Error probability distribution associated with a given Clifford measurement circuit is described exactly in terms of the circuit error-equivalence group, or the circuit subsystem code previously introduced by Bacon, Flammia, Harrow, and Shi. This gives a prescription for maximum-likelihood decoding with a given measurement circuit. Marginal distributions for subsets of circuit errors are also analyzed; these generate a family of related asymmetric LDPC codes of varying degeneracy. More generally, such a family is associated with any quantum code. Implications for decoding highly-degenerate quantum codes are discussed.
Error probability distribution associated with a given Clifford measurement circuit is described exactly in terms of the circuit error-equivalence group, or the circuit subsystem code previously introduced by Bacon, Flammia, Harrow, and Shi. This gives a prescription for maximum-likelihood decoding with a given measurement circuit. Marginal distributions for subsets of circuit errors are also analyzed; these generate a family of related asymmetric LDPC codes of varying degeneracy. More generally, such a family is associated with any quantum code. Implications for decoding highly-degenerate quantum codes are discussed.
Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes reduce the qubit overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computation by an order of magnitude, but their decoding is harder than its classical counterpart: because many physical errors are equivalent up to stabilizers, the degenerate maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder must compare the probabilities of entire equivalence classes of errors, that is, partition functions, rather than single errors. The workhorse decoder BP+OSD sidesteps degeneracy heuristically and offers no guarantees. We treat degenerate decoding as probabilistic inference in an undirected graphical model: the probability of each logical class is the partition function of an unconstrained, strictly positive Markov random field over the code's check variables, a construction that generalizes the random-bond Ising mapping of the surface code to arbitrary CSS codes and to spacetime decoding with measurement errors and circuit-level noise. On this model we build two decoders. The first estimates all class partition functions by annealed importance sampling with common random numbers and attaches to every decision a certificate of optimality: a paired bootstrap test, or, composed with constant-factor estimators such as WISH, an exact optimality proof. The second is region-based: the Bethe free energy, whose bias cancels between classes, reproduces exact ML decoding on every tested surface-code instance at millisecond cost, and enlarging the regions to elimination clusters makes exact degenerate ML decoding of the [[72,12,6]] bivariate bicycle code feasible. Across surface codes and the bivariate bicycle codes [[72,12,6]] and [[144,12,12]], under code-capacity, phenomenological, and circuit-level noise, the sampling decoder matches or exceeds BP+OSD while certifying the bulk of its decisions, and the certificate flags exactly the syndromes on which any fast decoder should be distrusted.
We propose a scheme for detecting and correcting faults in any Clifford circuit. The scheme is based on the observation that the set of all possible outcome bit-strings of a Clifford circuit is a linear code, which we call the outcome code. From the outcome code we construct a corresponding stabilizer code, the spacetime code. Our construction extends the circuit-to-code construction of Bacon, Flammia, Harrow and Shi [2], revisited recently by Gottesman [16], to include intermediate and multi-qubit measurements. With this correspondence, we reduce the problem of correcting faults in a circuit to the well-studied problem of correcting errors in a stabilizer code. More precisely, a most likely error decoder for the spacetime code can be transformed into a most likely fault decoder for the circuit. We give efficient algorithms to construct the outcome and spacetime codes. We also identify conditions under which these codes are LDPC, and give an algorithm to generate low-weight checks, which can then be combined with effcient LDPC code decoders.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is indispensable for realizing fault-tolerant quantum computation, yet its effectiveness hinges critically on the classical decoding algorithm that interprets noisy syndrome measurements. Among all possible decoding strategies, maximum likelihood decoding (MLD) is provably optimal, since it identifies the logical group with largest likelihood by summing over all possible errors within logical class consistent with the observed syndrome. Despite its optimality, MLD is computationally intractable in general (#P-hard), motivating a rich landscape of exact and approximate algorithms. In this topical review, we provide a unified perspective on MLD by surveying recent advances through three complementary lenses: statistical mechanics, tensor networks, and artificial intelligence. From the statistical mechanics viewpoint, the MLD problem maps onto evaluating partition functions of disordered spin models, enabling exact solutions for certain codes and noise models as well as threshold estimation via phase-transition analysis. From the tensor network perspective, approximate contraction of tensor networks on the code's factor graph yields decoders that closely approach MLD accuracy with polynomial computational cost. From the artificial intelligence perspective, neural-network-based decoders, including autoregressive generative models and recurrent transformers, learn to approximate the MLD distribution from data, achieving high accuracy with the parallelism afforded by modern hardware accelerators. We discuss the connections among these three approaches, review their application to both simulated and experimental quantum hardware, and outline open challenges including real-time decoding, scalability to large code distances, and generalization to high-rate quantum low-density parity-check codes.
