Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1907.11472 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Dimerization and effective decoupling in two spin-1 generalizations of the spin- 12 Majumdar-Ghosh chain

Natalia Chepiga, Frédéric Mila

Published Sep 20, 2019• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We perform a systematic DMRG investigation of the two natural spin-1 generalizations of the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain, the spin-1 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ Heisenberg chain, where ${J}_{2}$ is a next-nearest-neighbor Heisenberg coupling, and the spin-1 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}$ model, where ${J}_{3}$ refers to a three-site interaction defined by ${J}_{3}\left[({\mathbf{S}}_{i\ensuremath{-}1}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i})({\mathbf{S}}_{i}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i+1})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.\right]$. Although both models are rigorously equivalent to the Majumdar-Ghosh chain for spin 1/2, their physics appears to be quite different for spin 1. Indeed, when all couplings are antiferromagnetic, the spin-1 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ model undergoes an effective decoupling into two next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) Haldane chains upon increasing ${J}_{2}$, while the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}$ chain undergoes a spontaneous dimerization similar to the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain upon increasing ${J}_{3}$. By extending the phase diagram to all signs of the couplings, we show that both the dimerized and the NNN-Haldane phase are actually present in the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}$ model, the former one adjacent to the Haldane one, the latter to the ferromagneric one, with an Ising transition between them. By contrast, the ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ chain only has a NNN-Haldane phase between the Haldane phase and the ferromagnetic phase for positive ${J}_{2}$. In both cases, our DMRG data are consistent with a continuous Kosterlitz-Thouless transition between the NNN-Haldane and the ferromagnetic phases.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.100.104426

Related papers

Heisenberg spin chains with additional isotropic three-site exchange interactions

N.B. Ivanov

The J1-J3 Heisenberg spin models with nearest-neighbor (J1) and additional isotropic three-site (J3) spin interactions remain relatively less explored, although such types of competing exchange terms can naturally emerge from different sources, including the strong-coupling expansion of the multiorbital Hubbard model. Below we present a short survey of the recently published research in this field, the emphasis being on the characteristics of the variety of quantum phases supported by a few generic uniform- and alternating-spin J1-J3 Heisenberg chains. For the reason that the positive (J3>0) three-site couplings tend towards the formation of local quantum dimers, the J1-J3 spin models typically experience some spontaneous dimerization upon increasing J3. Actually, it occurred that the established dimer phases in spin-S J1-J3 Heisenberg chains (S>1/2) serve as complete analogues of the famous gapped Majumdar-Ghosh dimer phase in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with next-nearest-neighbor couplings. The same dimerizations have been observed in the alternating-spin (S,σ) J1-J3 chains (S>σ), provided that the cell spin S+σ= integer, whereas for half-integer cell spin, the local dimer formation produces gapless spin-liquid ground states. The alternating-spin J1-J3 chains also provide some typical examples of spin models supporting the so-called non-Lieb-Mattis magnetic phases.

arXiv:2101.05164•Condensed Matter Physics•Dec 1, 2020•2 citations

Spontaneous dimerization, critical lines, and short-range correlations in a frustrated spin-1 chain

