arXiv:1901.05272 · Synthese

Some remarks on the mentalistic reformulation of the measurement problem: a reply to S. Gao

Andréa Oldofredi

Published Jan 25, 2019• 2 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02101-3

Related papers

Resolving the measurement problem: reply to Allen Stairs

Arthur I. Fine

Foundations of Physics LettersApr 1, 19924 citations

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ~UANTUM THEORY OF MEASUREMENT

Francis Fer

Jan 1, 19840 citations

Reply to Gao’s ”Comment on ”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”

Jos Uffink

Shan Gao (Gao 2011) recently presented a critical reconsideration of a paper I wote (Uffink 1999) on the subject of protective measurement. Here, I take the occasion to reply to his objections.

Aug 24, 20122 citations

The measurement problem revisited

Shan Gao

arXiv:2001.09263SyntheseJun 27, 20179 citations

On the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics (reply to Gao)

Dustin Lazarovici

This note clarifies several details about the description of the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics and responds to a recent preprint by Shan Gao, wrongly claiming a contradiction in the theory.

Feb 1, 20190 citations

On Arthur Fine's solution to the measurement problem

Allen Stairs

Foundations of Physics LettersApr 1, 19923 citations