It has been stated in the physics literature that the probability amplitude for a quantum system after a continuous position measurement can be expressed by the restricted or the weighted Feynman path integral containing information about the result and the resolution of its measurement. In the present paper it is proved that the restricted Feynman path integrals can be defined in a rigorous sense. More specifically, we consider a quantum system consisting of some particles and simultaneously perform a continuous measurement of the positions of all particles in the time interval $[0,T]$. Then, it is shown rigorously that the restricted Feynman path integral after the measurement can be defined in the $L^2$ space and satisfies the corresponding non-self-adjoint Schroeodinger equation. In addition, our results are generalized to a quantum spin system where a continuous position measurement for all spin components of all particles is simultaneously performed, though the results obtained are inadequate for general use.
It has been stated in the physics literature that the probability amplitude for a quantum system after a continuous position measurement can be expressed by the restricted or the weighted Feynman path integral containing information about the result and the resolution of its measurement. In the present paper it is proved that the restricted Feynman path integrals can be defined in a rigorous sense. More specifically, we consider a quantum system consisting of some particles and simultaneously perform a continuous measurement of the positions of all particles in the time interval [0,T]. Then, it is shown rigorously that the restricted Feynman path integral after the measurement can be defined in the L2 space and satisfies the corresponding non-self-adjoint Schroeodinger equation. In addition, our results are generalized to a quantum spin system where a continuous position measurement for all spin components of all particles is simultaneously performed, though the results obtained are inadequate for general use.
Feynman proposed a postulate or a method of quantization in his celebrated paper in 1948. Applying Feynman’s postulate to temporally continuous quantum measurements of the positions of particles, Mensky proposed the restricted Feynman path integrals (RFPIs) for continuous quantum measurements after phenomenological considerations. Our aim in this paper is to give a rigorous proof that Mensky’s RFPIs emerge out of Feynman’s postulate under a simple approximation. In addition, it is proved that the RFPIs emerge out of von Neumann’s postulate on instantaneous measurements as well as Feynman’s postulate. The quantum systems that we study include spin systems. These results are applied to formulations of the multi-split experiments, the quantum Zeno and the Aharonov–Bohm effects.
The definitions of the Feynman path integral for the Pauli equation and more general equations in configuration space and in phase space are proposed, probably for the first time. Then it is proved rigorously that the Feynman path integrals are well-defined and are the solutions to the corresponding equations. These Feynman path integrals are defined by the time-slicing method through broken line paths, which is familiar in physics. Our definitions of these Feynman path integrals and our results give the extension of ones for the Schrödinger equation.
Feynman-Path Integral in Banach Space: In 1940, R.P. Feynman attempted to find a mathematical representation to express quantum dynamics of the general form for a double-slit experiment. His intuition on several slits with several walls in terms of Lagrangian instead of Hamiltonian resulted in a magnificent work. It was known as Feynman Path Integrals in quantum physics, and a large part of the scientific community still considers them a heuristic tool that lacks a sound mathematical definition. This paper aims to refute this prejudice, by providing an extensive and self-contained description of the mathematical theory of Feynman Path Integration, from the earlier attempts to the latest developments, as well as its applications to quantum mechanics. About a hundred years after the beginning of modern physics, it was realized that light could in fact show behavioral characteristics of both waves and particles. In 1927, Davisson and Germer demonstrated that electrons show the same dual behavior, which was later extended to atoms and molecules. We shall follow the method of integration with some modifications to construct a generalized Lebesgue-Bochner-Stieltjes (LBS) integral of the form , where u is a bilinear operator acting in the product of Banach spaces, f is a Bochner summable function, and μ is a vector-valued measure. We will demonstrate that the Feynman Path Integral is consistent and can be justified mathematically with LBS integration approach.
