Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1912.12057 · Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry

Existence of Schrödinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition

Lawrence Frolov, Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka

Published Sep 1, 2025• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region $$\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^3$$ Ω ⊂ R 3 , and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary $$\partial \Omega $$ ∂ Ω . The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface; a particularly convincing definition, called the absorbing boundary rule, involves a time evolution for the particle’s wave function $$\psi $$ ψ expressed by a Schrödinger equation in $$\Omega $$ Ω together with an “absorbing” boundary condition on $$\partial \Omega $$ ∂ Ω first considered by Werner in 1987, viz., $$\partial \psi /\partial n=i\kappa \psi $$ ∂ ψ / ∂ n = i κ ψ with $$\kappa >0$$ κ > 0 and $$\partial /\partial n$$ ∂ / ∂ n the normal derivative. We provide here a discussion of the rigorous mathematical foundation of this rule. First, for the viability of the rule it plays a crucial role that these two equations together uniquely define the time evolution of $$\psi $$ ψ ; we point out here how, under some technical assumptions on the regularity (i.e., smoothness) of the detecting surface, the Lumer-Phillips theorem implies that the time evolution is well defined and given by a contraction semigroup. Second, we show that the collapse required for the N-particle version of the problem is well defined. We also prove that the joint distribution of the detection times and places, according to the absorbing boundary rule, is governed by a positive-operator-valued measure.

DOI
10.1007/s11040-025-09521-3

Related papers

Detection-time distribution for several quantum particles

Roderich Tumulka

We address the question of how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which a detector clicks in the situation of $n$ nonrelativistic quantum particles in a volume $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}\ensuremath{\subset}{\mathbb{R}}^{3}$ in physical space and detectors placed along the boundary $\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$ of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$. We previously [Tumulka, Ann. Phys. (NY) 442, 168910 (2022)] argued in favor of a rule for the one-particle case that involves a Schr\"odinger equation with an absorbing boundary condition on $\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$ introduced by Werner; we call this rule the ``absorbing boundary rule.'' Here, we describe the natural extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the $n$-particle case. A key element of this extension is that, upon a detection event, the wave function gets collapsed by inserting the detected position, at the time of detection, into the wave function, thus yielding a wave function of $n\ensuremath{-}1$ particles. We also describe an extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the case of moving detectors.

arXiv:1601.03871•Physical Review A•Oct 24, 2022•17 citations

Detection Time Distribution for Dirac Particles

Roderich Tumulka

The problem of detection time distribution concerns a quantum particle surrounded by detectors and consists of computing the probability distribution of where and when the particle will be detected. While the correct answer can be obtained in principle by solving the Schrodinger equation of particle and detectors together, a more practical answer should involve a simple rule representing the behavior of idealized detectors. We have argued elsewhere [http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03715] that the most natural rule for this purpose is the "absorbing boundary rule," based on the 1-particle Schrodinger equation with a certain "absorbing" boundary condition, first considered by Werner in 1987, at the ideal detecting surface. Here we develop a relativistic variant of this rule using the Dirac equation and also a boundary condition. We treat one or several detectable particles, in flat or curved space-time, with stationary or moving detectors.

arXiv:1601.04571•Jan 18, 2016•3 citations

Detecting screens modeled by Schrödinger operators, that generate C0 contraction semigroups

Lawrence Frolov

Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function [Formula: see text] in a bounded [Formula: see text] region [Formula: see text], and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary [Formula: see text]. Assume the detection process is effectively irreversible, that its mechanism is time independent and also hard, i.e. detections occur only along the boundary [Formula: see text]. Under these conditions, Tumulka [ 32 ] informally argued that the dynamics of [Formula: see text] must be governed by a [Formula: see text] contraction semigroup that weakly solves the Schrödinger equation and proposed modeling the detector by a time-independent local absorbing boundary condition at [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we apply the newly discovered theory of boundary quadruples [ 33 ] to parameterize all [Formula: see text] contraction semigroups whose generators extend the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and prove a variant of Tumulka’s claim: all such evolutions are generated by the placement of a linear absorbing boundary condition on [Formula: see text] along [Formula: see text]. We combine this result with the work of Werner [ 12 ] to show that each [Formula: see text] contraction semigroup naturally admits a Born rule for the time of detection along [Formula: see text], and we prove that a detection will almost surely occur in finite time if detectors have been placed everywhere along [Formula: see text].

arXiv:2506.00231•Reviews in Mathematical Physics•Oct 30, 2025•3 citations

Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation for Absorbing Boundaries

