Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1807.00804 · International Journal of Quantum Information

Classifying data using near-term quantum devices

Johannes Bausch

Published Sep 5, 2018• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The goal of this work is to define a notion of a “quantum neural network” to classify data, which exploits the low-energy spectrum of a local Hamiltonian. As a concrete application, we build a binary classifier, train it on some actual data and then test its performance on a simple classification task. More specifically, we use Microsoft’s quantum simulator, LIQ[Formula: see text][Formula: see text], to construct local Hamiltonians that can encode trained classifier functions in their ground space, and which can be probed by measuring the overlap with test states corresponding to the data to be classified. To obtain such a classifier Hamiltonian, we further propose a training scheme based on quantum annealing which is completely closed-off to the environment and which does not depend on external measurements until the very end, avoiding unnecessary decoherence during the annealing procedure. For a network of size [Formula: see text], the trained network can be stored as a list of [Formula: see text] coupling strengths. We address the question of which interactions are most suitable for a given classification task, and develop a qubit-saving optimization for the training procedure on a simulated annealing device. Furthermore, a small neural network to classify colors into red versus blue is trained and tested, and benchmarked against the annealing parameters.

DOI
10.1142/s0219749918400014

Related papers

Towards the implementation of a quantum classifier

Lorenzo Confalonieri

In this work, we investigate the use of a quantum circuit as a binary classification model in the context of quantum machine learning. We call this model, binary quantum classifier. First, we describe fundamental concepts of quantum computing and introduce the computational tool used: Qibo, an open-source framework for efficient quantum simulations and quantum hardware control. Then, we describe how to design a binary quantum classifier for the classification of images and small arrays of variables by showing how to input data in the circuit, defining a quantum circuit model Ansatz with trainable parameters and a loss function, and implementing multiple minimizers. We test our quantum classifier with two data sets. The first one is the MNIST data set which is composed of handwritten digits (reduced to only handwritten zeros and handwritten ones for binary classification). We study the behavior of different minimizers by increasing the number of layers of the Ansatz. The second data set represents two different high energy collisions that can occur at colliders such as LHC (CERN). Due to in-time proton-proton interactions known as pile-up, we distinguish two different data sets: "without pile-up" and "with pile-up". These collisions can be represented by images of size 32x32 or by six high-level variables that we call features. By increasing the size of the training data set and the number of layers of the Ansatz, we search for the best minimizer. Splitting the data set in training set and test set, we compute: ROC curve, AUC score, confusion matrices and test set accuracy. For "with pile-up" images, we compare the results obtained with the quantum classifier with a small convolutional neural network. We conclude that is possible to build a binary quantum classifier with a quantum circuit and we highlight its performances and limitations in comparison with classical technologies.

quant-pharXiv:2606.10150•Jun 10, 2026•0 citations

Completely quantum neural networks

Steven Adam Abel, Juan Carlos Criado, Michael Spannowsky

Artificial neural networks are at the heart of modern deep learning algorithms. We describe how to embed and train a general neural network in a quantum annealer without introducing any classical element in training. To implement the network on a state-of-the-art quantum annealer, we develop three crucial ingredients: binary encoding the free parameters of the network; polynomial approximation of the activation function; and reduction of binary higher-order polynomials into quadratic ones. Together, these ideas allow encoding the loss function as an Ising model Hamiltonian. The quantum annealer then trains the network by finding the ground state. We implement this for an elementary network and illustrate the advantages of quantum training: its consistency in finding the global minimum of the loss function and the fact that the network training converges in a single annealing step, which leads to short training times while maintaining a high classification performance. After training the network using a quantum annealer, one can then use the quantum network weights in a classical network algorithm of identical design for inference. Our approach opens an avenue for the quantum training of general machine learning models.

arXiv:2202.11727•Physical Review A•Aug 1, 2022•34 citations

A Grover-search based quantum learning scheme for classification

Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu +1 more

Abstract The hybrid quantum–classical learning scheme provides a prominent way to achieve quantum advantages on near-term quantum devices. A concrete example toward this goal is the quantum neural network (QNN), which has been developed to accomplish various supervised learning tasks such as classification and regression. However, there are two central issues that remain obscure when QNN is exploited to accomplish classification tasks. First, a quantum classifier that can well balance the computational cost such as the number of measurements and the learning performance is unexplored. Second, it is unclear whether quantum classifiers can be applied to solve certain problems that outperform their classical counterparts. Here we devise a Grover-search based quantum learning scheme (GBLS) to address the above two issues. Notably, most existing QNN-based quantum classifiers can be seamlessly embedded into the proposed scheme. The key insight behind our proposal is reformulating the classification tasks as the search problem. Numerical simulations exhibit that GBLS can achieve comparable performance with other quantum classifiers under various noise settings, while the required number of measurements is dramatically reduced. We further demonstrate a potential quantum advantage of GBLS over classical classifiers in the measure of query complexity. Our work provides guidance to develop advanced quantum classifiers on near-term quantum devices and opens up an avenue to explore potential quantum advantages in various classification tasks.

