arXiv:1810.01080

Comments on "Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself"

Chen, Liang, Ye-Qi Zhang

Published Oct 2, 2018• 1 citation

Abstract

Recently, a delicately designed Gedankenexperiment was proposed to check the self-consistence of quantum theory in the description of the agents who are using this theory. It was demonstrated that the quantum theory is inconsistent. Here a critical improvement is presented, which can lead to a consistent explanation of the Gedankenexperiment by using quantum theory.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.01080

Related papers

Quantum theory has no problem consistently describing the use of itself

Guang Ping He

In a recent publication in Nature Communications by Frauchiger and Renner (Nat. Commun. 9, 3711 (2018)), a Gedankenexperiment was proposed, which was claimed to be able to lead to inconsistent conclusions with a self-referential use of quantum theory. Thus it seems to prove that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Shortly after, Chen and Zhang suggested an improvement (arXiv:1810.01080) which can made the explanation of the Gedankenexperiment become consistent. Here we show that from the viewpoint of any quantum interpretation theory which agrees that there is collapse of the wavefunction when being measured (e.g., the Copenhagen interpretation), the original conclusions of Frauchiger and Renner actually came from an incorrect description of some quantum states. With the correct description there will be no inconsistent results, even without modifying the original Gedankenexperiment.

Oct 16, 20181 citation

Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself

Daniela Frauchiger, Renato Renner

Quantum theory provides an extremely accurate description of fundamental processes in physics. It thus seems likely that the theory is applicable beyond the, mostly microscopic, domain in which it has been tested experimentally. Here, we propose a Gedankenexperiment to investigate the question whether quantum theory can, in principle, have universal validity. The idea is that, if the answer was yes, it must be possible to employ quantum theory to model complex systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory. Analysing the experiment under this presumption, we find that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. The agents' conclusions, although all derived within quantum theory, are thus inconsistent. This indicates that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.

arXiv:1604.07422Nature CommunicationsSep 7, 2018333 citations

How to Ensure Logical Consistency of Quantum Theory

Jindřich Krčmář

Predictions of quantum theory have been confirmed experimentally in the microscopic domain with no known exceptions. This success motivates physicists to assume universal validity of the theory. To put the predictions of the quantum theory to the test in the domain of more complex systems researchers like e.g. Eugene Wigner have proposed carefully designed Gedankenexperiments revealing unexpected difficulties of the theory. Daniela Frauchiger and Renato Renner have recently suggested an extension of the Gedankenexperiment commonly known as Wigner's friend and arrived at a conclusion that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. Their analysis shows that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Here, we will study the mentioned Gedankenexperiments and introduce an approach leading to consistent predictions of quantum theory, independent of observer using the theory.

arXiv:1904.07437Apr 15, 20190 citations

Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself

Daniela Frauchiger, Renato Renner

Abstract Quantum theory provides an extremely accurate description of fundamental processes in physics. It thus seems likely that the theory is applicable beyond the, mostly microscopic, domain in which it has been tested experimentally. Here, we propose a Gedankenexperiment to investigate the question whether quantum theory can, in principle, have universal validity. The idea is that, if the answer was yes, it must be possible to employ quantum theory to model complex systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory. Analysing the experiment under this presumption, we find that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. The agents’ conclusions, although all derived within quantum theory, are thus inconsistent. This indicates that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.

Jan 1, 2018241 citations

Decoherence allows quantum theory to describe the use of itself

Armando Relaño

We show that the quantum description of measurement based on decoherence fixes the bug in quantum theory discussed in [D. Frauchiger and R. Renner, {\em Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself}, Nat. Comm. {\bf 9}, 3711 (2018)]. Assuming that the outcome of a measurement is determined by environment-induced superselection rules, we prove that different agents acting on a particular system always reach the same conclusions about its actual state.

arXiv:1810.07065Oct 16, 201810 citations

Measurement schemes in AQFT, contextuality and the Wigner\'s friend Gedankenexperiment

Felipe Dilho Alves

Measurements have historically presented a problem for the consistent description of quantum theories, be it in non-relativistic quantum mechanics or in quantum field theory. Drawing on a recent surge of interest in the description of measurements in Algebraic Quantum Field theory, it was decided that this dissertation would be focused on trying to close the gap between the description of measurements proposed by K. Hepp in the 70's, considering decoherence of states in quasilocal algebras and the new framework of generally covariant measurement schemes proposed recently by C. Fewster and R. Verch. Another recent result that we shall also consider is the Frauchinger-Renner Gedankenexperiment, that has taken inspiration on Hepp's article about decoherence based measurements to arrive at a no-go result about the consistency of quantum descriptions of systems containing rational agents, we shall seek to provide a closure for the interpretation of this result. In doing so we naturally arrive at the study of the contextual properties of measurement setups.

arXiv:2402.19235Apr 17, 20240 citations