Roderich Tumulka

We prove the uncertainty relation $σ_T \, σ_E \geq \hbar/2$ between the time $T$ of detection of a quantum particle on the surface $\partial Ω$ of a region $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ containing the particle's initial wave function, using the "absorbing boundary rule" for detection time, and the energy $E$ of the initial wave function. Here, $σ$ denotes the standard deviation of the probability distribution associated with a quantum observable and a wave function. Since $T$ is associated with a POVM rather than a self-adjoint operator, the relation is not an instance of the standard version of the uncertainty relation due to Robertson and Schrödinger. We also prove that if there is nonzero probability that the particle never reaches $\partial Ω$ (in which case we write $T=\infty$), and if $σ_T$ denotes the standard deviation conditional on the event $T<\infty$, then $σ_T \, σ_E \geq (\hbar/2) \sqrt{\mathrm{Prob}(T<\infty)}$.

arXiv:2005.14514•May 29, 2020•0 citations

Extended Results on Absorbing Boundary Conditions as Limits of Complex Potentials

Rashi Kaimal, Roderich Tumulka

In quantum mechanics, among the proposals for how to compute the probability distribution of detection time and place along a given spatial surface or in a given volume, two leading candidates involve absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs) and complex absorbing potentials (CAPs) for the Schrödinger equation. Here, we extend earlier results on how the two are related. It was previously shown that ABCs arise as a limiting case of CAPs, but for that a (reflecting) Neumann boundary condition was assumed at the end of the region with the CAP. Here, we obtain ABCs in a different limit using a Dirichlet boundary condition at the end of the CAP region, which seems more practically relevant and realizable.

quant-pharXiv:2610.11865•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations

Absorbing boundary condition as limiting case of imaginary potentials

Roderich Tumulka

Abstract Imaginary potentials such as V(x) = −iσ1Ω(x) (with σ > 0 a constant, Ω a subset of 3-space, and 1Ω its characteristic function) have been used in quantum mechanics as models of a detector. They represent the effect of a ‘soft’ detector that takes a while to notice a particle in the detector volume Ω. In order to model a ‘hard’ detector (i.e. one that registers a particle as soon as it enters Ω), one may think of taking the limit σ → ∞ of increasing detector strength σ. However, as pointed out by Allcock, in this limit the particle never enters Ω; its wave function gets reflected at the boundary ∂Ω of Ω in the same way as by a Dirichlet boundary condition on ∂Ω. This phenomenon, a cousin of the ‘quantum Zeno effect,’ might suggest that a hard detector is mathematically impossible. Nevertheless, a mathematical description of a hard detector has recently been put forward in the form of the ‘absorbing boundary rule’ involving an absorbing boundary condition on the detecting surface ∂Ω. We show here that in a suitable (non-obvious) limit, the imaginary potential V yields a non-trivial distribution of detection time and place in agreement with the absorbing boundary rule. That is, a hard detector can be obtained as a limit, but it is a different limit than Allcock considered.

