Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1806.00211 · Physical Review A

Device-independent test of a delayed choice experiment

Emanuele Polino, Iris Agresti, Davide Poderini, Gonzalo Carvacho, Giorgio Milani, Gabriela Barreto Lemos, Rafael Chaves, Fabio Sciarrino

Published Aug 12, 2019• 25 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The wave or particle duality has long been considered a fundamental signature of the nonclassical behavior of quantum phenomena, especially in a delayed choice experiment, where the experimental setup revealing either the particle or the wave nature of the system is decided after the system has entered the apparatus. However, as counterintuitive as it might seem, usual delayed choice experiments do have a simple causal explanation. Here, we take a different route and under a natural assumption about the dimensionality of the system under examination, we present an experimental proof of the nonclassicality of a delayed choice experiment based on the violation of a dimension witness inequality. Our conclusion is reached in a device-independent and detection loophole-free manner, that is, based solely on the observed data and without the need of special assumptions about the measurement apparatus.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.100.022111

Related papers

Causal Modeling the Delayed-Choice Experiment

Rafael Chaves, Gabriela Barreto Lemos, Jacques Pienaar

Wave-particle duality has become one of the flagships of quantum mechanics. This counterintuitive concept is highlighted in a delayed-choice experiment, where the experimental setup that reveals either the particle or wave nature of a quantum system is decided after the system has entered the apparatus. Here we consider delayed-choice experiments from the perspective of device-independent causal models and show their equivalence to a prepare-and-measure scenario. Within this framework, we consider Wheeler's original proposal and its variant using a quantum control and show that a simple classical causal model is capable of reproducing the quantum mechanical predictions. Nonetheless, among other results, we show that, in a slight variant of Wheeler's gedanken experiment, a photon in an interferometer can indeed generate statistics incompatible with any nonretrocausal hidden variable model, whose dimensionality is the same as that of the quantum system it is supposed to mimic. Our proposal tolerates arbitrary losses and inefficiencies, making it specially suited to loophole-free experimental implementations.

arXiv:1710.07323•Physical Review Letters•May 7, 2018•44 citations

Realization of a causal-modeled delayed-choice experiment using single photons

Shang Yu, Yong-Nan Sun, Wei Liu +6 more

Wave-particle duality constitutes one of the most intriguing features in quantum physics. A well-known gedanken experiment that provides evidence for this is Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer [J. A. Wheeler, in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, edited by A. R. Marlow (Academic, New York, 1978), pp. 9--48; in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1984), pp. 182--213]. Many different versions of delayed-choice experiments have been conducted with both classical and quantum detecting devices. Recently, it was proposed that the delayed-choice experiment could be devised from the perspective of a device-independent prepare-and-measure scenario [R. Chaves et al., Causal Modeling the Delayed-Choice Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 190401 (2018)]. In our work, we experimentally realize this modified version with a deterministic single-photon source and examine the wave-particle objective in a causal-modeled scheme without the assistance of entanglement, which is achieved by violating the dimension-witness inequalities. Our experiment also provides an intriguing perspective and exhibits the benefits of studying quantum theory from the casual model point of view.

arXiv:1806.03689•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2019•21 citations

Compatibility of causal hidden-variable theories with a delayed-choice experiment

He-Liang Huang, Yi-Han Luo, B. Bai +14 more

Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment investigates the indeterminacy of wave-particle duality and the role played by the measurement apparatus in quantum theory. Due to the inconsistency with classical physics, it has been generally believed that it is not possible to reproduce the delayed-choice experiment using a hidden-variable theory. Recently, it was shown that Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment can be explained by a causal two-dimensional hidden-variable theory [R. Chaves, G. B. Lemos, and J. Pienaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 190401 (2018)]. Here, we carry out a delayed-choice experiment by using photon states that are spacelike separated and demonstrate that the experiment is consistent with quantum theory but inconsistent with any causal two-dimensional hidden-variable theory in a device-independent manner. This demonstrates that causality can be used to test quantum theory in a complementary way to the Bell and Leggett-Garg tests.

arXiv:1806.00156•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2019•19 citations

Beyond Wave–Particle Duality: The Delayed-Choice Experiment in the Intrinsic Observability Framework

