Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1810.04686

Quantum adiabatic optimization without heuristics

Michael Jarret, Brad Lackey, Aike Liu, Kianna Wan

Published Oct 10, 2018• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum adiabatic optimization (QAO) is performed using a time-dependent Hamiltonian $H(s)$ with spectral gap $γ(s)$. Assuming the existence of an oracle $Γ$ such that $γ_\min = Θ\left(\min_sΓ(s)\right)$, we provide an algorithm that reliably performs QAO in time $O\left(γ_\min^{-1}\right)$ with $O\left(\log(γ_\min^{-1})\right)$ oracle queries, where $γ_\min = \min_s γ(s)$. Our strategy is not heuristic and does not require guessing time parameters or annealing paths. Rather, our algorithm naturally produces an annealing path such that $\|dH/ds\| \approx γ(s)$ and chooses its own runtime to be as close as possible to optimal while promising convergence to the ground state. We then demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in practice by explicitly constructing a gap oracle $Γ$ for the problem of finding the minimum point $m = \mathrm{argmin}_u W(u)$ of the cost function $W:\mathcal{V}\longrightarrow [0,1]$, restricting ourselves to computational basis measurements and driving Hamiltonian $H(0)=I - |\mathcal{V}|^{-1}\sum_{u,v \in \mathcal{V}}\vert{u}\rangle\langle{v}\vert$. Requiring only that $W$ have a constant lower bound on its spectral gap and upper bound $κ$ on its spectral ratio, our QAO algorithm returns $m$ with probability $(1-ε)(1-e^{-1/ε})$ in time $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])$. This achieves a quantum advantage for all $κ$, and recovers Grover scaling up to logarithmic factors when $κ\approx 1$. We implement the algorithm as a subroutine in an optimization procedure that produces $m$ with exponentially small failure probability and expected runtime $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])$ even when $κ$ is not known beforehand.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1810.04686

Related papers

An adiabatic oracle for Grover's algorithm

Bin Yan, Nikolai A. Sinitsyn

Grover's search algorithm was originally proposed for circuit-based quantum computers. A crucial part of it is to query an oracle -- a black-box unitary operation. Generation of this oracle is formally beyond the original algorithm design. Here, we propose a realization of Grover's oracle for a large class of searching problems using a quantum annealing step. The time of this step grows only logarithmically with the size of the database. This suggests an efficient path to application of Grover's algorithm to practically important problems, such as finding the ground state of a Hamiltonian with a spectral gap over its ground state.

arXiv:2207.05665•Jul 12, 2022•1 citation

Fast digital methods for adiabatic state preparation

Kianna Wan, Isaac H. Kim

We present a quantum algorithm for adiabatic state preparation on a gate-based quantum computer, with complexity polylogarithmic in the inverse error. Our algorithm digitally simulates the adiabatic evolution between two self-adjoint operators $H_0$ and $H_1$, exponentially suppressing the diabatic error by harnessing the theoretical concept of quasi-adiabatic continuation as an algorithmic tool. Given an upper bound $α$ on $\|H_0\|$ and $\|H_1\|$ along with the promise that the $k$th eigenstate $|ψ_k(s)\rangle$ of $H(s) \equiv (1-s)H_0 + sH_1$ is separated from the rest of the spectrum by a gap of at least $γ> 0$ for all $s \in [0,1]$, this algorithm implements an operator $\widetilde{U}$ such that $\||ψ_k(1)\rangle - \widetilde{U}|ψ_k(s)\rangle\| \leq ε$ using $O(α^2/γ^2)\text{polylog}(α/γε)$ queries to block-encodings of $H_0$ and $H_1$. In addition, we develop an algorithm that is applicable only to ground states and requires multiple queries to an oracle that prepares $|ψ_0(0)\rangle$, but has slightly better scaling in all parameters. We also show that the costs of both algorithms can be further reduced under certain reasonable conditions, such as when $\|H_1 - H_0\|$ is small compared to $α$, or when more information about the gap of $H(s)$ is available. For certain problems, the scaling can even be improved to linear in $\|H_1 - H_0\|/γ$ up to polylogarithmic factors.

