatorname{diag}(f_i(x):x\in\mathbb{F}_2^n)$, $H$ is the Hadamard gate, and $N=2^n$. This normalized-trace problem can be solved with $k$ quantum queries in the DQC1 model. Its classical query complexity was left open in [JLS+26, FOCS'26], which conjectured a lower bound of $\widetildeΩ(N^{1-2/k})$. We establish a nearly complete characterization of the nonadaptive classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation. For even $k\ge 4$, we prove a tight bound of $Θ_k(N^{1-2/k})$ for constant additive error. For odd $k\ge 5$, we obtain a lower bound of $Ω_k(N^{1-2/(k-1)})$ and an upper bound of $O_k(N^{1-2/k})$. Surprisingly, $k=3$ admits a polylogarithmic-query nonadaptive classical algorithm, disproving the conjecture in this case. These results suggest an unexpected parity-dependent structure: the nonadaptive complexity may be governed by the independence number of the $k$-cycle, leading to the exponent $1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor$, rather than the previously conjectured $1-2/k$, which was motivated by a Fourier-growth heuristic. Finally, allowing adaptivity, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(N^{1/4})$ for every $k\ge4$. Although formally close to $k$-Forrelation, the cyclic structure leads to rather different classical behavior and requires different techniques. Our lower bounds are based on hidden-shift collision constructions, and our upper bounds follow from randomized sampling together with cycle-specific conditional-moment estimates. Our results provide a systematic understanding of its query advantages over classical computation.

quant-pharXiv:2610.41694Nov 2, 2026

k-forrelation optimally separates Quantum and classical query complexity

Nikhil Bansal, Makrand Sinha

Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP ‘18) showed that any partial function on N bits that can be computed with an advantage δ over a random guess by making q quantum queries, can also be computed classically with an advantage δ/2 by a randomized decision tree making Oq(N1−1/2qδ−2) queries. Moreover, they conjectured the k-Forrelation problem — a partial function that can be computed with q = ⌈ k/2 ⌉ quantum queries — to be a suitable candidate for exhibiting such an extremal separation.Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP ‘18) showed that any partial function on N bits that can be computed with an advantage δ over a random guess by making q quantum queries, can also be computed classically with an advantage δ/2 by a randomized decision tree making Oq(N1−1/2qδ−2) queries. Moreover, they conjectured the k-Forrelation problem — a partial function that can be computed with q = ⌈ k/2 ⌉ quantum queries — to be a suitable candidate for exhibiting such an extremal separation.

arXiv:2008.07003ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)Jun 15, 202122 citations

IQP circuits for 2-Forrelation

Quentin Buzet, André Chailloux

The $2$ -Forrelation problem provides an optimal separation between classical and quantum query complexity and is also the problem used for separating $\mathsf{BQP}$ and $\mathsf{PH}$ relative to an oracle. A natural question is therefore to ask what are the minimal quantum resources needed to solve this problem. We show that $2$ -Forrelation can be solved using Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-time ( $\mathsf{IQP}$ ) circuits, a restricted model of quantum computation in which all gates commute. Concretely, signed $2$ -Forrelation can be solved by a classical random choice between two one-query $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuits, while the absolute-value variant uses two independent executions of this randomized procedure. This answers a recent open question of Girish (STOC 2026) on the power of commuting quantum computations. For the Raz-Tal distribution, this randomization is unnecessary. We use this to show that there is an oracle $O$ such that $\mathsf{IQP}^O \not\subseteq \mathsf{PH}^O$ , strengthening the result of Raz and Tal (STOC 2019). It also yields an oracle separation between $\mathsf{IQP}$ and $\mathsf{DQC}_1$ . We prove Fourier growth bounds for multi-query $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuits, including bounds in terms of the size of their accepting set. Our results suggest a possible route toward decision-based quantum advantage within the restricted $\mathsf{IQP}$ model. The key ingredient is an algebraic identity of the quadratic function $Q(x) = \sum_{i < j} x_ix_j$ that allows extracting inner-product phases within an $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuit.The $2$-Forrelation problem provides an optimal separation between classical and quantum query complexity and is also the problem used for separating $\mathsf{BQP}$ and $\mathsf{PH}$ relative to an oracle. A natural question is therefore to ask what are the minimal quantum resources needed to solve this problem. We show that $2$-Forrelation can be solved using Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-time ($\mathsf{IQP}$) circuits, a restricted model of quantum computation in which all gates commute. Concretely, signed $2$-Forrelation can be solved by a classical random choice between two one-query $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuits, while the absolute-value variant uses two independent executions of this randomized procedure. This answers a recent open question of Girish (STOC 2026) on the power of commuting quantum computations. For the Raz-Tal distribution, this randomization is unnecessary. We use this to show that there is an oracle $O$ such that $\mathsf{IQP}^O \not\subseteq \mathsf{PH}^O$, strengthening the result of Raz and Tal (STOC 2019). It also yields an oracle separation between $\mathsf{IQP}$ and $\mathsf{DQC}_1$. We prove Fourier growth bounds for multi-query $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuits, including bounds in terms of the size of their accepting set. Our results suggest a possible route toward decision-based quantum advantage within the restricted $\mathsf{IQP}$ model. The key ingredient is an algebraic identity of the quadratic function $Q(x) = \sum_{i < j} x_ix_j$ that allows extracting inner-product phases within an $\mathsf{IQP}$ circuit.

