Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1806.01257 · npj Quantum Information

The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication

Hatim Salih, Will McCutcheon, Jonte R. Hance, John Rarity

Published May 18, 2022• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing precisely such a counterfactual scheme where-unambiguously-none of Alice's photons that correctly contribute to her information about Bob's message have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, and conceptually using consistent histories-thus simultaneously satisfying both criteria without loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob's bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.

DOI
10.1038/s41534-022-00564-w

Related papers

The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication

H Salih, W McCutcheon, Jonte R. Hance +1 more

It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing precisely such a counterfactual scheme where—unambiguously—none of Alice’s photons that correctly contribute to her information about Bob’s message have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, and conceptually using consistent histories—thus simultaneously satisfying both criteria without loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob’s bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.

•May 18, 2022•0 citations

Do the laws of physics prohibit counterfactual communication

Hatim Salih, Will McCutcheon, John Rarity

It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing exactly such a counterfactual scheme where---unambiguously---none of Alice's photons that contribute to the message from Bob have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, as well as conceptually using consistent histories---thus simultaneously closing both loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob's bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.

•Jun 4, 2018•13 citations

Quantum counterfactual communication without a weak trace

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, C. H. W. Barnes

The classical theories of communication rely on the assumption that there has to be a flow of particles from Bob to Alice in order for him to send a message to her. We develop a quantum protocol that allows Alice to perceive Bob's message ``counterfactually''; that is, without Alice receiving any particles that have interacted with Bob. By utilizing a setup built on results from interaction-free measurements, we outline a communication protocol whereby the information travels in the opposite direction of the emitted particles. In comparison to previous attempts on such protocols, this one is such that a weak measurement at the message source would not leave a weak trace that could be detected by Alice's receiver. While some interaction-free schemes require a large number of carefully aligned beam splitters, our protocol is realizable with two or more beam splitters. We demonstrate this protocol by numerically solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for a Hamiltonian that implements this quantum counterfactual phenomenon.

arXiv:1705.05628•Physical Review A•Dec 5, 2016•31 citations

From a Quantum Paradox to Counterportation

Hatim Salih

Abstract We uncover a new quantum paradox, where a simple question about two identical quantum systems reveals unsettlingly paradoxical answers when weak measurements are considered. Our resolution of the paradox, from within the weak measurement framework, amounts to a demonstration of exchange-free communication for the generalised protocol for sending an unknown qubit without any particles travelling between the communicating parties, i.e. counterfactually. The paradox and its resolution are reproduced from a consistent-histories viewpoint. We go on to propose a novel, experimentally feasible implementation of this counterfactual disembodied transport that we call counterportation, based on cavity quantum electrodynamics, estimating resources for beating the no-cloning fidelity limit---except that unlike teleportation no previously-shared entanglement nor classical communication are required. Our approach is several orders of magnitude more efficient in terms of physical resources than previously proposed techniques, while being remarkably tolerant to device imperfections, paving the way for an experimental demonstration. Surprisingly, while counterfactual communication is intuitively explained in terms of interaction-free measurement and the Zeno effect, we show based on our proposed scheme that neither is necessary, with implications in support of an underlying physical reality.

•Jun 8, 2021•5 citations

What Is Nonlocal in Counterfactual Quantum Communication?

Yakir Aharonov, Daniel Rohrlich

We revisit the "counterfactual quantum communication" of Salih et al. [1], who claim that an observer "Bob" can send one bit of information to a second observer "Alice" without any physical particle traveling between them. We show that a locally conserved, massless current-specifically, a current of modular angular momentum, L_{z} mod 2ℏ-carries the one bit of information. We integrate the flux of L_{z} mod 2ℏ from Bob to Alice and show that it equals one of the two eigenvalues of L_{z} mod 2ℏ, either 0 or ℏ, thus precisely accounting for the one bit of information he sends her. We previously [2] obtained this result using weak values of L_{z} mod ℏ; here we do not use weak values.

arXiv:2011.11667•Physical Review Letters•Dec 21, 2020•22 citations

Reply to “Comment to ‘The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication’ ”

Hatim Salih, Jonte R. Hance, Will McCutcheon +1 more

In his Comment on our recent paper “The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication”, npj Quantum Information (2022) 8:60, Popescu argues that the claims of the paper are invalid. Here, we refute his argument, showing that it is based on ignoring the specifics of what we set out to prove (that counterfactual communication is possible for post-selected particles, and more specifically in these cases is not prohibited by the weak trace or consistent histories criteria for particle path), followed by an unwarranted simplification of the protocol. Moreover, the Comment’s excursion into interpretation is misplaced. Our communication protocol is a precisely defined one that allows two remote parties, albeit rarely, to communicate an arbitrarily long binary message, with arbitrarily high accuracy. This is not a matter of interpretation—as the concrete example given in our paper in question illustrates. As for our overarching claim that no particles are exchanged in the course of this communication, we have already demonstrated this both theoretically and experimentally, in the postselected case we consider, as per the weak trace and consistent histories criteria for path of a quantum particle.