arXiv:2004.04164•Apr 8, 2020•8 citations

Unstructured Adiabatic Quantum Optimization: Optimality with Limitations

Arthur Braida, Shantanav Chakraborty, Alapan Chaudhuri +4 more

In the circuit model of quantum computing, amplitude amplification techniques can be used to find solutions to NP-hard problems defined on n -bits in time poly(n)2n/2 . In this work, we investigate whether such general statements can be made for adiabatic quantum optimization, as provable results regarding its performance are mostly unknown. Although a lower bound of Ω(2n/2) has existed in such a setting for over a decade, a purely adiabatic algorithm with this running time has been absent. We show that adiabatic quantum optimization using an unstructured search approach results in a running time that matches this lower bound (up to a polylogarithmic factor) for a broad class of classical local spin Hamiltonians. For this, it is necessary to bound the spectral gap throughout the adiabatic evolution and compute beforehand the position of the avoided crossing with sufficient precision so as to adapt the adiabatic schedule accordingly. However, we show that the position of the avoided crossing is approximately given by a quantity that depends on the degeneracies and inverse gaps of the problem Hamiltonian and is NP-hard to compute even within a low additive precision. Furthermore, computing it exactly (or nearly exactly) is #P-hard. Our work indicates a possible limitation of adiabatic quantum optimization algorithms, leaving open the question of whether provable Grover-like speed-ups can be obtained for any optimization problem using this approach.

arXiv:2411.05736•Quantum•Jul 11, 2025•2 citations

Optimal Scaling Quantum Linear-Systems Solver via Discrete Adiabatic Theorem

Pedro C. S. Costa, Dong An, Yuval R. Sanders +3 more

Recently, several approaches to solving linear systems on a quantum computer have been formulated in terms of the quantum adiabatic theorem for a continuously varying Hamiltonian.Such approaches have enabled near-linear scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system, without requiring a complicated variable-time amplitude amplification procedure.However, the most efficient of those procedures is still asymptotically suboptimal by a factor of log(κ).Here, we prove a rigorous form of the adiabatic theorem that bounds the error in terms of the spectral gap for intrinsically discrete-time evolutions.In combination with the qubitized quantum walk, our discrete adiabatic theorem gives a speed-up for all adiabatic algorithms.Here, we use this combination to develop a quantum algorithm for solving linear systems that is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that the complexity is strictly linear in κ, matching a known lower bound on the complexity.Our O[κ log(1/ )] complexity is also optimal in terms of the combined scaling in κ and the precision .Compared to existing suboptimal methods, our algorithm is simpler and easier to implement.Moreover, we determine the constant factors in the algorithm, which would be suitable for determining the complexity in terms of gate counts for specific applications.

arXiv:2111.08152•PRX Quantum•Oct 7, 2022•120 citations

On optimal methods for adiabatic quantum state transformations

Rolando D. Somma

Many problems in science could be solved by preparing the low-energy quantum state (or any eigenstate) of a Hamiltonian. A common example is the Boolean satisfiability problem, where each clause can be mapped to the energy of an interacting many-body system, and the problem reduces to minimizing the energy. In quantum computing, adiabatic quantum state transformations (ASTs) provide a tool for preparing the quantum state. ASTs are conventionally implemented via slow or adiabatic perturbations to the Hamiltonian, relying on the quantum adiabatic theorem. Nevertheless, more efficient implementations of ASTs exist. In this talk I will review recently developed methods for ASTs that are more efficient and require less assumptions on the Hamiltonians than the conventional implementation [1,2]. Such methods involve measurements of the states along the evolution path and have a best-case implementation cost of L/G, where L is the length of the (evolved) state path and G is a lower bound to the spectral gap of the Hamiltonians. I will show that this cost is optimal [3] and comment on results of the gap amplification problem, where the goal is to reduce the cost by increasing G [4].

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2013•0 citations

Schedule path optimization for adiabatic quantum computing and optimization

Lishan Zeng, Jun Zhang, Mohan Sarovar

Abstract Adiabatic quantum computing and optimization have garnered much attention recently as possible models for achieving a quantum advantage over classical approaches to optimization and other special purpose computations. Both techniques are probabilistic in nature and the minimum gap between the ground state and first excited state of the system during evolution is a major factor in determining the success probability. In this work we investigate a strategy for increasing the minimum gap and success probability by introducing intermediate Hamiltonians that modify the evolution path between initial and final Hamiltonians. We focus on an optimization problem relevant to recent hardware implementations and present numerical evidence for the existence of a purely local intermediate Hamiltonian that achieve the optimum performance in terms of pushing the minimum gap to one of the end points of the evolution. As a part of this study we develop a convex optimization formulation of the search for optimal adiabatic schedules that makes this computation more tractable, and which may be of independent interest. We further study the effectiveness of random intermediate Hamiltonians on the minimum gap and success probability, and empirically find that random Hamiltonians have a significant probability of increasing the success probability, but only by a modest amount.

