Abstract A system of linear constraints can be unsatisfiable and yet admit a solution in the form of quantum observables whose correlated outcomes satisfy the constraints. Recently, it has been claimed that such a satisfiability gap can be demonstrated using tensor products of generalized Pauli observables in odd dimensions. We provide an explicit proof that no quantum-classical satisfiability gap in any linear constraint system can be achieved using these observables. We prove a few other results for linear constraint systems modulo d > 2. We show that a characterization of the existence of quantum solutions when d is prime, due to Cleve et al , holds with a small modification for arbitrary d . We identify a key property of some linear constraint systems, called phase-commutation, and give a no-go theorem for the existence of quantum solutions to constraint systems for odd d whenever phase-commutation is present. As a consequence, all natural generalizations of the Peres–Mermin magic square and pentagram to odd prime d do not exhibit a satisfiability gap.
Abstract A system of linear constraints can be unsatisfiable and yet admit a solution in the form of quantum observables whose correlated outcomes satisfy the constraints. Recently, it has been claimed that such a satisfiability gap can be demonstrated using tensor products of generalized Pauli observables in odd dimensions. We provide an explicit proof that no quantum-classical satisfiability gap in any linear constraint system can be achieved using these observables. We prove a few other results for linear constraint systems modulo d > 2. We show that a characterization of the existence of quantum solutions when d is prime, due to Cleve et al , holds with a small modification for arbitrary d . We identify a key property of some linear constraint systems, called phase-commutation, and give a no-go theorem for the existence of quantum solutions to constraint systems for odd d whenever phase-commutation is present. As a consequence, all natural generalizations of the Peres–Mermin magic square and pentagram to odd prime d do not exhibit a satisfiability gap.
Linear constraint systems (LCS) provide a compact algebraic language for nonlocal games and state-independent contextuality. In the binary case the Mermin--Peres square shows that inconsistent LCS can be solved by promoting variables to local Pauli operators, whereas a series of no-go results excludes analogous Pauli-, Clifford- and monomial unitary-based constructions at odd prime modulus. We first isolate the reason for this difference: for tensor-product quantum solutions, the obstruction to a classical solution of a LCS over Zn decomposes into obstruction classes carried by the individual factors. As a consequence, a genuinely global obstruction cannot arise solely by tensoring locally unobstructed systems. The argument is specific to odd modulus; at even modulus the reordering phase need not vanish, as in Pauli-based examples.
Given this distinction, we instead associate LCS to finite arrangements of rank-one projectors and resolutions of the identity in finite-dimensional vector spaces. Quantum solvability for such LCS is automatic and the search for a quantum-classical gap rests entirely on proving classical unsatisfiability of the underlying modular incidence problem of the arrangement. By relating such LCS with group-valued frame functions, we identify a family of examples in the work of [Harding, Jager, and Smith, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 539 (2005)]. To establish the (non)existence of classically unsatisfiable LCS over Zn with quantum solutions in all dimensions d and for all n∈N, we further construct explicit examples for the cases d=n prime. Our main result thus positively resolves the existence problem of such LCS beyond the binary case: such systems exist if and only if d≥3 and gcd(n,d)>1. Moreover, we establish the existence of LCS with a quantum-classical gap over finite fields if and only if d≥3 and p∣d.
The Mermin-Peres magic square is a celebrated example of a system of Boolean linear equations that is not (classically) satisfiable but is satisfiable via linear operators on a Hilbert space of dimension four. A natural question is then, for what kind of problems such a phenomenon occurs? Atserias, Kolaitis, and Severini answered this question for all Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs): For 0-Valid-SAT, 1-Valid-SAT, 2-SAT, Horn-SAT, and Dual Horn-SAT, classical satisfiability and operator satisfiability is the same and thus there is no gap; for all other Boolean CSPs, these notions differ as there are gaps, i.e., there are unsatisfiable instances that are satisfiable via operators on Hilbert spaces. We generalize their result to CSPs on arbitrary finite domains and give an almost complete classification: First, we show that NP-hard CSPs admit a separation between classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Second, we show that tractable CSPs of bounded width have no satisfiability gaps of any kind. Finally, we show that tractable CSPs of unbounded width can simulate, in a satisfiability-gap-preserving fashion, linear equations over an Abelian group of prime order p; for such CSPs, we obtain a separation of classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Furthermore, if p = 2, such CSPs also have gaps separating classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
The Mermin-Peres magic square provides a simple example of a system of linear equations over Z/2Z which has no classical solutions but does have a finite-dimensional operator solution. For a long time, it was not known how to construct similar examples over Z/dZ with d odd. In this paper, we construct, for every integer d≥2, a linear system over Z/dZ that has a finite-dimensional operator solution but no classical solution. For an odd prime p, our operators act on two p-dimensional qudits and generate a finite p-group obtained by adjoining diagonal polynomial phase operators to the generalized Pauli group, thereby forming a natural analogue of the Mermin--Peres magic square. Classical inconsistency follows from an elementary linearity argument comparing assignments on abelian subgroups. Furthermore, we prove a sharp threshold for the required degree of the added polynomial phase operators: our construction uses polynomials up to degree p−1, and we show that the group formed by polynomials up to degree p−2 is noncontextual.
The Mermin-Peres magic square is a celebrated example of a system of Boolean linear equations that is not (classically) satisfiable but is satisfiable via linear operators on a Hilbert space of dimension four. A natural question is then, for what kind of problems such a phenomenon occurs? Atserias, Kolaitis, and Severini answered this question for all Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs): For 0-Valid-SAT, 1-Valid-SAT, 2-SAT, Horn-SAT, and Dual Horn-SAT, classical satisfiability and operator satisfiability is the same and thus there is no gap; for all other Boolean CSPs, these notions differ as there are gaps, i.e., there are unsatisfiable instances that are satisfiable via operators on Hilbert spaces. We generalize their result to CSPs on arbitrary finite domains and give an almost complete classification: First, we show that NP-hard CSPs admit a separation between classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Second, we show that tractable CSPs of bounded width have no satisfiability gaps of any kind. Finally, we show that tractable CSPs of unbounded width can simulate, in a satisfiability-gap-preserving fashion, linear equations over an Abelian group of prime order p; for such CSPs, we obtain a separation of classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Furthermore, if p=2, such CSPs also have gaps separating classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
We combine the study of resources in measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) with that of quantum solutions to linear constraint systems (LCS). Contextuality of the input state in MBQC has been identified as a key resource for quantum advantage, and in a stronger form, underlies algebraic relations between (measurement) operators which obey classically unsatisfiable (linear) constraints. Here, we compare these two perspectives on contextuality, and study to what extent they are related. More precisely, we associate a LCS to certain MBQC which exhibit strong forms of state-dependent contextuality, and ask if the measurement operators in such MBQC give rise to state-independent contextuality in the form of quantum solutions of its associated LCS. Our main result rules out such quantum solutions for a large class of MBQC. This both sharpens the distinction between state-dependent and state-independent forms of contextuality, and further generalises results on the non-existence of quantum solutions to LCS in finite odd (prime) dimension.
We prove that the quantum monad in dimension 2n admits no natural transformation to the polymorphism clone of linear equations modulo n. Consequently, for every n≥2, there exists an unsatisfiable system of linear equations over Zn whose constraint system game admits a perfect finite-dimensional quantum strategy. As a corollary, we completely characterise pseudo-telepathic constraint languages in finite dimension. The proof combines a result of Harding, Jager, and Smith on group-valued measures on subspaces of Hilbert spaces with the polymorphism-minion characterisation of quantum pseudo-telepathy.