Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs-where graph symmetry is manifested differently-we exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013).
Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs-where graph symmetry is manifested differently-we exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013).
Abstract. Aaronson and Ambainis [ Theory Comput., 10 (2014), pp. 133–166] and Chailloux [ Proceedings of the 10 th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 2018, pp. 19:1–19:7] showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent superpolynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow superpolynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs—where graph symmetry is manifested differently—we exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu [ Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 6845, Springer, 2011, pp. 365–376] and Montanaro and de Wolf [ Theory Comput., 7 (2016)].
Quantum computers can sometimes exponentially outperform classical ones, but only for problems with sufficient structure. While it is well known that query problems with full permutation symmetry can have at most polynomial quantum speedup -- even for partial functions -- it is unclear how far this condition must be relaxed to enable exponential speedup. In particular, it is natural to ask whether exponential speedup is possible for (partial) graph properties, in which the input describes a graph and the output can only depend on its isomorphism class. We show that the answer to this question depends strongly on the input model. In the adjacency matrix model, we prove that the bounded-error randomized query complexity R of any graph property P has R(P)=O(Q(P)6), where Q is the bounded-error quantum query complexity. This negatively resolves an open question of Montanaro and de Wolf in the adjacency matrix model. More generally, we prove R(P)=O(Q(P)3l) for any l-uniform hypergraph property P in the adjacency matrix model. In direct contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs, we exhibit a promise problem that shows an exponential separation between the randomized and quantum query complexities.
In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that Θ(N) queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where N denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform O(N1/3) queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that Ω(N1/4) queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight Ω(N1/3) quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.
Smoothed analysis is a central framework in classical algorithms for explaining the performance of algorithms beyond the worst case, often explaining why algorithms perform well in practice. We initiate a systematic study of its quantum counterpart and show the following results. (1) We show that there is a total function whose smoothed quantum query complexity is exponentially smaller than its classical query complexity. (2) We give near-tight characterizations of smoothed randomized and quantum query complexities for symmetric Boolean functions, unifying the worst-case complexity results of [Beals et al, FOCS'98] and average-case complexity results of [Ambainis and de Wolf, STACS'00]. (3) We study string problems such as pattern matching and edit distance and, in various regimes, give polynomial to superpolynomial quantum speedups. Our main technical ingredients include a near-tight quantum algorithm for ε-approximating the number of collisions between two non-repetitive strings, improving the result of Le Gall and Ng [QIC'22]. Together, our results show that smoothing can reveal larger quantum speedups than worst-case analysis suggests, opening a path towards quantum advantage on more realistic inputs.
Suppose a Boolean function f is symmetric under a group action G acting on the n bits of the input. For which G does this mean f does not have an exponential quantum speedup? Is there a characterization of how rich G must be before the function f cannot have enough structure for quantum algorithms to exploit? In this work, we make several steps towards understanding the group actions G which are "quantum intolerant" in this way. We show that sufficiently transitive group actions do not allow a quantum speedup, and that a "well-shuffling" property of group actions -- which happens to be preserved by several natural transformations -- implies a lack of super-polynomial speedups for functions symmetric under the group action. Our techniques are motivated by a recent paper by Chailloux (2018), which deals with the case where G=Sn. Our main application is for graph symmetries: we show that any Boolean function f defined on the adjacency matrix of a graph (and symmetric under relabeling the vertices of the graph) has a power 6 relationship between its randomized and quantum query complexities, even if f is a partial function. In particular, this means no graph property testing problems can have super-polynomial quantum speedups, settling an open problem of Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2011).
We study when partial Boolean functions can (and cannot) exhibit superpolynomial quantum query speedups, and develop a general framework for ruling out such speedups via two complementary lenses: promise-aware complexity measures and function completions. First, we introduce promise versions of standard combinatorial measures (including block sensitivity and related variants) and prove that if the relevant promise and completion measures ``collapse'', then deterministic and quantum query complexities are necessarily polynomially related, i.e. D(f)=poly(Q(f)). We then analyze structured families of promises, including symmetric partial functions and promises supported on Hamming slices, obtaining sharp (up to polynomial factors) characterizations in terms of a single gap parameter for the symmetric case and refined slice-dependent bounds for k-slice domains. Next, we formalize completion complexity as the minimum of a measure over total completions of a partial function, and show that completability of a measure captures the possibility of superpolynomial quantum speedups. Finally, we apply this viewpoint to derive broad non-speedup criteria for some classes of functions admitting well-behaved completions, such as functions defined on a single slice or a union of slices, functions with low maximum influence on both the standard and p-biased hypercubes and functions with efficiently identifiable domains, and then show some hardness results for general completion techniques.