Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1905.02041 · Physical review. D/Physical review. D.

Operator approach to complexity: Excited states

Wung-Hong Huang

Published Sep 17, 2019• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We evaluate the complexity of the free scalar field by the operator approach in which the transformation matrix between the second quantization operators of the reference state and target state is regarded as the quantum gate. We first examine the system in which the reference state is two noninteracting oscillators with the same frequency ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ while the target state is two interacting oscillators with frequency ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{1}$ and ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{2}$. We calculate the geodesic length on the associated group manifold of gate matrix and reproduce the known value of ground-state complexity. Next, we study the complexity in the excited states. Although the gate matrix is very large we can transform it to a diagonal matrix and obtain the associated complexity. We explicitly calculate the complexity in several excited states and prove that the square of the geodesic length in the general state $|\mathrm{n},\mathrm{m}⟩$ is ${D}_{(\mathrm{n},\mathrm{m})}^{2}=(n+1){(\mathrm{ln}\sqrt{\frac{{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{1}}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}}})}^{2}+(m+1){(\mathrm{ln}\sqrt{\frac{{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{2}}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}}})}^{2}$. The results are extended to the $N$ couple harmonic oscillators which correspond to the lattice version of the free scalar field.

DOI
10.1103/physrevd.100.066013

Related papers

Perturbative complexity of an interacting theory

Wung-Hong Huang

We present a systematic method to expand the quantum complexity of interacting theory in a series of coupling constants. The complexity is evaluated by the operator approach in which the transformation matrix between the second quantization operators of the reference state and the target state defines the quantum gate. We start with two coupled oscillators and perturbatively evaluate the geodesic length of the associated group manifold of the gate matrix. Next, we generalize the analysis to $N$ coupled oscillators, which describes the lattice $\ensuremath{\lambda}{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{4}$ theory. Especially, we introduce simple diagrams to represent the perturbative series and construct simple rules to efficiently calculate the complexity. General formulas are obtained for the higher-order complexity of excited states. We present several diagrams to illuminate the properties of complexity and show that the interaction correction to complexity may be positive or negative depending on the magnitude of the reference-state frequency.

arXiv:2008.05944•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Mar 8, 2021•4 citations

Circuit Complexity in Z2 EEFT

Kiran Adhikari, Sayantan Choudhury, Sourabh Kumar +6 more

Motivated by recent studies of circuit complexity in weakly interacting scalar field theory, we explore the computation of circuit complexity in Z2 Even Effective Field Theories (Z2 EEFTs). We consider a massive free field theory with higher-order Wilsonian operators such as ϕ4, ϕ6, and ϕ8. To facilitate our computation, we regularize the theory by putting it on a lattice. First, we consider a simple case of two oscillators and later generalize the results to N oscillators. This study was carried out for nearly Gaussian states. In our computation, the reference state is an approximately Gaussian unentangled state, and the corresponding target state, calculated from our theory, is an approximately Gaussian entangled state. We compute the complexity using the geometric approach developed by Nielsen, parameterizing the path-ordered unitary transformation and minimizing the geodesic in the space of unitaries. The contribution of higher-order operators to the circuit complexity in our theory is discussed. We also explore the dependency of complexity on other parameters in our theory for various cases.

arXiv:2109.09759•Symmetry•Dec 22, 2022•10 citations

Geometric quantum complexity of bosonic oscillator systems

Satyaki Chowdhury, Martin Bojowald A, Jakub Mielczarek A B

A bstract According to the pioneering work of Nielsen and collaborators, the length of the minimal geodesic in a geometric realization of a suitable operator space provides a measure of the quantum complexity of an operation. Compared with the original concept of complexity based on the minimal number of gates required to construct the desired operation as a product, this geometrical approach amounts to a more concrete and computable definition, but its evaluation is nontrivial in systems with a high-dimensional Hilbert space. The geometrical formulation can more easily be evaluated by considering the geometry associated with a suitable finite-dimensional group generated by a small number of relevant operators of the system. In this way, the method has been applied in particular to the harmonic oscillator, which is also of interest in the present paper. However, subtle and previously unrecognized issues of group theory can lead to unforeseen complications, motivating a new formulation that remains on the level of the underlying Lie algebras for most of the required steps. Novel insights about complexity can thereby be found in a low-dimensional setting, with the potential of systematic extensions to higher dimensions as well as interactions. Specific examples include the quantum complexity of various target unitary operators associated with a harmonic oscillator, inverted harmonic oscillator, and coupled harmonic oscillators. The generality of this approach is demonstrated by an application to an anharmonic oscillator with a cubic term.

