Familiar formulations of classical and quantum mechanics are shown to follow from a general theory of mechanics based on pure states with an intrinsic probability structure. This theory is developed to the stage where theorems from quantum logic enable expression of the state geometry in Hilbert space. Quantum and classical mechanics are then elaborated and applied to subsystems and the measurement process. Consideration is also given to space-time geometry and the constraints this places on the dynamics. Physics and Mathematics, it is argued, are growing apart; the inadequate treatment of approximations in general and localisation in quantum mechanics in particular are seen as contributing factors. In the description of systems, the link between localisation and lack of knowledge shows that quantum mechanics should reflect the domain of applicability. Restricting the class of states provides a means of achieving this goal. Localisation is then shown to have a mathematical expression in terms of compactness, which in turn is applied to yield a topological theory of bound and scattering states. Finally, the thesis questions the validity of classical limits and quantisations in intertheoretic reduction, and demonstrates that a widely accepted classical limit does not constitute a proof of reduction. It proposes a procedure for determining whether classical and quantum mechanics are weakly equivalent over a domain of applicability, and concludes that, in this restricted sense, classical mechanics reduces to quantum mechanics.
Familiar formulations of classical and quantum mechanics are shown to follow from a general theory of mechanics based on pure states with an intrinsic probability structure. This theory is developed to the stage where theorems from quantum logic enable expression of the state geometry in Hilbert space. Quantum and classical mechanics are then elaborated and applied to subsystems and the measurement process. Consideration is also given to space-time geometry and the constraints this places on the dynamics. Physics and Mathematics, it is argued, are growing apart; the inadequate treatment of approximations in general and localisation in quantum mechanics in particular are seen as contributing factors. In the description of systems, the link between localisation and lack of knowledge shows that quantum mechanics should reflect the domain of applicability. Restricting the class of states provides a means of achieving this goal. Localisation is then shown to have a mathematical expression in terms of compactness, which in turn is applied to yield a topological theory of bound and scattering states. Finally, the thesis questions the validity of classical limits and quantisations in intertheoretic reduction, and demonstrates that a widely accepted classical limit does not constitute a proof of reduction. It proposes a procedure for determining whether classical and quantum mechanics are weakly equivalent over a domain of applicability, and concludes that, in this restricted sense, classical mechanics reduces to quantum mechanics.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
Conceptual and formal problems Many of the problems surrounding the interpretation of quantum mechanics stem from the absence of a sufficiently general and physically transparent analysis of the connection with the domain in which classical concepts are assumed to apply. It is the purpose of this chapter to describe with the aid of a few examples how the quantum potential approach provides a context within which the conceptual and formal issues raised by this problem may be clarified. A key question is to explain how the state or context dependence which is so characteristic of the quantum domain turns into state independence at a certain level, characterized as ‘classical’. To illustrate one aspect of the conceptual problem we recall that in Bohr's interpretation the validity of classical concepts is already presupposed since, it is suggested, it is only in terms of these that one can unambiguously communicate the results of experiments in the quantum domain. Thus, classical physics must be considered as prior to quantum mechanics and the latter is a generalization of the former in that it provides a new set of laws governing the application of classical concepts. According to this view, any procedure by which classical mechanics is recovered from quantum mechanics as a mathematical limit can only be a demonstration of consistency with the already postulated epistemological relation between the two theories and not as a ‘derivation’ of classical mechanics from quantum mechanics (George, Prigogine & Rosenfeld, 1972).
A discussion is given of the structure of a physical theory and an ``ideal form'' for such a theory is proposed. The essential feature is that all concepts should be defined in operational terms. Quantum (and classical) mechanics is then formulated in this way (the formulation being, however, restricted to the kinematical theory). This requires the introduction of the concept of a mixed test, related to a pure test (or ``question'') just as a mixed state is related to a pure state. In the new formulation, the primitive concepts are not states and observables but certain operationally accessible mixed states and tests called physical. The notion of a C*-system is introduced; each such system is characterized by a certain C*-algebra. The structure of a general C*-system is then studied, all concepts being defined in terms of physical states and tests. It is shown first how pure states and tests can be so defined. The quantum analog of the phase space of classical mechanics is then constructed and on it is built a mathematical structure, called a q-topology, which is a quantum analog of the topology of classical phase space. Mathematically, a q-topology is related to a noncommutative C*-algebra as an ordinary topology is related to a commutative C*-algebra. Some properties of the q-topology of a C*-system are given. An appendix contains some physically motivated examples illustrating the theory.
