Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1901.09889 · Quantum Information Processing

Numerical and exact analyses of Bures and Hilbert–Schmidt separability and PPT probabilities

Paul B. Slater

Published Aug 22, 2019• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-019-2431-2

Related papers

Hilbert-Schmidt Geometry of n-Level Jakobczyk-Siennicki Two-Dimensional Quantum Systems

Paul B. Slater

Jakobczyk and Siennicki studied two-dimensional sections of a set of (generalized) Bloch vectors corresponding to n x n density matrices of two-qubit systems (that is, the case n = 4). They found essentially five different types of (nontrivial) separability regimes. We compute the Euclidean/Hilbert-Schmidt (HS) separability probabilities assigned to these regimes, and conduct parallel two-dimensional sectional analyses for the higher-level cases n=6,8,9 and 10. Making use of the newly-introduced capability for integration over implicitly defined regions of version 5.1 of Mathematica -- also fruitfully used in our n=4 three-parameter entropy-maximization-based study quant-ph/0507203 -- we obtain a wide-ranging variety of exact HS-probabilities. For n>6, the probabilities are those of having a partial positive transpose (PPT). For the n=6 case, we also obtain biseparability probabilities; in the n=8,9 instances, bi-PPT probabilities; and for n=8, tri-PPT probabilities. By far, the most frequently recorded probability for n>4 is π/4 = 0.785398. We also conduct a number of related analyses, pertaining to the (one-dimensional) boundaries (both exterior and interior) of the separability and PPT domains, and attempt (with limited success) some exact calculations pertaining to the 9-dimensional (real) and 15-dimensional (complex) convex sets of two-qubit density matrices -- for which HS-separability probabilities have been conjectured, but not verified.

arXiv:quant-ph/0508227•Aug 30, 2005•0 citations

Numerical Computations of Separability Probabilities

Jianjia Fei, Robert Joynt

arXiv:1409.1993•Reports on Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 2016•8 citations

Extended studies of separability functions and probabilities and the relevance of Dyson indices

Paul B. Slater

arXiv:0802.0197•Journal of Geometry and Physics•Mar 29, 2008•9 citations

Bures and Hilbert–Schmidt 2 × 2 determinantal moments

Paul B. Slater

We seek to gain insight into the nature of the determinantal moments 〈|ρ PT | n |ρ| k 〉 Bures of generic (nine-dimensional) two-rebit and (fifteen-dimensional) two-qubit systems (ρ), PT denoting partial transpose. Such information—as it has proved to be in the Hilbert–Schmidt counterpart—should be useful, employing probability-distribution reconstruction (inverse) procedures, in obtaining Bures 2 × 2 separability probabilities. The (regularizing) strategy we first adopt is to plot the ratio of numerically-generated (Ginibre ensemble) estimates of the Bures moments to the corresponding (apparently) exactly-known Hilbert–Schmidt moments (Slater and Dunkl 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 095305). Then, through a combination of symbolic and numerical computations, we obtain strong evidence as to the exact values (and underlying patterns) of certain Bures determinantal moments. In particular, the first moment (average) of |ρ PT | (where ) for the two-qubit systems is, remarkably, . The analogous value for the two-rebit systems is . While in the Hilbert–Schmidt case is the ratio of 3 n -degree polynomials in k , it appears to be the ratio of 5 n -degree polynomials in k in the Bures case.

arXiv:1207.1297•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 18, 2012•6 citations

A NOTE ON PPT FORMS AND SEPARABILITY OF MULTIPARTITE STATES

XIAO-HONG WANG, Shao-Ming Fei, Ke Wu

•Jul 1, 2008•0 citations

Qubit-Qudit Separability/PPT-Probability Analyses and Lovas-Andai Formula Extensions to Induced Measures

Paul B. Slater

We begin by seeking the qubit-qutrit and rebit-retrit counterparts to the now well-established Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities for (the 15-dimensional convex set of) two-qubits of $\frac{8}{33} = \frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424$ and (the 9-dimensional) two-rebits of $\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.453125$. Based in part on extensive numerical computations, we advance the possibilities of a qubit-qutrit value of $\frac{27}{1000} = (\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = 0.027$ and a rebit-retrit one of $\frac{860}{6561} =\frac{2^2 \cdot 5 \cdot 43}{3^8} \approx 0.131078$. These four values for $2 \times m$ systems ($m=2,3$) suggest certain numerator/denominator sequences involving powers of $m$, which we further investigate for $m>3$. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit $X$-states all equal $\frac{16}{3 π^2} \approx 0.54038$, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of $X$-states. Then, we extend the generalized two-qubit framework introduced by Lovas and Andai from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones. For instance, while the Lovas-Andai two-qubit function is $\frac{1}{3} \varepsilon^2 (4 -\varepsilon^2)$, yielding $\frac{8}{33}$, its $k=1$ induced measure counterpart is $\frac{1}{4} \varepsilon ^2 \left(3-\varepsilon ^2\right)^2$, yielding $\frac{61}{143} =\frac{61}{11 \cdot 13} \approx 0.426573$, where $\varepsilon$ is a singular-value ratio. We investigate, in these regards, the possibility of extending the previously-obtained "Lovas-Andai master formula".