Atsushi Okamoto

The delayed-choice experiment has long been regarded as one of the most conceptually intriguing demonstrations in quantum mechanics because the measurement configuration can be selected after a quantum system has already entered the experimental apparatus. This feature has often been interpreted as suggesting that the present measurement determines whether the quantum system behaved as a wave or as a particle in the past, thereby motivating discussions of wave–particle duality and retrocausality. This paper reexamines the delayed-choice experiment from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF). Rather than interpreting the experiment as demonstrating that the past is modified or that a quantum system intrinsically possesses either wave-like or particle-like properties prior to measurement, the IOF distinguishes between the pre-measurement domain of Potential Observability (PO) and the operational establishment of Observability through measurement. Within this framework, wave-like and particle-like behaviors are interpreted as observable representations established under different accessibility bases rather than intrinsic properties of the quantum system itself. Measurement grants accessibility, thereby establishing an observable representation according to the selected accessibility basis, within which observable values become operationally defined. Consequently, the delayed choice is understood not as selecting whether the quantum system was previously a wave or a particle, but as selecting the accessibility basis through which observability is established. From this perspective, the traditional wave–particle duality is reinterpreted as the basis dependence of observable representation rather than the coexistence of two fundamentally different physical natures. The delayed-choice experiment therefore illustrates how different accessibility bases lead to different observable representations while remaining fully compatible with the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics.

•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Modified quantum delayed-choice experiment without quantum control or entanglement assistance

Qi Guo, Wen-Jie Zhang, Gang Li +3 more

Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment delays the decision to observe either the wave or particle behavior of a photon until after it has entered the interferometer, and the quantum delayed-choice experiment provides the possibility of observing the wave and particle behaviors with a single experimental setup by introducing quantum control. We here propose a modified quantum delayed-choice experiment without quantum control or entanglement assistance, in which a photon can be prepared in a wave-particle superposition state and the morphing behavior of wave-to-particle transition can be observed easily. It is demonstrated that the presented scheme can allow us to rule out classical hidden-variable models in a device-independent manner via violating dimension witness. We also extend the scheme to the situation of two degrees of freedom, first constructing a hybrid quantum delayed-choice experiment which enables a photon respectively exhibits wave and particle behaviors in different degrees of freedom, and then proposing a scheme to prepare the single-photon wave-particle entanglement. This study is not only meaningful to explore the wave-particle complementarity of photons, but also provides potential for the research of the single-particle nonlocality from the perspective of the wave-particle degree of freedom.

arXiv:2102.11562•Physical Review A•Aug 20, 2021•4 citations

Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations

Xiao‐Song Ma, Johannes Kofler, Anton Zeilinger

Wave-particle duality lies at the root of quantum mechanics and is central in the description of interferences observed with elementary objects. In a delayed-choice experiment, the decision to observe the particle or wave character of a quantum system is delayed with respect to the time at which the system enters the interferometer. This paper reviews the history of the delayed-choice idea, introduced as a challenge to a realistic explanation of the wave-particle duality. It also describes recent experimental realizations of this idea and discusses intriguing extensions, such as the duality between separability and entanglement in multiple quantum systems.

