Abstract A series of recent works has shown that placing communication channels in a coherent superposition of alternative configurations can boost their ability to transmit information. Instances of this phenomenon are the advantages arising from the use of communication devices in a superposition of alternative causal orders, and those arising from the transmission of information along a superposition of alternative trajectories. The relation among these advantages has been the subject of recent debate, with some authors claiming that the advantages of the superposition of orders could be reproduced, and even surpassed, by other forms of superpositions. To shed light on this debate, we develop a general framework of resource theories of communication. In this framework, the resources are communication devices, and the allowed operations are (a) the placement of communication devices between the communicating parties, and (b) the connection of communication devices with local devices in the parties’ laboratories. The allowed operations are required to satisfy the minimal condition that they do not enable communication independently of the devices representing the initial resources. The resource-theoretic analysis reveals that the aforementioned criticisms on the superposition of causal orders were based on an uneven comparison between different types of quantum superpositions, exhibiting different operational features.
Abstract A series of recent works has shown that placing communication channels in a coherent superposition of alternative configurations can boost their ability to transmit information. Instances of this phenomenon are the advantages arising from the use of communication devices in a superposition of alternative causal orders, and those arising from the transmission of information along a superposition of alternative trajectories. The relation among these advantages has been the subject of recent debate, with some authors claiming that the advantages of the superposition of orders could be reproduced, and even surpassed, by other forms of superpositions. To shed light on this debate, we develop a general framework of resource theories of communication. In this framework, the resources are communication devices, and the allowed operations are (a) the placement of communication devices between the communicating parties, and (b) the connection of communication devices with local devices in the parties’ laboratories. The allowed operations are required to satisfy the minimal condition that they do not enable communication independently of the devices representing the initial resources. The resource-theoretic analysis reveals that the aforementioned criticisms on the superposition of causal orders were based on an uneven comparison between different types of quantum superpositions, exhibiting different operational features.
The capacity of distant parties to send signals to one another is a fundamental requirement in many information-processing tasks. Such ability is determined by the causal structure connecting the parties, and more generally, by the intermediate processes carrying signals from one laboratory to another. Here we build a fully fledged resource theory of causal connection for all multi-party communication scenarios, encompassing those where the parties operate in a definite causal order and also where the order is indefinite. We define and characterize the set of free processes and three different sets of free transformations thereof, resulting in three distinct resource theories of causal connection. In the causally ordered setting, we identify the most resourceful processes in the bipartite and tripartite scenarios. In the general setting, instead, our results suggest that there is no global most valuable resource. We establish the signalling robustness as a resource monotone of causal connection and provide tight bounds on it for many pertinent sets of processes. Finally, we introduce a resource theory of causal non-separability, and show that it is – in contrast to the case of causal connection – unique. Together our results offer a flexible and comprehensive framework to quantify and transform general quantum processes, as well as insights into their multi-layered causal connection structures.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with scenarios where physical processes occur in an indefinite order, potentially yielding advantages in a broad range of information processing tasks. However, advantages in communication, the most basic form of information processing, have so far remained controversial and hard to prove. Here we provide a framework for assessing the role of causal order in communication, by comparing different causal structures under the constraint that the allowed operations must not generate signaling from signaling-incapable devices. Using this framework, we establish a clear-cut advantage of indefinite causal order, and, at the same time, we identify a series of fundamental limits to the communication power of causal structures in quantum mechanics. Notably, we find that a special form of indefinite causal order, obtained by coherently controlling the order of two processes, enhances the transmission of classical messages in a one-shot scenario, but no quantum operation with indefinite order can offer advantages over shared entanglement when asymptotically many uses of the same communication device are employed. Overall, our results unveil non-trivial relations between communication, causal order, entanglement, and no-signaling quantum processes.
In a recent series of works [Ebler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120502 (2018); arXiv:1809.06655v2; arXiv:1810.10457v2], it has been shown that the quantum superposition of causal order---the quantum switch---offers an enhancement of classical and quantum channel capacity through noisy channels, a phenomenon that was coined ``causal activation.'' In this paper, we attempt to clarify the nature of the advantage, by comparing the quantum switch to a class of processes that can be interpreted as quantum superposition of processes with the same causal order. We show that some of these processes can match or even outperform the quantum switch at enhancing classical and quantum channel capacity, and argue that they require the same resources as the switch. We conclude, in agreement with Abbott et al. [arXiv:1810.09826v1], that the aforementioned advantages appear to be attributable to the ability to coherently control quantum operations, and not to indefinite causal order per se.
Quantum mechanics allows for the superposition of quantum states, thereby bringing about the great success of quantum communications. Recently, in the so-called quantum switch, the relative orders between quantum operations can also be coherently controlled with the help of an auxiliary system. In conventional quantum Shannon theory, however, communication channels are assumed to be combined in a classical way. Relaxing this assumption, it was shown theoretically that one can transmit information through a quantum switch. Here, we experimentally demonstrate this enhancement on the rates of communication for both classical and quantum information with the help of an optical quantum switch. Our results present evidence of the advantages of the superposition of causal orders in the communications domain.
Causal nonseparability refers to processes where events take place in a coherent superposition of different causal orders.These may be the key resource for experimental violations of causal inequalities and have been recently identified as resources for concrete information-theoretic tasks.Here, we take a step forward by deriving a complete operational framework for causal nonseparability as a resource.Our first contribution is a formal definition for the specific notion of quantum control of causal orders, a stronger form of causal nonseparability-with the celebrated quantum switch as best-known example-where the causal orders of events for a target system are coherently controlled by a control system.We then build a resource theory-for both generic causal nonseparability as well as quantum control of causal orders-with a physically motivated class of free operations, based on process-matrix concatenations.We present the framework explicitly in the mindset with a control register.However, our machinery is totally versatile, being directly applicable also to scenarios with a target register alone.Moreover, an important subclass of our operations is free not only with respect to causal nonseparability and quantum control of causal orders but it also preserves the very causal structure of causal processes.Hence, our treatment contains, as a built-in feature, the basis of a resource theory of quantum causal networks too.As applications, first, we establish a simple sufficient condition for pure-process free convertibility.This imposes a hierarchy of quantum control of causal orders with the quantum switch at the top.Second, we prove that causal-nonseparability distillation exists.More precisely, we show how to convert multiple copies of a process with arbitrarily little causal nonseparability into fewer copies of a quantum switch.Our findings reveal conceptually new, unexpected phenomena, with both fundamental and practical implications.
In a variant of communication complexity tasks, two or more separated parties cooperate to compute a function of their local data, using a limited amount of communication. It is known that communication of quantum systems and shared entanglement can increase the probability for the parties to arrive at the correct value of the function, compared to classical resources. Here we show that quantum superpositions of the direction of communication between parties can also serve as a resource to improve the probability of success. We present a tripartite task for which such a superposition provides an advantage compared to the case where the parties communicate in a fixed order. In a more general context, our result also provides semi-device-independent certification of the absence of a definite order of communication.