Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1907.02354 · Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)

Ehrenfest’s Theorem revisited

H. Arodź

Published Jul 30, 2019• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Historically, Ehrenfest’s theorem (1927) is the first one which shows that classical physics can emerge from quantum physics as a kind of approximation. We recall the theorem in its original form, and we highlight its generalizations to the relativistic Dirac particle and to a particle with spin and izospin. We argue that apparent classicality of the macroscopic world can probably be explained within the framework of standard quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.59203/zfn.66.463

Related papers

Significance of Ehrenfest theorem in quantum-classical relationship

Dipak Sen, Siddhant Das, A. N. Basu +1 more

ψ-function, the Generalized Ehrenfest Theorem re- veals some interesting exact relationships between quantum and classical expectation values. These general results seem to imply a deep-rooted unity (in spite of apparent radical differences in conceptual structures) between classical and quantum mechan- ics. Some significant consequences and important physical insights which follow from the general formulation are discussed with examples. Most im- portant is that it offers, under reasonable approx i- mations, a pure quantum mechanical description of the Stern-Gerlach experiment with realistic inhomo- geneous magnetic field (∇ ∇.B = 0). EVEN almost seventy-five years after the first formul a- tion of quantum mechanics (QM), its relation with clas - sical mechanics (CM) remains obscure. The usual belief that QM has superseded CM is also not well founded. In all cases where a new theory supersedes an old one, there is a universal prescription of recovering the mathematical structure of the old theory in the doma in of its validity, i.e. where it is empirically established. This is true for both special and general theory of rel a- tivity 1 . But for QM, no such universal approximation procedure can be offered. About the success and failure of the two mechanics we can make two positive asser- tions: (i) There are experimental results in the micr o- scopic domain (such as hydr ogen spectrum) or in the macroscopic domain (such as specific heat of so lids at low temperature) which cannot be interpreted within the framework of CM. (ii) In all such cases, the mathemat i- cal formalism of QM provides the correct empirical results. Not a single failure has yet been reported. These empirical evidences show that CM cannot be the universal mechanics and that QM has such a pote n- tiality. However, since it is not yet possible to recover CM in all the domains of its validity, we cannot assert that QM has superseded CM. A second alternative that

•Jan 1, 2001•9 citations

Ehrenfest theorem in relativistic quantum theory*

Iwo Białynicki‐Birula, Zofia Białynicka-Birula

Abstract Ehrenfest theorem is extended to the relativistic quantum theory of charged particles, moving under the influence of a classical electromagnetic field. In order to extend the original Ehrenfest result to the relativistic domain we bypassed the problems with the relativistic position operator by deriving directly Newton’s second law. Our approach is characterized by its universality. The detailed form of the wave equation is not needed. All that is required is the existence of the conserved electric four-current built from the particle wave function. The derivation is based on the conservation laws for the energy and momentum.

arXiv:2111.10798•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Apr 8, 2022•3 citations

Classical Physics Versus Quantum Physics: an Overview

Hardev Singh Virk

Newtonian mechanics is the foundation of Classical Physics. Newton’s mechanics, Thermodynamics, Wave theory of Optics and Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory belong to regime of Classical Physics and can be used to explain a wide range of phenomena in the Universe at macroscopic scale. These theories fail spectacularly when applied to phenomenain the atomic and nuclear regime, for example, proton-atom scattering or the flow of electrons in a semiconductor. Quantum mechanics is the most successful scientific theory that has ever been created and it has completely changed our view of the world. The failure of Classical Physics was highlighted by black body radiation and photoelectric effect. Max Planck and Albert Einstein provided explanations of both phenomena based on quantum hypothesis and are thus considered founders of Quantum Physics. The origin of quantum mechanics goes back to the mid-1920s.It was formulated first as matrix mechanics by Werner Heisenberg, Max Born and Pascual Jordan; then as wave mechanics by Louis de Broglie and Erwin Schrödinger; and later on asquantum statistics of subatomic particles by Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein. Combining relativistic mechanics with quantum mechanics, Dirac formulated his relativistic quantum mechanics during 1930s. Uncertainty Principle is thecornerstone of Quantum Physics. The role of randomness in microscopic physical processes shatters the myth that the universe is deterministic. Quantum world is unpredictable in the classical sense and demolishes the idea of an objective universe. The Copenhagen interpretation remains the quantum mechanical formalism that is currently most widely accepted amongst physicists.Quantum theories support cosmic spirit pervading the cosmos and inter – relationship of individuals in the world society. Quantum philosophy is holistic and is going to revolutionize our world-view.

OmniScience A Multi-disciplinary Journal•Aug 1, 2014•2 citations

Deduction of generalized Ehrenfest theorem by using the entangled state representation

MA Mei-juan

The Generalized Ehrenfest theorem is deduced by using the entangled state representation,that is the common eigenstate of relative coordinate and general momentum of two particles.It is shown that not only quantum mechanics is self-consistent with classical physics,but also the corresponding classical physics law could be deduced by virtue of the quantum mechanics law.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

M. Baldo

One of the main unsolved question in Quantum Mechanics (QM) is its compatibility with classical mechanics. The laws of QM, which describe the microscopic world, must merge into the classical ones for large enough physical systems, but it is still unknown at which point, if any, the transition occurs and if the transition is smooth or sudden as the size increases. Furthermore, a strict extension of QM to the macroscopic world leads to well known 'paradoxes', which is not straightforward to solve. This question is tightly connected with the measurement problem, since any measurement apparatus must give a response which can be described at classical level. Many experiments have been performed to answer to this question. They mainly try to find to which extent the number of particles can be increased in order to observe clear evidence of violation of standard QM. In this paper we argue that the macroscopicity parameter is not the number of particles but the number of independent degrees of freedom, as proposed in a recent model for the completion of QM. This introduces a sort of change of paradigm. To support this claim a representative set of well known experiments are analyzed from this point of view. This brings to a new interpretation of the experiments. A general scheme for the quantum-classical transition is discussed in some details.