arXiv:1407.2930•Reviews of Modern Physics•Mar 3, 2016•222 citations
The wave or particle duality has long been considered a fundamental signature of the nonclassical behavior of quantum phenomena, especially in a delayed choice experiment, where the experimental setup revealing either the particle or the wave nature of the system is decided after the system has entered the apparatus. However, as counterintuitive as it might seem, usual delayed choice experiments do have a simple causal explanation. Here, we take a different route and under a natural assumption about the dimensionality of the system under examination, we present an experimental proof of the nonclassicality of a delayed choice experiment based on the violation of a dimension witness inequality. Our conclusion is reached in a device-independent and detection loophole-free manner, that is, based solely on the observed data and without the need of special assumptions about the measurement apparatus.
Wave-particle duality has become one of the flagships of quantum mechanics. This counterintuitive concept is highlighted in a delayed-choice experiment, where the experimental setup that reveals either the particle or wave nature of a quantum system is decided after the system has entered the apparatus. Here we consider delayed-choice experiments from the perspective of device-independent causal models and show their equivalence to a prepare-and-measure scenario. Within this framework, we consider Wheeler's original proposal and its variant using a quantum control and show that a simple classical causal model is capable of reproducing the quantum mechanical predictions. Nonetheless, among other results, we show that, in a slight variant of Wheeler's gedanken experiment, a photon in an interferometer can indeed generate statistics incompatible with any nonretrocausal hidden variable model, whose dimensionality is the same as that of the quantum system it is supposed to mimic. Our proposal tolerates arbitrary losses and inefficiencies, making it specially suited to loophole-free experimental implementations.
Wave-particle duality constitutes one of the most intriguing features in quantum physics. A well-known gedanken experiment that provides evidence for this is Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer [J. A. Wheeler, in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, edited by A. R. Marlow (Academic, New York, 1978), pp. 9--48; in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1984), pp. 182--213]. Many different versions of delayed-choice experiments have been conducted with both classical and quantum detecting devices. Recently, it was proposed that the delayed-choice experiment could be devised from the perspective of a device-independent prepare-and-measure scenario [R. Chaves et al., Causal Modeling the Delayed-Choice Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 190401 (2018)]. In our work, we experimentally realize this modified version with a deterministic single-photon source and examine the wave-particle objective in a causal-modeled scheme without the assistance of entanglement, which is achieved by violating the dimension-witness inequalities. Our experiment also provides an intriguing perspective and exhibits the benefits of studying quantum theory from the casual model point of view.
Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment investigates the indeterminacy of wave-particle duality and the role played by the measurement apparatus in quantum theory. Due to the inconsistency with classical physics, it has been generally believed that it is not possible to reproduce the delayed-choice experiment using a hidden-variable theory. Recently, it was shown that Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment can be explained by a causal two-dimensional hidden-variable theory [R. Chaves, G. B. Lemos, and J. Pienaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 190401 (2018)]. Here, we carry out a delayed-choice experiment by using photon states that are spacelike separated and demonstrate that the experiment is consistent with quantum theory but inconsistent with any causal two-dimensional hidden-variable theory in a device-independent manner. This demonstrates that causality can be used to test quantum theory in a complementary way to the Bell and Leggett-Garg tests.
The delayed-choice experiment has long been regarded as one of the most conceptually intriguing demonstrations in quantum mechanics because the measurement configuration can be selected after a quantum system has already entered the experimental apparatus. This feature has often been interpreted as suggesting that the present measurement determines whether the quantum system behaved as a wave or as a particle in the past, thereby motivating discussions of wave–particle duality and retrocausality. This paper reexamines the delayed-choice experiment from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF). Rather than interpreting the experiment as demonstrating that the past is modified or that a quantum system intrinsically possesses either wave-like or particle-like properties prior to measurement, the IOF distinguishes between the pre-measurement domain of Potential Observability (PO) and the operational establishment of Observability through measurement. Within this framework, wave-like and particle-like behaviors are interpreted as observable representations established under different accessibility bases rather than intrinsic properties of the quantum system itself. Measurement grants accessibility, thereby establishing an observable representation according to the selected accessibility basis, within which observable values become operationally defined. Consequently, the delayed choice is understood not as selecting whether the quantum system was previously a wave or a particle, but as selecting the accessibility basis through which observability is established. From this perspective, the traditional wave–particle duality is reinterpreted as the basis dependence of observable representation rather than the coexistence of two fundamentally different physical natures. The delayed-choice experiment therefore illustrates how different accessibility bases lead to different observable representations while remaining fully compatible with the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics.
Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment delays the decision to observe either the wave or particle behavior of a photon until after it has entered the interferometer, and the quantum delayed-choice experiment provides the possibility of observing the wave and particle behaviors with a single experimental setup by introducing quantum control. We here propose a modified quantum delayed-choice experiment without quantum control or entanglement assistance, in which a photon can be prepared in a wave-particle superposition state and the morphing behavior of wave-to-particle transition can be observed easily. It is demonstrated that the presented scheme can allow us to rule out classical hidden-variable models in a device-independent manner via violating dimension witness. We also extend the scheme to the situation of two degrees of freedom, first constructing a hybrid quantum delayed-choice experiment which enables a photon respectively exhibits wave and particle behaviors in different degrees of freedom, and then proposing a scheme to prepare the single-photon wave-particle entanglement. This study is not only meaningful to explore the wave-particle complementarity of photons, but also provides potential for the research of the single-particle nonlocality from the perspective of the wave-particle degree of freedom.
Wave-particle duality lies at the root of quantum mechanics and is central in the description of interferences observed with elementary objects. In a delayed-choice experiment, the decision to observe the particle or wave character of a quantum system is delayed with respect to the time at which the system enters the interferometer. This paper reviews the history of the delayed-choice idea, introduced as a challenge to a realistic explanation of the wave-particle duality. It also describes recent experimental realizations of this idea and discusses intriguing extensions, such as the duality between separability and entanglement in multiple quantum systems.