Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1910.13991 · npj Quantum Information

Wilson loop and Wilczek-Zee phase from a non-Abelian gauge field

Seiji Sugawa, Francisco Salces-Carcoba, Yuchen Yue, Andika Putra, I. B. Spielman

Published Sep 30, 2021• 27 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Quantum states can acquire a geometric phase called the Berry phase after adiabatically traversing a closed loop, which depends on the path not the rate of motion. The Berry phase is analogous to the Aharonov–Bohm phase derived from the electromagnetic vector potential, and can be expressed in terms of an Abelian gauge potential called the Berry connection. Wilczek and Zee extended this concept to include non-Abelian phases—characterized by the gauge-independent Wilson loop—resulting from non-Abelian gauge potentials. Using an atomic Bose–Einstein condensate, we quantum-engineered a non-Abelian SU(2) gauge field, generated by a Yang monopole located at the origin of a 5-dimensional parameter space. By slowly encircling the monopole, we characterized the Wilczek–Zee phase in terms of the Wilson loop, that depended on the solid-angle subtended by the encircling path: a generalization of Stokes’ theorem. This observation marks the observation of the Wilson loop resulting from a non-Abelian point source.

DOI
10.1038/s41534-021-00483-2

Related papers

Observation and characterization of a non-Abelian gauge field's Wilczek-Zee phase by the Wilson loop

Seiji Sugawa, Francisco Salces-Carcoba, Yuchen Yue +2 more

Quantum states can acquire a phase called the Berry phase after adiabatically traversing a closed loop in parameter space. This phase is geometric -- dependent on the path -- not the rate of motion. Wilczek and Zee extended this concept to include non-Abelian phases that can be characterized the Wilson loop, a gauge independent quantity. Here we quantum-engineer a non-Abelian SU(2) gauge field for an atomic Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC), in a 5-dimensional synthetic parameter space derived from internal atomic degrees of freedom. By slowly encircling a topological monopole, we observed the adiabatic Wilczek-Zee phase that we characterize in terms of the Wilson loop.

•Oct 31, 2019•4 citations

On geometric interpretation of Berry's phase and the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Mikhail Orionovich Katanaev

A geometric interpretation of Berry’s phase, its Wilczek–Zee non-Abelian generalization, and Aharonov–Bohm effect is given in terms of connections on principal fiber bundles. It is shown that a principal fiber bundle in all cases can be trivial while the connection and its holonomy group are nontrivial. Therefore the main role is played not by topological effects but geometrical ones. The Berry phase is also shown not to be connected to the adiabatic changes of the Hamiltonian parameters. 1

•Sep 2, 2009•0 citations

Berry phases for quadratic spin Hamiltonians taken from atomic and solid state physics: examples of Abelian gauge fields not connected to physical particles

Claude C. Bouchiat

This paper contains an evaluation of the Berry phases associated with the following class of nonlinear spin Hamiltonians : H (B, n ) = γS S · B + γQ((S · n) 2 - S2/3), with B · n = 0. Examples of these Hamiltonians are given in Atomic and Solid State Physics. We compute exactly the Berry phases for S = 1, 3/2 and for S > 3/2, to second order with respect to the ratio γQ/(γS B ). The results involve loop integrals of an Abelian gauge field which can be considered as a generalization of the magnetic monopole field, the projective complex plane P2(C) playing the role of the sphere S2. In the case of the spin-1 the relation between the Aharonov and Anandan cyclic quantum phase and the Berry adiabatic phase is made explicit. The connection between the semiclassical limit of the Berry phase and the classical adiabatic Hannay angle is analyzed using the classical spin model recently proposed by Nielsen and Rohrlich.

Journal de physique•Jan 1, 1989•6 citations

Wave Packet Dynamics in Synthetic Non-Abelian Gauge Fields

Mehedi Hasan, Chetan Sriram Madasu, Ketan D. Rathod +4 more

It is generally admitted that in quantum mechanics, the electromagnetic potentials have physical interpretations otherwise absent in classical physics as illustrated by the Aharonov-Bohm effect. In 1984, Berry interpreted this effect as a geometrical phase factor. The same year, Wilczek and Zee generalized the concept of Berry phases to degenerate levels and showed that a non-Abelian gauge field arises in these systems. In sharp contrast with the Abelian case, spatially uniform non-Abelian gauge fields can induce particle noninertial motion. We explore this intriguing phenomenon with a degenerated Fermionic atomic gas subject to a two-dimensional synthetic SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field. We reveal the spin Hall nature of the noninertial dynamic as well as its anisotropy in amplitude and frequency due to the spin texture of the system. We finally draw the similarities and differences of the observed wave packet dynamic and the celebrated Zitterbewegung effect of the relativistic Dirac equation.

