Automated tuning of gate-defined quantum dots is an essential step toward scaling up quantum computing with semiconductor qubits. The authors demonstrate an algorithm that can tune several devices without prior knowledge of their details. The approach taken here shows that simple machine-learning classifiers trained on experimental data and well-established tuning sequences are sufficient to remove human interaction, paving the way for autonomous initialization of semiconductor qubits.
Automated tuning of gate-defined quantum dots is an essential step toward scaling up quantum computing with semiconductor qubits. The authors demonstrate an algorithm that can tune several devices without prior knowledge of their details. The approach taken here shows that simple machine-learning classifiers trained on experimental data and well-established tuning sequences are sufficient to remove human interaction, paving the way for autonomous initialization of semiconductor qubits.
Building a quantum computer able to solve real-world problems is facing several challenges, both in software and hardware.Some of these challenges are the physical implementation of a large number of qubits, as well as qubit quality and control.This thesis addresses one of the outstanding challenges -the automated initialisation of solid-state qubits.These qubit types, which encode information in charge, spin or topologically protected quasiparticle states, are based on electrostatically defined quantum dots.In order to define quantum dots, suitable gate voltage combinations need to be determined and several parameters such as the inter-dot tunnel coupling adjusted to desired values.With growing device complexity and an increasing number of devices required for measurements, a manual approach to tuning is impractical.Considering the success of machine learning in many disciplines over recent years, it is a promising tool whose suitability for qubit tuning is explored here.We first implement a two-stage device characterisation and dot-tuning process by automating well-established, manual tuning procedures, where the experimenter's decisions is replaced by supervised machine learning.A demonstration on several previously unmeasured devices shows that such an approach is sufficient to tune devices autonomously and without pre-measured input.Next, we address charge-state detection based on charge stability diagrams, an essential component of automated tuning.Beside our use of simple binary classifiers trained on experimental data, deep learning models trained on synthetic data have been previously used to perform this task.While the use of synthetic data has the advantage of providing the large training datasets required for deep learning without the need to hand label experimental data, it also trains classifiers on data coming from different distributions than the data encountered during tuning.We evaluate the classification accuracy of a range of machine learning models trained on simulated and experimental data, assessing their ability to generalise to experimental charge stability diagrams.We find that experimental training data as well as realistic quantum dot simulations and noise models iii Suominen, these two dragged me out of the lab on a regular basis and made sure all doubts and misery were drowned in bubbles.Their input on how to navigate the first period of new beginnings and changes was priceless.Beside the usual PhD challenges and as a result of living in two places at one, my adventure also included some overhead paperwork.Overwhelmed by it at times, it was more than reassuring to have a friend like Mario Könz.He has always been keen on sharing some of his abundant knowledge, be it in programming or in how to deal with Swiss authorities.My endeavour would have failed without his readiness to help me out on the Swiss paperwork front.Similarly, Anïs Mairena, whose presence already got me through my Master's in Lausanne, also saved me from a lot of admit headache.I am also immensely grateful for crossing the paths of John Hornibrook and Xanthe Croot.As the kindest and most generous people I have ever met, these two made me feel at home far away at home.I will always remember those 30km bush walks with Xanthe, during which I not only got to know some of the QNL lab rats better, but was also able to recharge on positivity, happiness and sunshine.Back in the lab, it was John who patiently listened to my complains and answered all my dumb questions.From my very first steps in python and QCoDeS to the implementation of my tuning package, I had the privilege to be able to count on William H. P Nielsen and Jens H. Nielsen for support.They not only helped me get through writing drivers for instruments I didn't how to use, but their patience, comprehensive feedback and technical expertise made me the programmer I am today.Despite the rather atypical working arrangement, I was blessed to have someone who could comprehend my situation: Natalie Pearson.I was fortunate not to be the only one packing my bags for Copenhagen early in their PhD.We embarked on the Danish journey together and were able to support each other in a new country.In German one would say "geteiltes Leid ist halbes Leid".Furthermore, I would like to mention those who always had a time for a spontaneous chat, ultimately getting me through those days that didn't seem to end:
Semiconductor quantum dots are at the forefront of quantum device technology. One longstanding obstacle to scalability is that multidot systems require a lengthy, complex, experimental tuning process. Here the authors introduce a machine-learning-driven algorithm for automated tuning of quantum dots. By letting the algorithm learn from experimental data, they develop a procedure that uses a small set of measurements as its input, and then automatically tunes the double-dot system to the desired charge state. This constitutes a significant step toward fully automated operation of multidot quantum systems.
