Optimization is one of the key applications of quantum computing where a quantum speedup has been an eagerly anticipated outcome. A promising approach to optimization using quantum dynamics is to consider a linear combination $s(t)B+[1\ensuremath{-}s(t)]C$ of two noncommuting Hamiltonians
B and
C, where
C encodes the solution to the optimization problem in its ground state,
B is a Hamiltonian whose ground state is easy to prepare, and $s(t)\ensuremath{\in}[0,1]$ is the bounded ``switching schedule'' or ``path,'' with $t\ensuremath{\in}[0,{t}_{f}]$. This approach encompasses two of the most widely studied quantum-optimization algorithms: quantum annealing [QA; continuous
s(t)] and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm [QAOA; piecewise constant
s(t)]. While it is notoriously difficult to prove a quantum advantage for either algorithm, it is possible to compare and contrast them by finding the optimal
s(t). Here we provide a rigorous analysis of this quantum optimal control problem, entirely within the geometric framework of Pontryagin's maximum principle of optimal control theory. We extend earlier results, derived in a purely closed-system setting, to open systems. This is the natural setting for experimental realizations of QA and QAOA. In the closed-system setting it was shown that the optimal solution is a ``bang-anneal-bang'' schedule, with the bangs characterized by
s(t)=0 and
s(t)=1 in finite subintervals of
[0,tf], in particular,
s(0)=0 and
s(tf)=1, in contrast to the standard prescription
s(0)=1 and
s(tf)=0 of QA. As an example, we prove that for a single spin-
1/2, the optimal solution in the closed-system setting is the bang-bang schedule, switching midway from $s\ensuremath{\equiv}0$ to $s\ensuremath{\equiv}1$. For finite-dimensional environments and without any approximations we identify sufficient conditions ensuring that either the bang-anneal, anneal-bang, or bang-anneal-bang schedules are optimal, and recover the optimality of
s(0)=0 and
s(tf)=1. However, for infinite-dimensional environments and a system described by an adiabatic Redfield master equation we do not recover the bang-type optimal solution. In fact we can only identify conditions under which
s(tf)=1, and even this result is not recovered in the fully Markovian limit, suggesting that the pure anneal-type schedule is optimal. Our open-system results have implications for the use of experimental quantum-information processors, which are by necessity noisy, and suggest that in this practical sense the optimal schedules for quantum optimization are likely to be continuous.
Analog quantum algorithms are formulated in terms of Hamiltonians rather than unitary gates and include quantum adiabatic computing, quantum annealing, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA).These algorithms are promising candidates for near-term quantum applications, but they often require fine tuning via the annealing schedule or variational parameters.In this work we connect all these algorithms to the optimal analog procedure.Notably, we explore how the optimal procedure approaches a smooth adiabatic procedure but with a superposed oscillatory pattern that can be explained in terms of the interactions between the ground state and first excited state.Furthermore, we provide numeric and analytic evidence that QAOA emulates this optimal procedure with the length of each QAOA layer equal to the period of the oscillatory pattern.Furthermore, the ratios of the QAOA bangs is determined by the smooth, non-oscillatory part of the optimal procedure.We provide arguments for these phenomena in terms of the product formula expansion of the optimal procedure.All of this shows that these analog algorithms are all different limits and approximations of the same optimal quantum protocol.In the appendix, we present a new algorithm for better approximating the optimal protocol using the insights from the main body.
Physically motivated classical heuristic optimization algorithms such as simulated annealing (SA) treat the objective function as an energy landscape, and allow walkers to escape local minima. It has been argued that quantum properties such as tunneling may give quantum algorithms advantage in finding ground states of vast, rugged cost landscapes. Indeed, the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm (QAO) and the recent Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have shown promising results on various problem instances that are considered classically hard. Here, building on previous observations from \cite{mcclean2016, Yang2017}, we argue that the type of control strategy used by the optimization algorithm may be crucial to its success. Along with SA, QAO, and QAOA, we define a new, bang-bang version of simulated annealing, BBSA, and study the performance of these algorithms on two well-studied problem instances from the literature. Both classically and quantumly, the successful control strategy is found to be bang-bang, exponentially outperforming the quasistatic analogues on the same instances. Lastly, we construct O(1)-depth QAOA protocols for a class of symmetric cost functions, and provide an accompanying physical picture.
The recent advances in the world of quantum technologies have prompted the development of various quantum-based algorithms, some of which are suitable to run on available quantum devices. Two leading candidates in this area are Quantum Annealing (QA) and hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). In the first part of the Thesis, we re-examine the issue of whether Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA) with Path Integral Monte Carlo has anything to do with the coherent QA Schrödinger dynamics. We do that by studying the random quantum Ising Chain in a transverse field. In the second part of the Thesis we address the issue of schedule optimization in both {em digitized}-QA and QAOA. Traditional schedule optimization in QA requires spectral information on the problem (e.g., location of the minimum gaps), which is in most cases inaccessible. On the other hand, in QAOA, the issue of schedule optimization --- alias, the optimization of the variational parameters --- is often an expensive task that constitutes a bottleneck for the algorithm. We show that, by combining the framework of QAOA and digitized-QA, optimal digitized-QA protocols can be constructed efficiently. When using this approach, the computational cost of schedule optimization is also significantly reduced, leading to a computational advantage both over a linear-schedule QA, and over an unstructured QAOA search. While studying these issues, we also developed rigorous variational bounds that provide insight on the best possible performance that one can hope to obtain from a digital QAOA circuit.
Abstract Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum–classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity -like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized QA schedule that is implementable on analog devices.
Quantum optimization allows for up to exponential quantum speedups for specific, possibly industrially relevant problems. As the key algorithm in this field, we motivate and discuss the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which can be understood as a slightly generalized version of Quantum Annealing for gate-based quantum computers. We delve into the quantum circuit implementation of the QAOA, including Hamiltonian simulation techniques for higher-order Ising models, and discuss parameter training using the parameter shift rule. An example implementation with Pennylane source code demonstrates practical application for the Maximum Cut problem. Further, we show how constraints can be incorporated into the QAOA using Grover mixers, allowing to restrict the search space to strictly valid solutions for specific problems. Finally, we outline the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) as a generalization of the QAOA, highlighting its potential in the NISQ era and addressing challenges such as barren plateaus and ansatz design.