arXiv:1906.02700 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising model with a trapped-ion quantum simulator

Guido Pagano, Aniruddha Bapat, Patrick Becker, Katherine Collins, Arinjoy De, Paul Hess, Harvey Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, Wen Lin Tan, Christopher L. Baldwin, Lucas T. Brady, Abhinav Deshpande, Fangli Liu, Stephen P. Jordan, Alexey Vyacheslavovich Gorshkov, Christopher R. Monroe

Published Oct 6, 2020• 261 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Quantum computers and simulators may offer significant advantages over their classical counterparts, providing insights into quantum many-body systems and possibly improving performance for solving exponentially hard problems, such as optimization and satisfiability. Here, we report the implementation of a low-depth Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) using an analog quantum simulator. We estimate the ground-state energy of the Transverse Field Ising Model with long-range interactions with tunable range, and we optimize the corresponding combinatorial classical problem by sampling the QAOA output with high-fidelity, single-shot, individual qubit measurements. We execute the algorithm with both an exhaustive search and closed-loop optimization of the variational parameters, approximating the ground-state energy with up to 40 trapped-ion qubits. We benchmark the experiment with bootstrapping heuristic methods scaling polynomially with the system size. We observe, in agreement with numerics, that the QAOA performance does not degrade significantly as we scale up the system size and that the runtime is approximately independent from the number of qubits. We finally give a comprehensive analysis of the errors occurring in our system, a crucial step in the path forward toward the application of the QAOA to more general problem instances.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006373117

Related papers

Quantum Approximate Optimization with a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator

Guido Pagano, Aniruddha Bapat, Patrick Becker +13 more

Quantum computers and simulators may offer significant advantages over their classical counterparts, providing insights into quantum many-body systems and possibly solving exponentially hard problems, such as optimization and satisfiability. Here we report the first implementation of a shallow-depth Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) using an analog quantum simulator to estimate the ground state energy of the transverse field Ising model with tunable long-range interactions. First, we exhaustively search the variational control parameters to approximate the ground state energy with up to 40 trapped-ion qubits. We then interface the quantum simulator with a classical algorithm to more efficiently find the optimal set of parameters that minimizes the resulting energy of the system. We finally sample from the full probability distribution of the QAOA output with single-shot and efficient measurements of every qubit.

Jun 6, 201911 citations

End-to-end protocol for high-quality quantum approximate optimization algorithm parameters with few shots

Tianyi Hao, Zichang He, Ruslan Shaydulin +2 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum heuristic for combinatorial optimization that has been demonstrated to scale better than state-of-the-art classical solvers for some problems. For a given problem instance, QAOA performance depends crucially on the choice of the parameters. While average-case optimal parameters are available in many cases, meaningful performance gains can be obtained by fine-tuning these parameters for a given instance. This task is especially challenging, however, when the number of circuit executions (shots) is limited. In this work, we develop an end-to-end protocol that combines multiple parameter settings and fine-tuning techniques. We use large-scale numerical experiments to optimize the protocol for the shot-limited setting and observe that optimizers with the simplest internal model (linear) perform best. We implement the optimized pipeline on a trapped-ion processor using up to 32 qubits and 5 QAOA layers, and we demonstrate that the pipeline is robust to small amounts of hardware noise. To the best of our knowledge, these are the largest demonstrations of QAOA parameter fine-tuning on a trapped-ion processor in terms of two-qubit gate count.

arXiv:2408.00557Physical Review ResearchAug 1, 20253 citations

Evaluating the limits of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm parameter transfer at high rounds on sparse Ising models with geometrically local cubic terms