arXiv:2607.09735•Jul 2, 2026•0 citations

Mathematics and physics of consistency of the Born rule with normal probability distribution

Alexey A. Kryukov

Abstract Newtonian and Scrödinger dynamics can be formulated in a physically meaningful way within the same Hilbert space framework. The resulting unexpected relation between classical and quantum motions goes beyond the results provided by the Ehrenfest theorem. The normal probability distribution and the Born rule turn out to be related. A dynamical mechanism responsible for the latter formula is proposed and applied to measurements of macroscopic and microscopic systems.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 1, 2019•2 citations
Historically, Ehrenfest’s theorem (1927) is the first one which shows that classical physics can emerge from quantum physics as a kind of approximation. We recall the theorem in its original form, and we highlight its generalizations to the relativistic Dirac particle and to a particle with spin and izospin. We argue that apparent classicality of the macroscopic world can probably be explained within the framework of standard quantum mechanics.
ψ-function, the Generalized Ehrenfest Theorem re- veals some interesting exact relationships between quantum and classical expectation values. These general results seem to imply a deep-rooted unity (in spite of apparent radical differences in conceptual structures) between classical and quantum mechan- ics. Some significant consequences and important physical insights which follow from the general formulation are discussed with examples. Most im- portant is that it offers, under reasonable approx i- mations, a pure quantum mechanical description of the Stern-Gerlach experiment with realistic inhomo- geneous magnetic field (∇ ∇.B = 0). EVEN almost seventy-five years after the first formul a- tion of quantum mechanics (QM), its relation with clas - sical mechanics (CM) remains obscure. The usual belief that QM has superseded CM is also not well founded. In all cases where a new theory supersedes an old one, there is a universal prescription of recovering the mathematical structure of the old theory in the doma in of its validity, i.e. where it is empirically established. This is true for both special and general theory of rel a- tivity 1 . But for QM, no such universal approximation procedure can be offered. About the success and failure of the two mechanics we can make two positive asser- tions: (i) There are experimental results in the micr o- scopic domain (such as hydr ogen spectrum) or in the macroscopic domain (such as specific heat of so lids at low temperature) which cannot be interpreted within the framework of CM. (ii) In all such cases, the mathemat i- cal formalism of QM provides the correct empirical results. Not a single failure has yet been reported. These empirical evidences show that CM cannot be the universal mechanics and that QM has such a pote n- tiality. However, since it is not yet possible to recover CM in all the domains of its validity, we cannot assert that QM has superseded CM. A second alternative that
Abstract Ehrenfest theorem is extended to the relativistic quantum theory of charged particles, moving under the influence of a classical electromagnetic field. In order to extend the original Ehrenfest result to the relativistic domain we bypassed the problems with the relativistic position operator by deriving directly Newton’s second law. Our approach is characterized by its universality. The detailed form of the wave equation is not needed. All that is required is the existence of the conserved electric four-current built from the particle wave function. The derivation is based on the conservation laws for the energy and momentum.
Newtonian mechanics is the foundation of Classical Physics. Newton’s mechanics, Thermodynamics, Wave theory of Optics and Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory belong to regime of Classical Physics and can be used to explain a wide range of phenomena in the Universe at macroscopic scale. These theories fail spectacularly when applied to phenomenain the atomic and nuclear regime, for example, proton-atom scattering or the flow of electrons in a semiconductor. Quantum mechanics is the most successful scientific theory that has ever been created and it has completely changed our view of the world. The failure of Classical Physics was highlighted by black body radiation and photoelectric effect. Max Planck and Albert Einstein provided explanations of both phenomena based on quantum hypothesis and are thus considered founders of Quantum Physics. The origin of quantum mechanics goes back to the mid-1920s.It was formulated first as matrix mechanics by Werner Heisenberg, Max Born and Pascual Jordan; then as wave mechanics by Louis de Broglie and Erwin Schrödinger; and later on asquantum statistics of subatomic particles by Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein. Combining relativistic mechanics with quantum mechanics, Dirac formulated his relativistic quantum mechanics during 1930s. Uncertainty Principle is thecornerstone of Quantum Physics. The role of randomness in microscopic physical processes shatters the myth that the universe is deterministic. Quantum world is unpredictable in the classical sense and demolishes the idea of an objective universe. The Copenhagen interpretation remains the quantum mechanical formalism that is currently most widely accepted amongst physicists.Quantum theories support cosmic spirit pervading the cosmos and inter – relationship of individuals in the world society. Quantum philosophy is holistic and is going to revolutionize our world-view.
One of the main unsolved question in Quantum Mechanics (QM) is its compatibility with classical mechanics. The laws of QM, which describe the microscopic world, must merge into the classical ones for large enough physical systems, but it is still unknown at which point, if any, the transition occurs and if the transition is smooth or sudden as the size increases. Furthermore, a strict extension of QM to the macroscopic world leads to well known 'paradoxes', which is not straightforward to solve. This question is tightly connected with the measurement problem, since any measurement apparatus must give a response which can be described at classical level. Many experiments have been performed to answer to this question. They mainly try to find to which extent the number of particles can be increased in order to observe clear evidence of violation of standard QM. In this paper we argue that the macroscopicity parameter is not the number of particles but the number of independent degrees of freedom, as proposed in a recent model for the completion of QM. This introduces a sort of change of paradigm. To support this claim a representative set of well known experiments are analyzed from this point of view. This brings to a new interpretation of the experiments. A general scheme for the quantum-classical transition is discussed in some details.