Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1810.05631 · New Journal of Physics

On the freedom in representing quantum operations

Junan Lin, Brandon Buonacorsi, Raymond Laflamme, Joel J. Wallman

Published Feb 15, 2019• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We discuss the effects of a gauge freedom in representing quantum information processing devices, and its implications for characterizing these devices. We demonstrate with experimentally relevant examples that there exists equally valid descriptions of the same experiment which distribute errors differently among objects in a gate-set, leading to different error rates. Consequently, it can be misleading to attach a concrete operational meaning to figures of merit for individual gate-set elements. We propose an alternative operational figure of merit for a gate-set, the mean variation error, and a protocol for measuring this figure.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/ab075a

Related papers

A gauge-invariant theory of small Markovian errors in quantum gate sets

Juan Gonzalez De Mendoza, Corey Ostrove, Timothy Proctor +3 more

Noisy logic operations on a quantum computational register -- e.g., one or more qubits -- can be described by transfer matrices (a.k.a. CPTP maps or superoperators) that act linearly on the density matrix representing the register's quantum state. Collectively, these operations form a gate set. Gate sets have a gauge freedom; many gate sets that appear different actually predict the same experimental outcomes. A property of a gate set can be observable (and thus physically relevant) only if it is gauge-invariant. Unfortunately, no good gauge-invariant parameterizations of gate sets are known. We introduce the next best thing, a perturbative gauge-invariant parameterization of small Markovian errors in gate sets. We construct vector spaces of properties that are first-order gauge-invariant (FOGI). We show how to construct and understand FOGI properties, how to use them as coordinates to parameterize gate sets without gauge freedom, and how to extract approximately gauge-invariant error metrics.

quant-pharXiv:2608.14891•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

Representing and Probing Errors in Quantum Information Processing Devices

Junan Lin

The quality of quantum information processing devices has been improving at an unprecedented speed. How to faithfully represent the quality of these devices has become an increasingly imminent problem. In this thesis we focus on two aspects in representing and characterizing quantum devices. First, we discuss why most conventional quality metrics are not in principle appropriate to quantify experimentally-determined representations of gate-set elements, due to a gauge degree of freedom in quantum experiments. We then propose an operational quality measure for a gate-set and discuss its usefulness in representing degree of errors and improving experimental control. Second, we develop a protocol that separately and unambiguously characterizes state and measurement errors, relying on high-quality quantum gates. By integrating a method called randomized compiling, we derive a favorable upper bound for the effects of gate errors on the estimated parameters, and numerically demonstrate its performance in the presence of an adversarial gate error.

•Aug 24, 2018•0 citations

Independent state and measurement characterization for quantum computers

Junan Lin, Joel J. Wallman, Ian Hincks +1 more

Correctly characterizing state preparation and measurement (SPAM) processes is a necessary step towards building reliable quantum processing units (QPUs). In this work, we discuss the subtleties behind separately measuring SPAM errors. We propose a protocol that can separately estimate SPAM errors, in the case where quantum gates are ideal. In the case where the quantum gates are imperfect, we derive bounds on the estimated SPAM error rates, based on gate error measures, which can be estimated independently of SPAM processes. Our method shows that the gauge ambiguity in characterizing SPAM operations can be resolved by assuming that there exists one qubit whose initial state is uncorrelated with other qubits in a QPU. We test the protocol on a publicly available five-qubit QPU and demonstrate its validity by comparing our results with simulations.