Natalia Chepiga, Ian K. Affleck, Frédéric Mila

We report on a detailed investigation of the spin-$1 {J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}$ Heisenberg model, a frustrated model with nearest-neighbor coupling ${J}_{1}$, next-nearest neighbor coupling ${J}_{2}$, and a three-site interaction ${J}_{3}\left[({\mathbf{S}}_{i\ensuremath{-}1}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i})({\mathbf{S}}_{i}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i+1})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.\right]$ previously studied in [Phys. Rev. B 93, 241108(R) (2016)]. Using density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) and exact diagonalizations, we show that the phase boundaries between the Haldane phase, the next-nearest neighbor Haldane phase, and the dimerized phase can be very accurately determined by combining the information deduced from the dimerization, the ground-state energy, the entanglement spectrum and the Berry phase. By a careful investigation of the finite-size spectrum, we also show that the transition between the next-nearest neighbor Haldane phase and the dimerized phase is in the Ising universality class all along the critical line. Furthermore, we justify the conformal embedding of the $\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{2}$ Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theory in terms of a boson and an Ising field, and we explicitly derive a number of consequences of this embedding for the spectrum along the $\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{2}$ transition line between the Haldane phase and the dimerized phase. We also show that the solitons along the first-order transition line between the Haldane phase and the dimerized phase carry a spin-1/2, while the domain walls between different dimerization domains inside the dimerized phase carry a spin 1. Finally, we show that short-range correlations change character in the Haldane and dimerized phases through disorder and Lifshitz lines, as well as through the development of short-range dimer correlations in the Haldane phase, leading to a remarkably rich phase diagram.

arXiv:1608.08109•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Nov 8, 2016•31 citations

Spontaneous dimerization in the ground state of one-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnets

Alberto Pimpinelli

Starting from the exact result of Majumdar and Ghosh for the dimerized ground state of a Heisenberg linear-chain antiferromagnet with competing next-nearest-neighbor interaction ${\mathit{J}}_{2}$=1/2${\mathit{J}}_{1}$, it is shown that this state is an exact eigenstate of the same Hamiltonian with couplings extended up to fourth-nearest neighbors, if the relations ${\mathit{J}}_{1}$-2${\mathit{J}}_{2}$+${\mathit{J}}_{3}$=0 and ${\mathit{J}}_{3}$=2${\mathit{J}}_{4}$ hold. Furthermore, it is proved to all orders in perturbation theory that this state is the ground state of this Hamiltonian in a finite interval of values of the parameter \ensuremath{\lambda}==1/2-${\mathit{j}}_{2}$ around \ensuremath{\lambda}=0. The actual extension of this interval is computed numerically for finite chains and is shown to be significant.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Feb 1, 1991•6 citations

Antiferromagnetic Spin- S Chains with Exactly Dimerized Ground States

Frédéric Michaud, F. Vernay, Salvatore R. Manmana +1 more

We show that spin $S$ Heisenberg spin chains with an additional three-body interaction of the form $({\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}\mathbf{\ensuremath{-}}\mathbf{1}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}})({\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{1}})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.$ possess fully dimerized ground states if the ratio of the three-body interaction to the bilinear one is equal to $1/[4S(S+1)\ensuremath{-}2]$. This result generalizes the Majumdar-Ghosh point of the ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ chain, to which the present model reduces for $S=1/2$. For $S=1$, we use the density matrix renormalization group method to show that the transition between the Haldane and the dimerized phases is continuous with a central charge $c=3/2$. Finally, we show that such a three-body interaction appears naturally in a strong-coupling expansion of the Hubbard model, and we discuss the consequences for the dimerization of actual antiferromagnetic chains.

arXiv:1110.3394•Physical Review Letters•Mar 20, 2012•47 citations

Confinement, deconfinement, and bound states in the spin-1 and spin- 3 2 generalizations of the Majumdar-Ghosh chain

