Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2005.06787

Classical Simulation of Quantum Supremacy Circuits

Cupjin Huang, Fang Zhang, Michael Newman, Junjie Cai, Xun Gao, Zhengxiong Tian, Junyin Wu, Haihong Xu, Huanjun Yu, Bo Yuan, Márió Szegedy, Yaoyun Shi, Jianxin Chen

Published May 14, 2020• 76 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is believed that random quantum circuits are difficult to simulate classically. These have been used to demonstrate quantum supremacy: the execution of a computational task on a quantum computer that is infeasible for any classical computer. The task underlying the assertion of quantum supremacy by Arute et al. (Nature, 574, 505--510 (2019)) was initially estimated to require Summit, the world's most powerful supercomputer today, approximately 10,000 years. The same task was performed on the Sycamore quantum processor in only 200 seconds. In this work, we present a tensor network-based classical simulation algorithm. Using a Summit-comparable cluster, we estimate that our simulator can perform this task in less than 20 days. On moderately-sized instances, we reduce the runtime from years to minutes, running several times faster than Sycamore itself. These estimates are based on explicit simulations of parallel subtasks, and leave no room for hidden costs. The simulator's key ingredient is identifying and optimizing the "stem" of the computation: a sequence of pairwise tensor contractions that dominates the computational cost. This orders-of-magnitude reduction in classical simulation time, together with proposals for further significant improvements, indicates that achieving quantum supremacy may require a period of continuing quantum hardware developments without an unequivocal first demonstration.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2005.06787

Related papers

Redefining the Quantum Supremacy Baseline With a New Generation Sunway Supercomputer

Xin Liu, Chu Guo, Yong Liu +11 more

A major milestone in the era of noisy intermediate scale quantum computers is \textit{quantum supremacy} [Nature \textbf{574}, 505 (2019)] claimed on the Sycamore quantum processor of $53$ qubits, which can perform a random circuit sampling task within $200$ seconds while the same task is estimated to require a runtime of $10,000$ years on Summit. This record has been renewed with two recent experiments on the Zuchongzhi $2.0$ ($56$ qubits) and Zuchongzhi $2.1$ ($60$ qubits) quantum processors. On the other front of quantum supremacy comparison, there has also been continuous improvements on both the classical simulation algorithm as well as the underlying hardware. And a fair justification of the computational advantages for those quantum supremacy experiments would require to practically simulate the same problems on current top supercomputers, which is still in lack. Here we report the full-scale simulations of these problems on new generation Sunway supercomputer, based on a customized tensor network contraction algorithm. Our benchmark shows that the most challenging sampling task performed on Sycamore can be accomplished within $1$ week, thus collapsing the quantum supremacy claim of Sycamore. Additionally, we show that the XEB fidelities of the \textit{quantum supremacy circuits} with up to $14$ cycles can be verified in minutes, which also provides strong consistency check for quantum supremacy experiments. Our results redefine quantum supremacy baseline using the new generation Sunway supercomputer.

arXiv:2111.01066•Nov 1, 2021•4 citations

Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor

Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush +74 more

The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.

arXiv:1910.11333•Nature•Oct 23, 2019•7,718 citations

Multi-Tensor Contraction for XEB Verification of Quantum Circuits

Gleb Vyacheslavovich Kalachev, Pavel Panteleev, Man‐Hong Yung

The computational advantage of noisy quantum computers has been demonstrated by sampling the bitstrings of quantum random circuits. An important issue is how the performance of quantum devices could be quantified in the so-called "supremacy regime". The standard approach is through the linear cross entropy benchmark (XEB), where the theoretical value of the probability is required for each bitstring. However, the computational cost of XEB grows exponentially. So far, random circuits of the 53-qubit Sycamore chip were verified up to 10 cycles of gates only; the XEB fidelities of deeper circuits were approximated with simplified circuits instead. Here we present a multi-tensor contraction algorithm for speeding up the calculations of XEB for quantum circuits, where the computational cost can be significantly reduced through some form of memoization. As a demonstration, we analyzed the experimental data of the 53-qubit Sycamore chip and obtained the exact values of the corresponding XEB fidelities up to 16 cycles using only moderate computing resources (few GPUs). If the algorithm was implemented on the Summit supercomputer, we estimate that for the supremacy (20 cycles) circuits, it would only cost 7.5 days, which is several orders of magnitude lower than previously estimated in the literature.

arXiv:2108.05665•Aug 12, 2021•9 citations

Quantum supremacy in a superconducting quantum processor

John M. Martinis

The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. We have used a programmable superconducting processor to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a "parallel computation" of 10 million trillion states. For a simple algorithm, our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to run a quantum circuit a million times - the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm.