arXiv:2507.19563•npj Quantum Information•Jun 10, 2025•2 citations
It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing precisely such a counterfactual scheme where-unambiguously-none of Alice's photons that correctly contribute to her information about Bob's message have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, and conceptually using consistent histories-thus simultaneously satisfying both criteria without loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob's bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.
It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing precisely such a counterfactual scheme where—unambiguously—none of Alice’s photons that correctly contribute to her information about Bob’s message have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, and conceptually using consistent histories—thus simultaneously satisfying both criteria without loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob’s bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.
It has been conjectured that counterfactual communication is impossible, even for post-selected quantum particles. We strongly challenge this by proposing exactly such a counterfactual scheme where---unambiguously---none of Alice's photons that contribute to the message from Bob have been to Bob. We demonstrate counterfactuality experimentally by means of weak measurements, as well as conceptually using consistent histories---thus simultaneously closing both loopholes. Importantly, the fidelity of Alice learning Bob's bit can be made arbitrarily close to unity.
The classical theories of communication rely on the assumption that there has to be a flow of particles from Bob to Alice in order for him to send a message to her. We develop a quantum protocol that allows Alice to perceive Bob's message ``counterfactually''; that is, without Alice receiving any particles that have interacted with Bob. By utilizing a setup built on results from interaction-free measurements, we outline a communication protocol whereby the information travels in the opposite direction of the emitted particles. In comparison to previous attempts on such protocols, this one is such that a weak measurement at the message source would not leave a weak trace that could be detected by Alice's receiver. While some interaction-free schemes require a large number of carefully aligned beam splitters, our protocol is realizable with two or more beam splitters. We demonstrate this protocol by numerically solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for a Hamiltonian that implements this quantum counterfactual phenomenon.
Abstract We uncover a new quantum paradox, where a simple question about two identical quantum systems reveals unsettlingly paradoxical answers when weak measurements are considered. Our resolution of the paradox, from within the weak measurement framework, amounts to a demonstration of exchange-free communication for the generalised protocol for sending an unknown qubit without any particles travelling between the communicating parties, i.e. counterfactually. The paradox and its resolution are reproduced from a consistent-histories viewpoint. We go on to propose a novel, experimentally feasible implementation of this counterfactual disembodied transport that we call counterportation, based on cavity quantum electrodynamics, estimating resources for beating the no-cloning fidelity limit---except that unlike teleportation no previously-shared entanglement nor classical communication are required. Our approach is several orders of magnitude more efficient in terms of physical resources than previously proposed techniques, while being remarkably tolerant to device imperfections, paving the way for an experimental demonstration. Surprisingly, while counterfactual communication is intuitively explained in terms of interaction-free measurement and the Zeno effect, we show based on our proposed scheme that neither is necessary, with implications in support of an underlying physical reality.
We revisit the "counterfactual quantum communication" of Salih et al. [1], who claim that an observer "Bob" can send one bit of information to a second observer "Alice" without any physical particle traveling between them. We show that a locally conserved, massless current-specifically, a current of modular angular momentum, L_{z} mod 2ℏ-carries the one bit of information. We integrate the flux of L_{z} mod 2ℏ from Bob to Alice and show that it equals one of the two eigenvalues of L_{z} mod 2ℏ, either 0 or ℏ, thus precisely accounting for the one bit of information he sends her. We previously [2] obtained this result using weak values of L_{z} mod ℏ; here we do not use weak values.
In his Comment on our recent paper “The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication”, npj Quantum Information (2022) 8:60, Popescu argues that the claims of the paper are invalid. Here, we refute his argument, showing that it is based on ignoring the specifics of what we set out to prove (that counterfactual communication is possible for post-selected particles, and more specifically in these cases is not prohibited by the weak trace or consistent histories criteria for particle path), followed by an unwarranted simplification of the protocol. Moreover, the Comment’s excursion into interpretation is misplaced. Our communication protocol is a precisely defined one that allows two remote parties, albeit rarely, to communicate an arbitrarily long binary message, with arbitrarily high accuracy. This is not a matter of interpretation—as the concrete example given in our paper in question illustrates. As for our overarching claim that no particles are exchanged in the course of this communication, we have already demonstrated this both theoretically and experimentally, in the postselected case we consider, as per the weak trace and consistent histories criteria for path of a quantum particle.