arXiv:1505.00209•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 14, 2016•31 citations
Quantum adiabatic optimization (QAO) is performed using a time-dependent Hamiltonian H(s)H(s)H(s) with spectral gap γ(s)γ(s)γ(s). Assuming the existence of an oracle ΓΓΓ such that γ_\min = Θ\left(\min_sΓ(s)\right), we provide an algorithm that reliably performs QAO in time O\left(γ_\min^{-1}\right) with O\left(\log(γ_\min^{-1})\right) oracle queries, where γ_\min = \min_s γ(s). Our strategy is not heuristic and does not require guessing time parameters or annealing paths. Rather, our algorithm naturally produces an annealing path such that ∥dH/ds∥≈γ(s)\|dH/ds\| \approx γ(s)∥dH/ds∥≈γ(s) and chooses its own runtime to be as close as possible to optimal while promising convergence to the ground state. We then demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in practice by explicitly constructing a gap oracle ΓΓΓ for the problem of finding the minimum point m=argminuW(u)m = \mathrm{argmin}_u W(u)m=argminu​W(u) of the cost function W:V⟶[0,1]W:\mathcal{V}\longrightarrow [0,1]W:V⟶[0,1], restricting ourselves to computational basis measurements and driving Hamiltonian H(0)=I−∣V∣−1∑u,v∈V∣u⟩⟨v∣H(0)=I - |\mathcal{V}|^{-1}\sum_{u,v \in \mathcal{V}}\vert{u}\rangle\langle{v}\vertH(0)=I−∣V∣−1∑u,v∈V​∣u⟩⟨v∣. Requiring only that WWW have a constant lower bound on its spectral gap and upper bound κκκ on its spectral ratio, our QAO algorithm returns mmm with probability (1−ε)(1−e−1/ε)(1-ε)(1-e^{-1/ε})(1−ε)(1−e−1/ε) in time O~(ε−1[∣V∣+(κ−1)2/3∣V∣2/3])\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])O(ε−1[∣V∣​+(κ−1)2/3∣V∣2/3]). This achieves a quantum advantage for all κκκ, and recovers Grover scaling up to logarithmic factors when κ≈1κ\approx 1κ≈1. We implement the algorithm as a subroutine in an optimization procedure that produces mmm with exponentially small failure probability and expected runtime O~(ε−1[∣V∣+(κ−1)2/3∣V∣2/3])\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])O(ε−1[∣V∣​+(κ−1)2/3∣V∣2/3]) even when κκκ is not known beforehand.
Grover's search algorithm was originally proposed for circuit-based quantum computers. A crucial part of it is to query an oracle -- a black-box unitary operation. Generation of this oracle is formally beyond the original algorithm design. Here, we propose a realization of Grover's oracle for a large class of searching problems using a quantum annealing step. The time of this step grows only logarithmically with the size of the database. This suggests an efficient path to application of Grover's algorithm to practically important problems, such as finding the ground state of a Hamiltonian with a spectral gap over its ground state.
We present a quantum algorithm for adiabatic state preparation on a gate-based quantum computer, with complexity polylogarithmic in the inverse error. Our algorithm digitally simulates the adiabatic evolution between two self-adjoint operators H0H_0H0​ and H1H_1H1​, exponentially suppressing the diabatic error by harnessing the theoretical concept of quasi-adiabatic continuation as an algorithmic tool. Given an upper bound ααα on ∥H0∥\|H_0\|∥H0​∥ and ∥H1∥\|H_1\|∥H1​∥ along with the promise that the kkkth eigenstate ∣ψk(s)⟩|ψ_k(s)\rangle∣ψk​(s)⟩ of H(s)≡(1−s)H0+sH1H(s) \equiv (1-s)H_0 + sH_1H(s)≡(1−s)H0​+sH1​ is separated from the rest of the spectrum by a gap of at least γ>0γ> 0γ>0 for all s∈[0,1]s \in [0,1]s∈[0,1], this algorithm implements an operator U~\widetilde{U}U such that ∥∣ψk(1)⟩−U~∣ψk(s)⟩∥≤ε\||ψ_k(1)\rangle - \widetilde{U}|ψ_k(s)\rangle\| \leq ε∥∣ψk​(1)⟩−U∣ψk​(s)⟩∥≤ε using O(α2/γ2)polylog(α/γε)O(α^2/γ^2)\text{polylog}(α/γε)O(α2/γ2)polylog(α/γε) queries to block-encodings of H0H_0H0​ and H1H_1H1​. In addition, we develop an algorithm that is applicable only to ground states and requires multiple queries to an oracle that prepares ∣ψ0(0)⟩|ψ_0(0)\rangle∣ψ0​(0)⟩, but has slightly better scaling in all parameters. We also show that the costs of both algorithms can be further reduced under certain reasonable conditions, such as when ∥H1−H0∥\|H_1 - H_0\|∥H1​−H0​∥ is small compared to ααα, or when more information about the gap of H(s)H(s)H(s) is available. For certain problems, the scaling can even be improved to linear in ∥H1−H0∥/γ\|H_1 - H_0\|/γ∥H1​−H0​∥/γ up to polylogarithmic factors.