A powerful method for analyzing quantum error-correcting codes is to map them onto classical statistical mechanics models. Such mappings have thus far mostly focused on static codes, possibly subject to repeated syndrome measurements. Recent progress in quantum error correction, however, has prompted new paradigms where codes emerge from stabilizer circuits in spacetime -- a unifying perspective encompassing syndrome extraction circuits of static codes, dynamically generated codes, and logical operations. We show how to construct statistical mechanical models for stabilizer circuits subject to independent Pauli errors, by mapping logical equivalence class probabilities of errors to partition functions using the spacetime subsystem code formalism. We also introduce a modular language of spin diagrams for constructing the spin Hamiltonians, which we describe in detail focusing on independent circuit-level X-Z error channels. With the repetition and toric codes as examples, we use our approach to analytically rank logical error rates and thresholds between code implementations with standard and dynamic syndrome extraction circuits, describe the effect of transversal logical Clifford gates on logical error rates, and perform Monte Carlo simulations to estimate maximum likelihood thresholds. Our framework offers a universal prescription to analyze, simulate, and compare the decoding properties of any stabilizer circuit, while revealing the innate connections between dynamical quantum systems and noise-resilient phases of matter.
Quantum error correction is essential for building scalable quantum computers. Within the stabilizer formalism, the Calderbank-Shor-Steane framework constructs quantum codes from pairs of classical linear codes. A distinctive feature in this setting is degeneracy, where multiple equivalent error estimates exist-a phenomenon that has no classical counterpart, and the lack of a meaningful classical coding-theoretic interpretation of which has remained a gap in the literature. In this paper, we demonstrate that degeneracy is closely related to the classical operation of shortening of a linear block code. Interestingly, the shortening here takes place at the decoder rather than at the encoder. Leveraging this insight, we present a parallel decoding scheme for quantum low-density parity-check codes, which we term impulse decoding, that significantly outperforms belief propagation with ordered statistics decoding, as well as several other existing techniques, under both code-capacity and circuit-level noise, with significantly lesser complexity. We then present another algorithm based on decoding of residual errors, which when combined with impulse decoding achieves further performance improvement under circuit-level noise.
We study the exact maximum-likelihood decoding of quantum error-correcting codes. Our primary focus is on the repetition code under circuit-level noise, which serves as a fundamental basis for quantum error correction experiments and is the only code that has achieved large distances and extremely low error rates. We uncover that the repetition code under circuit-level noise has an exact solution and propose an optimal maximum-likelihood decoding algorithm called "planar." This algorithm is based on the exact solution of the spin-glass partition function on planar graphs and has polynomial computational complexity. Through extensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our algorithm uncovers the exact threshold for depolarizing noise and realistic superconductor SI1000 noise. Furthermore, we apply our method to analyze data from recent quantum memory experiments conducted by Google Quantum AI, revealing that part of the error floor was attributed to the decoding algorithm used by Google. Finally, we implemented the repetition code quantum memory on superconducting systems using a 72-qubit quantum chip lacking reset gates, demonstrating that even with an unknown error model, the proposed algorithm achieves a significantly lower logical error rate than the matching-based algorithm. We also discuss the application of our approach to quantum codes whose maximum-likelihood decoding problem corresponds to a spin-glass problem, including the surface code under independent code-capacity noise.