Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2002.11106

Semi-relativistic $N$-body quantum mechanics of electrons and photons, with fixed nuclei

Michael K.‐H. Kiessling

Published Feb 24, 2020• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is argued that by the end of the 1920s a quantum-mechanical model could have been in place, that not only produces the atomic and molecular energy levels of the many-body Pauli equation with Coulomb interactions and external classical electro- and magneto-static fields without putting these interactions in by hand, but that also accurately describes the interaction of charged particles with electromagnetic radiation, in particular the transitions between atomic or molecular energy levels associated with emission or absorption of radiation. This model suggests a re-interpretation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field equations on spacetime as quantum-mechanical expected values of wave equations on time X configuration space for photons and electrons. The creation / annihilation formalism for photons emerges without invoking second-quantizing the classical Maxwell equations, and without involving the concept of creation / annihilation, thus suggesting an alternative physical interpretation of this formalism. Furthermore, the model suggests that Lorentz covariance of macroscopic physics models emerges through a law of large numbers from a fundamental microscopic model that is not itself Lorentz covariant.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2002.11106

Related papers

On semi-relativistic quantum mechanics of $N$-body systems composed of nuclei, electrons, and photons

Michael K.‐H. Kiessling

A quantum-mechanical model is developed which reproduces the atomic and molecular energy spectra of the many-body Pauli equation with Coulomb interactions and external electro- and magneto-static fields without putting these interactions in by hand. The model also describes the emission of electromagnetic radiation / photons with the right frequencies. Photons feature without invoking ``second quantizing'' the classical Maxwell equations. The model also suggests that Lorentz covariance emerges through a law of large numbers from a microscopic model which is not itself fundamentally Lorentz covariant.

•Feb 24, 2020•0 citations

Realistic model for radiation-matter interaction

Richard A. Pakula

This paper presents a realistic model that describes radiation-matter interactions. This is achieved by a generalization of first quantization, where the Maxwell equations are interpreted as the electromagnetic component of the Schroedinger equation. This picture is complemented by the consideration of electrons and photons as real particles in three-dimensional space, following guiding conditions derived from the particle-wave-functions to which they are associated. The guiding condition for the electron is taken from Bohmian mechanics, while the photon velocity is defined as the ratio between the Poynting vector and the electromagnetic energy density. The case of many particles is considered, taking into account their statistical properties. The formalism is applied to a two level system, providing a satisfactory description for spontaneous emission, Lamb shift, scattering, absorption, dispersion, resonance fluorescence and vacuum fields. This model adequately describes quantum jumps by the entanglement between the photon and the atomic system and it will prove to be very useful in the simulation of quantum devices for quantum computers and quantum information systems. A possible relativistic generalization is presented, together with its relationship to QED.

arXiv:quant-ph/0405055•May 11, 2004•0 citations

Classical Quantum Mechanics

Randell L Mills

Despite its successes, quantum mechanics (QM) has remained mysterious to all who have encountered it. Starting with Bohr and progressing into the present, the departure from intuitive, physical reality has widened. The connection between QM and reality is more than just a “philosophical” issue. It reveals that QM is not a correct or complete theory of the physical world and that inescapable internal inconsistencies and incongruities arise when attempts are made to treat it as physical as opposed to a purely mathematical “tool.” Some of these issues are discussed in a review by F. Laloe [Am. J. Phys. 69, 655 (2001)]. In an attempt to provide some physical insight into atomic problems and starting with the same essential physics as Bohr of e moving in the Coulombic field of the proton and the wave equation as modified by Schrodinger, a classical approach is explored that yields a remarkably accurate model and provides insight into physics on the atomic level. The proverbial view, deeply seated in the wave-particle duality notion, that there is no large-scale physical counterpart to the nature of the electron may not be correct. Physical laws and intuition may be restored when dealing with the wave equation and quantummechanical problems. Specifically, a theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM) is derived from first principles that successfully applies physical laws on all scales. Rather than using the postulated Schrodinger boundary condition “Ψ → 0 as r → ∞,” which leads to a purely mathematical model of the electron, the constraint is based on experimental observation. Using Maxwell’s equations, the classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that the bound (n = 1)state electron cannot radiate energy. By further application of Maxwell’s equations to electromagnetic and gravitational fields at particle production, the Schwarzschild metric is derived from the classical wave equation, which modifies general relativity to include conservation of spacetime in addition to momentum and matter/energy. The result gives a natural relationship among Maxwell’s equations, special relativity, and general relativity. CQM holds over a scale of spacetime of 85 orders of magnitude — it correctly predicts the nature of the universe from the scale of the quarks to that of the cosmos. A review is given by G. Landvogt [Internat. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1155 (2003)].