arXiv:1910.07511•Physical Review Research•Sep 28, 2021•28 citations

Concepts and methods for benchmarking quantum computers

Kristine Boone

Quantum computers have the potential to bring about a new age of technology, but in order for them to become a reality, the elephant in the room must be addressed, quantum errors. The complexity of quantum errors grows exponentially as the system size is increased; scalable characterization protocols which work under physically realistic noise are therefore needed to assess and optimize control. \n \nRandomized Benchmarking (RB) is a family of characterization protocols with the requisite qualities. RB protocols are independent of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, and because they extract partial information about the error profiles in the form of figures of merit, they are scalable in the number of qubits. In this thesis, we study these figures of merit under various error models, gate-sets, and sample distributions, to further our understanding of their physical meaning, and to fine-tune the best practice for diagnosing errors in basic gate-sets. \n \nThe first study presented in this thesis looks at the physical meaning of the unitarity under physically realistic gate-dependent noise. Numerically, we demonstrate that under these realistic noise models, the unitarity obtained via Extended RB (XRB) overlaps strongly with the average of the unitarity of the errors over the set of individual operations. \n \nThe second study numerically and analytically proves that the Standard RB (SRB) decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the novel figure of merit gate-set circuit fidelity. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the disconnect between the average gate fidelity and SRB experimental results is caused by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures. \n \nIn the third part of this thesis, we compare the results of two variations of the SRB protocol, one that samples uniformly (SRB) and one that samples non-uniformly (NIST RB) from the Clifford group. We prove that NIST RB produces an exponential fidelity curve that gives different infidelity results than SRB. \n \nThe fourth and final study gives a standard for assessing basic gate-sets. Experimental results are given from the assessment run on super-conducting and ion-trap devices. We also experimentally show how the systematic error bounds can be tightened by accounting for the error's degree of coherence, as well as using weaker randomizing sets.

•Jul 9, 2021•0 citations

Characterization of errors in quantum processes using finite sets of test measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum information processes utilize the potential of quantum coherence to achieve improvements in communication and computation protocols. In order to develop appropriate technologies, it is therefore necessary to test the successful implementation of quantum coherent operations in experimental devices. In this presentation, it is shown how the quantum coherent performance of a device can be evaluated from complementary test measurements. Despite the limitation of test measurements to only two orthogonal basis sets of states, this method provides a surprisingly detailed and intuitively accessible picture of errors in quantum operations, making it possible to assess the quantum parallelism of non-classical operations in terms of the directly observable "classical" device properties.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 31, 2006•0 citations

Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes

Alexei Gilchrist, Nathan K. Langford, Michael A. Nielsen

With growing success in experimental implementations it is critical to identify a ``gold standard'' for quantum information processing, a single measure of distance that can be used to compare and contrast different experiments. We enumerate a set of criteria that such a distance measure must satisfy to be both experimentally and theoretically meaningful. We then assess a wide range of possible measures against these criteria, before making a recommendation as to the best measures to use in characterizing quantum information processing.

