Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1912.05110

Finite-Dimensional Convex Effect Algebras

Stanley Gudder

Published Dec 11, 2019• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We first show that the convex effect algebras (CEA) approach to quantum mechanics is more general than the general probabilistic theories approach. We then restrict our attention to finite-dimension CEA's. After an introductory Section~1, we present basic definitions in Section~2. Section~3 studies convex subeffect algebras and observables. In Section~4 we consider strong CEA's and strong observables. We show that a CEA is strong if and only if it is classical. Informationally complete observables on classical CEA's are studied in Section~5. Section~6 considers quantum CEA's in Hilbert spaces.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1912.05110

Related papers

Sequential Products of Quantum Measurements

Stanley Gudder

Our basic structure is a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space $H$. We point out that the set of effects on $H$ form a convex effect algebra. Although the set of operators on $H$ also form a convex effect algebra, they have a more detailed structure. W introduce sequential products of effect and operations. Although these have already been studied, we introduce the new concept of sequential products of effects with operations and operations with effects. We then consider various special types of operations. After developing properties of these concepts, the results are generalized to include observables and instruments. In particular, sequential products of observables with instruments and instruments with observables are developed. Finally, we consider conditioning and coexistence of observables and instruments.

arXiv:2108.07925•Jun 6, 2007•2 citations

Convex and Sequential Effect Algebras

Stanley Gudder

We present a mathematical framework for quantum mechanics in which the basic entities and operations have physical significance. In this framework the primitive concepts are states and effects and the resulting mathematical structure is a convex effect algebra. We characterize the convex effect algebras that are classical and those that are quantum mechanical. The quantum mechanical ones are those that can be represented on a complex Hilbert space. We next introduce the sequential product of effects to form a convex sequential effect algebra. This product makes it possible to study conditional probabilities and expectations.

arXiv:1802.01265•Feb 5, 2018•7 citations

Quantum Channel Conditioning and Measurement Models

Stanley Gudder

If $H_1$ and $H_2$ are finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, a channel from $H_1$ to $H_2$ is a completely positive, linear map $\mathcal{I}$ that takes the set of states $\mathcal{S}(H_1)$ for $H_1$ to the set of states $\mathcal{S}(H_2)$ for $H_2$. Corresponding to $\mathcal{I}$ there is a unique dual map $\mathcal{I}^*$ from the set of effects $\mathcal{E}(H_2)$ for $H_2$ to the set of effects $\mathcal{E}(H_1)$ for $H_1$. We call $\mathcal{I}^*(b)$ the effect $b$ conditioned by $\mathcal{I}$ and the set $\mathcal{I}^c = \mathcal{I}^*(\mathcal{E}(H_2))$ the conditioned set of $\mathcal{I}$. We point out that $\mathcal{I}^c$ is a convex subeffect algebra of the effect algebra $\mathcal{E}(H_1)$. We extend this definition to the conditioning $\mathcal{I}^*(B)$ for an observable $B$ on $H_2$ and say that an observable $A$ is in $\mathcal{I}^c$ if $A=\mathcal{I}^*(B)$ for some observable $B$. We show that $\mathcal{I}^c$ is closed under post-processing and taking parts. We also define the conditioning of instruments by channels. These concepts are illustrated using examples of Holevo instruments and channels. We next discuss measurement models and their corresponding observables and instruments. We show that calculations can be simplified by employing Kraus and Holevo separable channels. Such channels allow one to separate the components of a tensor product.

arXiv:2403.08126•Mar 12, 2024•0 citations

H*-algebras and nonunital Frobenius algebras: first steps in infinite-dimensional categorical quantum mechanics

Samson Abramsky, Chris Heunen

A certain class of Frobenius algebras has been used to characterize orthonormal bases and observables on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The presence of units in these algebras means that they can only be realized finite-dimensionally. We seek a suitable generalization, which will allow arbitrary bases and observables to be described within categorical axiomatizations of quantum mechanics. We develop a definition of H*-algebra that can be interpreted in any symmetric monoidal dagger category, reduces to the classical notion from functional analysis in the category of (possibly infinite-dimensional) Hilbert spaces, and hence provides a categorical way to speak about orthonormal bases and quantum observables in arbitrary dimension. Moreover, these algebras reduce to the usual notion of Frobenius algebra in compact categories. We then investigate the relations between nonunital Frobenius algebras and H*-algebras. We give a number of equivalent conditions to characterize when they coincide in the category of Hilbert spaces. We also show that they always coincide in categories of generalized relations and positive matrices.

