Stationary scattering problem (when the distance
r tends to infinity) and dynamical scattering problem (when the time
t tends to infinity) are considered for the 3D Schrödinger equation. A simple interconnection between the scattering amplitude (stationary case) and scattering operator (dynamical case) is given in the paper. This result is a quantum mechanical analog of the ergodic formulas in the classical mechanics.
A self-contained discussion of nonrelativistic quantum mechanical potential scattering in two dimensions is presented. The discussion includes, among other topics, partial wave decomposition in coordinate and momentum space, Lippmann–Schwinger integral equations of scattering for the scattering wavefunction and the transition operator, optical theorem, and the unitarity relation for the transition operator. The present definition of the scattering amplitude in terms of the asymptotic wavefunction differs from the usual definition. The present definition has certain advantages, for example, in writing the optical theorem and in studying the analytical properties of the scattering amplitude.
The purpose of these lectures is to give an accessible and self contained introduction to quantum scattering theory in one dimension. Part A defines the theoretical playground, and develops basic concepts of scattering theory in the time domain (Asymptotic Condition, in- and out- states, scattering operator
S^). The aim of Part B is then to build up, in a step-by-step fashion, the time independent scattering theory in energy domain. This amounts to introduce the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for the stationary scattering states (denoted as
∣ψE(±1)±⟩), to discuss fundamental properties of
∣ψE(±1)±⟩, and subsequently to construct
S^ and
T^ operators in terms of
∣ψE(±1)±⟩. Physical contents of the
S^ and
T^ operators is then illuminated by deriving explicit formulas for the probability of transmission/reflection of our quantum particle through/from the interaction region of the potential. An illustrative numerical example is given, which also highlights an existence of scattering resonances. Finally, Part C elaborates the nonhermitian scattering theory (Siegert pseudostate formalism), which offers an extremely powerful tool suitable for clear cut understanding of the resonance phenomena.
Given two Hamiltonians
H0,H1=H0+V corresponding respectively to a free particle Hamiltonian and the free particle Hamiltonian plus its interaction energy with a scattering centre, we can compute the S-matrix, i.e., the matrix that determines the quantum mechanical amplitude of the process involving a particle coming from a free particle state at an infinite distance from the scattering centre at time
t=−∞, entering into an initial scattered state, interacting with the scattering centre, entering into a final scattered state, and then escaping away to infinity at time
t→∞ to a final free particle state. Such amplitudes were first studied by Lippmann and Schwinger (Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1, W.O. Amrein, Hilbert Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics) and then analyzed in a mathematically precise way by [T. Kato], [W. Amrein], and [K.B. Sinha]. In this paper, we first derive the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for the input and output scattered states in terms of the input and output free particle states using intuitive arguments originally due to Lippmann and Schwinger, and then, using rigorous operator theoretic arguments revolving around the spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators in a Hilbert space, we obtain an elegant formula for the scattering matrix elements in terms of the interaction potential and the free particle Hamiltonian between two free particle states corresponding to the same measure. We then discuss a computationally more efficient method based on the Dyson series expansion (Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1), which works even in the case when the interaction Hamiltonian is time varying, in contrast to the Lippmann-Schwinger method, for calculating the S-matrix. We assume that the scattering potential, which can be time varying, can be controlled by incorporating control parameters and explain how the resulting unitary S-matrix can be made to approximate a given unitary gate in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space by optimizing the Hilbert-Schmidt/Frobenius norm distance between the given gate and the S-matrix gate, in which the latter is approximated by a truncated Dyson series. Of course, the S-matrix given by the Dyson series is a Taylor series functional expansion in the interaction potential and hence is a highly nonlinear function of the control parameters, and hence we propose numerical methods for such optimization. We then observe that if the control parameters are taken as random variables with joint moments, then the TPCP map involving statistical averaging of the adjoint action of the S-matrix acting on an initial mixed state w.r.t. the probability distribution of the control parameters will result in a final mixed state that is linear in the statistical moments of the control parameters, and hence optimization w.r.t. these moments can be easily carried out. Our method of TPCP map design is to optimize the sum of Frobenius distance squares between a sequence of desired output mixed states and the S-matrix based formula for the TPCP map acting on the corresponding input mixed states w.r.t. the statistical moments of the control parameters. We then generalize this method to include the case of TPCP maps obtained from the Hudson-Parthasarathy quantum noisy Schrödinger equation. In summary, we simulate the S-matrix gate for independent realizations of the control parameters having a probability distribution defined by their joint moments obtained by the above optimization procedure and apply the adjoint action of these independent S-matrices on a given input state, and take their ensemble average to obtain a good approximation to the action of the desired TPCP map on any given input state. This suggests that TPCP maps of arbitrarily large size can be realized using scattering experiments in the laboratory.