arXiv:2201.00885•Physical Review Letters•Sep 19, 2022•27 citations

Non-Abelian Gauge Field Mechanics

Ivan Velkovsky, Carlos Camacho, Tomoki Ozawa +2 more

Non-Abelian gauge fields play a key role in describing the behavior of particles whose motion is coupled to internal degrees of freedom, such as their spin. Here, we experimentally realize a tuneable non-Abelian gauge field in an active mechanical lattice by using pairs of oscillators to encode a local pseudo-spin for each site, with inter-site spin-dependent couplings engineered via real-time measurement and feedback. We experimentally extract Wilson-loop observables in our set-up and hence demonstrate that we can create a genuinely non-Abelian gauge field. We then exploit the controllability of our mechanical lattice to engineer non-reciprocal hoppings to explore non-Hermitian non-Abelian gauge potentials. For a two-dimensional (2D) lattice, we demonstrate that the non-Hermiticity can manifest in direction-dependent Wilson loops for a single plaquette, while for a one-dimensional (1D) system, we show that a non-Abelian gauge potential can switch the localization of non-Hermitian skin modes between opposite ends of a chain. Our work establishes active mechanical lattices as a flexible and programmable platform for probing non-Abelian gauge fields and exploring their interplay with non-Hermitian dynamics.

cond-mat.mes-hallCross-listedarXiv:2607.18215•Jul 21, 2026

Extending the Geometric Phase to Relativistic Spacetime

Sajid Raihan Akash

The Berry phase [3] is traditionally understood as a geometric phase acquired during cyclic adiabatic evolution, often interpreted as the flux of an effective “magnetic field” through a solid angle in parameter space. In this thesis, we investigate situations in which a geometric phase arises even when no spatial solid angle is enclosed, revealing the limitations of the standard purely spatial interpretation. We first review the Berry phase for a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field and analyze scenarios in which the system’s eigenstate is changed during the adiabatic evolution. We show that the resulting phase can be understood through a spacetime formulation analogous to the electrodynamic Aharonov–Bohm effect [1], where both “analogous magnetic” and “analogous electric” fields contribute through a spacetime surface integral. This framework clarifies how nonzero geometric phases can occur even when the projected spatial solid angle vanishes. We then extend this perspective to the Jahn–Teller 𝐸 ⊗ 𝑒 system. While a closed loop around the conical intersection yields the familiar π phase, we show that nontrivial geometric phases can also emerge in paths with zero net enclosed solid angle. Advisors: Herman Batelaan and Ilya Kravchenko