Physics Essays•Dec 1, 2003•26 citations

QUANTIZATION OF RADIATION FIELD

Vishnu S. Mathur, Surendra Singh

In atomic, nuclear and particle physics we come across several situations where particles or radiation quanta (photons) are created or destroyed. For example in the beta decay of the neutron, a neutron is annihilated and a proton, electron and antineutrino are created. In some situations the interaction of radiation with matter can result in creation or annihilation of a pair of electron and positron. Such processes cannot be understood on the basis of (non-relativistic or relativistic) single particle wave equations because in such theories the probability ψ∗ψdτ (of finding the particle in the region of space dτ) when integrated over the whole space, results in unity at all times and so the existence of the particle is always guaranteed. Hence in the framework of single particle wave equation it is not possible to understand the creation or annihilation of particles. Even a simple process in which an atom undergoes a transition from an excited to the ground state by spontaneous emission of a photon in the absence of a perturbing electromagnetic field cannot be explained within this framework.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Dec 12, 2008•0 citations

Classical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanical Concepts

Clymer, NY, USA, Richard Joseph Oldani

All of the mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics describe the interaction between radiation and atoms, but we show here that only Einstein has been able to establish a solid logical connection with classical theory. His methods are used to interpret the other mathematical models by requiring that observables be described in a physically-defined coordinate system and that there be strict adherence to the conservation of momentum. The properties of momentum exchange are included in a quantum oscillator, or clock, by replacing the non-relativistic Hamiltonian model with a relativistically correct Lagrangian model. Equal contributions are assigned to photon, electron, and nucleus; and field boundaries are defined that coincide with the electron shells. The fields of the particles superpose linearly, but otherwise their physical integrity is maintained throughout. The Lagrangian model accounts for the 720 degree rotation of a wave function as an initial 360 degree electromagnetic wave cycle (photon absorption) followed by a second wave cycle (photon emission), yielding two wave cycles to correspond with one complete electron cycle. The abstract space of quantum mechanics is replaced by a real classical space.

