Commercial adiabatic quantum annealers have the potential to solve important NP-hard optimization problems efficiently. The newest generation of those machines additionally allows the user to customize the anneal schedule, that is, the schedule with which the anneal fraction is changed from the start to the end of the annealing. In this work we use the aforementioned feature of the D-Wave 2000Q to attempt to monitor how the anneal solution evolves during the anneal process. This process we call slicing: at each time slice during the anneal, we are able to obtain an approximate distribution of anneal solutions. We use our technique to obtain a variety of insights into the D-Wave 2000Q. For example, we observe when individual bits flip during the anneal process and when they stabilize, which allows us to determine the freeze-out point for each qubit individually. We highlight our results using both random QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) instances and, for better visualization, instances which we specifically optimize (using our own genetic algorithm) to exhibit a pronounced evolution of its solution during the anneal.
Commercial adiabatic quantum annealers have the potential to solve important NP-hard optimization problems efficiently. The newest generation of those machines additionally allows the user to customize the anneal schedule, that is, the schedule with which the anneal fraction is changed from the start to the end of the annealing. In this work we use the aforementioned feature of the D-Wave 2000Q to attempt to monitor how the anneal solution evolves during the anneal process. This process we call slicing: at each time slice during the anneal, we are able to obtain an approximate distribution of anneal solutions. We use our technique to obtain a variety of insights into the D-Wave 2000Q. For example, we observe when individual bits flip during the anneal process and when they stabilize, which allows us to determine the freeze-out point for each qubit individually. We highlight our results using both random QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) instances and, for better visualization, instances which we specifically optimize (using our own genetic algorithm) to exhibit a pronounced evolution of its solution during the anneal.
To solve an optimization problem using a commercial quantum annealer, one has to represent the problem of interest as an Ising or a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem and submit its coefficients to the annealer, which then returns a user-specified number of low-energy solutions. It would be useful to know what happens in the quantum processor during the anneal process so that one could design better algorithms or suggest improvements to the hardware. However, existing quantum annealers are not able to directly extract such information from the processor. Hence, in this article we propose to use advanced features of D-Wave 2000Q to indirectly infer information about the dynamics of the state evolution during the anneal process. Specifically, D-Wave 2000Q allows the user to customize the anneal schedule, that is, the schedule with which the anneal fraction is changed from the start to the end of the anneal. Using this feature, we design a set of modified anneal schedules whose outputs can be used to generate information about the states of the system at user-defined time points during a standard anneal. With this process, called slicing, we obtain approximate distributions of lowest-energy anneal solutions as the anneal time evolves. We use our technique to obtain a variety of insights into the annealer, such as the state evolution during annealing, when individual bits in an evolving solution flip during the anneal process and when they stabilize, and we introduce a technique to estimate the freeze-out point of both the system as well as of individual qubits.
To solve an optimization problem using a commercial quantum annealer, one has to represent the problem of interest as an Ising or a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem and submit its coefficients to the annealer, which then returns a user-specified number of low-energy solutions. It would be useful to know what happens in the quantum processor during the anneal process so that one could design better algorithms or suggest improvements to the hardware. However, existing quantum annealers are not able to directly extract such information from the processor. Hence, in this article we propose to use advanced features of D-Wave 2000Q to indirectly infer information about the dynamics of the state evolution during the anneal process. Specifically, D-Wave 2000Q allows the user to customize the anneal schedule, that is, the schedule with which the anneal fraction is changed from the start to the end of the anneal. Using this feature, we design a set of modified anneal schedules whose outputs can be used to generate information about the states of the system at user-defined time points during a standard anneal. With this process, called slicing , we obtain approximate distributions of lowest-energy anneal solutions as the anneal time evolves. We use our technique to obtain a variety of insights into the annealer, such as the state evolution during annealing, when individual bits in an evolving solution flip during the anneal process and when they stabilize, and we introduce a technique to estimate the freeze-out point of both the system as well as of individual qubits.
The exploitation of quantum mechanical principles seems to provide a decisive advantage over classical computation technologies. In the recent years there has been big progress in realizing different quantum computer architectures, especially by the Canadian company D-Wave Systems, which developed the first commercially available adiabatic quantum annealer. By adiabatic evolution of quantum mechanical systems it can solve NP-hard discrete optimization problems probabilistically. Due to the restrictions of the hardware architecture the directly mappable problems are limited to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems over a so called Chimera interaction graph. After briefly introducing the physical and quantum computational background including the diffculties in determining the run time and success probability of the D-Wave machine, the presentation will focus on the mapping of more general problems onto their specific problem structure. In addition to the reductions to QUBOs the main part here is the minor embedding with the distribution of the weight of the original node onto several hardware nodes.
Abstract Quantum annealing is a type of analog computation that aims to use quantum mechanical fluctuations in search of optimal solutions of QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) or, equivalently, Ising problems. Since NP-hard problems can in general be mapped to Ising and QUBO formulations, the quantum annealing paradigm has the potential to help solve various NP-hard problems. Current quantum annealers, such as those manufactured by D-Wave Systems, Inc. have various practical limitations including the size (number of qubits) of the problem that can be solved, the qubit connectivity, and error due to the environment or system calibration, which can reduce the quality of the solutions. Typically, for an arbitrary problem instance, the corresponding QUBO (or Ising) structure will not natively embed onto the available qubit architecture on the quantum chip. Thus, in these cases, a minor embedding of the problem structure onto the device is necessary. However, minor embeddings on these devices do not always make use of the full sparse chip hardware graph, and a large portion of the available qubits stay unused during quantum annealing. In this work, we embed a disjoint random QUBO on the unused parts of the chip alongside the QUBO to be solved, which acts as an indicator of the solution quality of the device over time. Using experiments on three different D-Wave quantum annealers, we demonstrate that (i) long term trends in solution quality exist on the D-Wave device, and (ii) the unused qubits can be used to measure the current level of noise of the quantum system.
Quantum annealers, such as the device built by D-Wave Systems, Inc., offer a way to compute solutions of NP-hard problems that can be expressed in Ising or quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) form. Although such solutions are typically of very high quality, problem instances are usually not solved to optimality due to imperfections of the current generations quantum annealers. In this contribution, we aim to understand some of the factors contributing to the hardness of a problem instance, and to use machine learning models to predict the accuracy of the D-Wave 2000Q annealer for solving specific problems. We focus on the maximum clique problem, a classic NP-hard problem with important applications in network analysis, bioinformatics, and computational chemistry. By training a machine learning classification model on basic problem characteristics such as the number of edges in the graph, or annealing parameters, such as the D-Wave’s chain strength, we are able to rank certain features in the order of their contribution to the solution hardness, and present a simple decision tree which allows to predict whether a problem will be solvable to optimality with the D-Wave 2000Q. We extend these results by training a machine learning regression model that predicts the clique size found by D-Wave.
Quantum annealing is getting increasing attention in combinatorial optimization. The quantum processing unit by D-Wave is constructed to approximately solve Ising models on so-called Chimera graphs. Ising models are equivalent to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems and maximum cut problems on the associated graphs. We have tailored branch-and-cut as well as semidefinite programming algorithms for solving Ising models for Chimera graphs to provable optimality and use the strength of these approaches for comparing our solution values to those obtained on the current quantum annealing machine, D-Wave 2000Q. This allows for the assessment of the quality of solutions produced by the D-Wave hardware. In addition, we also evaluate the performance of a heuristic by Selby. It has been a matter of discussion in the literature how well the D-Wave hardware performs at its native task, and our experiments shed some more light on this issue. In particular, we examine how reliably the D-Wave computer can deliver true optimum solutions and present some surprising results.