Photonics for Quantum (PfQ)•Jul 13, 2021•4 citations

Revisiting Quantum Supremacy: Simulating Sycamore-Class Circuits Using Hybrid CPU/GPU HPC Workloads

Bob Wold, Venkateswaran Kasirajan

We present a framework for effectively simulating the execution of quantum circuits originally designed to demonstrate quantum supremacy using accessible high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. Building on prior CPU-only approaches, our pipeline combines a single NVIDIA A100 GPU for quantum state construction, followed by N parallel CPU jobs that perform distributed measurement sampling. We validate the fidelity by simulating the 53-qubit, 14-cycle Sycamore circuit and achieving a linear cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) score of 0.549, exceeding the published XEB score of 0.002 from Google's reference data. We then evaluate execution time performance with the more complex 53-qubit, 20-cycle circuit, completing the full 2.5 million-shot workload over 100 CPU jobs in 01:15:36, representing a 6.95 x 10^7 speedup compared to Google's original classical estimate. Further, we show that if 1,000 CPU jobs were employed, the estimated duration would be approximately 00:17:35, only 12 minutes slower than the time taken by the original QPU-based experiment. These results illustrate that 'quantum supremacy' is not fixed and continues to be a moving target. In addition, hybrid classical-quantum strategies may provide broader near-term quantum utility than once thought.

quant-pharXiv:2512.07311•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations

Solving the Sampling Problem of the Sycamore Quantum Circuits

Feng Ping Pan, Keyang Chen, Pan Zhang

We study the problem of generating independent samples from the output distribution of Google's Sycamore quantum circuits with a target fidelity, which is believed to be beyond the reach of classical supercomputers and has been used to demonstrate quantum supremacy. We propose a method to classically solve this problem by contracting the corresponding tensor network just once, and is massively more efficient than existing methods in generating a large number of uncorrelated samples with a target fidelity. For the Sycamore quantum supremacy circuit with 53 qubits and 20 cycles, we have generated 1×10^{6} uncorrelated bitstrings s which are sampled from a distribution P[over ^](s)=|ψ[over ^](s)|^{2}, where the approximate state ψ[over ^] has fidelity F≈0.0037. The whole computation has cost about 15 h on a computational cluster with 512 GPUs. The obtained 1×10^{6} samples, the contraction code and contraction order are made public. If our algorithm could be implemented with high efficiency on a modern supercomputer with ExaFLOPS performance, we estimate that ideally, the simulation would cost a few dozens of seconds, which is faster than Google's quantum hardware.

