In this work we improve the runtime of recent classical algorithms for strong simulation of quantum circuits composed of Clifford and T gates. The improvement is obtained by establishing a new upper bound on the stabilizer rank of m copies of the magic state | T ⟩ = 2 − 1 ( | 0 ⟩ + e i π / 4 | 1 ⟩ ) in the limit of large m . In particular, we show that | T ⟩ ⊗ m can be exactly expressed as a superposition of at most O ( 2 α m ) stabilizer states, where α ≤ 0.3963 , improving on the best previously known bound α ≤ 0.463 . This furnishes, via known techniques, a classical algorithm which approximates output probabilities of an n -qubit Clifford + T circuit U with m uses of the T gate to within a given inverse polynomial relative error using a runtime p o l y ( n , m ) 2 α m . We also provide improved upper bounds on the stabilizer rank of symmetric product states | ψ ⟩ ⊗ m more generally; as a consequence we obtain a strong simulation algorithm for circuits consisting of Clifford gates and m instances of any (fixed) single-qubit Z -rotation gate with runtime poly ( n , m ) 2 m / 2 . We suggest a method to further improve the upper bounds by constructing linear codes with certain properties.
Despite the widespread belief that quantum computers cannot be efficiently simulated classically, efficient simulation is known to be possible in certain restricted regimes. In particular, the Gottesman-Knill theorem states that Clifford circuits can be efficiently simulated. We begin this thesis by reviewing and comparing several known techniques for efficient simulation of Clifford circuits: the stabilizer formalism, CH form, affine form, and the graph state formalism. We describe each simulation method and give four different proofs of the Gottesman-Knill theorem. \n \nNext we review a recent work [15], which shows that restricting the geometry of Clifford circuits can lead to a further speedup. We give an algorithm for simulating Pauli basis measurements on a planar graph state in time
widetildeO(nomega/2), where
omega<2.373 is the matrix multiplication exponent. This algorithm achieves a quadratic speedup over using Clifford simulation methods directly. As an application of this algorithm, we consider a depth-
d Clifford circuit whose two-qubit gates act along edges of a planar graph and describe how to sample from its output distribution or compute an output probability in time $\\widetilde{O}(n^{\\omega/2}d^\\omega)$. For
d=O(logn), both of these results are quadratic speedups over using Clifford simulation methods directly. \n \nFinally, we extend these simulation algorithms to universal circuits by using stabilizer rank methods. We follow a previously known gadgetization procedure [9] to show that given a depth-
d Clifford+
T circuit with
t T gates and whose two-qubit gates act along edges of a planar graph, we can sample from its output distribution in time
widetildeO(20.7926tn5/2t6d3) and can compute output probabilities in time
widetildeO(20.3963tn3/2t6d3). Previous work [9,6], applied to the case
d=O(logn), gives algorithms for sampling in time
O(20.3963tn6t6) and computation of output probabilities in time
O(20.3963tn3t3). Our sampling algorithm offers improved scaling in
n but poorer scaling in the exponential term, while our algorithm for computing output probabilities offers improved scaling in
n with identical scaling in the exponential term.
We study the computational power of unitary Clifford circuits with solely magic state inputs (CM circuits), supplemented by classical efficient computation. We show that CM circuits are hard to classically simulate up to multiplicative error (assuming polynomial hierarchy non-collapse), and also up to additive error under plausible average-case hardness conjectures. Unlike other such known classes, a broad variety of possible conjectures apply. Along the way, we give an extension of the Gottesman-Knill theorem that applies to universal computation, showing that for Clifford circuits with joint stabilizer and non-stabilizer inputs, the stabilizer part can be eliminated in favour of classical simulation, leaving a Clifford circuit on only the non-stabilizer part. Finally, we discuss implementational advantages of CM circuits.
We study the computational power of unitary Clifford circuits with solely magic state inputs (CM circuits), supplemented by classical efficient computation. We show that CM circuits are hard to classically simulate up to multiplicative error (assuming polynomial hierarchy non-collapse), and also up to additive error under plausible average-case hardness conjectures. Unlike other such known classes, a broad variety of possible conjectures apply. Along the way, we give an extension of the Gottesman-Knill theorem that applies to universal computation, showing that for Clifford circuits with joint stabilizer and non-stabilizer inputs, the stabilizer part can be eliminated in favour of classical simulation, leaving a Clifford circuit on only the non-stabilizer part. Finally, we discuss implementational advantages of CM circuits.
