Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1806.07693 · Physics Letters A

Spectra in nested Mach–Zehnder interferometer experiments

Marcin Wieśniak

Published Jun 21, 2018• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2018.06.032

Related papers

An Ideal Experiment to Determine the ‘Past of a Particle’ in the Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

李福, Hashmi, 张俊香 +1 more

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Cross-Double-Slit Experiment and Extended-Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Huei Peng

•May 20, 2019•7 citations

Wave theory of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer

H. K. Zienkiewicz

•Jan 1, 1959•2 citations

Response to the comment on “Paradox of photons disconnected trajectories being located by means of ‘weak measurements’ in the nested Mach–Zehnder interferometer” (JETP Letters 105, 152 (2017))

G. N. Nikolaev

The author of the comment on my work [1] states that the proposed modification of the scheme of the experiment reported in [2] is improper and that the experiment faithfully demonstrates a discontinuous trace of photons.It is difficult to agree with this statement because of the absence of clear and well-founded (see below).In [1], I discussed the recent experiment [2] with a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The authors treated the experiment so that the past of photons is not described by continuous trajectories because photons are detected inside the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer and are not detected outside it.The idea of a small modification of the scheme of the experiment [2] has been proposed just to detect photons at the input of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer.Instead of the vibration of the mirror, the direction of polarization of light is modulated in this scheme.Further, in one of the arms of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer, this modulation is converted into a shift of the light beam of orthogonal polarization, which is then transformed to the original polarization.The realization of the idea is as follows.A birefringent plate, a phase compensator, and two polarizers that oriented at the angle of 45° and in parallel to the initial polarization are placed in one of the arms of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The same polarizers are placed in the other two arms of the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The author of the comment states that such a modification is improper because it "violates the faithfulness of the experiment because it causes different transformations of the polarization record at E into a signal at the detector, depending on the path the beam takes."The author of the comment also claims that "the signal at the detector does not present a faithful indication of the trace inside the interferometer" in the absence of con-

arXiv:1705.08721•Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters•Apr 1, 2017•7 citations

An Ideal Experiment to Determine the ‘Past of a Particle’ in the Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

fu Li, F. A. Hashmi, Jun-Xiang Zhang +1 more

An ideal experiment is designed to determine the past of a particle in the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) by using standard quantum mechanics with quantum non-demolition measurements. We find that when the photon reaches the detector, it only follows one arm of the outer interferometer and leaves no trace in the inner MZI. When it goes through the inner MZI, it cannot reach the detector. Our result obtained from the standard quantum mechanics contradicts the statement based on two-state vector formulism, 'the photon did not enter the (inner) interferometer, the photon never left the interferometer, but it was there'. Therefore, the statement and also the overlapping claim are incorrect.

arXiv:1410.7482•Chinese Physics Letters•May 1, 2015•21 citations

MACH-ZEHNDER INTERFEROMETER AND QUANTITATIVE COMPLEMENTARITY

Carlo Tarsitani, Fabrizio Logiurato

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions•Jun 1, 2006•0 citations
The author of the comment on my work [1] states that the proposed modification of the scheme of the experiment reported in [2] is improper and that the experiment faithfully demonstrates a discontinuous trace of photons.It is difficult to agree with this statement because of the absence of clear and well-founded (see below).In [1], I discussed the recent experiment [2] with a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The authors treated the experiment so that the past of photons is not described by continuous trajectories because photons are detected inside the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer and are not detected outside it.The idea of a small modification of the scheme of the experiment [2] has been proposed just to detect photons at the input of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer.Instead of the vibration of the mirror, the direction of polarization of light is modulated in this scheme.Further, in one of the arms of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer, this modulation is converted into a shift of the light beam of orthogonal polarization, which is then transformed to the original polarization.The realization of the idea is as follows.A birefringent plate, a phase compensator, and two polarizers that oriented at the angle of 45° and in parallel to the initial polarization are placed in one of the arms of the inner Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The same polarizers are placed in the other two arms of the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer.The author of the comment states that such a modification is improper because it "violates the faithfulness of the experiment because it causes different transformations of the polarization record at E into a signal at the detector, depending on the path the beam takes."The author of the comment also claims that "the signal at the detector does not present a faithful indication of the trace inside the interferometer" in the absence of con-
An ideal experiment is designed to determine the past of a particle in the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) by using standard quantum mechanics with quantum non-demolition measurements. We find that when the photon reaches the detector, it only follows one arm of the outer interferometer and leaves no trace in the inner MZI. When it goes through the inner MZI, it cannot reach the detector. Our result obtained from the standard quantum mechanics contradicts the statement based on two-state vector formulism, 'the photon did not enter the (inner) interferometer, the photon never left the interferometer, but it was there'. Therefore, the statement and also the overlapping claim are incorrect.