Elijah Pelofske, Marek M. Rams, Andreas Bärtschi +4 more

The emergent practical applicability of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for approximate combinatorial optimization is a subject of considerable interest. One of the primary limitations of QAOA is the task of finding a set of good parameters, which is usually done using a variational optimization loop. Parameter transfer, or parameter concentration, is a phenomenon where QAOA angles trained on problem instances that are self-similar tend to perform well for other problem instances from that similar class. This suggests a potentially highly efficient and scalable nonvariational learning method for QAOA angle finding. In this work, we systematically study QAOA parameter transferability from small problem sizes (16 and 27 decision variables) onto large problem instances (up to 156 qubits) for heavy-hex graph Ising models with geometrically local higher-order terms using the Julia based QAOA simulation tool to perform classical angle finding for up to 49 QAOA layers ( p ) . Parameter transfer of the fixed angles is validated using a combination of full state vector, projected entangled pair states, matrix product state, and LOWESA numerical simulations. We find that the QAOA parameter transfer from single instances applied to other (unseen) problem instances does not in general provide monotonically improving performance as a function of p —there are many cases where the performance temporarily decreases as a function of p —but despite this the transferred angles have a general trend of improved expectation value as the QAOA depth increases, in many cases converging close to the true ground-state energy of the 100 + qubit instances. We also sample the hardware-compatible Ising models using the ensemble of transfer-learned QAOA parameters on several superconducting qubit IBM quantum processors with 127, 133, and 156 qubits. We find continuous solution quality improvement of the hardware-compatible QAOA circuits run on the IBM noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors up to p = 5 on , up to p = 9 on , and up to p = 10 on .

arXiv:2509.13528Physical Review ResearchMar 2, 20261 citation

Snapshot-QAOA: Extending QAOA to Quantum Hamiltonian Simulation

Reuben Tate, Quinn Langfitt, Elijah Pelofske +4 more

Abstract We present Snapshot-QAOA, a variation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) that finds approximate minimum energy eigenstates of a large set of quantum Hamiltonians. Traditionally, QAOA targets the task of approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems. Snapshot-QAOA enables a significant expansion of the use case space for QAOA to more general quantum Hamiltonians, where the goal is to approximate the ground-state. Snapshot-QAOA retains the desirable variational-algorithm qualities of QAOA such as a small parameter count and relatively shallow circuit depth. Snapshot-QAOA is thus a better trainable alternative to the (Near Intermediate-Scale Quantum) NISQ-era Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) algorithm, while retaining a significant circuit-depth advantage over the (Quantum Error Corrected) QEC-era Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) algorithm. Our fundamental approach is inspired by the idea of Trotterization of a continuous-time linear adiabatic anneal schedule. Snapshot-QAOA restricts the QAOA evolution to not phasing out the mixing Hamiltonian completely at the end of the evolution, instead evolving only a partial typical linear QAOA schedule, thus creating a type of snapshot of the typical QAOA evolution. In this way, the cost of the quantum Hamiltonian is encoded by the phase separator to address the diagonal terms in the problem Hamiltonian and by the mixer to address the non-diagonal terms in the problem Hamiltonian. We focus on QAOA with the transverse field mixer, and thus simulations of quantum Hamiltonians that contain single-site Pauli-X terms. By measuring the expectation value of the system in both X and Z-basis, we can estimate the ground-state energy of transverse field quantum Hamiltonians. The accuracy of ground-state energy finding with snapshot-QAOA is evaluated using extensive numerical simulations on a 16 qubit J1-J2 frustrated transverse field Ising model.

Mar 22, 20260 citations

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices

Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi +2 more

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems.Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant.An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization.We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations.Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in O½polyðpÞ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 OðpÞ optimization runs to achieve similar performance.We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps.The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps.Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA.When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices.We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.

arXiv:1812.01041Physical Review XJun 24, 2020932 citations

Assessing the Efficacy of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing for Combinatorial Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of QAOA and Classical Solvers

Ayan Khan

The transition from theoretical quantum computing to practical real-world applications heavily relies onhybrid quantum-classical architectures designed for NoisyIntermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Among these approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm(QAOA) is a prominent strategy for addressing complex combinatorial optimization challenges, such as the NP-hard MaxCut problem. Instead of performing the entire computationon a quantum processor, QAOA utilizes a quantum circuit toevaluate a parameterized cost function, whereas a classical optimizer refines the parameters iteratively. This study presentsa rigorous empirical evaluation comparing the performanceof QAOA against established classical solvers on small-scaleMax-Cut instances. All experiments were implemented andexecuted using Python (Qiskit Aer) on a state-vector simulator.Using Erdős–Rényi random graphs and regular graphs with4 to 20 nodes, we benchmark QAOA at depths p = 2 andp = 3 against simulated annealing, the Goemans–WilliamsonSDP-based algorithm, and a linear-time greedy heuristic. Ourexperimental results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA implementations exhibit severe performance degradation, prohibitive computational overhead (O(2^n) scaling), and low convergencerates compared to mature classical algorithms. At 20 nodes,QAOA (p = 2) achieves only a 0.467 approximation ratio versus0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, with a 210× runtime slowdownover greedy heuristics

Jun 3, 20260 citations