quant-pharXiv:2604.15248Apr 17, 20260 citations

Quantum versus Randomized Communication Complexity, with Efficient Players

Uma Girish, Ran Raz, Avishay Tal

We study a new type of separations between quantum and classical communication complexity, separations that are obtained using quantum protocols where all parties are efficient , in the sense that they can be implemented by small quantum circuits, with oracle access to their inputs. Our main result qualitatively matches the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity Gavinsky (2016) and is obtained using a quantum protocol where all parties are efficient. More precisely, we give an explicit partial Boolean function f over inputs of length N , such that: f can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog( N ) (where at the beginning of the protocol Alice and Bob also have polylog( N ) entangled EPR pairs). Any classical randomized protocol for f , with any number of rounds, has communication complexity at least $\tilde{\Omega}\left(N^{1/4}\right)$ . All parties in the quantum protocol of Item (1) (Alice, Bob and the referee) can be implemented by quantum circuits of size polylog( N ) (where Alice and Bob have oracle access to their inputs). Items (1), (2) qualitatively match the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity, proved by Gavinsky (2016). Item (3) is new. (Our result is incomparable to the one of Gavinsky. While he obtained a quantitatively better lower bound of $\Omega\left(N^{1/2}\right)$ in the classical case, the referee in his quantum protocol is inefficient). Exponential separations of quantum and classical communication complexity have been studied in numerous previous works, but to the best of our knowledge the efficiency of the parties in the quantum protocol has not been addressed, and in most previous separations the quantum parties seem to be inefficient. The only separations that we know of that have efficient quantum parties are the recent separations that are based on lifting Göös et al. (2017), Chattopadhyay et al. (2019a). However, these separations seem to require quantum protocols with at least two rounds of communication, so they imply a separation of two-way quantum and classical communication complexity, but they do not give the stronger separations of simultaneous-message quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity (or even one-way quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity). Our proof technique is completely new, in the context of communication complexity, and is based on techniques from Raz & Tal (2019). Our function f is based on a lift of the forrelation problem, using xor as a gadget.We study a new type of separations between quantum and classical communication complexity, separations that are obtained using quantum protocols where all parties are efficient , in the sense that they can be implemented by small quantum circuits, with oracle access to their inputs. Our main result qualitatively matches the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity Gavinsky (2016) and is obtained using a quantum protocol where all parties are efficient. More precisely, we give an explicit partial Boolean function f over inputs of length N , such that: f can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog( N ) (where at the beginning of the protocol Alice and Bob also have polylog( N ) entangled EPR pairs). Any classical randomized protocol for f , with any number of rounds, has communication complexity at least $\tilde{\Omega}\left(N^{1/4}\right)$ . All parties in the quantum protocol of Item (1) (Alice, Bob and the referee) can be implemented by quantum circuits of size polylog( N ) (where Alice and Bob have oracle access to their inputs). Items (1), (2) qualitatively match the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity, proved by Gavinsky (2016). Item (3) is new. (Our result is incomparable to the one of Gavinsky. While he obtained a quantitatively better lower bound of $\Omega\left(N^{1/2}\right)$ in the classical case, the referee in his quantum protocol is inefficient). Exponential separations of quantum and classical communication complexity have been studied in numerous previous works, but to the best of our knowledge the efficiency of the parties in the quantum protocol has not been addressed, and in most previous separations the quantum parties seem to be inefficient. The only separations that we know of that have efficient quantum parties are the recent separations that are based on lifting Göös et al. (2017), Chattopadhyay et al. (2019a). However, these separations seem to require quantum protocols with at least two rounds of communication, so they imply a separation of two-way quantum and classical communication complexity, but they do not give the stronger separations of simultaneous-message quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity (or even one-way quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity). Our proof technique is completely new, in the context of communication complexity, and is based on techniques from Raz & Tal (2019). Our function f is based on a lift of the forrelation problem, using xor as a gadget.

arXiv:1911.02218Computational ComplexityOct 28, 20228 citations

\approx 1/\sqrt{N}

, that is, the success probability is larger than

\approx 1/2 + 1/\sqrt{N}

. To achieve separations when the classical protocol has smaller advantage, we study in this work the XOR of

k

independent copies of the Forrelation function (where

k\ll N

). We prove a very general result that shows that any family of Boolean functions that is closed under restrictions, whose Fourier mass at level

2k

is bounded by

α^k

, cannot compute the XOR of

k

independent copies of the Forrelation function with advantage better than

O\left(\frac{α^k}{N^{k/2}}\right)

. This is a strengthening of a result of [CHLT19], that gave a similar result for

k=1

, using the technique of [RT19]. As an application of our result, we give the first example of a partial Boolean function that can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol of cost

\mbox{polylog}(N)

(when players share

\mbox{polylog}(N)

EPR pairs), however, any classical interactive randomized protocol of cost at most

\tilde{o}(N^{1/4})

, has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess. We also give the first example of a partial Boolean function that has a quantum query algorithm of cost

\mbox{polylog}(N)

, and such that, any constant-depth circuit of quasipolynomial size has quasipolynomially small advantage over a random guess.

