Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1911.03069 · Quantum

Towards local testability for quantum coding

Anthony Leverrier, Vivien Londe, Gilles Zémor

Published Feb 24, 2022• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We introduce the hemicubic codes, a family of quantum codes obtained by associating qubits with the p -faces of the n -cube (for n>p ) and stabilizer constraints with faces of dimension (p±1) . The quantum code obtained by identifying antipodal faces of the resulting complex encodes one logical qubit into N=2n−p−1(np) physical qubits and displays local testability with a soundness of Ω(1/log⁡(N)) beating the current state-of-the-art of 1/log2⁡(N) due to Hastings. We exploit this local testability to devise an efficient decoding algorithm that corrects arbitrary errors of size less than the minimum distance, up to polylog factors.We then extend this code family by considering the quotient of the n -cube by arbitrary linear classical codes of length n . We establish the parameters of these generalized hemicubic codes. Interestingly, if the soundness of the hemicubic code could be shown to be constant, similarly to the ordinary n -cube, then the generalized hemicubic codes could yield quantum locally testable codes of length not exceeding an exponential or even polynomial function of the code dimension.

DOI
10.22331/q-2022-02-24-661

Related papers

General Distance Balancing for Quantum Locally Testable Codes

Adam Wills, Ting-Chun Lin, Min-Hsiu Hsieh

In this paper, we prove a lower bound on the soundness of quantum locally testable codes under the distance balancing construction of Evra et al. arXiv:2004.07935 [quant-ph]. Our technical contribution is that the new soundness of the quantum code is at least the old soundness divided by the classical code length (up to a constant factor). This allows us to use any classical code with independent checks when distance balancing, where previously only the repetition code had been considered for qLTCs. By using a good classical LDPC code, we are able to grow the dimension of the hypersphere product codes arXiv:1608.05089 [quant-ph] and the hemicubic codes arXiv:1911.03069 [quant-ph] while maintaining their distance and locality, but at the expense of soundness. From this, and also by distance balancing a chain complex of Cross et al. arXiv:2209.11405 [cs.IT], we obtain quantum locally testable codes of new parameters.

arXiv:2305.00689•May 1, 2023•1 citation

Local testability of distance-balanced quantum codes

Adam Wills, Ting-Chun Lin, Min-Hsiu Hsieh

In this paper, we prove a lower bound on the soundness of quantum locally testable codes under the distance balancing construction of Evra et al. Our technical contribution is that the soundness of the quantum code after this procedure is at least its soundness before the procedure divided by the length of the classical code used to perform distance balancing. This allows us to use any classical code when distance balancing, where previously only the repetition code had been considered for these codes. By using a good classical low-density parity check (LDPC) code, we are able to grow the dimension of the hypersphere product codes and the hemicubic codes while maintaining their distance and locality, but at the expense of soundness. From this, and also by distance balancing a chain complex of Cross et al., we obtain quantum locally testable codes of new parameters.

npj Quantum Information•Nov 20, 2024•2 citations

Tradeoff Constructions for Quantum Locally Testable Codes

Adam Wills, Ting-Chun Lin, Min-Hsiu Hsieh

In this work, we continue the search for quantum locally testable codes (qLTCs) of new parameters by presenting three constructions that can make new qLTCs from old. The first analyses the soundness of a quantum code under Hastings’ weight reduction construction for qLDPC codes to give a weight reduction procedure for qLTCs. Secondly, we describe a novel ‘soundness amplification’ procedure for qLTCs which can increase the soundness of any qLTC to a constant while preserving its distance and dimension, with an impact only felt on its locality. Finally, we apply the AEL distance amplification construction to the case of qLTCs for the first time which can turn a high-distance qLTC into one with linear distance, at the expense of other parameters. These constructions can be used on as-yet undiscovered qLTCs to obtain new parameters, but we also find a number of present applications to prove the existence of codes in previously unknown parameter regimes. In particular, applications of these operations to the hypersphere product code and the hemicubic code yield many previously unknown parameters. In addition, applications of all three results are described to an upcoming work.