arXiv:1803.10680•Mar 28, 2018•1 citation
Jakobczyk and Siennicki studied two-dimensional sections of a set of (generalized) Bloch vectors corresponding to n x n density matrices of two-qubit systems (that is, the case n = 4). They found essentially five different types of (nontrivial) separability regimes. We compute the Euclidean/Hilbert-Schmidt (HS) separability probabilities assigned to these regimes, and conduct parallel two-dimensional sectional analyses for the higher-level cases n=6,8,9 and 10. Making use of the newly-introduced capability for integration over implicitly defined regions of version 5.1 of Mathematica -- also fruitfully used in our n=4 three-parameter entropy-maximization-based study quant-ph/0507203 -- we obtain a wide-ranging variety of exact HS-probabilities. For n>6, the probabilities are those of having a partial positive transpose (PPT). For the n=6 case, we also obtain biseparability probabilities; in the n=8,9 instances, bi-PPT probabilities; and for n=8, tri-PPT probabilities. By far, the most frequently recorded probability for n>4 is π/4 = 0.785398. We also conduct a number of related analyses, pertaining to the (one-dimensional) boundaries (both exterior and interior) of the separability and PPT domains, and attempt (with limited success) some exact calculations pertaining to the 9-dimensional (real) and 15-dimensional (complex) convex sets of two-qubit density matrices -- for which HS-separability probabilities have been conjectured, but not verified.
We seek to gain insight into the nature of the determinantal moments 〈|ρ PT | n |ρ| k 〉 Bures of generic (nine-dimensional) two-rebit and (fifteen-dimensional) two-qubit systems (ρ), PT denoting partial transpose. Such information—as it has proved to be in the Hilbert–Schmidt counterpart—should be useful, employing probability-distribution reconstruction (inverse) procedures, in obtaining Bures 2 × 2 separability probabilities. The (regularizing) strategy we first adopt is to plot the ratio of numerically-generated (Ginibre ensemble) estimates of the Bures moments to the corresponding (apparently) exactly-known Hilbert–Schmidt moments (Slater and Dunkl 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 095305). Then, through a combination of symbolic and numerical computations, we obtain strong evidence as to the exact values (and underlying patterns) of certain Bures determinantal moments. In particular, the first moment (average) of |ρ PT | (where ) for the two-qubit systems is, remarkably, . The analogous value for the two-rebit systems is . While in the Hilbert–Schmidt case is the ratio of 3 n -degree polynomials in k , it appears to be the ratio of 5 n -degree polynomials in k in the Bures case.
We begin by seeking the qubit-qutrit and rebit-retrit counterparts to the now well-established Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities for (the 15-dimensional convex set of) two-qubits of 833=233⋅11≈0.242424\frac{8}{33} = \frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424338​=3⋅1123​≈0.242424 and (the 9-dimensional) two-rebits of 2964=2926≈0.453125\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.4531256429​=2629​≈0.453125. Based in part on extensive numerical computations, we advance the possibilities of a qubit-qutrit value of 271000=(310)3=3323⋅53=0.027\frac{27}{1000} = (\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = 0.027100027​=(103​)3=23⋅5333​=0.027 and a rebit-retrit one of 8606561=22⋅5⋅4338≈0.131078\frac{860}{6561} =\frac{2^2 \cdot 5 \cdot 43}{3^8} \approx 0.1310786561860​=3822⋅5⋅43​≈0.131078. These four values for 2×m2 \times m2×m systems (m=2,3m=2,3m=2,3) suggest certain numerator/denominator sequences involving powers of mmm, which we further investigate for m>3m>3m>3. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit XXX-states all equal 163π2≈0.54038\frac{16}{3 π^2} \approx 0.540383π216​≈0.54038, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of XXX-states. Then, we extend the generalized two-qubit framework introduced by Lovas and Andai from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones. For instance, while the Lovas-Andai two-qubit function is 13ε2(4−ε2)\frac{1}{3} \varepsilon^2 (4 -\varepsilon^2)31​ε2(4−ε2), yielding 833\frac{8}{33}338​, its k=1k=1k=1 induced measure counterpart is 14ε2(3−ε2)2\frac{1}{4} \varepsilon ^2 \left(3-\varepsilon ^2\right)^241​ε2(3−ε2)2, yielding 61143=6111⋅13≈0.426573\frac{61}{143} =\frac{61}{11 \cdot 13} \approx 0.42657314361​=11⋅1361​≈0.426573, where ε\varepsilonε is a singular-value ratio. We investigate, in these regards, the possibility of extending the previously-obtained "Lovas-Andai master formula".