Condensed matter physics (CMP) seeks to understand the microscopic interactions of matter at the quantum and atomistic levels, and describes how these interactions result in both mesoscopic and macroscopic properties. CMP overlaps with many other important branches of science, such as chemistry, materials science, statistical physics, and high-performance computing. With the advancements in modern machine learning (ML) technology, a keen interest in applying these algorithms to further CMP research has created a compelling new area of research at the intersection of both fields. In this review, we aim to explore the main areas within CMP, which have successfully applied ML techniques to further research, such as the description and use of ML schemes for potential energy surfaces, the characterization of topological phases of matter in lattice systems, the prediction of phase transitions in off-lattice and atomistic simulations, the interpretation of ML theories with physics-inspired frameworks and the enhancement of simulation methods with ML algorithms. We also discuss in detail the main challenges and drawbacks of using ML methods on CMP problems, as well as some perspectives for future developments.
Condensed matter physics (CMP) seeks to understand the microscopic interactions of matter at the quantum and atomistic levels, and describes how these interactions result in both mesoscopic and macroscopic properties. CMP overlaps with many other important branches of science, such as chemistry, materials science, statistical physics, and high-performance computing. With the advancements in modern machine learning (ML) technology, a keen interest in applying these algorithms to further CMP research has created a compelling new area of research at the intersection of both fields. In this review, we aim to explore the main areas within CMP, which have successfully applied ML techniques to further research, such as the description and use of ML schemes for potential energy surfaces, the characterization of topological phases of matter in lattice systems, the prediction of phase transitions in off-lattice and atomistic simulations, the interpretation of ML theories with physics-inspired frameworks and the enhancement of simulation methods with ML algorithms. We also discuss in detail the main challenges and drawbacks of using ML methods on CMP problems, as well as some perspectives for future developments.
Quantum matter, the research field studying phases of matter whose properties are intrinsically quantum mechanical, draws from areas as diverse as hard condensed matter physics, materials science, statistical mechanics, quantum information, quantum gravity, and large-scale numerical simulations. Recently, researchers interested in quantum matter and strongly correlated quantum systems have turned their attention to the algorithms underlying modern machine learning with an eye on making progress in their fields. Here we provide a short review on the recent development and adaptation of machine learning ideas for the purpose advancing research in quantum matter, including ideas ranging from algorithms that recognize conventional and topological states of matter in synthetic experimental data, to representations of quantum states in terms of neural networks and their applications to the simulation and control of quantum systems. We discuss the outlook for future developments in areas at the intersection between machine learning and quantum many-body physics.
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a formidable force for identifying hidden but pertinent patterns within a given data set with the objective of subsequent generation of automated predictive behavior. In recent years, it is safe to conclude that ML and its close cousin, deep learning (DL), have ushered in unprecedented developments in all areas of physical sciences, especially chemistry. Not only classical variants of ML, even those trainable on near-term quantum hardwares have been developed with promising outcomes. Such algorithms have revolutionized materials design and performance of photovoltaics, electronic structure calculations of ground and excited states of correlated matter, computation of force-fields and potential energy surfaces informing chemical reaction dynamics, reactivity inspired rational strategies of drug designing and even classification of phases of matter with accurate identification of emergent criticality. In this review we shall explicate a subset of such topics and delineate the contributions made by both classical and quantum computing enhanced machine learning algorithms over the past few years. We shall not only present a brief overview of the well-known techniques but also highlight their learning strategies using statistical physical insight. The objective of the review is not only to foster exposition of the aforesaid techniques but also to empower and promote cross-pollination among future research in all areas of chemistry which can benefit from ML and in turn can potentially accelerate the growth of such algorithms.
The identification and characterization of phase transitions is one of the oldest and most central problems in condensed matter physics, traditionally approached through order parameters, free-energy expansions, renormalization-group analysis, and direct numerical simulation. Over the past decade, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a complementary and, in some regimes, transformative methodology for this task. Supervised classifiers can learn to distinguish phases directly from raw configurations without an a priori order parameter; unsupervised and self-supervised techniques such as principal component analysis, autoencoders, and learning-by-confusion can locate transition points with minimal or no labeled data; and generative and variational architectures, including neural-network quantum states, now approximate ground-state wavefunctions of strongly correlated systems well beyond the reach of exact diagonalization. This paper reviews the theoretical foundations of phase transitions relevant to machine-learning applications, surveys the principal families of algorithms used to detect and classify phases, and examines their application across classical spin systems, percolation, topological and quantum phases, strongly correlated electron systems, and experimentally measured spectroscopic data. Representative case studies are discussed, including convolutional and graph-neural-network classifiers of lattice configurations, explainable-ML detection of thermodynamic transitions in photoemission spectra, and deep-learning-guided discovery of high-temperature superconductors. The review closes with a critical discussion of persistent challenges interpretability, data scarcity in correlated-electron experiments, generalization across Hamiltonians, and the reliability of learned order parameters near criticality and outlines directions for future research, including physics-informed architectures, uncertainty quantification, and closed-loop integration with autonomous experimentation.
Machine learning (ML) has emerged into formidable force for identifying hidden but pertinent patterns within a given data set with the objective of subsequent generation of automated predictive behavior. In the recent years, it is safe to conclude that ML and its close cousin deep learning (DL) have ushered unprecedented developments in all areas of physical sciences especially chemistry. Not only the classical variants of ML , even those trainable on near-term quantum hardwares have been developed with promising outcomes. Such algorithms have revolutionzed material design and performance of photo-voltaics, electronic structure calculations of ground and excited states of correlated matter, computation of force-fields and potential energy surfaces informing chemical reaction dynamics, reactivity inspired rational strategies of drug designing and even classification of phases of matter with accurate identification of emergent criticality. In this review we shall explicate a subset of such topics and delineate the contributions made by both classical and quantum computing enhanced machine learning algorithms over the past few years. We shall not only present a brief overview of the well-known techniques but also highlight their learning strategies using statistical physical insight. The objective of the review is to not only to foster exposition to the aforesaid techniques but also to empower and promote cross-pollination among future-research in all areas of chemistry which can benefit from ML and in turn can potentially accelerate the growth of such algorithms.
Classifying different phases and the transitions between them is a major task in condensed matter physics. Machine learning, which has achieved dramatic success recently in a broad range of artificial intelligence applications, may bring an unprecedented perspective for this challenging task. In this paper, we study the robustness of this intriguing machine-learning approach to adversarial perturbations, with a focus on supervised learning scenarios. We find that typical phase classifiers based on deep neural networks are extremely vulnerable to adversarial examples: adding a tiny amount of carefully-crafted noises, which are imperceptible to human eyes and ineffective to traditional methods, into the original legitimate data obtained from numerical simulations or real experiments will cause the classifiers to make incorrect predictions at a notably high confidence level. Our results reveal a novel vulnerability aspect in applying machine learning techniques to condensed matter physics, which provides a valuable guidance for both theoretical and experimental future studies along this direction.
The detection of phase transitions is a fundamental challenge in condensed matter physics, traditionally addressed through analytical methods and direct numerical simulations. In recent years, machine learning techniques have emerged as powerful tools to complement these standard approaches, offering valuable insights into phase and structure determination. Additionally, they have been shown to enhance the application of traditional methods. In this work, we review recent advancements in this area, with a focus on our contributions to phase and structure determination using supervised and unsupervised learning methods in several systems: (a) 2D site percolation, (b) the 3D Anderson model of localization, (c) the 2D J1-J2 Ising model, and (d) the prediction of large-angle convergent beam electron diffraction patterns.