•Mar 25, 2026•0 citations
Abstract Quantum states can acquire a geometric phase called the Berry phase after adiabatically traversing a closed loop, which depends on the path not the rate of motion. The Berry phase is analogous to the Aharonov–Bohm phase derived from the electromagnetic vector potential, and can be expressed in terms of an Abelian gauge potential called the Berry connection. Wilczek and Zee extended this concept to include non-Abelian phases—characterized by the gauge-independent Wilson loop—resulting from non-Abelian gauge potentials. Using an atomic Bose–Einstein condensate, we quantum-engineered a non-Abelian SU(2) gauge field, generated by a Yang monopole located at the origin of a 5-dimensional parameter space. By slowly encircling the monopole, we characterized the Wilczek–Zee phase in terms of the Wilson loop, that depended on the solid-angle subtended by the encircling path: a generalization of Stokes’ theorem. This observation marks the observation of the Wilson loop resulting from a non-Abelian point source.
Quantum states can acquire a phase called the Berry phase after adiabatically traversing a closed loop in parameter space. This phase is geometric -- dependent on the path -- not the rate of motion. Wilczek and Zee extended this concept to include non-Abelian phases that can be characterized the Wilson loop, a gauge independent quantity. Here we quantum-engineer a non-Abelian SU(2) gauge field for an atomic Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC), in a 5-dimensional synthetic parameter space derived from internal atomic degrees of freedom. By slowly encircling a topological monopole, we observed the adiabatic Wilczek-Zee phase that we characterize in terms of the Wilson loop.
A geometric interpretation of Berry’s phase, its Wilczek–Zee non-Abelian generalization, and Aharonov–Bohm effect is given in terms of connections on principal fiber bundles. It is shown that a principal fiber bundle in all cases can be trivial while the connection and its holonomy group are nontrivial. Therefore the main role is played not by topological effects but geometrical ones. The Berry phase is also shown not to be connected to the adiabatic changes of the Hamiltonian parameters. 1
This paper contains an evaluation of the Berry phases associated with the following class of nonlinear spin Hamiltonians : H (B, n ) = γS S · B + γQ((S · n) 2 - S2/3), with B · n = 0. Examples of these Hamiltonians are given in Atomic and Solid State Physics. We compute exactly the Berry phases for S = 1, 3/2 and for S > 3/2, to second order with respect to the ratio γQ/(γS B ). The results involve loop integrals of an Abelian gauge field which can be considered as a generalization of the magnetic monopole field, the projective complex plane P2(C) playing the role of the sphere S2. In the case of the spin-1 the relation between the Aharonov and Anandan cyclic quantum phase and the Berry adiabatic phase is made explicit. The connection between the semiclassical limit of the Berry phase and the classical adiabatic Hannay angle is analyzed using the classical spin model recently proposed by Nielsen and Rohrlich.
It is generally admitted that in quantum mechanics, the electromagnetic potentials have physical interpretations otherwise absent in classical physics as illustrated by the Aharonov-Bohm effect. In 1984, Berry interpreted this effect as a geometrical phase factor. The same year, Wilczek and Zee generalized the concept of Berry phases to degenerate levels and showed that a non-Abelian gauge field arises in these systems. In sharp contrast with the Abelian case, spatially uniform non-Abelian gauge fields can induce particle noninertial motion. We explore this intriguing phenomenon with a degenerated Fermionic atomic gas subject to a two-dimensional synthetic SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field. We reveal the spin Hall nature of the noninertial dynamic as well as its anisotropy in amplitude and frequency due to the spin texture of the system. We finally draw the similarities and differences of the observed wave packet dynamic and the celebrated Zitterbewegung effect of the relativistic Dirac equation.
Non-Abelian gauge fields play a key role in describing the behavior of particles whose motion is coupled to internal degrees of freedom, such as their spin. Here, we experimentally realize a tuneable non-Abelian gauge field in an active mechanical lattice by using pairs of oscillators to encode a local pseudo-spin for each site, with inter-site spin-dependent couplings engineered via real-time measurement and feedback. We experimentally extract Wilson-loop observables in our set-up and hence demonstrate that we can create a genuinely non-Abelian gauge field. We then exploit the controllability of our mechanical lattice to engineer non-reciprocal hoppings to explore non-Hermitian non-Abelian gauge potentials. For a two-dimensional (2D) lattice, we demonstrate that the non-Hermiticity can manifest in direction-dependent Wilson loops for a single plaquette, while for a one-dimensional (1D) system, we show that a non-Abelian gauge potential can switch the localization of non-Hermitian skin modes between opposite ends of a chain. Our work establishes active mechanical lattices as a flexible and programmable platform for probing non-Abelian gauge fields and exploring their interplay with non-Hermitian dynamics.
The Berry phase [3] is traditionally understood as a geometric phase acquired during cyclic adiabatic evolution, often interpreted as the flux of an effective “magnetic field” through a solid angle in parameter space. In this thesis, we investigate situations in which a geometric phase arises even when no spatial solid angle is enclosed, revealing the limitations of the standard purely spatial interpretation. We first review the Berry phase for a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field and analyze scenarios in which the system’s eigenstate is changed during the adiabatic evolution. We show that the resulting phase can be understood through a spacetime formulation analogous to the electrodynamic Aharonov–Bohm effect [1], where both “analogous magnetic” and “analogous electric” fields contribute through a spacetime surface integral. This framework clarifies how nonzero geometric phases can occur even when the projected spatial solid angle vanishes. We then extend this perspective to the Jahn–Teller 𝐸 ⊗ 𝑒 system. While a closed loop around the conical intersection yields the familiar π phase, we show that nontrivial geometric phases can also emerge in paths with zero net enclosed solid angle. Advisors: Herman Batelaan and Ilya Kravchenko