Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1905.10228 · Quantum Information Processing

Error correction schemes for fully correlated quantum channels protecting both quantum and classical information

Chi-Kwong Li, Seth Lyles, Yiu‐Tung Poon

Published Mar 26, 2020• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-020-02639-z

Related papers

Error Correction for Correlated Quantum Systems

Mark Byrd, Alvin Gonzales, Daniel Dilley +1 more

Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Approximating Decoherence Processes for the Design and Simulation of Quantum Error Correction Codes on Classical Computers

Josu Etxezarreta Martínez, Patricio Fuentes, Pedro M. Crespo +1 more

Quantum information is prone to suffer from errors caused by the so-called decoherence, which describes the loss in coherence of quantum states associated to their interactions with the surrounding environment. This decoherence phenomenon is present in every quantum information task, be it transmission, processing or even storage of quantum information. Consequently, the protection of quantum information via quantum error correction codes (QECC) is of paramount importance to construct fully operational quantum computers. Understanding environmental decoherence processes and the way they are modeled is fundamental in order to construct effective error correction methods capable of protecting quantum information. Moreover, quantum channel models that are efficiently implementable and manageable on classical computers are required in order to design and simulate such error correction schemes. In this article, we present a survey of decoherence models, reviewing the manner in which these models can be approximated into quantum Pauli channel models, which can be efficiently implemented on classical computers. We also explain how certain families of quantum error correction codes can be entirely simulated in the classical domain, without the explicit need of a quantum computer. A quantum error correction code for the approximated channel is also a correctable code for the original channel, and its performance can be obtained by Monte Carlo simulations on a classical computer.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2020•33 citations

The Road to Near-Capacity CV-QKD Reconciliation: An FEC-Agnostic Design

Xin Liu, Chao Xu, Yasir J. Noori +2 more

New near-capacity continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) reconciliation schemes are proposed, where both the authenticated classical channel (ClC) and the quantum channel (QuC) for QKD are protected by separate forward error correction (FEC) coding schemes. More explicitly, all of the syndrome-based QKD reconciliation schemes found in literature rely on syndrome-based codes, such as low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. Hence at the current state-of-the-art the channel codes that cannot use syndrome decoding such as the family of convolutional codes (CCs) and polar codes cannot be directly applied. Moreover, the ClC used for syndrome transmission in these schemes is generally assumed to be idealistically error-free, where the realistic additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh fading of the ClC have not been taken into account. To circumvent this limitation, a new codeword-based -rather than syndrome-based -QKD reconciliation scheme is proposed, where Alice sends an FEC-protected codeword to Bob through a ClC, while Bob sends a separate FEC protected codeword to Alice through a QuC. Upon decoding the codeword received from the other side, the final key is obtained by applying a simple modulo-2 operation to the local codeword and the decoded remote codeword. As a result, first of all, the proposed codeword-based QKD reconciliation system ensures protection of both the QuC and of the ClC. Secondly, the proposed system has a similar complexity at both sides, where both Alice and Bob have an FEC encoder and an FEC decoder. Thirdly, the proposed system makes QKD reconciliation compatible with a wide range of FEC schemes, including polar codes, CCs and irregular convolutional codes (IRCCs), where a near-capacity performance can be achieved for both the QuC and for the ClC. Our simulation results demonstrate that thanks to the proposed regime, the performance improvements of the QuC and of the ClC benefit each other, hence leading to an improved secret key rate (SKR) that inches closer to both the Pirandola-Laurenza-Ottaviani-Banchi (PLOB) bound and to the maximum achieveable rate bound.

arXiv:2403.16180•IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society•Jan 1, 2024•7 citations