arXiv:1011.6123•Nov 29, 2010•25 citations

H*-algebras and nonunital Frobenius algebras: first steps in infinite-dimensional categorical quantum mechanics

Chris Heunen

A certain class of Frobenius algebras has been used to characterize orthonormal bases and observables on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The presence of units in these algebras means that they can only be realized finite-dimensionally. We seek a suitable generalization, which will allow arbitrary bases and observables to be described within categorical axiomatizations of quantum mechanics. We develop a definition of H*-algebra that can be interpreted in any symmetric monoidal dagger category, reduces to the classical notion from functional analysis in the category of (possibly infinite-dimensional) Hilbert spaces, and hence provides a categorical way to speak about orthonormal bases and quantum observables in arbitrary dimension. Moreover, these algebras reduce to the usual notion of Frobenius algebra in compact categories. We then investigate the relations between nonunital Frobenius algebras and H*algebras. We give a number of equivalent conditions to characterize when they coincide in the category of Hilbert spaces. We also show that they always coincide in categories of generalized relations and positive matrices.

•Jan 1, 2012•26 citations

Conjugates, Filters and Quantum Mechanics

Alexander Wilce

The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each defined by a set of basic measurements and a convex set of states). The key assumption is that each system A can be paired with an isomorphic conjugate system, A¯ , by means of a non-signaling bipartite state ηA perfectly and uniformly correlating each basic measurement on A with its counterpart on A¯ . In the case of a quantum-mechanical system associated with a complex Hilbert space H , the conjugate system is that associated with the conjugate Hilbert space H , and ηA corresponds to the standard maximally entangled EPR state on H⊗H¯ . A second ingredient is the notion of a reversible filter , that is, a probabilistically reversible process that independently attenuates the sensitivity of detectors associated with a measurement. In addition to offering more flexibility than most existing reconstructions of finite-dimensional quantum theory, the approach taken here has the advantage of not relying on any form of the ``no restriction" hypothesis. That is, it is not assumed that arbitrary effects are physically measurable, nor that arbitrary families of physically measurable effects summing to the unit effect, represent physically accessible observables. (An appendix shows how a version of Hardy's ``subpace axiom" can replace several assumptions native to this paper, although at the cost of disallowing superselection rules.)

