Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1806.01297 · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A

Space and Time as a Consequence of Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Quantum Jumps

Tejinder P. Singh

Published Sep 15, 2018• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract The Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory of spontaneous collapse offers a possible resolution of the quantum measurement problem. In this theory, the wave function of a particle spontaneously and repeatedly localises to one or the other random position in space, as a consequence of the hypothesised quantum jumps. In between jumps, the wave function undergoes the usual Schrödinger evolution. In the present paper, we suggest that these jumps take place in Hilbert space, with no reference to physical space and a physical three-dimensional space arises as a consequence of localisation of macroscopic objects in the universe. That is, collapse of the wave-function is responsible for the origin of space. We then suggest that similar jumps take place for a hypothetical time operator in Hilbert space and classical time, as we know it emerges from localisation of this time operator, for macroscopic objects. More generally, the jumps are suggested to take place in an operator space-time in Hilbert space, leading to an emergent classical space-time.

DOI
10.1515/zna-2018-0351

Related papers

On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Theory

Valia Allori, Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka +1 more

Bohmian mechanics and Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory provide opposite resolutions of the quantum measurement problem: the former postulates additional variables (the particle positions) besides the wave function, whereas the latter implements spontaneous collapses of the wave function by a nonlinear and stochastic modification of the Schr\\"odinger equation. Still, both theories, when understood appropriately, share the following structure: They are ultimately not about wave functions but about matter moving in space, represented by either particle trajectories, fields on space-time, or a discrete set of space-time points. The role of the wave function then is to guide the motion of the matter.

•Jan 1, 2006•196 citations

Space-time from Collapse of the Wave-function

Tejinder P. Singh

Abstract We propose that space-time results from collapse of the wave function of macroscopic objects, in quantum dynamics. We first argue that there ought to exist a formulation of quantum theory which does not refer to classical time. We then propose such a formulation by invoking an operator Minkowski space-time on the Hilbert space. We suggest relativistic spontaneous localisation as the mechanism for recovering classical space-time from the underlying theory. Quantum interference in time could be one possible signature for operator time, and in fact may have been already observed in the laboratory, on attosecond time scales. A possible prediction of our work seems to be that interference in time will not be seen for ‘time slit’ separations significantly larger than 100 attosecond, if the ideas of operator time and relativistic spontaneous localisation are correct.

arXiv:1809.03441•Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Nov 13, 2018•18 citations

A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Model

Roderich Tumulka

Carrying out a research program outlined by John S. Bell in 1987, we arrive at a relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model of spon-taneous wavefunction collapse. The GRW model was proposed as a solution of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics and involves a stochastic and nonlinear modification of the Schrödinger equation. It deviates very little from the Schrödinger equation for microscopic systems but efficiently suppresses, for macroscopic systems, superpositions of macroscopically different states. As sug-gested by Bell, we take the primitive ontology, or local beables, of our model to be a discrete set of space-time points, at which the collapses are centered. This set is random with distribution determined by the initial wavefunction. Our model is nonlocal and violates Bell’s inequality though it does not make use of a preferred slicing of space-time or any other sort of synchronization of spacelike separated points. Like the GRW model, it reproduces the quantum probabilities in all cases presently testable, though it entails deviations from the quantum formalism that are in principle testable. Our model works in Minkowski space-time as well as in (well-behaved) curved background space-times. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta; 03.65.Ud; 03.30.+p. Key words: spontaneous wave-function collapse; relativity; quantum theory without observers. 1

•Jan 1, 2004•233 citations

Quantum collapse dynamics with attractive densities

Franck Laloë

We discuss a model of spontaneous collapse of the quantum state that does not require adding any stochastic processes to the standard dynamics. The additional ingredient with respect to the wave function is a position in the configuration space which drives the collapse in a completely deterministic way. This new variable is equivalent to a set of positions of all the particles, i.e., a set of Bohmian positions, which obey the usual guiding equation of Bohmian theory. Any superposition of quantum states of a macroscopic object occupying different regions of space is projected by a localization process onto the region occupied by the positions. Since the Bohmian positions are well defined in a single realization of the experiment, a space localization into one region is produced. The mechanism is based on the correlations between these positions arising from the cohesive forces inside macroscopic objects. The model introduces two collapse parameters which play a role very similar to those of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) [Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)] and continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) [Pearle, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989); Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. A 42, 78 (1990)] theories. With appropriate values of these parameters, we check that the corresponding dynamics rapidly projects superpositions of macroscopic states localized in different regions of space into a single region, while it maintains a negligible effect in all situations where the predictions of standard quantum dynamics are known to be correct. We briefly speculate about the possible relations with gravity. We then study the evolution of the density operator and a mean-field approximation of the dynamical equations of this model, as well as the change of the evolution of the momentum introduced by the localization process. Possible theoretical interpretations are discussed. Generally speaking, this model introduces a sharper border between the quantum and classical worlds than the GRW and CSL theories and leaves a broader range of acceptable values for the parameters.