Abstract Tuning gate-defined quantum dots for qubit operation is an often frustrating and time-consuming activity in spin qubit research due to inherent device variability and the complex interactions between dots. Furthermore, tuning these devices grows more complicated as quantum computers grow to utility-scale. Computer-automated and machine learning techniques are popular approaches to accelerate the tuning process. However, these techniques need to become much faster and more accurate to address the tuning of millions of qubits in utility-scale quantum computing. We examine the literature of computer-automated and machine learning spin qubit tuning algorithms, grouping the algorithms by similar tasks and analyzing them from a computer science perspective to keep necessary background knowledge of quantum computing/physics at a minimum. We look at which approaches seem propitious for scaling up to utility-scale systems and where computer scientists could potentially have the most impact.
While spin qubits based on gate-defined quantum dots have demonstrated very favorable properties for quantum computing, one remaining hurdle is the need to tune each of them into a good operating regime by adjusting the voltages applied to electrostatic gates. The automation of these tuning procedures is a necessary requirement for the operation of a quantum processor based on gate-defined quantum dots, which is yet to be fully addressed. We present an algorithm for the automated fine-tuning of quantum dots and demonstrate its performance on a semiconductor singlet-triplet qubit in GaAs. The algorithm employs a Kalman filter based on Bayesian statistics to estimate the gradients of the target parameters as a function of gate voltages, thus learning the system response. The algorithm's design is focused on the reduction of the number of required measurements. We experimentally demonstrate the ability to change the operation regime of the qubit within 3–5 iterations, corresponding to 10–15 min of lab-time.
Abstract Recent progress in building large-scale quantum devices for exploring quantum computing and simulation has relied upon effective tools for achieving and maintaining good experimental parameters, i.e., tuning up devices. In many cases, including quantum dot-based architectures, the parameter space grows substantially with the number of qubits, and may become a limit to scalability. Fortunately, machine learning techniques for pattern recognition and image classification, using so-called deep neural networks, have shown surprising successes for computer-aided understanding of complex systems. We propose a new paradigm for fully automated experimental initialization through a closed-loop system relying on machine learning and optimization techniques. We use deep convolutional neural networks to characterize states and charge configurations of semiconductor quantum dot arrays when only measurements of a current−voltage characteristic of transport are available. For simplicity, we model a semiconductor nanowire connected to leads and capacitively coupled to depletion gates using the Thomas−Fermi approximation and Coulomb blockade physics. We then generate labeled training data for the neural networks, and find at least 90 % accuracy for charge and state identification for single and double dots. Using these characterization networks, we can then optimize the parameter space to achieve a desired configuration of the array, a technique we call “auto-tuning”. Finally, we show how such techniques can be implemented in an experimental setting by applying our approach to an experimental dataset, and outline further problems in this domain, from using charge sensing data to extensions to full one- and two-dimensional arrays, that can be tackled with machine learning.
Gate-defined semiconductor quantum dots require an appropriate number of electrons to function as qubits. The number of electrons is usually tuned by analyzing charge stability diagrams, in which charge transitions manifest as edges. Therefore, to fully automate qubit tuning, it is necessary to recognize these edges automatically and reliably. This paper investigates possible detection methods, describes their training with simulated data from the SimCATS framework, and performs a quantitative comparison with a future hardware implementation in mind. Furthermore, we investigated the quality of the optimized approaches on experimentally measured data from a GaAs and a SiGe qubit sample.