In the circuit model of quantum computing, amplitude amplification techniques can be used to find solutions to NP-hard problems defined on n -bits in time poly(n)2n/2 . In this work, we investigate whether such general statements can be made for adiabatic quantum optimization, as provable results regarding its performance are mostly unknown. Although a lower bound of Ω(2n/2) has existed in such a setting for over a decade, a purely adiabatic algorithm with this running time has been absent. We show that adiabatic quantum optimization using an unstructured search approach results in a running time that matches this lower bound (up to a polylogarithmic factor) for a broad class of classical local spin Hamiltonians. For this, it is necessary to bound the spectral gap throughout the adiabatic evolution and compute beforehand the position of the avoided crossing with sufficient precision so as to adapt the adiabatic schedule accordingly. However, we show that the position of the avoided crossing is approximately given by a quantity that depends on the degeneracies and inverse gaps of the problem Hamiltonian and is NP-hard to compute even within a low additive precision. Furthermore, computing it exactly (or nearly exactly) is #P-hard. Our work indicates a possible limitation of adiabatic quantum optimization algorithms, leaving open the question of whether provable Grover-like speed-ups can be obtained for any optimization problem using this approach.
Recently, several approaches to solving linear systems on a quantum computer have been formulated in terms of the quantum adiabatic theorem for a continuously varying Hamiltonian.Such approaches have enabled near-linear scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system, without requiring a complicated variable-time amplitude amplification procedure.However, the most efficient of those procedures is still asymptotically suboptimal by a factor of log(κ).Here, we prove a rigorous form of the adiabatic theorem that bounds the error in terms of the spectral gap for intrinsically discrete-time evolutions.In combination with the qubitized quantum walk, our discrete adiabatic theorem gives a speed-up for all adiabatic algorithms.Here, we use this combination to develop a quantum algorithm for solving linear systems that is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that the complexity is strictly linear in κ, matching a known lower bound on the complexity.Our O[κ log(1/ )] complexity is also optimal in terms of the combined scaling in κ and the precision .Compared to existing suboptimal methods, our algorithm is simpler and easier to implement.Moreover, we determine the constant factors in the algorithm, which would be suitable for determining the complexity in terms of gate counts for specific applications.
Many problems in science could be solved by preparing the low-energy quantum state (or any eigenstate) of a Hamiltonian. A common example is the Boolean satisfiability problem, where each clause can be mapped to the energy of an interacting many-body system, and the problem reduces to minimizing the energy. In quantum computing, adiabatic quantum state transformations (ASTs) provide a tool for preparing the quantum state. ASTs are conventionally implemented via slow or adiabatic perturbations to the Hamiltonian, relying on the quantum adiabatic theorem. Nevertheless, more efficient implementations of ASTs exist. In this talk I will review recently developed methods for ASTs that are more efficient and require less assumptions on the Hamiltonians than the conventional implementation [1,2]. Such methods involve measurements of the states along the evolution path and have a best-case implementation cost of L/G, where L is the length of the (evolved) state path and G is a lower bound to the spectral gap of the Hamiltonians. I will show that this cost is optimal [3] and comment on results of the gap amplification problem, where the goal is to reduce the cost by increasing G [4].
Abstract Adiabatic quantum computing and optimization have garnered much attention recently as possible models for achieving a quantum advantage over classical approaches to optimization and other special purpose computations. Both techniques are probabilistic in nature and the minimum gap between the ground state and first excited state of the system during evolution is a major factor in determining the success probability. In this work we investigate a strategy for increasing the minimum gap and success probability by introducing intermediate Hamiltonians that modify the evolution path between initial and final Hamiltonians. We focus on an optimization problem relevant to recent hardware implementations and present numerical evidence for the existence of a purely local intermediate Hamiltonian that achieve the optimum performance in terms of pushing the minimum gap to one of the end points of the evolution. As a part of this study we develop a convex optimization formulation of the search for optimal adiabatic schedules that makes this computation more tractable, and which may be of independent interest. We further study the effectiveness of random intermediate Hamiltonians on the minimum gap and success probability, and empirically find that random Hamiltonians have a significant probability of increasing the success probability, but only by a modest amount.