arXiv:1901.08016•Physical Review A•May 14, 2019•3 citations

On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory

Valia Allori, Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka +1 more

Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory provide opposite resolutions of the quantum measurement problem: the former postulates additional variables (the particle positions) besides the wave function, whereas the latter implements spontaneous collapses of the wave function by a nonlinear and stochastic modification of Schrödinger's equation. Still, both theories, when understood appropriately, share the following structure: They are ultimately not about wave functions but about ‘matter’ moving in space, represented by either particle trajectories, fields on space-time, or a discrete set of space-time points. The role of the wave function then is to govern the motion of the matter. 1. Introduction2. Bohmian Mechanics3. Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber3.1. GRWm3.2. GRWf3.3. Empirical equivalence between GRWm and GRWf4. Primitive Ontology4.1. Primitive ontology and physical equivalence4.2. Primitive ontology and symmetry4.3. Without primitive ontology4.4. Primitive ontology and quantum state5. Differences between BM and GRW5.1. Primitive ontology and quadratic functionals5.2. Primitive ontology and equivariance6. A Plethora of Theories6.1. Particles, fields, and flashes6.2. Schrödinger wave functions and many-worlds7. The Flexible Wave Function7.1. GRWf without collapse7.2. Bohmian mechanics with collapse7.3. Empirical equivalence and equivariance8. What is a Quantum Theory without Observers?

arXiv:quant-ph/0603027•The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Jul 11, 2008•211 citations

Collapse dynamics and Hilbert-space stochastic processes

Daniele Bajoni, O. Nicrosini, A. Rimini +1 more

Spontaneous collapse models of state vector reduction represent a possible solution to the quantum measurement problem. In the present paper we focus our attention on the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) theory and the corresponding continuous localisation models in the form of a Brownian-driven motion in Hilbert space. We consider experimental setups in which a single photon hits a beam splitter and is subsequently detected by photon detector(s), generating a superposition of photon-detector quantum states. Through a numerical approach we study the dependence of collapse times on the physical features of the superposition generated, including also the effect of a finite reaction time of the measuring apparatus. We find that collapse dynamics is sensitive to the number of detectors and the physical properties of the photon-detector quantum states superposition.