The preparation of high-fidelity logical magic states is a crucial subroutine for universal fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC). Predicting the performance of FTQC and developing improved protocols rely on numerical methods to classically simulate logical magic state preparation in the presence of noise. Clifford logic on Pauli-stabilizer codes with circuit-level Pauli errors can be efficiently simulated using Pauli-stabilizer formalism, but the non-Clifford operations required to prepare logical magic states render generic simulation inefficient. We introduce Clifford-stabilizer simulation, an exact and efficient algorithm based on updating a Clifford-stabilizer group to simulate noisy preparation protocols for a broad class of logical magic states used to implement non-Clifford gates in the third level of the Clifford hierarchy under circuit-level Pauli errors. Clifford-stabilizer simulation applies to a range of operations that commonly appear in preparation protocols for such logical magic states, including Pauli-stabilizer measurements, logical Clifford measurements, and transversal non-Clifford gates. Our algorithm for Clifford-stabilizer simulation maps a non-Clifford circuit with sampled circuit-level Pauli errors to a Clifford circuit that exactly reproduces its measurement outcome distribution, achieving time and space complexities polynomial in relevant protocol parameters. We perform exact simulation of magic state cultivation up to fault distance 7 by Clifford-stabilizer simulation. Our method provides a route to perform exact benchmarking of large-scale logical magic state preparation protocols required for useful FTQC.
One of the state of the art techniques for classically simulating quantum circuits relies on approximating the output state of the circuit by a superposition of stabilizer states. \nIf the number of non-Clifford gates in the circuit is small, such simulations can be very effective. \nThis thesis provides various improvements in this framework. First, we describe an improved method of computing approximate stabilizer decompositions, which reduces the time cost of computing a single term in the decomposition from
O(elln2) to
O(mn2), where
ell is the total number of gates in the circuit, and
m is the number of non-Clifford gates. \nSince this subroutine has to be repeated exponentially many times, this improvement can be significant in practice whenever
ellggm. \nOur method uses a certain re-writing of the circuit, which in some cases allows for a significant amelioration of the exponential scaling of the required classical resources. \n \nFurthermore, we describe a method of constructing exact, low-rank stabilizer decompositions of
ketpsiotimesm, where
ketpsi is either a magic state or an equatorial state. \nFor any single qubit magic state
ketpsi, we find stabilizer decompositions of
ketpsiotimesm with
2mlog2(3)/4 terms. This improves on the best known bound of
2mlog2(7)/6. \nSimilarly, for any single qubit equatorial state
ketpsi, we give a stabilizer decomposition of
ketpsiotimesm with
2m/2 terms. \nTo our knowledge no such decompositions were previously known. \nThese results translate to milder exponential scaling of the classical resources required for estimating probabilities of quantum circuits up to a polynomially small multiplicative error, as well as allowing more types of circuits to be simulated in this way. \n \nWe also consider certain obstructions to classical simulations. \nIt has been argued in various contexts that contextuality and non-locality hamper classical simulations of quantum circuits. \nLinear constraint systems (LCSs) are a generalization of the well-known Peres-Mermin magic square, which has been recently used to prove a separation between the power of constant depth classical and quantum circuits. \n \nWhile binary LCSs have been studied in detail,
d-ary LCSs are less well-understood. In this thesis we consider linear constraint systems modulo
d>2. We give a simple proof, of the previously known fact, that any linear constraint system which admits a quantum solution consisting of generalized Pauli observables in odd dimension must be classically satisfiable. We further prove that, for odd
d, if a Pauli-like commutation relation between two variables in the LCS arises, then it has no quantum solutions in any dimensions, in stark contrast to the even
d case. We apply this result to various examples, for instance showing that many generalizations of the Peres-Mermin magic square do not give rise to a quantum vs. classical satisfiability gap.