arXiv:quant-ph/0408063•Physical Review A•Jun 13, 2005•654 citations
We discuss the effects of a gauge freedom in representing quantum information processing devices, and its implications for characterizing these devices. We demonstrate with experimentally relevant examples that there exists equally valid descriptions of the same experiment which distribute errors differently among objects in a gate-set, leading to different error rates. Consequently, it can be misleading to attach a concrete operational meaning to figures of merit for individual gate-set elements. We propose an alternative operational figure of merit for a gate-set, the mean variation error, and a protocol for measuring this figure.
Noisy logic operations on a quantum computational register -- e.g., one or more qubits -- can be described by transfer matrices (a.k.a. CPTP maps or superoperators) that act linearly on the density matrix representing the register's quantum state. Collectively, these operations form a gate set. Gate sets have a gauge freedom; many gate sets that appear different actually predict the same experimental outcomes. A property of a gate set can be observable (and thus physically relevant) only if it is gauge-invariant. Unfortunately, no good gauge-invariant parameterizations of gate sets are known. We introduce the next best thing, a perturbative gauge-invariant parameterization of small Markovian errors in gate sets. We construct vector spaces of properties that are first-order gauge-invariant (FOGI). We show how to construct and understand FOGI properties, how to use them as coordinates to parameterize gate sets without gauge freedom, and how to extract approximately gauge-invariant error metrics.
The quality of quantum information processing devices has been improving at an unprecedented speed. How to faithfully represent the quality of these devices has become an increasingly imminent problem. In this thesis we focus on two aspects in representing and characterizing quantum devices. First, we discuss why most conventional quality metrics are not in principle appropriate to quantify experimentally-determined representations of gate-set elements, due to a gauge degree of freedom in quantum experiments. We then propose an operational quality measure for a gate-set and discuss its usefulness in representing degree of errors and improving experimental control. Second, we develop a protocol that separately and unambiguously characterizes state and measurement errors, relying on high-quality quantum gates. By integrating a method called randomized compiling, we derive a favorable upper bound for the effects of gate errors on the estimated parameters, and numerically demonstrate its performance in the presence of an adversarial gate error.
Correctly characterizing state preparation and measurement (SPAM) processes is a necessary step towards building reliable quantum processing units (QPUs). In this work, we discuss the subtleties behind separately measuring SPAM errors. We propose a protocol that can separately estimate SPAM errors, in the case where quantum gates are ideal. In the case where the quantum gates are imperfect, we derive bounds on the estimated SPAM error rates, based on gate error measures, which can be estimated independently of SPAM processes. Our method shows that the gauge ambiguity in characterizing SPAM operations can be resolved by assuming that there exists one qubit whose initial state is uncorrelated with other qubits in a QPU. We test the protocol on a publicly available five-qubit QPU and demonstrate its validity by comparing our results with simulations.
Quantum computers have the potential to bring about a new age of technology, but in order for them to become a reality, the elephant in the room must be addressed, quantum errors. The complexity of quantum errors grows exponentially as the system size is increased; scalable characterization protocols which work under physically realistic noise are therefore needed to assess and optimize control. \n \nRandomized Benchmarking (RB) is a family of characterization protocols with the requisite qualities. RB protocols are independent of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, and because they extract partial information about the error profiles in the form of figures of merit, they are scalable in the number of qubits. In this thesis, we study these figures of merit under various error models, gate-sets, and sample distributions, to further our understanding of their physical meaning, and to fine-tune the best practice for diagnosing errors in basic gate-sets. \n \nThe first study presented in this thesis looks at the physical meaning of the unitarity under physically realistic gate-dependent noise. Numerically, we demonstrate that under these realistic noise models, the unitarity obtained via Extended RB (XRB) overlaps strongly with the average of the unitarity of the errors over the set of individual operations. \n \nThe second study numerically and analytically proves that the Standard RB (SRB) decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the novel figure of merit gate-set circuit fidelity. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the disconnect between the average gate fidelity and SRB experimental results is caused by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures. \n \nIn the third part of this thesis, we compare the results of two variations of the SRB protocol, one that samples uniformly (SRB) and one that samples non-uniformly (NIST RB) from the Clifford group. We prove that NIST RB produces an exponential fidelity curve that gives different infidelity results than SRB. \n \nThe fourth and final study gives a standard for assessing basic gate-sets. Experimental results are given from the assessment run on super-conducting and ion-trap devices. We also experimentally show how the systematic error bounds can be tightened by accounting for the error's degree of coherence, as well as using weaker randomizing sets.
Quantum information processes utilize the potential of quantum coherence to achieve improvements in communication and computation protocols. In order to develop appropriate technologies, it is therefore necessary to test the successful implementation of quantum coherent operations in experimental devices. In this presentation, it is shown how the quantum coherent performance of a device can be evaluated from complementary test measurements. Despite the limitation of test measurements to only two orthogonal basis sets of states, this method provides a surprisingly detailed and intuitively accessible picture of errors in quantum operations, making it possible to assess the quantum parallelism of non-classical operations in terms of the directly observable "classical" device properties.
With growing success in experimental implementations it is critical to identify a ``gold standard'' for quantum information processing, a single measure of distance that can be used to compare and contrast different experiments. We enumerate a set of criteria that such a distance measure must satisfy to be both experimentally and theoretically meaningful. We then assess a wide range of possible measures against these criteria, before making a recommendation as to the best measures to use in characterizing quantum information processing.