Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2006.08730 · Journal of Physics Communications

Fundamental bound for time measurements and minimum uncertainty clocks

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

Published Jun 1, 2020• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract We present a simple argument leading to a fundamental minimum uncertainty in the determination of times. It only relies in the uncertainty principle and time dilation in a gravitational field. It implies any attempt to measure times will have a fundamental level of uncertainty. Implications are briefly outlined.
DOI
10.1088/2399-6528/ab9a07

Related papers

Fundamental bound for time measurements and minimum uncertainty clocks

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge A. Pullin

We present a simple argument leading to a fundamental minimum uncertainty in the determination of times. It only relies in the uncertainty principle and time dilation in a gravitational field. It implies any attempt to measure times will have a fundamental level of uncertainty. Implications are briefly outlined.

Civil War Book Review•Jan 1, 2020•2 citations

The role of general relativity in the uncertainty principle

Τ. Padmanabhan

The role played by general relativity in quantum mechanics (especially as regards the uncertainty principle) is investigated. It is confirmed that the validity of time-energy uncertainty does depend on gravitational time dilation. The author also shows that there exists an intrinsic lower bound to the accuracy with which acceleration due to gravity can be measured. The motion of the equivalence principle in quantum mechanics is clarified.

Classical and Quantum Gravity•Sep 1, 1986•18 citations

UNIVERSALITY IN THE GRAVITATIONAL STRETCHING OF CLOCKS, WAVES AND QUANTUM STATES

C. S. Unnikrishnan, G. T. Gillies

There are discernible and fundamental differences between clocks, waves and physical states in classical physics. These fundamental concepts find a common expression in the context of quantum physics in gravitational fields; matter and light waves, quantum states and oscillator clocks become quantum synonymous through the Planck–Einstein–de Broglie relations and the equivalence principle. With this insight, gravitational effects on quantum systems can be simply and accurately analyzed. Apart from providing a transparent framework for conceptual and quantitative thinking on matter waves and quantum states in a gravitational field, we address and resolve with clarity the recent controversial discussions on the important issue of the relation and the crucial difference between gravimetery using atom interferometers and the measurement of gravitational time dilation.

arXiv:1106.4151•International Journal of Modern Physics D•Dec 31, 2011•6 citations

Measuring time with physical clocks

Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Flaminia Giacomini, Časlav Brukner

In general relativity, the picture of spacetime assigns an ideal clock to each spacetime point. Being ideal, gravitational effects due to these clocks are ignored and the flow of time according to one clock is not affected by the presence of surrounding clocks. However, if time is defined operationally, as a pointer position of a physical clock that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics and general relativity, such a picture is at most a convenient fiction. We show that the mass-energy equivalence implies gravitational interaction between the clocks, while the superposition of energy eigenstates leads to a non-fixed metric background. Based only on the assumption that both quantum mechanics and general relativity are valid in this situation, we show that the clocks necessarily get entangled through time dilation effect, which eventually leads to a loss of coherence of a single clock. Hence, the time as measured by a single clock is not well-defined. However, the general relativistic notion of time is recovered in the classical limit of clocks.

•Jul 7, 2015•1 citation

Measuring Clock Precision Without an Ideal Time Reference

Pablo Á. Domínguez, Christopher Chubb, Mischa P. Woods

Characterising physical devices typically requires comparison with more precise reference standards. For clocks, however, this approach is problematic because no physically perfect time reference exists; real clocks have finite, model-dependent uncertainty. We address whether multiple imperfect clocks can collectively determine their precision without an absolute reference. This paper provides analytic bounds and protocols for quantifying clock precision using only multiple copies of the same clock, which need not be synchronised and may have manufacturing variations or environmental coupling. Beyond clock characterisation, these methods enable precise measurements f sub-period intervals and relativistic effects such as time dilation and Doppler shifts, providing tools for quantum metrology and fundamental physics.

quant-pharXiv:2609.31837•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Minimum Uncertainty for Transit-Time

Jonathan Oppenheim, Benni Reznik, William George Unruh

Using various model clocks it has been shown that the time-of-arrival cannot be measured more accurately than 1/E where E is the kinetic energy of a free particle. However, this result has never been proved. In this paper, we show that a violation of the above limitation for the transit-time, implies a violation of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.

arXiv:quant-ph/9801034•Jan 16, 1998•2 citations
There are discernible and fundamental differences between clocks, waves and physical states in classical physics. These fundamental concepts find a common expression in the context of quantum physics in gravitational fields; matter and light waves, quantum states and oscillator clocks become quantum synonymous through the Planck–Einstein–de Broglie relations and the equivalence principle. With this insight, gravitational effects on quantum systems can be simply and accurately analyzed. Apart from providing a transparent framework for conceptual and quantitative thinking on matter waves and quantum states in a gravitational field, we address and resolve with clarity the recent controversial discussions on the important issue of the relation and the crucial difference between gravimetery using atom interferometers and the measurement of gravitational time dilation.
In general relativity, the picture of spacetime assigns an ideal clock to each spacetime point. Being ideal, gravitational effects due to these clocks are ignored and the flow of time according to one clock is not affected by the presence of surrounding clocks. However, if time is defined operationally, as a pointer position of a physical clock that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics and general relativity, such a picture is at most a convenient fiction. We show that the mass-energy equivalence implies gravitational interaction between the clocks, while the superposition of energy eigenstates leads to a non-fixed metric background. Based only on the assumption that both quantum mechanics and general relativity are valid in this situation, we show that the clocks necessarily get entangled through time dilation effect, which eventually leads to a loss of coherence of a single clock. Hence, the time as measured by a single clock is not well-defined. However, the general relativistic notion of time is recovered in the classical limit of clocks.
Characterising physical devices typically requires comparison with more precise reference standards. For clocks, however, this approach is problematic because no physically perfect time reference exists; real clocks have finite, model-dependent uncertainty. We address whether multiple imperfect clocks can collectively determine their precision without an absolute reference. This paper provides analytic bounds and protocols for quantifying clock precision using only multiple copies of the same clock, which need not be synchronised and may have manufacturing variations or environmental coupling. Beyond clock characterisation, these methods enable precise measurements f sub-period intervals and relativistic effects such as time dilation and Doppler shifts, providing tools for quantum metrology and fundamental physics.