The Bell's theorem stands as an insuperable roadblock in the path to a very desired intuitive solution of the EPR paradox and, hence, it lies at the core of the current lack of a clear interpretation of the quantum formalism. The theorem states through an experimentally testable inequality that the predictions of quantum mechanics for the Bell's polarization states of two entangled particles cannot be reproduced by any statistical model of hidden variables that shares certain intuitive features. In this paper, we show, however, that the proof of the Bell's theorem involves a subtle, though crucial, assumption that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it is not necessarily fulfilled in the experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, this assumption can neither be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics. Namely, the proof of the theorem assumes that there exists a preferred absolute frame of reference, supposedly provided by the lab, which enables to compare the orientation of the polarization measurement devices for successive realizations of the experiment and, hence, to define jointly their response functions over the space of hypothetical hidden configurations for all their possible alternative settings. We notice, however, that only the relative orientation between the two measurement devices in every single realization of the experiment is a properly defined physical degree of freedom, while their global rigid orientation is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Hence, the preferred frame of reference required by the proof of the Bell's theorem does not necessarily exist. In fact, it cannot exist in models in which the gauge symmetry of the experimental setup under global rigid rotations of the two detectors is spontaneously broken by the hidden configurations of the pair of entangled particles and a non-zero geometric phase appears under some cyclic gauge symmetry transformations. Following this observation, we build an explicitly local model of hidden variables that reproduces the predictions of quantum mechanics for the Bell's states.
The Bell's theorem stands as an insuperable roadblock in the path to a very desired intuitive solution of the EPR paradox and, hence, it lies at the core of the current lack of a clear interpretation of the quantum formalism. The theorem states through an experimentally testable inequality that the predictions of quantum mechanics for the Bell's polarization states of two entangled particles cannot be reproduced by any statistical model of hidden variables that shares certain intuitive features. In this paper, we show, however, that the proof of the Bell's theorem involves a subtle, though crucial, assumption that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it is not necessarily fulfilled in the experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, this assumption can neither be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics. Namely, the proof of the theorem assumes that there exists a preferred absolute frame of reference, supposedly provided by the lab, which enables to compare the orientation of the polarization measurement devices for successive realizations of the experiment and, hence, to define jointly their response functions over the space of hypothetical hidden configurations for all their possible alternative settings. We notice, however, that only the relative orientation between the two measurement devices in every single realization of the experiment is a properly defined physical degree of freedom, while their global rigid orientation is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Hence, the preferred frame of reference required by the proof of the Bell's theorem does not necessarily exist. In fact, it cannot exist in models in which the gauge symmetry of the experimental setup under global rigid rotations of the two detectors is spontaneously broken by the hidden configurations of the pair of entangled particles and a non-zero geometric phase appears under some cyclic gauge symmetry transformations. Following this observation, we build an explicitly local model of hidden variables that reproduces the predictions of quantum mechanics for the Bell's states.
The Bell's inequality is thought to be a common constraint shared by all models of local hidden variables that aim to describe the entangled states of two qubits. Since the inequality is violated by the quantum mechanical description of these states, it purportedly allows distinguishing in an experimentally testable way the predictions of quantum mechanics from those of models of local hidden variables and, ultimately, ruling the latter out. In this paper, we show, however, that the models of local hidden variables constrained by the Bell's inequality all share a subtle, though crucial, feature that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it might not be fulfilled in the actual experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, the disputed feature neither can be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics and it is even at odds with the fundamental principle of relativity. Namely, the proof of the inequality requires the existence of a preferred absolute frame of reference (supposedly provided by the lab) with respect to which the hidden properties of the entangled particles and the orientations of each one of the measurement devices that test them can be independently defined through a long sequence of realizations of the experiment. We notice, however, that while the relative orientation between the two measurement devices is a properly defined physical magnitude in every single realization of the experiment, their global rigid orientation with respect to a lab frame is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Following this observation, we were able to explicitly build a model of local hidden variables that does not share the disputed feature and, hence, it is able to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics for the entangled states of two qubits.
The Bell inequality is thought to be a common constraint shared by all models of local hidden variables that aim to describe the entangled states of two qubits. Since the inequality is violated by the quantum mechanical description of these states, it purportedly allows distinguishing in an experimentally testable way the predictions of quantum mechanics from those of models of local hidden variables and, ultimately, ruling the latter out. In this paper, we show, however, that the models of local hidden variables constrained by the Bell inequality all share a subtle, though crucial, feature that is not required by fundamental physical principles and, hence, it might not be fulfilled in the actual experimental setup that tests the inequality. Indeed, the disputed feature neither can be properly implemented within the standard framework of quantum mechanics and it is even at odds with the fundamental principle of relativity. Namely, the proof of the inequality requires the existence of a preferred absolute frame of reference (supposedly provided by the lab) with respect to which the hidden properties of the entangled particles and the orientations of each one of the measurement devices that test them can be independently defined through a long sequence of realizations of the experiment. We notice, however, that while the relative orientation between the two measurement devices is a properly defined physical magnitude in every single realization of the experiment, their global rigid orientation with respect to a lab frame is a spurious gauge degree of freedom. Following this observation, we were able to explicitly build a model of local hidden variables that does not share the disputed feature and, hence, it is able to reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics for the entangled states of two qubits.
