Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1903.09370 · Physical Review Letters

Phase-Preserving Linear Amplifiers Not Simulable by the Parametric Amplifier

A. Chia, Michal Hajdušek, Ranjith Nair, Rosario Fazio, L. C. Kwek, Vlatko Vedral

Published Oct 16, 2020• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that a parametric amplifier can simulate a phase-preserving linear amplifier regardless of how the latter is realized [C. M. Caves et al., Phys. Rev. A 86, 063802 (2012)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.86.063802]. If true, this reduces all phase-preserving linear amplifiers to a single familiar model. Here we disprove this claim by constructing two counterexamples. A detailed discussion of the physics of our counterexamples is provided. It is shown that a Heisenberg-picture analysis facilitates a microscopic explanation of the physics. This also resolves a question about the nature of amplifier-added noise in degenerate two-photon amplification.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.125.163603

Related papers

Quantum limits on phase-preserving linear amplifiers

Carlton M. Caves, Joshua Combes, Jiang Zhang +1 more

The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, regardless of its phase, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise ratio. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: A high-gain linear amplifier must degrade the signal-to-noise ratio; the noise added by the amplifier, when referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we derive the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: We show that any phase-preserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state for the ancillary mode; the noise added to the amplified field mode is distributed according to the Wigner function of the ancilla state.

arXiv:1208.5174•Physical Review A•Dec 3, 2012•109 citations

Noise in phase-preserving linear amplifiers

Shashank Pandey, Jiang Zhang, Joshua Combes +1 more

The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: the noise added by the amplifier, referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we provide the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: any phasepreserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state σ for the ancillary mode; σ determines the properties of the added noise.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Linear amplifiers with phase-sensitive noise

Gerard J Milburn, Moira L. Steyn‐Ross, Daniel F. Walls

We present a model for a linear amplifier which adds phase-dependent noise to the input signal. This is achieved by preparing the internal modes of the amplifier in a squeezed vacuum. Such a scheme could be used to amplify a squeezed-signal quadrature with reduced added noise compared with conventional schemes. The model discussed could be realized as nondegenerate parametric amplification.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1987•46 citations

Phase fluctuations in a degenerate parametric amplifier

Zohra Rauf, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

The effect of laser linewidth associated with the phase fluctuations on the photon statistics in a degenerate parametric process is studied.Received 13 January 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.36.1481©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1987•6 citations

Quantum noise in light amplifiers

Matthew J. Collett, Daniel F. Walls

The principal problem of light amplifiers is to find a means to amplify a coherent amplitude without decreasing the SNR. Consider a signal with amplitude squeezed quantum fluctuations, that is, less noise in the amplitude quadrature than the phase quadrature. The objective is to find a phase sensitive amplifier, which, while amplifying the coherent amplitude, adds quantum noise preferentially to the phase quadrature. We take as a concrete model for the amplifier an intracavity parametric amplifier. We go beyond the usual linear analysis and include the nonlinear regime where pump depletion is important. We find that in the linear region the quantum noise added by the amplification process may be reduced by squeezing the idler mode, while in the nonlinear regime the quantum fluctuations from the pump become more important. These results are of direct application to practical light amplifiers.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1988•0 citations

Phase diffusion and the small-noise approximation in linear amplifiers: Limitations and beyond

A. Chia, Michal Hajdušek, Rosario Fazio +2 more

The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). For coherent light, this condition is determined by the average photon number. The small-noise approximation relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: For a coherent input, how many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise at the output to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We address these questions by showing how the phase uncertainty can be obtained without recourse to the small-noise approximation. It is shown that for an ideal linear amplifier (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for a nonideal amplifier.

arXiv:1811.08105•Quantum•Nov 4, 2019•8 citations
It is commonly accepted that a parametric amplifier can simulate a phase-preserving linear amplifier regardless of how the latter is realized [C. M. Caves et al., Phys. Rev. A 86, 063802 (2012)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.86.063802]. If true, this reduces all phase-preserving linear amplifiers to a single familiar model. Here we disprove this claim by constructing two counterexamples. A detailed discussion of the physics of our counterexamples is provided. It is shown that a Heisenberg-picture analysis facilitates a microscopic explanation of the physics. This also resolves a question about the nature of amplifier-added noise in degenerate two-photon amplification.
The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, regardless of its phase, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise ratio. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: A high-gain linear amplifier must degrade the signal-to-noise ratio; the noise added by the amplifier, when referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we derive the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: We show that any phase-preserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state for the ancillary mode; the noise added to the amplified field mode is distributed according to the Wigner function of the ancilla state.
The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: the noise added by the amplifier, referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we provide the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: any phasepreserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state σ for the ancillary mode; σ determines the properties of the added noise.
The principal problem of light amplifiers is to find a means to amplify a coherent amplitude without decreasing the SNR. Consider a signal with amplitude squeezed quantum fluctuations, that is, less noise in the amplitude quadrature than the phase quadrature. The objective is to find a phase sensitive amplifier, which, while amplifying the coherent amplitude, adds quantum noise preferentially to the phase quadrature. We take as a concrete model for the amplifier an intracavity parametric amplifier. We go beyond the usual linear analysis and include the nonlinear regime where pump depletion is important. We find that in the linear region the quantum noise added by the amplification process may be reduced by squeezing the idler mode, while in the nonlinear regime the quantum fluctuations from the pump become more important. These results are of direct application to practical light amplifiers.
The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). For coherent light, this condition is determined by the average photon number. The small-noise approximation relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: For a coherent input, how many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise at the output to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We address these questions by showing how the phase uncertainty can be obtained without recourse to the small-noise approximation. It is shown that for an ideal linear amplifier (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for a nonideal amplifier.