Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1910.11725 · Annals of Physics

Concerning Mössbauer experiments in a rotating system and their physical interpretation

Alexander L. Kholmetskii, Tolga Yarman, Ozan Yarman, Metin Arik

Published Aug 6, 2019• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2019.167912

Related papers

Classical description of Mossbauer effect with experiments in transient region and using restricted geometries

J. Hietaniemi

•Aug 1, 1991•0 citations

Physical discussion of the Mössbauer effect

Raffaele Giovanelli, A. Orefice

Physica B Condensed Matter•Dec 1, 2000•4 citations

An ‘aether drift’ experiment based on the Mössbauer effect

David C. Champeney, G. R. Isaak, Amina Khan

Physics Letters•Dec 1, 1963•109 citations

Comment on "Analyses of Mössbauer Experiments in a Rotating System: Proper and Improper Approaches"

Jaykov Foukzon

In paper [1] published recently A. L.Kholmetskii et al.argued that S.A.Podosenov et al. paper [2] wrong and cannot explain nowel Mossbauer experiment in a rotating system. However paper [1] contains a lot of principal mistakes: (i) first notice that [1] based on rejection Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) (see [3]) and misconception in basic notion of GRT. By using these misconception A. L.Kholmetskii et al.argued that: the problem of physical interpretation of observed energy shift between emission and absorption lines in a rotating system under framework of general relativity open. Ofcourse after rejection EEP under framework of general relativity one explains nothing. (ii) secondary note that paper [1] based on misleading in quantum optics. In quantum optics we dealing with probability density w(t,r),r∈ℝ³ such that w(t,‖r‖,Ω)δΩdt is probability of photon registration near point r, between instant t and t+dt by a detector with angular size δΩ≪1sr and located at point r∈ℝ³.The probability density w(t,r) is not highly localized in free space except unphysical 1D case known from literature (see [4],5B 1.2).A single photons cannot be localized by using photodetector. Nevertheless in order to disprove S.A.Podosenov et al. paper [2], A. L.Kholmetskii et al. in [1] naively argued that γ-quanta is a point particle and propagate along highly localized classical trajectory. But this is a missconcept. Remark 1. But more importantly, these authors deliberately mislead readers by reporting absolutely false information about experimental results stated in classical papers [5]-[9]. A. L.Kholmetskii et al. wrote (see [1] p.5): However, it becomes obvious that Podosenov et al. [26] did not even realize fact that Eq. (11) indicates a red shift of frequency of resonant radiation (i.e., ν_{R} ν₀. We add that same blue shift of frequency of resonant γ -quanta has been obtained in all other Mossbauer rotor experiments [1--6] (see corresponding ref.[5]-[9] in this paper) in configuration where source of resonant radiation was located on rotational axis, and resonant absorber was mounted on rotor rim. Remark 1. Note that in classical Mossbauer rotor experiments [1]--[6] only a red shift in full accordance with GRT prediction without any doubt were obtained. [Truncated by viXra Admin to <400 words]

•Dec 1, 2020•0 citations

Concerning, once more, the circulation of an incorrect interpretation of Moessbauer experiments in a rotating system by C. Corda

Alexander L. Kholmetskii, Tolga Yarman, Ozan Yarman +1 more

•Sep 15, 2016•0 citations

Coherence and interference in the Mossbauer effect

Harry J. Lipkin

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations
In paper [1] published recently A. L.Kholmetskii et al.argued that S.A.Podosenov et al. paper [2] wrong and cannot explain nowel Mossbauer experiment in a rotating system. However paper [1] contains a lot of principal mistakes: (i) first notice that [1] based on rejection Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) (see [3]) and misconception in basic notion of GRT. By using these misconception A. L.Kholmetskii et al.argued that: the problem of physical interpretation of observed energy shift between emission and absorption lines in a rotating system under framework of general relativity open. Ofcourse after rejection EEP under framework of general relativity one explains nothing. (ii) secondary note that paper [1] based on misleading in quantum optics. In quantum optics we dealing with probability density w(t,r),r∈ℝ³ such that w(t,‖r‖,Ω)δΩdt is probability of photon registration near point r, between instant t and t+dt by a detector with angular size δΩ≪1sr and located at point r∈ℝ³.The probability density w(t,r) is not highly localized in free space except unphysical 1D case known from literature (see [4],5B 1.2).A single photons cannot be localized by using photodetector. Nevertheless in order to disprove S.A.Podosenov et al. paper [2], A. L.Kholmetskii et al. in [1] naively argued that γ-quanta is a point particle and propagate along highly localized classical trajectory. But this is a missconcept. Remark 1. But more importantly, these authors deliberately mislead readers by reporting absolutely false information about experimental results stated in classical papers [5]-[9]. A. L.Kholmetskii et al. wrote (see [1] p.5): However, it becomes obvious that Podosenov et al. [26] did not even realize fact that Eq. (11) indicates a red shift of frequency of resonant radiation (i.e., ν_{R} ν₀. We add that same blue shift of frequency of resonant γ -quanta has been obtained in all other Mossbauer rotor experiments [1--6] (see corresponding ref.[5]-[9] in this paper) in configuration where source of resonant radiation was located on rotational axis, and resonant absorber was mounted on rotor rim. Remark 1. Note that in classical Mossbauer rotor experiments [1]--[6] only a red shift in full accordance with GRT prediction without any doubt were obtained. [Truncated by viXra Admin to <400 words]