arXiv:2307.13736•Journal of High Energy Physics•Oct 4, 2024•7 citations

Circuit complexity for generalized coherent states in thermal field dynamics

Minyong Guo, Zhong-Ying Fan, Jie Jiang +2 more

In this work, we study the circuit complexity for generalized coherent states in thermal systems by adopting the covariance matrix approach. We focus on the coherent thermal (CT) state, which is non-Gaussian and has a nonvanishing one-point function. We find that even though the CT state cannot be fully determined by the symmetric two-point function, the circuit complexity can still be computed in the framework of the covariance matrix formalism by properly enlarging the covariance matrix. Now the group generated by the unitary is the semiproduct of translation and the symplectic group. If the reference state is Gaussian, the optimal geodesic is still be generated by a horizontal generator such that the circuit complexity can be read from the generalized covariance matrix associated to the target state by taking the cost function to be ${F}_{2}$. For a single harmonic oscillator, we discuss carefully the complexity and its formation in the cases that the reference states are Gaussian and the target space is excited by a single mode or double modes. We show that the study can be extended to the free scalar field theory.

arXiv:2004.00344•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jun 12, 2020•32 citations

Circuit complexity in U(1) gauge theory

Amir Moghimnejad, Shahrokh Parvizi

In this paper, we study circuit complexity for a free vector field of a [Formula: see text] gauge theory in Coulomb gauge, and Gaussian states. We introduce a quantum circuit model with Gaussian states, including reference and target states. Using Nielsen’s geometric approach, the complexity then can be found as the shortest geodesic in the space of states. This geodesic is based on the notion of geodesic distance on the Lie group of Bogoliubov transformations equipped with a right-invariant metric. We use the framework of the covariance matrix to compute circuit complexity between Gaussian states. We apply this framework to the free vector field in general dimensions where we compute the circuit complexity of the ground state of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:2108.08208•Modern Physics Letters A•Nov 10, 2021•5 citations

Circuit complexity in quantum field theory

Ro Jefferson, Robert C. Myers

Motivated by recent studies of holographic complexity, we examine the question of circuit complexity in quantum field theory. We provide a quantum circuit model for the preparation of Gaussian states, in particular the ground state, in a free scalar field theory for general dimensions. Applying the geometric approach of Nielsen to this quantum circuit model, the complexity of the state becomes the length of the shortest geodesic in the space of circuits. We compare the complexity of the ground state of the free scalar field to the analogous results from holographic complexity, and find some surprising similarities.