Aman Sharma, Mithilesh Nayak, Natalia Chepiga +2 more

We investigate the nature of low-energy excitations in a spin chain with antiferrmomagnetic nearest-neighbor $J_1$, next-nearest-neighbor $J_2$, and three-site $J_3$ interactions using the time-dependent density matrix renormalization group and the single mode approximation techniques. In the absence of the $J_2$ interaction, we identify clear distinctions in the spectral functions in the fully dimerized phase across the exactly dimerized line for different magnitudes of the spins. In contrast to the spin-$1/2$ chain, where the spinon continuum dominates the spectral functions, the magnon modes are prominent in the spectral functions of the spin-$1$ and spin-$3/2$ chains. Through single mode approximation and valence bond solid approaches, we disentangle magnon and spinon contributions to the spectral functions. After including the $J_2$ interactions, for the spin-$1$ chain we trace the evolution of the dynamical structure factor along the phase transition line between the Haldane phase and the fully dimerized phase. We find that the excitation spectrum is a continuum along this line and the spectral gap closes as the order of the transition changes from first order to second order. Along the line of first-order transitions, the spinon-like domain walls are deconfined, and the model exhibits their confinement into discrete bound states away from the transition line. A similar phenomenon occurs in the spin-$3/2$ chain across the phase transition between partially dimerized to fully dimerized phases, revealing a universal spinon confinement phenomenon across first-order phase transitions. This study presents the dynamical structure factor corresponding to the ground state phase diagram and establishes a unified quasiparticle framework for understanding the fundamental nature of excitations across distinct quantum phases in frustrated $J_1$-$J_2$-$J_3$ Heisenberg spin chains.

arXiv:2509.06720•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Feb 2, 2026•0 citations

A dimerized and frustrated spin model with alternating ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchanges: investigating quantum phases of Heisenberg spin chains with s = 1/2 and 1

Shaon Sahoo, V. M. L. Durga Prasad Goli, Diptiman Sen +1 more

We study Heisenberg spin-1/2 and spin-1 chains with alternating ferromagnetic ($J_1^F$) and antiferromagnetic ($J_1^A$) nearest-neighbor interactions and ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction ($J_2^F$). In this model frustration is induced by the non-zero $J_2^F$ and the effect of dimerization is realized by changing the strength of $J_1^A$ for a fixed value of $J_1^F$. The model with site spin $s$ behaves like a Haldane spin chain with site spin 2$s$ in the limit of vanishing $J_2^F$ and large $J_1^F/J_1^A$. We show that the exact ground state of the model can be found along a line in the parameter space. The phase diagram in the space of $J_1^A-J_2^F$ is determined using numerical techniques complemented by some analytical calculations. A number of quantities, including the ground state spin, energy gap, structure factor, entanglement entropy, and zero temperature magnetization, are studied to understand the complete phase diagram. An interesting and application-wise important feature of this model is that it exhibits a macroscopic magnetization jump in the presence of a magnetic field; we study this using an effective Hamiltonian.