arXiv:1911.12730•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Oct 19, 2022•11 citations
Abstract Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region Ω⊂R3\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^3Ω⊂R3 Ω ⊂ R 3 , and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary ∂Ω\partial \Omega ∂Ω ∂ Ω . The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface; a particularly convincing definition, called the absorbing boundary rule, involves a time evolution for the particle’s wave function ψ\psi ψ ψ expressed by a Schrödinger equation in Ω\Omega Ω Ω together with an “absorbing” boundary condition on ∂Ω\partial \Omega ∂Ω ∂ Ω first considered by Werner in 1987, viz., ∂ψ/∂n=iκψ\partial \psi /\partial n=i\kappa \psi ∂ψ/∂n=iκψ ∂ ψ / ∂ n = i κ ψ with κ>0\kappa >0κ>0 κ > 0 and ∂/∂n\partial /\partial n∂/∂n ∂ / ∂ n the normal derivative. We provide here a discussion of the rigorous mathematical foundation of this rule. First, for the viability of the rule it plays a crucial role that these two equations together uniquely define the time evolution of ψ\psi ψ ψ ; we point out here how, under some technical assumptions on the regularity (i.e., smoothness) of the detecting surface, the Lumer-Phillips theorem implies that the time evolution is well defined and given by a contraction semigroup. Second, we show that the collapse required for the N-particle version of the problem is well defined. We also prove that the joint distribution of the detection times and places, according to the absorbing boundary rule, is governed by a positive-operator-valued measure.
We address the question of how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which a detector clicks in the situation of nnn nonrelativistic quantum particles in a volume $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}\ensuremath{\subset}{\mathbb{R}}^{3}$ in physical space and detectors placed along the boundary $\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$ of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$. We previously [Tumulka, Ann. Phys. (NY) 442, 168910 (2022)] argued in favor of a rule for the one-particle case that involves a Schr\"odinger equation with an absorbing boundary condition on $\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$ introduced by Werner; we call this rule the ``absorbing boundary rule.'' Here, we describe the natural extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the nnn-particle case. A key element of this extension is that, upon a detection event, the wave function gets collapsed by inserting the detected position, at the time of detection, into the wave function, thus yielding a wave function of $n\ensuremath{-}1$ particles. We also describe an extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the case of moving detectors.
The problem of detection time distribution concerns a quantum particle surrounded by detectors and consists of computing the probability distribution of where and when the particle will be detected. While the correct answer can be obtained in principle by solving the Schrodinger equation of particle and detectors together, a more practical answer should involve a simple rule representing the behavior of idealized detectors. We have argued elsewhere [http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03715] that the most natural rule for this purpose is the "absorbing boundary rule," based on the 1-particle Schrodinger equation with a certain "absorbing" boundary condition, first considered by Werner in 1987, at the ideal detecting surface. Here we develop a relativistic variant of this rule using the Dirac equation and also a boundary condition. We treat one or several detectable particles, in flat or curved space-time, with stationary or moving detectors.
Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function [Formula: see text] in a bounded [Formula: see text] region [Formula: see text], and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary [Formula: see text]. Assume the detection process is effectively irreversible, that its mechanism is time independent and also hard, i.e. detections occur only along the boundary [Formula: see text]. Under these conditions, Tumulka [ 32 ] informally argued that the dynamics of [Formula: see text] must be governed by a [Formula: see text] contraction semigroup that weakly solves the Schrödinger equation and proposed modeling the detector by a time-independent local absorbing boundary condition at [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we apply the newly discovered theory of boundary quadruples [ 33 ] to parameterize all [Formula: see text] contraction semigroups whose generators extend the Schrödinger Hamiltonian and prove a variant of Tumulka’s claim: all such evolutions are generated by the placement of a linear absorbing boundary condition on [Formula: see text] along [Formula: see text]. We combine this result with the work of Werner [ 12 ] to show that each [Formula: see text] contraction semigroup naturally admits a Born rule for the time of detection along [Formula: see text], and we prove that a detection will almost surely occur in finite time if detectors have been placed everywhere along [Formula: see text].
We prove the uncertainty relation σT σE≥ℏ/2σ_T \, σ_E \geq \hbar/2σT​σE​≥ℏ/2 between the time TTT of detection of a quantum particle on the surface ∂Ω\partial Ω∂Ω of a region Ω⊂R3Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^3Ω⊂R3 containing the particle's initial wave function, using the "absorbing boundary rule" for detection time, and the energy EEE of the initial wave function. Here, σσσ denotes the standard deviation of the probability distribution associated with a quantum observable and a wave function. Since TTT is associated with a POVM rather than a self-adjoint operator, the relation is not an instance of the standard version of the uncertainty relation due to Robertson and Schrödinger. We also prove that if there is nonzero probability that the particle never reaches ∂Ω\partial Ω∂Ω (in which case we write T=∞T=\inftyT=∞), and if σTσ_TσT​ denotes the standard deviation conditional on the event T<∞T<\inftyT<∞, then σT σE≥(ℏ/2)Prob(T<∞)σ_T \, σ_E \geq (\hbar/2) \sqrt{\mathrm{Prob}(T<\infty)}σT​σE​≥(ℏ/2)Prob(T<∞)​.
In quantum mechanics, among the proposals for how to compute the probability distribution of detection time and place along a given spatial surface or in a given volume, two leading candidates involve absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs) and complex absorbing potentials (CAPs) for the Schrödinger equation. Here, we extend earlier results on how the two are related. It was previously shown that ABCs arise as a limiting case of CAPs, but for that a (reflecting) Neumann boundary condition was assumed at the end of the region with the CAP. Here, we obtain ABCs in a different limit using a Dirichlet boundary condition at the end of the CAP region, which seems more practically relevant and realizable.
Abstract Imaginary potentials such as V(x) = −iσ1Ω(x) (with σ > 0 a constant, Ω a subset of 3-space, and 1Ω its characteristic function) have been used in quantum mechanics as models of a detector. They represent the effect of a ‘soft’ detector that takes a while to notice a particle in the detector volume Ω. In order to model a ‘hard’ detector (i.e. one that registers a particle as soon as it enters Ω), one may think of taking the limit σ → ∞ of increasing detector strength σ. However, as pointed out by Allcock, in this limit the particle never enters Ω; its wave function gets reflected at the boundary ∂Ω of Ω in the same way as by a Dirichlet boundary condition on ∂Ω. This phenomenon, a cousin of the ‘quantum Zeno effect,’ might suggest that a hard detector is mathematically impossible. Nevertheless, a mathematical description of a hard detector has recently been put forward in the form of the ‘absorbing boundary rule’ involving an absorbing boundary condition on the detecting surface ∂Ω. We show here that in a suitable (non-obvious) limit, the imaginary potential V yields a non-trivial distribution of detection time and place in agreement with the absorbing boundary rule. That is, a hard detector can be obtained as a limit, but it is a different limit than Allcock considered.