arXiv:1707.08570•Journal of High Energy Physics•Oct 1, 2017•476 citations
We evaluate the complexity of the free scalar field by the operator approach in which the transformation matrix between the second quantization operators of the reference state and target state is regarded as the quantum gate. We first examine the system in which the reference state is two noninteracting oscillators with the same frequency \ensuremathω0{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}\ensuremathω0​ while the target state is two interacting oscillators with frequency \ensuremathω\texttildelow1{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{1}\ensuremathω\texttildelow​1​ and \ensuremathω\texttildelow2{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{2}\ensuremathω\texttildelow​2​. We calculate the geodesic length on the associated group manifold of gate matrix and reproduce the known value of ground-state complexity. Next, we study the complexity in the excited states. Although the gate matrix is very large we can transform it to a diagonal matrix and obtain the associated complexity. We explicitly calculate the complexity in several excited states and prove that the square of the geodesic length in the general state ∣n,m⟩|\mathrm{n},\mathrm{m}⟩∣n,m⟩ is D(n,m)2=(n+1)(ln\ensuremathω\texttildelow1\ensuremathω0)2+(m+1)(ln\ensuremathω\texttildelow2\ensuremathω0)2{D}_{(\mathrm{n},\mathrm{m})}^{2}=(n+1){(\mathrm{ln}\sqrt{\frac{{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{1}}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}}})}^{2}+(m+1){(\mathrm{ln}\sqrt{\frac{{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{2}}{{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}}})}^{2}D(n,m)2​=(n+1)(ln\ensuremathω0​\ensuremathω\texttildelow​1​​​)2+(m+1)(ln\ensuremathω0​\ensuremathω\texttildelow​2​​​)2. The results are extended to the NNN couple harmonic oscillators which correspond to the lattice version of the free scalar field.
We present a systematic method to expand the quantum complexity of interacting theory in a series of coupling constants. The complexity is evaluated by the operator approach in which the transformation matrix between the second quantization operators of the reference state and the target state defines the quantum gate. We start with two coupled oscillators and perturbatively evaluate the geodesic length of the associated group manifold of the gate matrix. Next, we generalize the analysis to NNN coupled oscillators, which describes the lattice $\ensuremath{\lambda}{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{4}$ theory. Especially, we introduce simple diagrams to represent the perturbative series and construct simple rules to efficiently calculate the complexity. General formulas are obtained for the higher-order complexity of excited states. We present several diagrams to illuminate the properties of complexity and show that the interaction correction to complexity may be positive or negative depending on the magnitude of the reference-state frequency.
Motivated by recent studies of circuit complexity in weakly interacting scalar field theory, we explore the computation of circuit complexity in Z2 Even Effective Field Theories (Z2 EEFTs). We consider a massive free field theory with higher-order Wilsonian operators such as ϕ4, ϕ6, and ϕ8. To facilitate our computation, we regularize the theory by putting it on a lattice. First, we consider a simple case of two oscillators and later generalize the results to N oscillators. This study was carried out for nearly Gaussian states. In our computation, the reference state is an approximately Gaussian unentangled state, and the corresponding target state, calculated from our theory, is an approximately Gaussian entangled state. We compute the complexity using the geometric approach developed by Nielsen, parameterizing the path-ordered unitary transformation and minimizing the geodesic in the space of unitaries. The contribution of higher-order operators to the circuit complexity in our theory is discussed. We also explore the dependency of complexity on other parameters in our theory for various cases.
A bstract According to the pioneering work of Nielsen and collaborators, the length of the minimal geodesic in a geometric realization of a suitable operator space provides a measure of the quantum complexity of an operation. Compared with the original concept of complexity based on the minimal number of gates required to construct the desired operation as a product, this geometrical approach amounts to a more concrete and computable definition, but its evaluation is nontrivial in systems with a high-dimensional Hilbert space. The geometrical formulation can more easily be evaluated by considering the geometry associated with a suitable finite-dimensional group generated by a small number of relevant operators of the system. In this way, the method has been applied in particular to the harmonic oscillator, which is also of interest in the present paper. However, subtle and previously unrecognized issues of group theory can lead to unforeseen complications, motivating a new formulation that remains on the level of the underlying Lie algebras for most of the required steps. Novel insights about complexity can thereby be found in a low-dimensional setting, with the potential of systematic extensions to higher dimensions as well as interactions. Specific examples include the quantum complexity of various target unitary operators associated with a harmonic oscillator, inverted harmonic oscillator, and coupled harmonic oscillators. The generality of this approach is demonstrated by an application to an anharmonic oscillator with a cubic term.
In this work, we study the circuit complexity for generalized coherent states in thermal systems by adopting the covariance matrix approach. We focus on the coherent thermal (CT) state, which is non-Gaussian and has a nonvanishing one-point function. We find that even though the CT state cannot be fully determined by the symmetric two-point function, the circuit complexity can still be computed in the framework of the covariance matrix formalism by properly enlarging the covariance matrix. Now the group generated by the unitary is the semiproduct of translation and the symplectic group. If the reference state is Gaussian, the optimal geodesic is still be generated by a horizontal generator such that the circuit complexity can be read from the generalized covariance matrix associated to the target state by taking the cost function to be F2{F}_{2}F2​. For a single harmonic oscillator, we discuss carefully the complexity and its formation in the cases that the reference states are Gaussian and the target space is excited by a single mode or double modes. We show that the study can be extended to the free scalar field theory.
In this paper, we study circuit complexity for a free vector field of a [Formula: see text] gauge theory in Coulomb gauge, and Gaussian states. We introduce a quantum circuit model with Gaussian states, including reference and target states. Using Nielsen’s geometric approach, the complexity then can be found as the shortest geodesic in the space of states. This geodesic is based on the notion of geodesic distance on the Lie group of Bogoliubov transformations equipped with a right-invariant metric. We use the framework of the covariance matrix to compute circuit complexity between Gaussian states. We apply this framework to the free vector field in general dimensions where we compute the circuit complexity of the ground state of the Hamiltonian.
Motivated by recent studies of holographic complexity, we examine the question of circuit complexity in quantum field theory. We provide a quantum circuit model for the preparation of Gaussian states, in particular the ground state, in a free scalar field theory for general dimensions. Applying the geometric approach of Nielsen to this quantum circuit model, the complexity of the state becomes the length of the shortest geodesic in the space of circuits. We compare the complexity of the ground state of the free scalar field to the analogous results from holographic complexity, and find some surprising similarities.