For light fields, the manifestation of correlations between fluctuating electric field components at different space–time points is referred to as coherence, whereas these correlations appearing between orthogonal electric field components at a single space–time point are referred to as polarization. In this context, a natural question is as follows: how are coherence and polarization interconnected? Very recently, a tight equality P2=V2+D2, namely, the “polarization coherence theorem” (PCT) connecting polarization P with interference visibility V (measure of coherence) and distinguishability D (measure of which-path information) has been proposed [Optica4, 1113 (2017)OPTIC82334-253610.1364/OPTICA.4.001113]. We here report a direct observation of the PCT for classical light fields using a Mach–Zehnder interferometer along with a synthesized source producing a complete gamut of degrees of polarizations. Our experimental demonstration could motivate ongoing experimental efforts toward probing the hidden coherences and complementarity features.
For light fields, the manifestation of correlations between fluctuating electric field components at different space–time points is referred to as coherence, whereas these correlations appearing between orthogonal electric field components at a single space–time point are referred to as polarization. In this context, a natural question is as follows: how are coherence and polarization interconnected? Very recently, a tight equality P2=V2+D2, namely, the “polarization coherence theorem” (PCT) connecting polarization P with interference visibility V (measure of coherence) and distinguishability D (measure of which-path information) has been proposed [Optica4, 1113 (2017)OPTIC82334-253610.1364/OPTICA.4.001113]. We here report a direct observation of the PCT for classical light fields using a Mach–Zehnder interferometer along with a synthesized source producing a complete gamut of degrees of polarizations. Our experimental demonstration could motivate ongoing experimental efforts toward probing the hidden coherences and complementarity features.
Light is neither wave nor particle, but both, according to Bohr’s complementarity principle, which was first devised to qualitatively characterize quantum phenomena. Later, quantification was achieved through inequalities such as V2+D2≤1, which engage visibility V and distinguishability D. Recently, equality V2+D2=P2—the polarization coherence theorem (PCT)—was established, incorporating polarization P and addressing both quantum and classical coherences. This shows that Bohr’s complementarity is not restricted to quantum phenomena. We derive an extension of the PCT that also applies to quantum and classical light fields carrying intertwined, dichotomic observables, such as polarization and two-path alternative. We discuss how constraints critically depend on the chosen measurement strategy. This may prompt various experiments to exhibit complementary features that possibly lurk behind hidden coherences.
We report experimental results that show the interplay between visibility, distinguishability, and the degree of polarization, as ruled by a recent extension of the polarization coherence theorem (PCT). Theorems of this kind address duality in both quantum and classical scenarios. We particularly focus on the inherent vector nature of the polarization degree of freedom and display various effects that lie beyond the scope of the original PCT. Our results exhibit features that can be shared by quantum and classical phenomena, whenever these phenomena reflect some hidden or exposed coherence.
We present an extension of the polarization coherence theorem (PCT) for the case in which two qubits play similarly important roles. The standard version of the PCT: V2+D2=P2, involves three measures, visibility V, distinguishability D, and the degree of polarization P, all of which refer to a single qubit, regardless of its physical realization. This is also the case with the inequality that is implied by the PCT: V2+D2≤1, which was originally derived in an attempt to quantify Bohr’s complementarity principle. We show that all of these constraints hold true, no matter how the involved qubits are physically realized, either as quantum or else as classical objects.
Two-path complementarity in polarized interferometric fields is reconsidered by retaining the complete path--polarization density matrix instead of reducing the description to the path degree of freedom from the outset. The familiar relation connecting the Cartesian visibility components, path predictability, and reduced-state mixedness is recovered as a marginal consequence of the reduced path state and is not interpreted as a new complementarity law. Attention is focused instead on the full path--polarization description in a real reference basis adapted to the path and linear-polarization degrees of freedom. Within this framework, the normalized purity separates naturally into path, polarization, and path--polarization-correlation contributions, while the antisymmetric sector provides a sector-resolved measure of cohesion. The resulting decomposition identifies which parts of the complete state store phase-sensitive interferometric coherence and which contributions are removed when polarization is traced out. The formalism therefore provides a sector-resolved accounting of complementarity within the full path--polarization state and clarifies the connection between reduced visibility loss, polarization marking, path--polarization correlations, and quantum-eraser recovery. The present article establishes the framework and associated purity decomposition; a more detailed exploration of full path--polarization complementarity and its dynamical aspects is left for future work.
Introduction We will now study the properties of fluctuating electromagnetic fields, paying attention mainly to the optical region of the electromagnetic spectrum. It seems hardly necessary to stress that every electromagnetic field found in nature has some fluctuations associated with it. Even though these fluctuations are, as a rule, much too rapid to be observed directly, one can deduce their existence from suitable experiments that provide information about correlations between the fluctuations at two or more space-time points. The simplest manifestations of correlations in optical fields are the well-known interference effects that arise when two light beams that originate from the same source are superposed. With the availability of modern light detectors and electronic circuitry of very short resolving time, other types of correlations in optical fields began to be studied in more recent times. These investigations, as well as the development of lasers and other novel types of light sources, led to a systematic classification of optical correlation phenomena and the complete statistical description of optical fields. The area of optics concerned with such questions is now generally known as optical coherence theory . The first investigations of coherence phenomena are due to Verdet (1865, 1869) and von Laue (1907a, b). Some early investigations of Stokes (1852) and Michelson (1890, 1891a, b, c, 1892, 1920) although not explicitly mentioning coherence – because this concept is of a much later origin – have also contributed to the clarification and development of this subject.
Over the past several decades, single photon-based path interference in double-slit experiment has been well demonstrated for the particle nature of photons satisfying complementarity theory, where the quantum mechanical interpretation of the single photon interference fringe is given by Born rule for complex amplitudes in measurements. Unlike most conventional methods using entangled photon pairs, here, a classical coherent light source is directly applied for the proof of the same self-interference phenomenon. Instead of double slits, we use a Mach-Zehnder interferometer as usual, where the resulting self-interference fringe of coherent single photons is exactly the same as that of the coherent photon ensemble of the laser, demonstrating that the classical coherence based on the wave nature is rooted in the single photon self-interference. This unexpected result seems to contradict our common understanding of decoherence phenomena caused by multi-wave interference among bandwidth distributed photons in coherence optics.