Japan Journal of Research•Feb 28, 2023•0 citations

From the Light Quantum to the Photon: The Evolution of a Physical Concept

Aaron Collavini, Valentina Bologna, Francesco Longo +2 more

This work examines the physical and conceptual evolution of the light quantum from Planck's blackbody theory to the theoretical and experimental developments that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field. The present study shows that the decisive transition occurred in Einstein's quantum theory of radiation (1916-1917). Absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission were formulated as elementary probabilistic mechanisms whose statistical balance alone reproduces the blackbody spectrum. In particular, spontaneous emission requires the emission of a light quantum, thereby implicitly proving its physical necessity before its theoretical status was clarified. At the same time, the already existing term photon began to acquire a stable usage following Lewis's 1926 proposal and became increasingly associated with Einstein's light quantum. By the mid-1920s, the central problem had shifted from whether light quanta were physically required to how radiation could be incorporated into the emerging quantum-mechanical formalism. This transition marks a key stage, illustrating how initial debates about the existence of light quanta gave way to their integration into a comprehensive theoretical structure. The resulting asymmetry between the novel quantum description of matter and the still-classical description of radiation, called into question by the phenomenon of spontaneous emission, identifies the physical problem that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2609.04985•Sep 7, 2026
Semi-relativistic NNN-body quantum mechanics of electrons and photons, with fixed nuclei
It is argued that by the end of the 1920s a quantum-mechanical model could have been in place, that not only produces the atomic and molecular energy levels of the many-body Pauli equation with Coulomb interactions and external classical electro- and magneto-static fields without putting these interactions in by hand, but that also accurately describes the interaction of charged particles with electromagnetic radiation, in particular the transitions between atomic or molecular energy levels associated with emission or absorption of radiation. This model suggests a re-interpretation of Maxwell's electromagnetic field equations on spacetime as quantum-mechanical expected values of wave equations on time X configuration space for photons and electrons. The creation / annihilation formalism for photons emerges without invoking second-quantizing the classical Maxwell equations, and without involving the concept of creation / annihilation, thus suggesting an alternative physical interpretation of this formalism. Furthermore, the model suggests that Lorentz covariance of macroscopic physics models emerges through a law of large numbers from a fundamental microscopic model that is not itself Lorentz covariant.
On semi-relativistic quantum mechanics of NNN-body systems composed of nuclei, electrons, and photons
A quantum-mechanical model is developed which reproduces the atomic and molecular energy spectra of the many-body Pauli equation with Coulomb interactions and external electro- and magneto-static fields without putting these interactions in by hand. The model also describes the emission of electromagnetic radiation / photons with the right frequencies. Photons feature without invoking ``second quantizing'' the classical Maxwell equations. The model also suggests that Lorentz covariance emerges through a law of large numbers from a microscopic model which is not itself fundamentally Lorentz covariant.
This paper presents a realistic model that describes radiation-matter interactions. This is achieved by a generalization of first quantization, where the Maxwell equations are interpreted as the electromagnetic component of the Schroedinger equation. This picture is complemented by the consideration of electrons and photons as real particles in three-dimensional space, following guiding conditions derived from the particle-wave-functions to which they are associated. The guiding condition for the electron is taken from Bohmian mechanics, while the photon velocity is defined as the ratio between the Poynting vector and the electromagnetic energy density. The case of many particles is considered, taking into account their statistical properties. The formalism is applied to a two level system, providing a satisfactory description for spontaneous emission, Lamb shift, scattering, absorption, dispersion, resonance fluorescence and vacuum fields. This model adequately describes quantum jumps by the entanglement between the photon and the atomic system and it will prove to be very useful in the simulation of quantum devices for quantum computers and quantum information systems. A possible relativistic generalization is presented, together with its relationship to QED.
Despite its successes, quantum mechanics (QM) has remained mysterious to all who have encountered it. Starting with Bohr and progressing into the present, the departure from intuitive, physical reality has widened. The connection between QM and reality is more than just a “philosophical” issue. It reveals that QM is not a correct or complete theory of the physical world and that inescapable internal inconsistencies and incongruities arise when attempts are made to treat it as physical as opposed to a purely mathematical “tool.” Some of these issues are discussed in a review by F. Laloe [Am. J. Phys. 69, 655 (2001)]. In an attempt to provide some physical insight into atomic problems and starting with the same essential physics as Bohr of e moving in the Coulombic field of the proton and the wave equation as modified by Schrodinger, a classical approach is explored that yields a remarkably accurate model and provides insight into physics on the atomic level. The proverbial view, deeply seated in the wave-particle duality notion, that there is no large-scale physical counterpart to the nature of the electron may not be correct. Physical laws and intuition may be restored when dealing with the wave equation and quantummechanical problems. Specifically, a theory of classical quantum mechanics (CQM) is derived from first principles that successfully applies physical laws on all scales. Rather than using the postulated Schrodinger boundary condition “Ψ → 0 as r → ∞,” which leads to a purely mathematical model of the electron, the constraint is based on experimental observation. Using Maxwell’s equations, the classical wave equation is solved with the constraint that the bound (n = 1)state electron cannot radiate energy. By further application of Maxwell’s equations to electromagnetic and gravitational fields at particle production, the Schwarzschild metric is derived from the classical wave equation, which modifies general relativity to include conservation of spacetime in addition to momentum and matter/energy. The result gives a natural relationship among Maxwell’s equations, special relativity, and general relativity. CQM holds over a scale of spacetime of 85 orders of magnitude — it correctly predicts the nature of the universe from the scale of the quarks to that of the cosmos. A review is given by G. Landvogt [Internat. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1155 (2003)].
In atomic, nuclear and particle physics we come across several situations where particles or radiation quanta (photons) are created or destroyed. For example in the beta decay of the neutron, a neutron is annihilated and a proton, electron and antineutrino are created. In some situations the interaction of radiation with matter can result in creation or annihilation of a pair of electron and positron. Such processes cannot be understood on the basis of (non-relativistic or relativistic) single particle wave equations because in such theories the probability ψ∗ψdτ (of finding the particle in the region of space dτ) when integrated over the whole space, results in unity at all times and so the existence of the particle is always guaranteed. Hence in the framework of single particle wave equation it is not possible to understand the creation or annihilation of particles. Even a simple process in which an atom undergoes a transition from an excited to the ground state by spontaneous emission of a photon in the absence of a perturbing electromagnetic field cannot be explained within this framework.
All of the mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics describe the interaction between radiation and atoms, but we show here that only Einstein has been able to establish a solid logical connection with classical theory. His methods are used to interpret the other mathematical models by requiring that observables be described in a physically-defined coordinate system and that there be strict adherence to the conservation of momentum. The properties of momentum exchange are included in a quantum oscillator, or clock, by replacing the non-relativistic Hamiltonian model with a relativistically correct Lagrangian model. Equal contributions are assigned to photon, electron, and nucleus; and field boundaries are defined that coincide with the electron shells. The fields of the particles superpose linearly, but otherwise their physical integrity is maintained throughout. The Lagrangian model accounts for the 720 degree rotation of a wave function as an initial 360 degree electromagnetic wave cycle (photon absorption) followed by a second wave cycle (photon emission), yielding two wave cycles to correspond with one complete electron cycle. The abstract space of quantum mechanics is replaced by a real classical space.
This work examines the physical and conceptual evolution of the light quantum from Planck's blackbody theory to the theoretical and experimental developments that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field. The present study shows that the decisive transition occurred in Einstein's quantum theory of radiation (1916-1917). Absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission were formulated as elementary probabilistic mechanisms whose statistical balance alone reproduces the blackbody spectrum. In particular, spontaneous emission requires the emission of a light quantum, thereby implicitly proving its physical necessity before its theoretical status was clarified. At the same time, the already existing term photon began to acquire a stable usage following Lewis's 1926 proposal and became increasingly associated with Einstein's light quantum. By the mid-1920s, the central problem had shifted from whether light quanta were physically required to how radiation could be incorporated into the emerging quantum-mechanical formalism. This transition marks a key stage, illustrating how initial debates about the existence of light quanta gave way to their integration into a comprehensive theoretical structure. The resulting asymmetry between the novel quantum description of matter and the still-classical description of radiation, called into question by the phenomenon of spontaneous emission, identifies the physical problem that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field.