arXiv:2309.05541•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Nov 20, 2024•3 citations

Quantum Locally Testable Codes

Dorit Aharonov, Lior Eldar

We initiate the study of quantum locally testable codes ($\text{qLTC}$s). Classical $\text{LTC}$s are very important in computational complexity. These codes are defined as the linear subspace satisfying a set of local constraints, with the additional requirement that their soundness, $R(\delta)$, which is the probability that a randomly chosen constraint is violated, is proportional to the proximity $\delta$, where $\delta n$ is the distance of a word from the code. Excellent $\text{LTC}$s exist in the classical world, and they are tightly related to the celebrated $\text{PCP}$ (probabilistically checkable proof) theorem. In quantum complexity, quantum error correcting codes provide central examples in the study of the illusive behavior of multiparticle entanglement, and they have played a crucial role in many computational complexity results. We provide a definition of the quantum analogue of $\text{LTC}$s and motivate it by connecting its central notions in the study of both entanglement and quantum Hamiltonian complexity. A natural question is whether such codes exist, and how good can their soundness be. To the best of our knowledge all quantum codes known today exhibit poor soundness. Moreover, we show that the soundness of $\text{CSS}$ codes (which are commonly used quantum codes defined by two classical codes) is governed by the minimal soundness of the two classical codes; in the most natural $\text{CSS}$ code we examined as a candidate $\text{qLTC}$, namely, the Reed--Muller code, there is a tradeoff between the parameters of the two codes, which prevents the resulting quantum code from being $\text{qLTC}$. These facts seem to suggest a more general phenomenon, by which the soundness of $\text{qLTC}$s is inherently restricted due to multiparticle entanglement. Our main technical contribution consists of two complementary results regarding $\text{qLTC}$s which are stabilizer codes (denoted $\text{sLTC}$s). We first prove a surprising, inherently quantum property of $\text{sLTC}$s. For small constant values of proximity, the better the local expansion of the interaction graph of the constraints, the less sound the $\text{sLTC}$ becomes. This stands in sharp contrast to the classical setting. The complementary, more intuitive result also holds (and is actually much more involved technically to prove in the quantum case): an upper bound on the soundness when the code is defined on bad local expanders. Together we arrive at a quantum upper bound on the soundness of $\text{sLTC}$s set on any graph, which does not hold in the classical case. Many open questions are raised regarding what possible parameters are achievable for $\text{qLTC}$s, and their relation to other objects of interest in quantum information theory. In the appendix we also define a quantum analogue of $\text{PCP}$s of proximity ($\text{PCPP}$s) and point out that the result of [E. Ben-Sasson et al., SIAM J. Comput., 36 (2006), pp. 889--974] by which $\text{PCPP}$s imply $\text{LTC}$s with related parameters carries over to the $\text{sLTC}$s. This creates a first link between $\text{qLTC}$s and quantum $\text{PCP}$s [D. Aharonov, I. Arad, and T. Vidick, ACM SIGACT News Archive, 44 (2013), pp. 47--79].

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2015•35 citations

Expansion of High-Dimensional Cubical Complexes: with Application to Quantum Locally Testable Codes

Irit Dinur, Ting-Chun Lin, Thomas Vidick

We introduce a high-dimensional cubical complex, for any dimension$t \in \mathbb{N}$, and apply it to the design of quantum locally testable codes. Our complex is a natural generalization of the constructions by Panteleev and Kalachev and by Dinur et. al of a square complex (case$t=2$), which have been applied to the design of classical locally testable codes (LTC) and quantum low-density parity check codes (qLDPC) respectively. We turn the geometric (cubical) complex into a chain complex by relying on constant-sized local codes$h_{1}, \ldots,h_{t}$as gadgets. A recent result of Panteleev and Kalachev on existence of tuples of codes that are product expanding enables us to prove lower bounds on the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex. For$t=4$our construction gives a new family of “almost-good” quantum LTCs - with constant relative rate, inverse-polylogarithmic relative distance and soundness, and constant-size parity checks. Both the distance of the quantum code and its local testability are proven directly from the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 27, 2024•4 citations