arXiv:1809.06056•New Journal of Physics•Jan 22, 2021•38 citations

A Primer on Quantum Neural Network Model for Text Classification: From Concept to Design

Annysha Huzzat, Ahmed Shaharyar Khwaja, Bhagawat Adhikari +3 more

Quantum neural networks (QNNs) have recently attracted remarkable attention as a potential alternative to classical and deep neural network (NN) models particularly under constraints imposed by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, which support only shallow circuits with few quantum bits (qubits) and limited variational depth. However, applying QNNs to natural language processing (NLP) remains challenging because text representations are typically high-dimensional, while NISQ classifiers can only encode a small number of features at a time, requiring classical compression to enable stable training and flexible circuit configuration. In addition, many existing studies integrate QNNs into rich-text representation pipelines, where the quantum circuit is often implemented as a variational quantum circuit (VQC). Here, the VQC acts as an additional component within a larger model, and it remains unclear how the quantum component improves the classification task. Therefore, in this work, we propose a fully reproducible and compact QNN pipeline that provides a controlled setting for studying the contribution of the VQC to text classification. The model is trained end-to-end with a lightweight classical compression layer, and the overall study is supported by systematic ablation analyses of the compression layer, the classifier heads under a shared frozen low-dimensional representation, and quantum circuit structure. Our model uses the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) features with linear compression followed by a shallow four-qubit, two-layer VQC, implemented in PyTorch and PennyLane for end-to-end training. It is evaluated on five benchmark text classification datasets against classical baselines, including logistic regression and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models. Experimental results show that the proposed QNN achieves a competitive performance across all evaluated datasets, yielding the best results on three of the five benchmark datasets.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Topological Quantum Machine Learning

A. Mott, Joshua Job, Jean-Roch Vlimant +2 more

The discovery of Higgs-boson decays in a background of standard-model processes was assisted by machine learning methods. The classifiers used to separate signals such as these from background are trained using highly unerring but not completely perfect simulations of the physical processes involved, often resulting in incorrect labelling of background processes or signals (label noise) and systematic errors. Here we use quantum and classical annealing (probabilistic techniques for approximating the global maximum or minimum of a given function) to solve a Higgs-signal-versus-background machine learning optimization problem, mapped to a problem of finding the ground state of a corresponding Ising spin model. We build a set of weak classifiers based on the kinematic observables of the Higgs decay photons, which we then use to construct a strong classifier. This strong classifier is highly resilient against overtraining and against errors in the correlations of the physical observables in the training data. We show that the resulting quantum and classical annealing-based classifier systems perform comparably to the state-of-the-art machine learning methods that are currently used in particle physics9,10. However, in contrast to these methods, the annealing-based classifiers are simple functions of directly interpretable experimental parameters with clear physical meaning. The annealer-trained classifiers use the excited states in the vicinity of the ground state and demonstrate some advantage over traditional machine learning methods for small training datasets. Given the relative simplicity of the algorithm and its robustness to error, this technique may find application in other areas of experimental particle physics, such as real-time decision making in event-selection problems and classification in neutrino physics.

•Feb 1, 2020•0 citations

Characterizing Quantum Classifier Utility in Natural Language Processing Workflows