A SIMPLE OPERATOR QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION SCHEME AVOIDING FULLY CORRELATED ERRORS

Chiara Bagnasco, Yasushi Kondo, Mikio Nakahara

•Apr 1, 2014•1 citation

An Introduction to Error-Correcting Codes: From Classical to Quantum

Hsun‐Hsien Chang

This report surveys quantum error-correcting codes. As Preskill claimed, 21st century would be the golden age of quantum error correction. Quantum channels behave differently from classical channels, so researchers face difficulties in developing robust quantum codes. Fortunately, the classical error control methods have been well developed. If we can learn many lessons from classical coding theory, we can expedite the development of quantum codes. Scientists have discovered that quantum error correction shares many concepts with classical counterpart. Both quantum and classical coding schemes add redundancy to information to protect against noises. They also have similar conditions for error detectability and correctability.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602157•Feb 18, 2006•4 citations

Efficient quantum error correction for fully correlated noise

Chi-Kwong Li, Mikio Nakahara, Yiu‐Tung Poon +2 more

arXiv:1104.4750•Physics Letters A•Jul 25, 2011•18 citations
Quantum information is prone to suffer from errors caused by the so-called decoherence, which describes the loss in coherence of quantum states associated to their interactions with the surrounding environment. This decoherence phenomenon is present in every quantum information task, be it transmission, processing or even storage of quantum information. Consequently, the protection of quantum information via quantum error correction codes (QECC) is of paramount importance to construct fully operational quantum computers. Understanding environmental decoherence processes and the way they are modeled is fundamental in order to construct effective error correction methods capable of protecting quantum information. Moreover, quantum channel models that are efficiently implementable and manageable on classical computers are required in order to design and simulate such error correction schemes. In this article, we present a survey of decoherence models, reviewing the manner in which these models can be approximated into quantum Pauli channel models, which can be efficiently implemented on classical computers. We also explain how certain families of quantum error correction codes can be entirely simulated in the classical domain, without the explicit need of a quantum computer. A quantum error correction code for the approximated channel is also a correctable code for the original channel, and its performance can be obtained by Monte Carlo simulations on a classical computer.
New near-capacity continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) reconciliation schemes are proposed, where both the authenticated classical channel (ClC) and the quantum channel (QuC) for QKD are protected by separate forward error correction (FEC) coding schemes. More explicitly, all of the syndrome-based QKD reconciliation schemes found in literature rely on syndrome-based codes, such as low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. Hence at the current state-of-the-art the channel codes that cannot use syndrome decoding such as the family of convolutional codes (CCs) and polar codes cannot be directly applied. Moreover, the ClC used for syndrome transmission in these schemes is generally assumed to be idealistically error-free, where the realistic additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh fading of the ClC have not been taken into account. To circumvent this limitation, a new codeword-based -rather than syndrome-based -QKD reconciliation scheme is proposed, where Alice sends an FEC-protected codeword to Bob through a ClC, while Bob sends a separate FEC protected codeword to Alice through a QuC. Upon decoding the codeword received from the other side, the final key is obtained by applying a simple modulo-2 operation to the local codeword and the decoded remote codeword. As a result, first of all, the proposed codeword-based QKD reconciliation system ensures protection of both the QuC and of the ClC. Secondly, the proposed system has a similar complexity at both sides, where both Alice and Bob have an FEC encoder and an FEC decoder. Thirdly, the proposed system makes QKD reconciliation compatible with a wide range of FEC schemes, including polar codes, CCs and irregular convolutional codes (IRCCs), where a near-capacity performance can be achieved for both the QuC and for the ClC. Our simulation results demonstrate that thanks to the proposed regime, the performance improvements of the QuC and of the ClC benefit each other, hence leading to an improved secret key rate (SKR) that inches closer to both the Pirandola-Laurenza-Ottaviani-Banchi (PLOB) bound and to the maximum achieveable rate bound.
This report surveys quantum error-correcting codes. As Preskill claimed, 21st century would be the golden age of quantum error correction. Quantum channels behave differently from classical channels, so researchers face difficulties in developing robust quantum codes. Fortunately, the classical error control methods have been well developed. If we can learn many lessons from classical coding theory, we can expedite the development of quantum codes. Scientists have discovered that quantum error correction shares many concepts with classical counterpart. Both quantum and classical coding schemes add redundancy to information to protect against noises. They also have similar conditions for error detectability and correctability.