Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1806.07230 · STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health

A Computational Proof of Locality in Entanglement

Han J.F. Geurdes

Published Jan 1, 2018• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-74971-6_6

Related papers

Towards characterizing the non-locality of entangled quantum states

Renato Renner, Stefan Wolf

arXiv:quant-ph/0211019•Theoretical Computer Science•Dec 22, 2012•3 citations

A note on locally unextendible non-maximally entangled basis : comment on 'Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 0271(2012)'

Chen, B., Halqem Nizamidin, Shao-Ming Fei

We study the locally unextendible non-maximally entangled basis (LUNMEB) in H d ⊗ H d . We point out that there exists an error in the proof of the main result of LUNMEB [Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 0271(2012)], which claims that there are at most d orthogonal vectors in a LUNMEB, constructed from a given non-maximally entangled state. We show that both the proof and the main result are not correct in general. We present a counter example for d = 4, in which ve orthogonal vectors from a specic nonmaximally entangled state are constructed. Besides, we completely solve the problem of LUNMEB for the case of d = 2.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Introduction to Localizable Entanglement

M. Popp, Frank Verstraete, Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado +1 more

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Entanglement Detection by Violations of Noisy Uncertainty Relations: A Proof of Principle

Yuanyuan Zhao, Guo‐Yong Xiang, Xiao‐Min Hu +5 more

It is well known that the violation of a local uncertainty relation can be used as an indicator for the presence of entanglement. Unfortunately, the practical use of these nonlinear witnesses has been limited to few special cases in the past. However, new methods for computing uncertainty bounds have become available. Here we report on an experimental implementation of uncertainty-based entanglement witnesses, benchmarked in a regime dominated by strong local noise. We combine the new computational method with a local noise tomography in order to design noise-adapted entanglement witnesses. This proof-of-principle experiment shows that quantum noise can be successfully handled by a fully quantum model in order to enhance the ability to detect entanglement.

arXiv:1810.05588•Physical Review Letters•Jun 7, 2019•20 citations

Entanglement and Non-Locality

Charles H. Holbrow, James N. Lloyd, Joseph C. Amato +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•11 citations

A Note on Locally Unextendible Non-Maximally Entangled Basis

Chen, Bin, Halqem Nizamidin, Shao-Ming Fei

We study the locally unextendible non-maximally entangled basis (LUNMEB) in $H^{d}\bigotimes H^{d}$. We point out that there exists an error in the proof of the main result of LUNMEB [Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 0271(2012)], which claims that there are at most $d$ orthogonal vectors in a LUNMEB, constructed from a given non-maximally entangled state. We show that both the proof and the main result are not correct in general. We present a counter example for $d=4$, in which five orthogonal vectors from a specific non-maximally entangled state are constructed. Besides, we completely solve the problem of LUNMEB for the case of $d=2$.

arXiv:1304.7412•Apr 28, 2013•0 citations
We study the locally unextendible non-maximally entangled basis (LUNMEB) in H d ⊗ H d . We point out that there exists an error in the proof of the main result of LUNMEB [Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 0271(2012)], which claims that there are at most d orthogonal vectors in a LUNMEB, constructed from a given non-maximally entangled state. We show that both the proof and the main result are not correct in general. We present a counter example for d = 4, in which ve orthogonal vectors from a specic nonmaximally entangled state are constructed. Besides, we completely solve the problem of LUNMEB for the case of d = 2.
It is well known that the violation of a local uncertainty relation can be used as an indicator for the presence of entanglement. Unfortunately, the practical use of these nonlinear witnesses has been limited to few special cases in the past. However, new methods for computing uncertainty bounds have become available. Here we report on an experimental implementation of uncertainty-based entanglement witnesses, benchmarked in a regime dominated by strong local noise. We combine the new computational method with a local noise tomography in order to design noise-adapted entanglement witnesses. This proof-of-principle experiment shows that quantum noise can be successfully handled by a fully quantum model in order to enhance the ability to detect entanglement.
We study the locally unextendible non-maximally entangled basis (LUNMEB) in Hd⨂HdH^{d}\bigotimes H^{d}Hd⨂Hd. We point out that there exists an error in the proof of the main result of LUNMEB [Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 0271(2012)], which claims that there are at most ddd orthogonal vectors in a LUNMEB, constructed from a given non-maximally entangled state. We show that both the proof and the main result are not correct in general. We present a counter example for d=4d=4d=4, in which five orthogonal vectors from a specific non-maximally entangled state are constructed. Besides, we completely solve the problem of LUNMEB for the case of d=2d=2d=2.