We study the randomized classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation, a cyclic analogue of

k

-Forrelation [AA15, STOC'15; BS21, STOC'21]. Given

k

Boolean functions

f_1,\ldots,f_k:\mathbb{F}_2^n\to\{-1,1\}

, the goal is to estimate

T_k=N^{-1}\operatorname{Tr}(D_{f_1}H^{\otimes n}\cdots D_{f_k}H^{\otimes n}),

where

D_{f_i}=\operatorname{diag}(f_i(x):x\in\mathbb{F}_2^n)

H

is the Hadamard gate, and

N=2^n

. This normalized-trace problem can be solved with

k

quantum queries in the DQC1 model. Its classical query complexity was left open in [JLS+26, FOCS'26], which conjectured a lower bound of

\widetildeΩ(N^{1-2/k})

. We establish a nearly complete characterization of the nonadaptive classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation. For even

k\ge 4

, we prove a tight bound of

Θ_k(N^{1-2/k})

for constant additive error. For odd

k\ge 5

, we obtain a lower bound of

Ω_k(N^{1-2/(k-1)})

and an upper bound of

O_k(N^{1-2/k})

. Surprisingly,

k=3

admits a polylogarithmic-query nonadaptive classical algorithm, disproving the conjecture in this case. These results suggest an unexpected parity-dependent structure: the nonadaptive complexity may be governed by the independence number of the

k

-cycle, leading to the exponent

1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor

, rather than the previously conjectured

1-2/k

, which was motivated by a Fourier-growth heuristic. Finally, allowing adaptivity, we prove a lower bound of

Ω(N^{1/4})

for every

k\ge4

. Although formally close to

k

-Forrelation, the cyclic structure leads to rather different classical behavior and requires different techniques. Our lower bounds are based on hidden-shift collision constructions, and our upper bounds follow from randomized sampling together with cycle-specific conditional-moment estimates. Our results provide a systematic understanding of its query advantages over classical computation.

The

2

-Forrelation problem provides an optimal separation between classical and quantum query complexity and is also the problem used for separating

\mathsf{BQP}

and

\mathsf{PH}

relative to an oracle. A natural question is therefore to ask what are the minimal quantum resources needed to solve this problem. We show that

2

-Forrelation can be solved using Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-time (

\mathsf{IQP}

) circuits, a restricted model of quantum computation in which all gates commute. Concretely, signed

2

-Forrelation can be solved by a classical random choice between two one-query

\mathsf{IQP}

circuits, while the absolute-value variant uses two independent executions of this randomized procedure. This answers a recent open question of Girish (STOC 2026) on the power of commuting quantum computations. For the Raz-Tal distribution, this randomization is unnecessary. We use this to show that there is an oracle

O

such that

\mathsf{IQP}^O \not\subseteq \mathsf{PH}^O

, strengthening the result of Raz and Tal (STOC 2019). It also yields an oracle separation between

\mathsf{IQP}

and

\mathsf{DQC}_1

. We prove Fourier growth bounds for multi-query

\mathsf{IQP}

circuits, including bounds in terms of the size of their accepting set. Our results suggest a possible route toward decision-based quantum advantage within the restricted

\mathsf{IQP}

model. The key ingredient is an algebraic identity of the quadratic function

Q(x) = \sum_{i < j} x_ix_j

that allows extracting inner-product phases within an

\mathsf{IQP}

circuit.

\tilde{\Omega}\left(N^{1/4}\right)

. All parties in the quantum protocol of Item (1) (Alice, Bob and the referee) can be implemented by quantum circuits of size polylog( N ) (where Alice and Bob have oracle access to their inputs). Items (1), (2) qualitatively match the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity, proved by Gavinsky (2016). Item (3) is new. (Our result is incomparable to the one of Gavinsky. While he obtained a quantitatively better lower bound of

\Omega\left(N^{1/2}\right)

in the classical case, the referee in his quantum protocol is inefficient). Exponential separations of quantum and classical communication complexity have been studied in numerous previous works, but to the best of our knowledge the efficiency of the parties in the quantum protocol has not been addressed, and in most previous separations the quantum parties seem to be inefficient. The only separations that we know of that have efficient quantum parties are the recent separations that are based on lifting Göös et al. (2017), Chattopadhyay et al. (2019a). However, these separations seem to require quantum protocols with at least two rounds of communication, so they imply a separation of two-way quantum and classical communication complexity, but they do not give the stronger separations of simultaneous-message quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity (or even one-way quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity). Our proof technique is completely new, in the context of communication complexity, and is based on techniques from Raz & Tal (2019). Our function f is based on a lift of the forrelation problem, using xor as a gadget.