Kathleen E. Hamilton, Mayanka Chandrashekar, John P. Gounley +5 more

Quantum Natural Language Processing (QNLP) develops natural language processing (NLP) models for deployment on quantum computers. We explore feature and data prototype selection techniques to address challenges posed by encoding high dimensional features. Our study builds quantum circuit classifiers that includes classical feature pre-processing, quantum embedding and quantum model training. The quantum models are built on 4 or 6 qubits and the quantum neural network (QNN) uses the established bricklayer design. We compare the dependence of model performance (in terms of accuracy and F1 scores) on feature length, embedding gates and parameterized unitary design. We compare the performance of quantum machine learning models to classical convolution neural network model (CNN) on binary and multi-class classification tasks using two datasets of synthetic features and labels. The first is the ECP-CANDLE P3B3 dataset a corpus of synthetically generated cancer pathology reports. The second dataset is extracted from well-known benchmark dataset (MADELON) - features are generated with a combination of informative, repeated and uninformative features. Both datasets are used for binary classification and multi-class classification with 3 classes. We observe robust, accurate performance from all models on the binary classification tasks, but multiclass classification is a challenge for the quantum models-there is a notable decrease in accuracy when using 3 classes. Overall the performance is comparable in terms of recall and accuracy between QNNs and CNNs, even with large datasets. These results provide a point of comparison between quantum and classical models on real-world datasets.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 17, 2023•1 citation
The goal of this work is to define a notion of a “quantum neural network” to classify data, which exploits the low-energy spectrum of a local Hamiltonian. As a concrete application, we build a binary classifier, train it on some actual data and then test its performance on a simple classification task. More specifically, we use Microsoft’s quantum simulator, LIQ[Formula: see text][Formula: see text], to construct local Hamiltonians that can encode trained classifier functions in their ground space, and which can be probed by measuring the overlap with test states corresponding to the data to be classified. To obtain such a classifier Hamiltonian, we further propose a training scheme based on quantum annealing which is completely closed-off to the environment and which does not depend on external measurements until the very end, avoiding unnecessary decoherence during the annealing procedure. For a network of size [Formula: see text], the trained network can be stored as a list of [Formula: see text] coupling strengths. We address the question of which interactions are most suitable for a given classification task, and develop a qubit-saving optimization for the training procedure on a simulated annealing device. Furthermore, a small neural network to classify colors into red versus blue is trained and tested, and benchmarked against the annealing parameters.
In this work, we investigate the use of a quantum circuit as a binary classification model in the context of quantum machine learning. We call this model, binary quantum classifier. First, we describe fundamental concepts of quantum computing and introduce the computational tool used: Qibo, an open-source framework for efficient quantum simulations and quantum hardware control. Then, we describe how to design a binary quantum classifier for the classification of images and small arrays of variables by showing how to input data in the circuit, defining a quantum circuit model Ansatz with trainable parameters and a loss function, and implementing multiple minimizers. We test our quantum classifier with two data sets. The first one is the MNIST data set which is composed of handwritten digits (reduced to only handwritten zeros and handwritten ones for binary classification). We study the behavior of different minimizers by increasing the number of layers of the Ansatz. The second data set represents two different high energy collisions that can occur at colliders such as LHC (CERN). Due to in-time proton-proton interactions known as pile-up, we distinguish two different data sets: "without pile-up" and "with pile-up". These collisions can be represented by images of size 32x32 or by six high-level variables that we call features. By increasing the size of the training data set and the number of layers of the Ansatz, we search for the best minimizer. Splitting the data set in training set and test set, we compute: ROC curve, AUC score, confusion matrices and test set accuracy. For "with pile-up" images, we compare the results obtained with the quantum classifier with a small convolutional neural network. We conclude that is possible to build a binary quantum classifier with a quantum circuit and we highlight its performances and limitations in comparison with classical technologies.
Artificial neural networks are at the heart of modern deep learning algorithms. We describe how to embed and train a general neural network in a quantum annealer without introducing any classical element in training. To implement the network on a state-of-the-art quantum annealer, we develop three crucial ingredients: binary encoding the free parameters of the network; polynomial approximation of the activation function; and reduction of binary higher-order polynomials into quadratic ones. Together, these ideas allow encoding the loss function as an Ising model Hamiltonian. The quantum annealer then trains the network by finding the ground state. We implement this for an elementary network and illustrate the advantages of quantum training: its consistency in finding the global minimum of the loss function and the fact that the network training converges in a single annealing step, which leads to short training times while maintaining a high classification performance. After training the network using a quantum annealer, one can then use the quantum network weights in a classical network algorithm of identical design for inference. Our approach opens an avenue for the quantum training of general machine learning models.