•May 29, 2013•0 citations
We perform a systematic DMRG investigation of the two natural spin-1 generalizations of the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain, the spin-1 J1\ensuremath-J2{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}J1​\ensuremath-J2​ Heisenberg chain, where J2{J}_{2}J2​ is a next-nearest-neighbor Heisenberg coupling, and the spin-1 J1\ensuremath-J3{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}J1​\ensuremath-J3​ model, where J3{J}_{3}J3​ refers to a three-site interaction defined by J3[(Si\ensuremath−1\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiSi)(Si\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiSi+1)+H.c.]{J}_{3}\left[({\mathbf{S}}_{i\ensuremath{-}1}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i})({\mathbf{S}}_{i}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i+1})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.\right]J3​[(Si\ensuremath−1​\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiSi​)(Si​\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiSi+1​)+H.c.]. Although both models are rigorously equivalent to the Majumdar-Ghosh chain for spin 1/2, their physics appears to be quite different for spin 1. Indeed, when all couplings are antiferromagnetic, the spin-1 J1\ensuremath-J2{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}J1​\ensuremath-J2​ model undergoes an effective decoupling into two next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) Haldane chains upon increasing J2{J}_{2}J2​, while the J1\ensuremath-J3{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}J1​\ensuremath-J3​ chain undergoes a spontaneous dimerization similar to the spin-1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh chain upon increasing J3{J}_{3}J3​. By extending the phase diagram to all signs of the couplings, we show that both the dimerized and the NNN-Haldane phase are actually present in the J1\ensuremath-J3{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}J1​\ensuremath-J3​ model, the former one adjacent to the Haldane one, the latter to the ferromagneric one, with an Ising transition between them. By contrast, the J1\ensuremath-J2{J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}J1​\ensuremath-J2​ chain only has a NNN-Haldane phase between the Haldane phase and the ferromagnetic phase for positive J2{J}_{2}J2​. In both cases, our DMRG data are consistent with a continuous Kosterlitz-Thouless transition between the NNN-Haldane and the ferromagnetic phases.
The J1-J3 Heisenberg spin models with nearest-neighbor (J1) and additional isotropic three-site (J3) spin interactions remain relatively less explored, although such types of competing exchange terms can naturally emerge from different sources, including the strong-coupling expansion of the multiorbital Hubbard model. Below we present a short survey of the recently published research in this field, the emphasis being on the characteristics of the variety of quantum phases supported by a few generic uniform- and alternating-spin J1-J3 Heisenberg chains. For the reason that the positive (J3>0) three-site couplings tend towards the formation of local quantum dimers, the J1-J3 spin models typically experience some spontaneous dimerization upon increasing J3. Actually, it occurred that the established dimer phases in spin-S J1-J3 Heisenberg chains (S>1/2) serve as complete analogues of the famous gapped Majumdar-Ghosh dimer phase in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with next-nearest-neighbor couplings. The same dimerizations have been observed in the alternating-spin (S,σ) J1-J3 chains (S>σ), provided that the cell spin S+σ= integer, whereas for half-integer cell spin, the local dimer formation produces gapless spin-liquid ground states. The alternating-spin J1-J3 chains also provide some typical examples of spin models supporting the so-called non-Lieb-Mattis magnetic phases.
We report on a detailed investigation of the spin-$1 {J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{3}$ Heisenberg model, a frustrated model with nearest-neighbor coupling J1{J}_{1}J1​, next-nearest neighbor coupling J2{J}_{2}J2​, and a three-site interaction ${J}_{3}\left[({\mathbf{S}}_{i\ensuremath{-}1}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i})({\mathbf{S}}_{i}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{i+1})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.\right]$ previously studied in [Phys. Rev. B 93, 241108(R) (2016)]. Using density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) and exact diagonalizations, we show that the phase boundaries between the Haldane phase, the next-nearest neighbor Haldane phase, and the dimerized phase can be very accurately determined by combining the information deduced from the dimerization, the ground-state energy, the entanglement spectrum and the Berry phase. By a careful investigation of the finite-size spectrum, we also show that the transition between the next-nearest neighbor Haldane phase and the dimerized phase is in the Ising universality class all along the critical line. Furthermore, we justify the conformal embedding of the SU(2)2\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{2}SU(2)2​ Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theory in terms of a boson and an Ising field, and we explicitly derive a number of consequences of this embedding for the spectrum along the SU(2)2\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{2}SU(2)2​ transition line between the Haldane phase and the dimerized phase. We also show that the solitons along the first-order transition line between the Haldane phase and the dimerized phase carry a spin-1/2, while the domain walls between different dimerization domains inside the dimerized phase carry a spin 1. Finally, we show that short-range correlations change character in the Haldane and dimerized phases through disorder and Lifshitz lines, as well as through the development of short-range dimer correlations in the Haldane phase, leading to a remarkably rich phase diagram.