By using the formulation of quantum mechanics with classical pictures, the motion of a quantum is analysed for linear harmonic oscillator. On this occasion it is postulated that the quantum mechanical momentum of the quantum is approximately equal to the corresponding classical mechanical momentum in the region of validity of the coordinates. According to this analysis it is shown that the quantum mechanical motion well corresponds to the classical motion, and that the wave equation determines the associated wave along the whole orbit of the quantum in the configuration space and the uniqueness of the wave throughout the orbit plays an important role in quantum mechanics. In addition to the above, an attempt is made to make clear the well-known fact that classical mechanics with the quantization gives approximately the same results as quantum mechanics.
Abstract Within the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC), Gödel‘s incompleteness theorems and Tarski’s undefinability theorem are established via Gödel arithmetic encoding, embedding first-order formal languages into zero-dimensional natural number spaces. Geometric measure theory, in turn, defines Lebesgue measure and Hausdorff dimension as intrinsic invariant volume quantities on Euclidean manifolds, treating measure as an absolute property of space independent of observation. This paper, taking Amari‘s information geometry and its quantum generalization as an external meta-basis beyond ZFC, constructs a branch growth layer system with a sheaf-theoretic semantics embedding via a fully faithful functor, embedding the entire first-order formal syntax into the global section space of the structure sheaf on a compact simply connected 4D Poincaré topological manifold. We strictly distinguish two classes of mathematical structures: (i) global quantum joint pure states with no observational loss (corresponding to global sheaf sections, carrying complete intrinsic information), and (ii) marginal measures induced by local observational truncation (classical Lebesgue measure being the classical limit of the reduced density mapping from quantum partial trace). The central proof establishes that the formal-logical obstructions identified by Gödel and Tarski are equivalent to the strict Shannon / von Neumann information entropy loss induced by the local truncation functor of sheaves. We define a critical trajectory submanifold T, on whose neighborhood all sheaf restriction morphisms are surjective, thereby eliminating information loss due to projection and constructing a hierarchy-free global truth morphism. The Kakeya-Besicovitch paradox is employed as a case study to validate the framework: the Besicovitch set — of zero Lebesgue measure and full Hausdorff dimension — is categorically isomorphic to a two-body maximally entangled pure state, where local marginal observational information vanishes while global intrinsic correlation information reaches its maximum. This meta-framework takes information as the primary ontology, transcending the internal constraints of ZFC axioms, and coherently integrates sheaf cohomology, quantum information geometry, harmonic analysis, computability theory, and geometric measure theory. It demonstrates that the inherent limitations of classical mathematical logic and measure theory are merely categorical representations arising from dimensional projection reduction, and not essential constraints of purely mathematical objects themselves. License CC BY 4.0 Knowledge belongs to all humanity. Research work only indicates the directions explored and the places once reached by human mathematicians.
Quantum mechanics is basically a mathematical recipe on how to construct physical models. Historically its origin and main domain of application has been in the microscopic regime, although it strictly seen constitutes a general mathematical framework not limited to this regime. Since it is a statistical theory, the meaning and role of probabilities in it need to be defined and understood in order to gain an understanding of the predictions and validity of quantum mechanics. The interpretational problems of quantum mechanics are also connected with the interpretation of the concept of probability. In this thesis the use of probability theory as extended logic, in particular in the way it was presented by E. T. Jaynes, will be central. With this interpretation of probabilities they become a subjective notion, always dependent on one's state of knowledge or the context in which they are assigned, which has consequences on how things are to be viewed, understood and tackled in quantum mechanics. For instance, the statistical operator or density operator, is usually defined in terms of probabilities and therefore also needs to be updated when the probabilities are updated by acquisition of additional data. Furthermore, it is a context dependent notion, meaning, e.g., that two observers will in general assign different statistical operators to the same phenomenon, which is demonstrated in the papers of the thesis. It is also presented an alternative and conceptually clear approach to the problematic notion of "probabilities of probabilities", which is related to such things as probability distributions on statistical operators. In connection to this, we consider concrete numerical applications of Bayesian quantum state assignment methods to a three-level quantum system, where prior knowledge and various kinds of measurement data are encoded into a statistical operator, which can then be used for deriving probabilities of other measurements. The thesis also offers examples of an alternative quantum state assignment technique, using maximum entropy methods, which in some cases are compared with the Bayesian quantum state assignment methods. Finally, the interesting and important problem whether the statistical operator, or more generally quantum mechanics, gives a complete description of "objective physical reality" is considered. A related concern is here the possibility of finding a "local hidden-variable theory" underlying the quantum mechanical description. There have been attempts to prove that such a theory cannot be constructed, where the most well-known impossibility proof claiming to show this was given by J. S. Bell. In connection to this, the thesis presents an idea for an interpretation or alternative approach to quantum mechanics based on the concept of space-time.