A recent manuscript ( arXiv:2002.07488 (2020) ) compares the effect of linear dissipators and squeezing drive on quantum synchronisation. We point at serious mistakes in the validity of the equations they use, the consistency of the ansatz employed, the unregulated fashion in which parameters are varied and the misleading scientific statements made in their manuscript.
A recent manuscript ( arXiv:2002.07488 (2020) ) compares the effect of linear dissipators and squeezing drive on quantum synchronisation. We point at serious mistakes in the validity of the equations they use, the consistency of the ansatz employed, the unregulated fashion in which parameters are varied and the misleading scientific statements made in their manuscript.
In this reply we clarify the main points of our manuscript and respond to the critique in the Comment arXiv:2002.11514. In particular, we emphasize that our conclusion "squeezing loses effectiveness in the deep quantum regime" does not contradict the previous work arXiv:1801.10383, but instead adds to it, and raises fundamental questions on classifying parameter regimes for quantum synchronization. Moreover, we address the concern brought up on the validity of the master equation in the deep quantum regime, and show that our noise-enhanced synchronization differs from previous literature. Through numerical examples, we also demonstrate that the choice of ansatz, while appearing inconsistent, does not lead to erroneous conclusions. Lastly, we expound on the physics of noise-boosted synchronization, and show that it is indeed a genuine feature unique to the deep quantum regime. However, we note that single photon dissipation is a more accurate term, and will move to using that.
It is desirable to observe synchronization of quantum systems in the quantum regime, defined by the low number of excitations and a highly nonclassical steady state of the self-sustained oscillator. Several existing proposals of observing synchronization in the quantum regime suffer from the fact that the noise statistics overwhelm synchronization in this regime. Here, we resolve this issue by driving a self-sustained oscillator with a squeezing Hamiltonian instead of a harmonic drive and analyze this system in the classical and quantum regime. We demonstrate that strong entrainment is possible for small values of squeezing, and in this regime, the states are nonclassical. Furthermore, we show that the quality of synchronization measured by the FWHM of the power spectrum is enhanced with squeezing.
In an optomechanical system (OMS), the dynamics of quantum correlations, e.g., quantum discord, can witness synchronized squeezing between the cavity and mechanical modes. We investigate an OMS driven by two coherent fields, and demonstrate that optimal quantum correlations and squeezing synchronization can be achieved by carefully tuning key parameters: the cavity-laser detunings, loss rates, and the effective coupling ratio between the optomechanical interaction and the amplitude drive. By employing the steady-state solution of the covariance matrix within the Lyapunov framework, we identify the conditions under which squeezing becomes stabilized. Furthermore, we demonstrate that synchronized squeezing of the cavity and mechanical modes can be effectively controlled by tuning the loss ratio between the cavity and mechanical subsystems. Alternatively, in the case where the cavity is driven by a single field, we demonstrate that synchronized squeezing in the conjugate quadratures of the cavity and mechanical modes can still be achieved, provided that the cavity is coupled to a squeezed reservoir. The presence of this engineered reservoir compensates the absent driving field, by injecting directional quantum noise, thereby enabling the emergence of steady-state squeezing correlations between the two modes. A critical aspect of our study reveals how the interplay between dissipative and driven-dispersive squeezing mechanisms governs the system’s bandwidth and robustness against decoherence. Our findings provide a versatile framework for manipulating quantum correlations and squeezing in OMS, with applications in quantum metrology, sensing, and the engineering of nonclassical states. This work advances the understanding of squeezing synchronization and offers new strategies for enhancing quantum-coherent phenomena in dissipative environments.
Quantum synchronization has been a central topic in quantum nonlinear dynamics. Despite the rapid development in this field, very few have studied how to efficiently boost synchronization. Homodyne measurement emerges as one of the successful candidates for this task but preferably in the semiclassical regime. In our work, we focus on the phase synchronization of a harmonic-driven quantum Stuart-Landau oscillator and show that the enhancement induced by homodyne measurement persists into the quantum regime. Interestingly, optimal two-photon damping rates exist when the oscillator and driving are at resonance and with a small single-photon damping rate. We also report noise-induced enhancement in quantum synchronization when the single-photon damping rate is sufficiently large. Apart from these results, we discover that adding a squeezing Hamiltonian can further boost synchronization, especially in the semiclassical regime. Furthermore, the addition of squeezing causes the optimal two-photon pumping rates to shift and converge.
Synchronisation has been explored extensively for classical systems from the mid-1600s, and is a phenomenon widely understood in many diverse systems. In the age of technology miniaturisation, there are great incentives to develop an understanding of quantum synchronisation, where quantum fluctuations become the dominant source of noise and non-classical features become important. This thesis considers different types of synchronisation in systems that can display highly non-linear, quantum behaviours. Phase synchronisation for a micromaser coupled to an external drive is initially considered, and it is found that for low photon numbers a semiclassical approximation underestimates phase synchronisation, but a perturbation theory can be accurate for sufficiently weak coupling in either a quantum or semiclassical regime. When a small detuning between the drive and micromaser is introduced, frequency entrainment is also found to exist. Then two micromasers are coupled with each other, in two different configurations, and synchronisation through a relative phase preference is found for each. A semiclassical approximation once again underestimates the phase synchronisation. Entanglement and mutual information are found to behave differently to the relative phase preference depending on each system's parameters. Finally, a mean-field theory is considered for many coupled van der Pol oscillators and micromasers respectively. As the coupling between the oscillators is increased, a critical point is reached and the systems undergo a transition to a phase synchronised state. This bistability appears via a saddle-node bifurcation, and in addition to examining a variety of properties before and after the transition the critical scaling behaviour was investigated close to the transition.
In a recent preprint arXiv:2203.15521 G. X. Chan, P. Huang, and X. Wang claim that triple-quantum dot superexchange in a (1, 0, 1) charge configuration exhibits a change of sign (going from positive to negative) as a function of middle dot detuning. Furthermore, their claim is that charge sweet-spots exist for specific values of the inter-dot detuning. Their analysis is based on the Hubbard model and something to what they refer to as the full Configuration-Interaction method. All of this findings were already reported by M. J. Rančić and G. Burkard in Ref. Phys. Rev. B 96, 201304(R) (2017) based on the Hubbard model. No reference to this manuscript was made in Ref. arXiv:2203.15521. I have asked the authors to urgently modify the pre-print and position their work with respect to the previously conducted study - which they rejected to do at the current moment, quoting that pp. it is not their style to modify preprints before they were accepted. This alongside with a very similar style of some figures lead me to the conclusion that they are deliberately misleading the scientific community and trying to adopt other peoples work and ideas as their own.