Starting from the exact result of Majumdar and Ghosh for the dimerized ground state of a Heisenberg linear-chain antiferromagnet with competing next-nearest-neighbor interaction J2{\mathit{J}}_{2}J2​=1/2J1{\mathit{J}}_{1}J1​, it is shown that this state is an exact eigenstate of the same Hamiltonian with couplings extended up to fourth-nearest neighbors, if the relations J1{\mathit{J}}_{1}J1​-2J2{\mathit{J}}_{2}J2​+J3{\mathit{J}}_{3}J3​=0 and J3{\mathit{J}}_{3}J3​=2J4{\mathit{J}}_{4}J4​ hold. Furthermore, it is proved to all orders in perturbation theory that this state is the ground state of this Hamiltonian in a finite interval of values of the parameter \ensuremath{\lambda}==1/2-j2{\mathit{j}}_{2}j2​ around \ensuremath{\lambda}=0. The actual extension of this interval is computed numerically for finite chains and is shown to be significant.
We show that spin SSS Heisenberg spin chains with an additional three-body interaction of the form $({\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}\mathbf{\ensuremath{-}}\mathbf{1}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}})({\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{1}})+\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{c}.$ possess fully dimerized ground states if the ratio of the three-body interaction to the bilinear one is equal to $1/[4S(S+1)\ensuremath{-}2]$. This result generalizes the Majumdar-Ghosh point of the ${J}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ chain, to which the present model reduces for S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2. For S=1S=1S=1, we use the density matrix renormalization group method to show that the transition between the Haldane and the dimerized phases is continuous with a central charge c=3/2c=3/2c=3/2. Finally, we show that such a three-body interaction appears naturally in a strong-coupling expansion of the Hubbard model, and we discuss the consequences for the dimerization of actual antiferromagnetic chains.
We investigate the nature of low-energy excitations in a spin chain with antiferrmomagnetic nearest-neighbor J1J_1J1​, next-nearest-neighbor J2J_2J2​, and three-site J3J_3J3​ interactions using the time-dependent density matrix renormalization group and the single mode approximation techniques. In the absence of the J2J_2J2​ interaction, we identify clear distinctions in the spectral functions in the fully dimerized phase across the exactly dimerized line for different magnitudes of the spins. In contrast to the spin-1/21/21/2 chain, where the spinon continuum dominates the spectral functions, the magnon modes are prominent in the spectral functions of the spin-111 and spin-3/23/23/2 chains. Through single mode approximation and valence bond solid approaches, we disentangle magnon and spinon contributions to the spectral functions. After including the J2J_2J2​ interactions, for the spin-111 chain we trace the evolution of the dynamical structure factor along the phase transition line between the Haldane phase and the fully dimerized phase. We find that the excitation spectrum is a continuum along this line and the spectral gap closes as the order of the transition changes from first order to second order. Along the line of first-order transitions, the spinon-like domain walls are deconfined, and the model exhibits their confinement into discrete bound states away from the transition line. A similar phenomenon occurs in the spin-3/23/23/2 chain across the phase transition between partially dimerized to fully dimerized phases, revealing a universal spinon confinement phenomenon across first-order phase transitions. This study presents the dynamical structure factor corresponding to the ground state phase diagram and establishes a unified quasiparticle framework for understanding the fundamental nature of excitations across distinct quantum phases in frustrated J1J_1J1​-J2J_2J2​-J3J_3J3​ Heisenberg spin chains.
We study Heisenberg spin-1/2 and spin-1 chains with alternating ferromagnetic (J1FJ_1^FJ1F​) and antiferromagnetic (J1AJ_1^AJ1A​) nearest-neighbor interactions and ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction (J2FJ_2^FJ2F​). In this model frustration is induced by the non-zero J2FJ_2^FJ2F​ and the effect of dimerization is realized by changing the strength of J1AJ_1^AJ1A​ for a fixed value of J1FJ_1^FJ1F​. The model with site spin sss behaves like a Haldane spin chain with site spin 2sss in the limit of vanishing J2FJ_2^FJ2F​ and large J1F/J1AJ_1^F/J_1^AJ1F​/J1A​. We show that the exact ground state of the model can be found along a line in the parameter space. The phase diagram in the space of J1A−J2FJ_1^A-J_2^FJ1A​−J2F​ is determined using numerical techniques complemented by some analytical calculations. A number of quantities, including the ground state spin, energy gap, structure factor, entanglement entropy, and zero temperature magnetization, are studied to understand the complete phase diagram. An interesting and application-wise important feature of this model is that it exhibits a macroscopic magnetization jump in the presence of a magnetic field; we study this using an effective Hamiltonian.