arXiv:1206.2897•Quantum•Jul 8, 2019•26 citations
We first show that the convex effect algebras (CEA) approach to quantum mechanics is more general than the general probabilistic theories approach. We then restrict our attention to finite-dimension CEA's. After an introductory Section1, we present basic definitions in Section2. Section3 studies convex subeffect algebras and observables. In Section4 we consider strong CEA's and strong observables. We show that a CEA is strong if and only if it is classical. Informationally complete observables on classical CEA's are studied in Section5. Section6 considers quantum CEA's in Hilbert spaces.
Our basic structure is a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space HHH. We point out that the set of effects on HHH form a convex effect algebra. Although the set of operators on HHH also form a convex effect algebra, they have a more detailed structure. W introduce sequential products of effect and operations. Although these have already been studied, we introduce the new concept of sequential products of effects with operations and operations with effects. We then consider various special types of operations. After developing properties of these concepts, the results are generalized to include observables and instruments. In particular, sequential products of observables with instruments and instruments with observables are developed. Finally, we consider conditioning and coexistence of observables and instruments.
We present a mathematical framework for quantum mechanics in which the basic entities and operations have physical significance. In this framework the primitive concepts are states and effects and the resulting mathematical structure is a convex effect algebra. We characterize the convex effect algebras that are classical and those that are quantum mechanical. The quantum mechanical ones are those that can be represented on a complex Hilbert space. We next introduce the sequential product of effects to form a convex sequential effect algebra. This product makes it possible to study conditional probabilities and expectations.
If H1H_1H1​ and H2H_2H2​ are finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, a channel from H1H_1H1​ to H2H_2H2​ is a completely positive, linear map I\mathcal{I}I that takes the set of states S(H1)\mathcal{S}(H_1)S(H1​) for H1H_1H1​ to the set of states S(H2)\mathcal{S}(H_2)S(H2​) for H2H_2H2​. Corresponding to I\mathcal{I}I there is a unique dual map I∗\mathcal{I}^*I∗ from the set of effects E(H2)\mathcal{E}(H_2)E(H2​) for H2H_2H2​ to the set of effects E(H1)\mathcal{E}(H_1)E(H1​) for H1H_1H1​. We call I∗(b)\mathcal{I}^*(b)I∗(b) the effect bbb conditioned by I\mathcal{I}I and the set Ic=I∗(E(H2))\mathcal{I}^c = \mathcal{I}^*(\mathcal{E}(H_2))Ic=I∗(E(H2​)) the conditioned set of I\mathcal{I}I. We point out that Ic\mathcal{I}^cIc is a convex subeffect algebra of the effect algebra E(H1)\mathcal{E}(H_1)E(H1​). We extend this definition to the conditioning I∗(B)\mathcal{I}^*(B)I∗(B) for an observable BBB on H2H_2H2​ and say that an observable AAA is in Ic\mathcal{I}^cIc if A=I∗(B)A=\mathcal{I}^*(B)A=I∗(B) for some observable BBB. We show that Ic\mathcal{I}^cIc is closed under post-processing and taking parts. We also define the conditioning of instruments by channels. These concepts are illustrated using examples of Holevo instruments and channels. We next discuss measurement models and their corresponding observables and instruments. We show that calculations can be simplified by employing Kraus and Holevo separable channels. Such channels allow one to separate the components of a tensor product.
A certain class of Frobenius algebras has been used to characterize orthonormal bases and observables on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The presence of units in these algebras means that they can only be realized finite-dimensionally. We seek a suitable generalization, which will allow arbitrary bases and observables to be described within categorical axiomatizations of quantum mechanics. We develop a definition of H*-algebra that can be interpreted in any symmetric monoidal dagger category, reduces to the classical notion from functional analysis in the category of (possibly infinite-dimensional) Hilbert spaces, and hence provides a categorical way to speak about orthonormal bases and quantum observables in arbitrary dimension. Moreover, these algebras reduce to the usual notion of Frobenius algebra in compact categories. We then investigate the relations between nonunital Frobenius algebras and H*-algebras. We give a number of equivalent conditions to characterize when they coincide in the category of Hilbert spaces. We also show that they always coincide in categories of generalized relations and positive matrices.
A certain class of Frobenius algebras has been used to characterize orthonormal bases and observables on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The presence of units in these algebras means that they can only be realized finite-dimensionally. We seek a suitable generalization, which will allow arbitrary bases and observables to be described within categorical axiomatizations of quantum mechanics. We develop a definition of H*-algebra that can be interpreted in any symmetric monoidal dagger category, reduces to the classical notion from functional analysis in the category of (possibly infinite-dimensional) Hilbert spaces, and hence provides a categorical way to speak about orthonormal bases and quantum observables in arbitrary dimension. Moreover, these algebras reduce to the usual notion of Frobenius algebra in compact categories. We then investigate the relations between nonunital Frobenius algebras and H*algebras. We give a number of equivalent conditions to characterize when they coincide in the category of Hilbert spaces. We also show that they always coincide in categories of generalized relations and positive matrices.
The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each defined by a set of basic measurements and a convex set of states). The key assumption is that each system A can be paired with an isomorphic conjugate system, A¯ , by means of a non-signaling bipartite state ηA perfectly and uniformly correlating each basic measurement on A with its counterpart on A¯ . In the case of a quantum-mechanical system associated with a complex Hilbert space H , the conjugate system is that associated with the conjugate Hilbert space H , and ηA corresponds to the standard maximally entangled EPR state on H⊗H¯ . A second ingredient is the notion of a reversible filter , that is, a probabilistically reversible process that independently attenuates the sensitivity of detectors associated with a measurement. In addition to offering more flexibility than most existing reconstructions of finite-dimensional quantum theory, the approach taken here has the advantage of not relying on any form of the ``no restriction" hypothesis. That is, it is not assumed that arbitrary effects are physically measurable, nor that arbitrary families of physically measurable effects summing to the unit effect, represent physically accessible observables. (An appendix shows how a version of Hardy's ``subpace axiom" can replace several assumptions native to this paper, although at the cost of disallowing superselection rules.)