"Feynman path integrals are ubiquitous in quantum physics, even if a large part of the scientific community still considers them as a heuristic tool that lacks a sound mathematical definition. Our book aims to refute this prejudice, providing an extensive and self-contained description of the mathematical theory of Feynman path integration, from the earlier attempts to the latest developments, as well as its applications to quantum mechanics. This second edition presents a detailed discussion of the general theory of complex integration on infinite dimensional spaces, providing on one hand a unified view of the various existing approaches to the mathematical construction of Feynman path integrals and on the other hand a connection with the classical theory of stochastic processes. Moreover, new chapters containing recent applications to several dynamical systems have been added. This book bridges between the realms of stochastic analysis and the theory of Feynman path integration. It is accessible to both mathematicians and physicists"--
Path integration methods are of crucial importance to quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. There are multiple ways the path integral can be constructed, one method uses the link between the Fokker-Planck and the Langevin equations, as is covered in this thesis. This is related to the standard derivation of the path integral in physics, in which the time is discretised. We study the mathematical problems related to the Feynman path integral, in particular the impossibility of a Lebesgue-type measure on the space of paths. It is discussed how oscillatory integrals can be used to have a well-defined `integral' on an infinite dimensional space. This formalism is subsequently applied to both the harmonic and the anharmonic oscillator. We prove an infinite dimensional oscillatory integral exists and obtain a convergent expression for both these cases, under conditions. Examples of these conditions are the initial wavefunctions being Schwartz functions as well as conditions on the endtime, angular frequency and coupling constant. Finally, a possible approach to establish an oscillatory integral for the hydrogen atom is discussed. It is proven that the result is no longer independent of the sequence of projection operators, which is a key step towards a rigorous path integral for this system.
In 1948, Richard Feynman published the first paper on his new approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Before Feynman's work there were two mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger's formulation was based on PDE (the Schrödinger equation) and states representation by wave functions, so it was in the framework of analysis and differential equations. The other formulation was Heisenberg's matrix algebra. Initially, they were thought to be competing. The proponents of one claimed that the other was “ wrong. ” Within a couple of years, John von Neumann had proved that they are equivalent.\nAlthough Feynman's theory was not fundamentally new, it nonetheless offered an entirely fresh and different perspective: via a precise formulation of Bohr's correspondence principle, it made quantum mechanics similar to classical mechanics in a precise sense. In addition, Feynman's approach made it possible to explain physical experiments, and, via diagrams, link them directly to computations. What resulted was a very powerful device for computing energies and scattering amplitudes - the famous Feynman's diagrams.\nIn his formulation, Feynman aimed at representing the solution to the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the form of an “ average ” over histories or paths of a particle. This solution is commonly known as the Feynman path integral. It plays an important role in the theory but appears as a postulate based on intuition coming from physics rather than a justified mathematical object. This is why Feynman's vision has caught the attention of many mathematicians as well as physicists.\nThe papers of Gelfand, Cameron, and Nelson are among the first, and more substantial, attempts to supply Feynman's theory with a rigorous mathematical foundation. These attempts were followed by many others, but unfortunately all of them were not quite satisfactory. The difficulty comes from a need to define a measure on an infinite-dimensional space of continuous functions that represent all possible paths of a particle. This Feynman's measure has to produce an integral with the properties requested by Feynman. In particular, the expression for the Feynman measure has to involve the non-absolutely integrable Fresnel integrands. The non-absolute integrability of the Fresnel integrands makes the measure fail to be positive and to have the countably additive property. Thus, a well-defined measure in the case of the Feynman path integral does not exist.\nExtensive research has been done on the methods of relating the Feynman path integral to the integral with respect to the Wiener measure. The method of analytic continuation in mass defines the Feynman path integral as a certain limit of the Wiener integrals. Unfortunately, this method can be used as definition for only almost all values of the mass parameter in the Schrödinger equation. For physicists, this is not a satisfactory result and needs to be improved.\nIn this work we examine those questions which originally led to the Feynman path integral. By now we know that Feynman's “ dream ” cannot be realized as a positive and countably additive measure on the path-space. Here, we offer a new way out by modifying Feynman's question, and thereby achieving a solution to the Schrödinger equation via a different kind of averages in the path-space.\nWe give our version of the question that Feynman “ should have asked ” in order to realize the elusive path integral. In our formulation, we get a Feynman path integral as a limit of linear functionals, as opposed to the more familiar inductive limits of positive measures, traditionally used for constructing the Wiener measure, and related Gaussian families. We adapt here an approach pioneered by Patrick Muldowney. In it, Muldowney suggested a Henstock integration technique in order to deal with the non-absolute integrability of the kind of Fresnel integrals which we need in our solution to Feynman's question. By applying Henstock's theory to Fresnel integrals, we construct a complex-valued “ probability distribution functions ” on the path-space. Then we use this “ probability ” distribution function to define the Feynman path integral as an inductive limit. This establishes a mathematically rigorous Feynman limit, and at the same time, preserves Feynman's intuitive idea in resulting functional. In addition, our definition, and our solution, do not place any restrictions on any of the parameters in the Schrödinger equation, and have a potential to offer useful computational experiments, and other theoretical insights.