Asymptotically Good Quantum Locally Testable Codes

William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo

We construct explicit families of asymptotically good quantum locally testable codes over qubits. More precseily, we construct explicit quantum LDPC CSS codes over qubits having constant rate, constant relative distance and constant weight local testers with constant soundness.

quant-pharXiv:2609.20780•Sep 18, 2026•0 citations
We introduce the hemicubic codes, a family of quantum codes obtained by associating qubits with the p -faces of the n -cube (for n>p ) and stabilizer constraints with faces of dimension (p±1) . The quantum code obtained by identifying antipodal faces of the resulting complex encodes one logical qubit into N=2n−p−1(np) physical qubits and displays local testability with a soundness of Ω(1/log⁡(N)) beating the current state-of-the-art of 1/log2⁡(N) due to Hastings. We exploit this local testability to devise an efficient decoding algorithm that corrects arbitrary errors of size less than the minimum distance, up to polylog factors.We then extend this code family by considering the quotient of the n -cube by arbitrary linear classical codes of length n . We establish the parameters of these generalized hemicubic codes. Interestingly, if the soundness of the hemicubic code could be shown to be constant, similarly to the ordinary n -cube, then the generalized hemicubic codes could yield quantum locally testable codes of length not exceeding an exponential or even polynomial function of the code dimension.
In this paper, we prove a lower bound on the soundness of quantum locally testable codes under the distance balancing construction of Evra et al. arXiv:2004.07935 [quant-ph]. Our technical contribution is that the new soundness of the quantum code is at least the old soundness divided by the classical code length (up to a constant factor). This allows us to use any classical code with independent checks when distance balancing, where previously only the repetition code had been considered for qLTCs. By using a good classical LDPC code, we are able to grow the dimension of the hypersphere product codes arXiv:1608.05089 [quant-ph] and the hemicubic codes arXiv:1911.03069 [quant-ph] while maintaining their distance and locality, but at the expense of soundness. From this, and also by distance balancing a chain complex of Cross et al. arXiv:2209.11405 [cs.IT], we obtain quantum locally testable codes of new parameters.
In this paper, we prove a lower bound on the soundness of quantum locally testable codes under the distance balancing construction of Evra et al. Our technical contribution is that the soundness of the quantum code after this procedure is at least its soundness before the procedure divided by the length of the classical code used to perform distance balancing. This allows us to use any classical code when distance balancing, where previously only the repetition code had been considered for these codes. By using a good classical low-density parity check (LDPC) code, we are able to grow the dimension of the hypersphere product codes and the hemicubic codes while maintaining their distance and locality, but at the expense of soundness. From this, and also by distance balancing a chain complex of Cross et al., we obtain quantum locally testable codes of new parameters.
In this work, we continue the search for quantum locally testable codes (qLTCs) of new parameters by presenting three constructions that can make new qLTCs from old. The first analyses the soundness of a quantum code under Hastings’ weight reduction construction for qLDPC codes to give a weight reduction procedure for qLTCs. Secondly, we describe a novel ‘soundness amplification’ procedure for qLTCs which can increase the soundness of any qLTC to a constant while preserving its distance and dimension, with an impact only felt on its locality. Finally, we apply the AEL distance amplification construction to the case of qLTCs for the first time which can turn a high-distance qLTC into one with linear distance, at the expense of other parameters. These constructions can be used on as-yet undiscovered qLTCs to obtain new parameters, but we also find a number of present applications to prove the existence of codes in previously unknown parameter regimes. In particular, applications of these operations to the hypersphere product code and the hemicubic code yield many previously unknown parameters. In addition, applications of all three results are described to an upcoming work.