Abstract Solid experimental evidence has now been obtained that confirms the violation of Bell’s inequality in tests of maximally entangled qubit pairs. This violation is widely interpreted as definitive proof of the impossibility of describing quantum phenomena in terms of locally defined elements of reality. In a series of recent papers, we have noticed, however, that this conclusion inadvertently, yet crucially, relies on the assumed existence of an absolute frame of reference, with respect to which it would be possible to describe independently of each other the hypothetical elements of reality and the measurement devices that test them. Otherwise, a non-zero geometric phase may appear in the description of the former with respect to a closed sequence of settings of the latter, leading to the violation of the inequality. Following this observation, we discuss an explicit statistical model, which fully reproduces the predictions of Quantum Mechanics for the Bell experiment.
The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is widely regarded as a conclusive logical argument that rules out the possibility of reproducing the predictions of Quantum Mechanics within the framework of any physical theory sharing the notions of reality and relativistic causality that we acknowledge as a given in our classical descriptions of the macroscopic world. Thus, this renowned argument stands as a seemingly insurmountable roadblock on the path to a very desired, physically intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena and, in particular, quantum entanglement. In this paper, we notice, however, that the GHZ argument involves unaccounted spurious gauge degrees of freedom and that it can be overcome once these degrees are properly taken into account. It is then possible to explicitly build a successful statistical model for the GHZ experiment based on the usual notions of relativistic causality and physical reality. This model, thus, completes—in the EPR sense—the quantum description of the GHZ state and paves the way to a novel intuitive interpretation of the quantum formalism and a deeper understanding of the physical reality that it describes.
Bell’s theorem is a foundational result in quantum theory, demonstrating that no local hidden-variable model satisfying certain assumptions can reproduce quantum correlations. While mathematically correct within its formal framework, the theorem implicitly relies on a specific representational choice: measurement outcomes are modeled as scalar, commutative variables (±1). This assumption, though natural for flat and static configurations, is not mandated by physical necessity. In this work, we examine the consequences of relaxing this representational constraint when measurement outcomes arise as projections of states with nontrivial topology. We show that when physical correlations are naturally organized as elements of an S³-valued structure — such as those associated with spin and rotational degrees of freedom — the induced measurement algebra becomes noncommutative. Under these conditions, the key algebraic factorizations employed in Bell-type derivations no longer apply. We construct an explicit local, realistic model in which observable correlations reproduce the quantum expectation E(a, b) = − cos θ and violate the CHSH bound S ≤ 2, without invoking non-local interactions or superluminal influences. The effective S³×I structure arises not as a fundamental substrate, but as the natural geometric form taken by the actualization of physical processes within an underlying relational framework. Importantly, this structure was not introduced to address quantum entanglement specifically; it emerged independently in the study of cosmological expansion, emergent gravity, and mass generation. Its relevance to Bell-type correlations follows as a consequence of geometry, not as an ad hoc modification. These results suggest that quantum entanglement may reflect topological features of physical realization rather than intrinsic non-locality. Possible experimental implications and connections to geometric and substrate-based approaches to fundamental physics
This work develops a deterministic, field-based reformulation of quantum mechanics in which entanglement arises naturally from correlated hidden variables, directly realizing Einstein’s prediction. Fermions are modeled as coupled real fields whose internal oscillatory phases provide a physical ontology for spin, interference, and charge. The model yields the standard −cosθ correlation law in the uniform-phase limit, while predicting a small deterministic correction C( θ )=−cosθ+ε sin 2 θ with ε≈0.06 . This deviation is benchmarked against historic and modern Bell tests, showing it is not excluded but lies within the sensitivity of angle-resolved experiments. Thus, the work provides a realist, experimentally testable account of entanglement, aligning with Einstein’s vision of hidden variables. Experimental deviation between the quantum mechanics model to our real coupled-fields model is expected to be of order ε=0.06 . The model provides unique experimental predictions—a finite offset at symmetry points (e.g. Δ = 45˚) not explained by noise or reduced visibility. This work examines the violation of Bell’s inequality through the lens of the Coupled-Fields model. While standard quantum mechanics attributes these results to nonlocal entanglement, the Coupled-Fields framework reproduces the same correlations through deterministic, local interactions between the internal variables of the coupled strings. Each fermion pair shares an intrinsic phase relationship established at creation, which governs measurement outcomes without requiring instantaneous influence. Statistical violation of Bell’s inequality thus reflects the geometry of internal field orientations rather than true nonlocality. This analysis reconciles experimental data with physical realism, demonstrating that local hidden variables—when properly defined within the coupled-fields structure—can reproduce the full quantum correlation pattern. Our conclusion is that Einstein (EPR) [1] was right. Internal phase is the hidden variable.