Abstract The hybrid quantum–classical learning scheme provides a prominent way to achieve quantum advantages on near-term quantum devices. A concrete example toward this goal is the quantum neural network (QNN), which has been developed to accomplish various supervised learning tasks such as classification and regression. However, there are two central issues that remain obscure when QNN is exploited to accomplish classification tasks. First, a quantum classifier that can well balance the computational cost such as the number of measurements and the learning performance is unexplored. Second, it is unclear whether quantum classifiers can be applied to solve certain problems that outperform their classical counterparts. Here we devise a Grover-search based quantum learning scheme (GBLS) to address the above two issues. Notably, most existing QNN-based quantum classifiers can be seamlessly embedded into the proposed scheme. The key insight behind our proposal is reformulating the classification tasks as the search problem. Numerical simulations exhibit that GBLS can achieve comparable performance with other quantum classifiers under various noise settings, while the required number of measurements is dramatically reduced. We further demonstrate a potential quantum advantage of GBLS over classical classifiers in the measure of query complexity. Our work provides guidance to develop advanced quantum classifiers on near-term quantum devices and opens up an avenue to explore potential quantum advantages in various classification tasks.
Quantum neural networks (QNNs) have recently attracted remarkable attention as a potential alternative to classical and deep neural network (NN) models particularly under constraints imposed by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, which support only shallow circuits with few quantum bits (qubits) and limited variational depth. However, applying QNNs to natural language processing (NLP) remains challenging because text representations are typically high-dimensional, while NISQ classifiers can only encode a small number of features at a time, requiring classical compression to enable stable training and flexible circuit configuration. In addition, many existing studies integrate QNNs into rich-text representation pipelines, where the quantum circuit is often implemented as a variational quantum circuit (VQC). Here, the VQC acts as an additional component within a larger model, and it remains unclear how the quantum component improves the classification task. Therefore, in this work, we propose a fully reproducible and compact QNN pipeline that provides a controlled setting for studying the contribution of the VQC to text classification. The model is trained end-to-end with a lightweight classical compression layer, and the overall study is supported by systematic ablation analyses of the compression layer, the classifier heads under a shared frozen low-dimensional representation, and quantum circuit structure. Our model uses the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) features with linear compression followed by a shallow four-qubit, two-layer VQC, implemented in PyTorch and PennyLane for end-to-end training. It is evaluated on five benchmark text classification datasets against classical baselines, including logistic regression and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models. Experimental results show that the proposed QNN achieves a competitive performance across all evaluated datasets, yielding the best results on three of the five benchmark datasets.
The discovery of Higgs-boson decays in a background of standard-model processes was assisted by machine learning methods. The classifiers used to separate signals such as these from background are trained using highly unerring but not completely perfect simulations of the physical processes involved, often resulting in incorrect labelling of background processes or signals (label noise) and systematic errors. Here we use quantum and classical annealing (probabilistic techniques for approximating the global maximum or minimum of a given function) to solve a Higgs-signal-versus-background machine learning optimization problem, mapped to a problem of finding the ground state of a corresponding Ising spin model. We build a set of weak classifiers based on the kinematic observables of the Higgs decay photons, which we then use to construct a strong classifier. This strong classifier is highly resilient against overtraining and against errors in the correlations of the physical observables in the training data. We show that the resulting quantum and classical annealing-based classifier systems perform comparably to the state-of-the-art machine learning methods that are currently used in particle physics9,10. However, in contrast to these methods, the annealing-based classifiers are simple functions of directly interpretable experimental parameters with clear physical meaning. The annealer-trained classifiers use the excited states in the vicinity of the ground state and demonstrate some advantage over traditional machine learning methods for small training datasets. Given the relative simplicity of the algorithm and its robustness to error, this technique may find application in other areas of experimental particle physics, such as real-time decision making in event-selection problems and classification in neutrino physics.
Quantum Natural Language Processing (QNLP) develops natural language processing (NLP) models for deployment on quantum computers. We explore feature and data prototype selection techniques to address challenges posed by encoding high dimensional features. Our study builds quantum circuit classifiers that includes classical feature pre-processing, quantum embedding and quantum model training. The quantum models are built on 4 or 6 qubits and the quantum neural network (QNN) uses the established bricklayer design. We compare the dependence of model performance (in terms of accuracy and F1 scores) on feature length, embedding gates and parameterized unitary design. We compare the performance of quantum machine learning models to classical convolution neural network model (CNN) on binary and multi-class classification tasks using two datasets of synthetic features and labels. The first is the ECP-CANDLE P3B3 dataset a corpus of synthetically generated cancer pathology reports. The second dataset is extracted from well-known benchmark dataset (MADELON) - features are generated with a combination of informative, repeated and uninformative features. Both datasets are used for binary classification and multi-class classification with 3 classes. We observe robust, accurate performance from all models on the binary classification tasks, but multiclass classification is a challenge for the quantum models-there is a notable decrease in accuracy when using 3 classes. Overall the performance is comparable in terms of recall and accuracy between QNNs and CNNs, even with large datasets. These results provide a point of comparison between quantum and classical models on real-world datasets.