We initiate the study of quantum locally testable codes (qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTCs). Classical LTC\text{LTC}LTCs are very important in computational complexity. These codes are defined as the linear subspace satisfying a set of local constraints, with the additional requirement that their soundness, R(δ)R(\delta)R(δ), which is the probability that a randomly chosen constraint is violated, is proportional to the proximity δ\deltaδ, where δn\delta nδn is the distance of a word from the code. Excellent LTC\text{LTC}LTCs exist in the classical world, and they are tightly related to the celebrated PCP\text{PCP}PCP (probabilistically checkable proof) theorem. In quantum complexity, quantum error correcting codes provide central examples in the study of the illusive behavior of multiparticle entanglement, and they have played a crucial role in many computational complexity results. We provide a definition of the quantum analogue of LTC\text{LTC}LTCs and motivate it by connecting its central notions in the study of both entanglement and quantum Hamiltonian complexity. A natural question is whether such codes exist, and how good can their soundness be. To the best of our knowledge all quantum codes known today exhibit poor soundness. Moreover, we show that the soundness of CSS\text{CSS}CSS codes (which are commonly used quantum codes defined by two classical codes) is governed by the minimal soundness of the two classical codes; in the most natural CSS\text{CSS}CSS code we examined as a candidate qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTC, namely, the Reed--Muller code, there is a tradeoff between the parameters of the two codes, which prevents the resulting quantum code from being qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTC. These facts seem to suggest a more general phenomenon, by which the soundness of qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTCs is inherently restricted due to multiparticle entanglement. Our main technical contribution consists of two complementary results regarding qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTCs which are stabilizer codes (denoted sLTC\text{sLTC}sLTCs). We first prove a surprising, inherently quantum property of sLTC\text{sLTC}sLTCs. For small constant values of proximity, the better the local expansion of the interaction graph of the constraints, the less sound the sLTC\text{sLTC}sLTC becomes. This stands in sharp contrast to the classical setting. The complementary, more intuitive result also holds (and is actually much more involved technically to prove in the quantum case): an upper bound on the soundness when the code is defined on bad local expanders. Together we arrive at a quantum upper bound on the soundness of sLTC\text{sLTC}sLTCs set on any graph, which does not hold in the classical case. Many open questions are raised regarding what possible parameters are achievable for qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTCs, and their relation to other objects of interest in quantum information theory. In the appendix we also define a quantum analogue of PCP\text{PCP}PCPs of proximity (PCPP\text{PCPP}PCPPs) and point out that the result of [E. Ben-Sasson et al., SIAM J. Comput., 36 (2006), pp. 889--974] by which PCPP\text{PCPP}PCPPs imply LTC\text{LTC}LTCs with related parameters carries over to the sLTC\text{sLTC}sLTCs. This creates a first link between qLTC\text{qLTC}qLTCs and quantum PCP\text{PCP}PCPs [D. Aharonov, I. Arad, and T. Vidick, ACM SIGACT News Archive, 44 (2013), pp. 47--79].
We introduce a high-dimensional cubical complex, for any dimensiont∈Nt \in \mathbb{N}t∈N, and apply it to the design of quantum locally testable codes. Our complex is a natural generalization of the constructions by Panteleev and Kalachev and by Dinur et. al of a square complex (caset=2t=2t=2), which have been applied to the design of classical locally testable codes (LTC) and quantum low-density parity check codes (qLDPC) respectively. We turn the geometric (cubical) complex into a chain complex by relying on constant-sized local codesh1,…,hth_{1}, \ldots,h_{t}h1​,…,ht​as gadgets. A recent result of Panteleev and Kalachev on existence of tuples of codes that are product expanding enables us to prove lower bounds on the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex. Fort=4t=4t=4our construction gives a new family of “almost-good” quantum LTCs - with constant relative rate, inverse-polylogarithmic relative distance and soundness, and constant-size parity checks. Both the distance of the quantum code and its local testability are proven directly from the cycle and co-cycle expansion of our chain complex.