arXiv:2112.14580•Scientific Reports•Nov 12, 2021•1 citation
Abstract The Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory of spontaneous collapse offers a possible resolution of the quantum measurement problem. In this theory, the wave function of a particle spontaneously and repeatedly localises to one or the other random position in space, as a consequence of the hypothesised quantum jumps. In between jumps, the wave function undergoes the usual Schrödinger evolution. In the present paper, we suggest that these jumps take place in Hilbert space, with no reference to physical space and a physical three-dimensional space arises as a consequence of localisation of macroscopic objects in the universe. That is, collapse of the wave-function is responsible for the origin of space. We then suggest that similar jumps take place for a hypothetical time operator in Hilbert space and classical time, as we know it emerges from localisation of this time operator, for macroscopic objects. More generally, the jumps are suggested to take place in an operator space-time in Hilbert space, leading to an emergent classical space-time.
Bohmian mechanics and Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory provide opposite resolutions of the quantum measurement problem: the former postulates additional variables (the particle positions) besides the wave function, whereas the latter implements spontaneous collapses of the wave function by a nonlinear and stochastic modification of the Schr\\"odinger equation. Still, both theories, when understood appropriately, share the following structure: They are ultimately not about wave functions but about matter moving in space, represented by either particle trajectories, fields on space-time, or a discrete set of space-time points. The role of the wave function then is to guide the motion of the matter.
Abstract We propose that space-time results from collapse of the wave function of macroscopic objects, in quantum dynamics. We first argue that there ought to exist a formulation of quantum theory which does not refer to classical time. We then propose such a formulation by invoking an operator Minkowski space-time on the Hilbert space. We suggest relativistic spontaneous localisation as the mechanism for recovering classical space-time from the underlying theory. Quantum interference in time could be one possible signature for operator time, and in fact may have been already observed in the laboratory, on attosecond time scales. A possible prediction of our work seems to be that interference in time will not be seen for ‘time slit’ separations significantly larger than 100 attosecond, if the ideas of operator time and relativistic spontaneous localisation are correct.
Carrying out a research program outlined by John S. Bell in 1987, we arrive at a relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber (GRW) model of spon-taneous wavefunction collapse. The GRW model was proposed as a solution of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics and involves a stochastic and nonlinear modification of the Schrödinger equation. It deviates very little from the Schrödinger equation for microscopic systems but efficiently suppresses, for macroscopic systems, superpositions of macroscopically different states. As sug-gested by Bell, we take the primitive ontology, or local beables, of our model to be a discrete set of space-time points, at which the collapses are centered. This set is random with distribution determined by the initial wavefunction. Our model is nonlocal and violates Bell’s inequality though it does not make use of a preferred slicing of space-time or any other sort of synchronization of spacelike separated points. Like the GRW model, it reproduces the quantum probabilities in all cases presently testable, though it entails deviations from the quantum formalism that are in principle testable. Our model works in Minkowski space-time as well as in (well-behaved) curved background space-times. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta; 03.65.Ud; 03.30.+p. Key words: spontaneous wave-function collapse; relativity; quantum theory without observers. 1
We discuss a model of spontaneous collapse of the quantum state that does not require adding any stochastic processes to the standard dynamics. The additional ingredient with respect to the wave function is a position in the configuration space which drives the collapse in a completely deterministic way. This new variable is equivalent to a set of positions of all the particles, i.e., a set of Bohmian positions, which obey the usual guiding equation of Bohmian theory. Any superposition of quantum states of a macroscopic object occupying different regions of space is projected by a localization process onto the region occupied by the positions. Since the Bohmian positions are well defined in a single realization of the experiment, a space localization into one region is produced. The mechanism is based on the correlations between these positions arising from the cohesive forces inside macroscopic objects. The model introduces two collapse parameters which play a role very similar to those of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) [Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)] and continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) [Pearle, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989); Ghirardi et al., Phys. Rev. A 42, 78 (1990)] theories. With appropriate values of these parameters, we check that the corresponding dynamics rapidly projects superpositions of macroscopic states localized in different regions of space into a single region, while it maintains a negligible effect in all situations where the predictions of standard quantum dynamics are known to be correct. We briefly speculate about the possible relations with gravity. We then study the evolution of the density operator and a mean-field approximation of the dynamical equations of this model, as well as the change of the evolution of the momentum introduced by the localization process. Possible theoretical interpretations are discussed. Generally speaking, this model introduces a sharper border between the quantum and classical worlds than the GRW and CSL theories and leaves a broader range of acceptable values for the parameters.
Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory provide opposite resolutions of the quantum measurement problem: the former postulates additional variables (the particle positions) besides the wave function, whereas the latter implements spontaneous collapses of the wave function by a nonlinear and stochastic modification of Schrödinger's equation. Still, both theories, when understood appropriately, share the following structure: They are ultimately not about wave functions but about ‘matter’ moving in space, represented by either particle trajectories, fields on space-time, or a discrete set of space-time points. The role of the wave function then is to govern the motion of the matter. 1. Introduction2. Bohmian Mechanics3. Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber3.1. GRWm3.2. GRWf3.3. Empirical equivalence between GRWm and GRWf4. Primitive Ontology4.1. Primitive ontology and physical equivalence4.2. Primitive ontology and symmetry4.3. Without primitive ontology4.4. Primitive ontology and quantum state5. Differences between BM and GRW5.1. Primitive ontology and quadratic functionals5.2. Primitive ontology and equivariance6. A Plethora of Theories6.1. Particles, fields, and flashes6.2. Schrödinger wave functions and many-worlds7. The Flexible Wave Function7.1. GRWf without collapse7.2. Bohmian mechanics with collapse7.3. Empirical equivalence and equivariance8. What is a Quantum Theory without Observers?
Spontaneous collapse models of state vector reduction represent a possible solution to the quantum measurement problem. In the present paper we focus our attention on the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) theory and the corresponding continuous localisation models in the form of a Brownian-driven motion in Hilbert space. We consider experimental setups in which a single photon hits a beam splitter and is subsequently detected by photon detector(s), generating a superposition of photon-detector quantum states. Through a numerical approach we study the dependence of collapse times on the physical features of the superposition generated, including also the effect of a finite reaction time of the measuring apparatus. We find that collapse dynamics is sensitive to the number of detectors and the physical properties of the photon-detector quantum states superposition.