arXiv:2111.03011•Physical Review Letters•Aug 22, 2022•142 citations
It is believed that random quantum circuits are difficult to simulate classically. These have been used to demonstrate quantum supremacy: the execution of a computational task on a quantum computer that is infeasible for any classical computer. The task underlying the assertion of quantum supremacy by Arute et al. (Nature, 574, 505--510 (2019)) was initially estimated to require Summit, the world's most powerful supercomputer today, approximately 10,000 years. The same task was performed on the Sycamore quantum processor in only 200 seconds. In this work, we present a tensor network-based classical simulation algorithm. Using a Summit-comparable cluster, we estimate that our simulator can perform this task in less than 20 days. On moderately-sized instances, we reduce the runtime from years to minutes, running several times faster than Sycamore itself. These estimates are based on explicit simulations of parallel subtasks, and leave no room for hidden costs. The simulator's key ingredient is identifying and optimizing the "stem" of the computation: a sequence of pairwise tensor contractions that dominates the computational cost. This orders-of-magnitude reduction in classical simulation time, together with proposals for further significant improvements, indicates that achieving quantum supremacy may require a period of continuing quantum hardware developments without an unequivocal first demonstration.
A major milestone in the era of noisy intermediate scale quantum computers is \textit{quantum supremacy} [Nature \textbf{574}, 505 (2019)] claimed on the Sycamore quantum processor of 535353 qubits, which can perform a random circuit sampling task within 200200200 seconds while the same task is estimated to require a runtime of 10,00010,00010,000 years on Summit. This record has been renewed with two recent experiments on the Zuchongzhi 2.02.02.0 (565656 qubits) and Zuchongzhi 2.12.12.1 (606060 qubits) quantum processors. On the other front of quantum supremacy comparison, there has also been continuous improvements on both the classical simulation algorithm as well as the underlying hardware. And a fair justification of the computational advantages for those quantum supremacy experiments would require to practically simulate the same problems on current top supercomputers, which is still in lack. Here we report the full-scale simulations of these problems on new generation Sunway supercomputer, based on a customized tensor network contraction algorithm. Our benchmark shows that the most challenging sampling task performed on Sycamore can be accomplished within 111 week, thus collapsing the quantum supremacy claim of Sycamore. Additionally, we show that the XEB fidelities of the \textit{quantum supremacy circuits} with up to 141414 cycles can be verified in minutes, which also provides strong consistency check for quantum supremacy experiments. Our results redefine quantum supremacy baseline using the new generation Sunway supercomputer.
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2–7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8–14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.
The computational advantage of noisy quantum computers has been demonstrated by sampling the bitstrings of quantum random circuits. An important issue is how the performance of quantum devices could be quantified in the so-called "supremacy regime". The standard approach is through the linear cross entropy benchmark (XEB), where the theoretical value of the probability is required for each bitstring. However, the computational cost of XEB grows exponentially. So far, random circuits of the 53-qubit Sycamore chip were verified up to 10 cycles of gates only; the XEB fidelities of deeper circuits were approximated with simplified circuits instead. Here we present a multi-tensor contraction algorithm for speeding up the calculations of XEB for quantum circuits, where the computational cost can be significantly reduced through some form of memoization. As a demonstration, we analyzed the experimental data of the 53-qubit Sycamore chip and obtained the exact values of the corresponding XEB fidelities up to 16 cycles using only moderate computing resources (few GPUs). If the algorithm was implemented on the Summit supercomputer, we estimate that for the supremacy (20 cycles) circuits, it would only cost 7.5 days, which is several orders of magnitude lower than previously estimated in the literature.
The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. We have used a programmable superconducting processor to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a "parallel computation" of 10 million trillion states. For a simple algorithm, our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to run a quantum circuit a million times - the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm.
We present a framework for effectively simulating the execution of quantum circuits originally designed to demonstrate quantum supremacy using accessible high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure. Building on prior CPU-only approaches, our pipeline combines a single NVIDIA A100 GPU for quantum state construction, followed by N parallel CPU jobs that perform distributed measurement sampling. We validate the fidelity by simulating the 53-qubit, 14-cycle Sycamore circuit and achieving a linear cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) score of 0.549, exceeding the published XEB score of 0.002 from Google's reference data. We then evaluate execution time performance with the more complex 53-qubit, 20-cycle circuit, completing the full 2.5 million-shot workload over 100 CPU jobs in 01:15:36, representing a 6.95 x 10^7 speedup compared to Google's original classical estimate. Further, we show that if 1,000 CPU jobs were employed, the estimated duration would be approximately 00:17:35, only 12 minutes slower than the time taken by the original QPU-based experiment. These results illustrate that 'quantum supremacy' is not fixed and continues to be a moving target. In addition, hybrid classical-quantum strategies may provide broader near-term quantum utility than once thought.
We study the problem of generating independent samples from the output distribution of Google's Sycamore quantum circuits with a target fidelity, which is believed to be beyond the reach of classical supercomputers and has been used to demonstrate quantum supremacy. We propose a method to classically solve this problem by contracting the corresponding tensor network just once, and is massively more efficient than existing methods in generating a large number of uncorrelated samples with a target fidelity. For the Sycamore quantum supremacy circuit with 53 qubits and 20 cycles, we have generated 1×10^{6} uncorrelated bitstrings s which are sampled from a distribution P[over ^](s)=|ψ[over ^](s)|^{2}, where the approximate state ψ[over ^] has fidelity F≈0.0037. The whole computation has cost about 15 h on a computational cluster with 512 GPUs. The obtained 1×10^{6} samples, the contraction code and contraction order are made public. If our algorithm could be implemented with high efficiency on a modern supercomputer with ExaFLOPS performance, we estimate that ideally, the simulation would cost a few dozens of seconds, which is faster than Google's quantum hardware.